|
|
| Re: remote control nonsense ? [message #60722 is a reply to message #60721] |
Mon, 28 November 2005 23:07   |
Deej [1]
 Messages: 2149 Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;If I did this sort of thing more often I would have known to check =
>into
> the
> >car at the same time as the ticket. But...
> >
> >So, do any of you fine Paris folk, who know darned near everything, =
>know
> >of a source for renting a car for a week, cheap? or anything else I =
>should
> >know of, or see, or do, while in Boston?
> >
> >Or anyone need a fast mural done in exchange for a car for a week? =
>Ha! It
> >would have to be a fast one...
> >
> >-steve
>
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hey Steve,</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Beside the Christian Science Center =
>Globe (really=20
>great!) and Aquarium, I'd suggest</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a walk through Harvard Square in =
>Cambridge. =20
>It would be nicer in the</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>summer but Christmas can be cool. =
>Red Line to=20
>Harvard Square via the T and you're there.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>There are incredibly giant ice =
>sculpt
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: remote control nonsense ? [message #60725 is a reply to message #60721] |
Tue, 29 November 2005 04:01   |
Don Nafe
 Messages: 1206 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;in message=20
> <A =
>href=3D"news:43a8aed6$1@linux">news:43a8aed6$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>Hey
=
>
> STA,<BR>If you're going to be in the city proper, you really shouldn't
=
>need a=20
> car.<BR> Their version of a subway (the "T") is pretty =
>inexpensive, and=20
> for a visitor,<BR>a gas to ride. Definately check out Fanuel =
>Hall=20
> (spelling is off I'm sure).<BR> I'd second Bill's recommendation =
>on the=20
> Christian SM globe, its pretty cool.<BR> The Museum of Fine Art =
>is=20
> wonderful, as is the Isabella Stewart Gardiner<BR>art museum (google =
>for more=20
> info). As I recall, they moved the villa/museum<BR>from =
>Italy. The=20
> science museum is also a nifty experience. They have a<BR>show =
>on=20
> electricity that's "hair raising." Oh yeah, and the =
>aquarium. =20
> In<BR>fact, I'd recommend the aquarium over the science museum. =
>In the=20
> center<BR>of the place is this three or four story (you guessed it) =
>aquarium.=20
> Quite<BR>a sight. It (and the science museum) have and are =
>located on,=20
> their own<BR>"T" stop. <BR>Hope this helps. May your =
>explorations=20
> rise up to meet you!<BR>MR <BR><BR><BR>"steve the artguy&qu
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: remote control nonsense ? [message #60726 is a reply to message #60721] |
Tue, 29 November 2005 04:11   |
John [1]
 Messages: 2229 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ot; <<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:artguy@svnhoohaa.net">artguy@svnhoohaa.net</A>>=20
> wrote:<BR>><BR>>Hey, guys-<BR>><BR>>The impossible is =
>about to=20
> happen. I'm flying back to Boston for Christmas.<BR>>First =
>Christmas=20
> outside Napa in... hmmm...53 years. Bonnie's daughter=20
> lives<BR>>there, so the two of us are flying =
>out.<BR>><BR>>Silly me.=20
> Should have checked before today. The only things I can see=20
> available<BR>>to rent tomorrow (!) are, hmm, a little more =
>expensive than I=20
> had anticipated.<BR>>If I did this sort of thing more often I would =
>have=20
> known to check into<BR>the<BR>>car at the same time as the ticket.=20
> But...<BR>><BR>>So, do any of you fine Paris folk, who know =
>darned near=20
> everything, know<BR>>of a source for renting a car for a week, =
>cheap? or=20
> anything else I should<BR>>know of, or see, or do, while in=20
> Boston?<BR>><BR>>Or anyone need a fast mural done in exchange =
>for a car=20
> for a week? Ha! It<BR>>would have to be a fast=20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: remote control nonsense ? [message #60731 is a reply to message #60721] |
Tue, 29 November 2005 06:43   |
Chris Wargo
Messages: 45 Registered: November 2005
|
Member |
|
|
B)
> > with the older 2.2 software, and has been running like that
> > for a couple of years - all inputs and outputs producing
> > sound without problems. So, I know my clock is good, the
> > cards are good, the MECs and interfaces are good. I just
> > brought up V2.2 to double check, and recorded using the
> > interfaces that don't work with 3.0, so it's definatley
> > a 3.0 issue.
> >
> > When you had to have your MECs on A and C (or E), was that
> > with Version 2.2 and 3.0, or just with 3.0? I could try moving
> > the MEC to C and see if that fixes it, but I dread making any
> > changes at all to a functional (under 2.2) PARIS system......
> >
> >
> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >Dead,
> > >What Aaron says is true. When my system was three cards with two =
> >Mecs
> > >I had card A and C attached to the Mecs. Now with five cards it's
> =
> >A and
> > =3D
> > >E. =3D20
> > >My ASUS boards like the first and last card when using two Mecs.
> > >Tom
> > > "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message =3D
> > >news:43a5b0b4$1@linux...
&g
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|