|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Some More Props - new songfile posted [message #96714 is a reply to message #96700] |
Tue, 11 March 2008 07:35   |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ou have any
> (non-negative)
> comments to add, feel free.
>
> Thanks in advance - Kerry
>Hi Rod,
I guess I just assume everyone knows the history of the effect boxes. The
Dp/4 was an earlier effect box, and the dp/pro was its successor.
It looks to me, and I'm only guessing based on comments in the code, that
when the developers set out to make the dp/pro, they first translated the
dp4 algos to the esp2 chip. Those initial translations were left in the
source code folder.
They then modified the code to make it what we saw in the dp/pro. In the
case of the halls, there massive changes. The Pro version is wider and more
transparent. But, they also removed the chorusing in the pro version, which
gives the dp/4 version slightly nicer last split seconds of tail.
The dp/4 versions sound incredibly nice. The DP4 ran at 16 bit, 40.5 KHz.
Those same algos at 44.1 with 24 bit stereo inputs sound really nice.
I hope this helps!
Mike
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Man Mike...I can't keep up.I havn't had a chance to check out the other
2
>verbs I got from you yet. Which brings up the question. What's the difference
>between the DP/4 Hall and the DP Pro Hall?
>Rod
>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote:
|
|
|
|
| Re: Some More Props - new songfile posted [message #96715 is a reply to message #96714] |
Tue, 11 March 2008 07:58 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
r />
>>
>>This is the moment I've been looking forward to since I started these plugins.
>> I just finished the DP/Pro hall for PARIS.
>>
>>I think this one speaks for itself. The best part is the sound. The second
>>best part is that you can run four of them on one card. I'll never understand
>>why this didn't come with PARIS in the first place.
>>
>>There's a demo on my website.
>>
>>www.ensoniq.ca
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote:
>
>Hi Rod,
>
>I guess I just assume everyone knows the history of the effect boxes. The
>Dp/4 was an earlier effect box, and the dp/pro was its successor.
>
>It looks to me, and I'm only guessing based on comments in the code, that
>when the developers set out to make the dp/pro, they first translated the
>dp4 algos to the esp2 chip. Those initial translations were left in the
>source code folder.
>
>They then modified the code to make it what we saw in the dp/pro. In the
>case of the halls, there massive changes. The Pro version is wider and
more
>transparent. But, they also removed the chorusing in the pro version, which
>gives the dp/4 version slightly nicer last split seconds of tail.
>
>The dp/4 versions sound incredibly nice. The DP4 ran at 16 bit, 40.5 KHz.
> Those same algos at 44.1 with 24 bit stereo inputs sound really nice.
>
>I hope this helps!
>
>Mike
>
Rod, Just in case it wasn't clear, the DP4 was a 16bit box, the DP Pro was
a 24bit box.
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>Man Mike...I can't keep up.I havn't had a chance to check out the other
>2
>>verbs I got from you yet. Which brings up the question. What's the difference
>>between the DP/4 Hall and the DP Pro Hall?
>>Rod
>>"Mike Audet" <mike@..> wrote:
>>>
>>>This is the moment I've been looking forward to since I started these
plugins.
>>> I just finished the DP/Pro hall for PARIS.
>>>
>>>I think this one speaks for itself. The best part is the sound. The
second
>>>best part is that you can run four of them on one card. I'll never understand
>>>why this didn't come with PARIS in the first place.
>>>
>>>There's a demo on my website.
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
