The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » 2.2 vs 3.0 Win XP,or BOTH ?
2.2 vs 3.0 Win XP,or BOTH ? [message #59367] Fri, 21 October 2005 08:47 Go to next message
tonehouse is currently offline  tonehouse   UNITED STATES
Messages: 184
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
;>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes
>>>>>
>>>>>You do
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>have to leave a small amount of space betw
Re: 2.2 vs 3.0 Win XP,or BOTH ? [message #59392 is a reply to message #59367] Sat, 22 October 2005 02:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
>Thanks,
> >> >Edna
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>So then there wouldn't be much advantage to processing 24bit files over
16bit, i.e., relative to the amount of processing you intend to do?

"EK Sound" <spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote in message
news:4388ade6$1@linux...
> While the tracks themselves are 16 bit, all porocessing is done at
> full internal resolution. Then, when you bounce to disc, set the
> project bit depth to 24 and you will get a full 24 bits for your mix.
> This file can then be mastered, dithered and put to CD.
>
> If you are doing more open, airy type music, you may want to track at
> 24 bit. Even using the on-board A/D, you will get 24 bit files with
> 20 bits of resolution... still better than 16.
>
> Personally, I track everything at 16 also with very good results. Why
> waste the drive space if it's not needed.
>
> Alternately, as you suggested, an outbo
Re: 2.2 vs 3.0 Win XP,or BOTH ? [message #59494 is a reply to message #59392] Mon, 24 October 2005 12:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tonehouse is currently offline  tonehouse   UNITED STATES
Messages: 184
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Rick,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>ADATs have/had been good to =
me.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
Re: 2.2 vs 3.0 Win XP,or BOTH ? [message #59507 is a reply to message #59494] Mon, 24 October 2005 15:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Martin Harrington is currently offline  Martin Harrington   AUSTRALIA
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
pegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Just plain spooky.
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I've seen the same thing in young classical players. When you get
>>>>to know them a bit you realize it is a savant-like quickness in the
>>>>mind that allows them to play at such unearthly levels. In a way, it
>>>>is like Rain Man, if you know what I mean.
>>>>
>>>>Now comes the hard part. They have to learn everything else
>>>>about music, and really apply themselves in the next few years to
>>>>even maintain their current levels of playing. The *worst* thing that
>>>>can happen is adults fawning over them and praising them to the
>&
Re: 2.2 vs 3.0 Win XP,or BOTH ? [message #59509 is a reply to message #59507] Mon, 24 October 2005 16:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
/> >>>>band
>>>>members might as well go to McDonalds or something while this kid
>>>>plays....
>>>>"DC" <dc@spamsony.com> wrote in message news:4388ba1a$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>>"Tom Bruhl" <Arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Just plain spooky.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I've seen the same thing in young classical players. When you get
>>>>>to know them a bit you realize it is a savant-like quickness in the
>>>>>mind that allows them to play at such unearthly levels. In a way, it
>>>>>is like Rain Man, if you know what I mean.
>>>>>
>>>>>Now comes the hard part. They have to learn everything else
>>>>>about music, and really apply themselves in the next few years to
>>>>>even maintain their current levels of playing. The *worst* thing that
>>>>>can happen is adults fawning over them and praising the
Re: 2.2 vs 3.0 Win XP,or BOTH ? [message #59513 is a reply to message #59509] Mon, 24 October 2005 18:01 Go to previous message
Aaron Allen is currently offline  Aaron Allen   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
to know them a bit you realize it is a savant-like quickness in the
>>>>>>mind that allows them to play at such unearthly levels. In a way, it
>>>>>>is like Rain Man, if you know what I mean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now comes the hard part. They have to learn everything else
>>>>>>about music, and really apply themselves in the next few years to
>>>>>>even maintain their current levels of playing. The *worst* thing that
>>>>>>can happen is adults fawning over them and praising them to the
>>>>>>sky and comparing them to the greats, and getting them record
>>>>>>deals. Yet this is usually what happens. When it does, the prodigy
>>>>>>disappears and is never heard from again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In classical, if you have a great teacher, they keep your nose to the
>>>>>>wheel, and let you know that you have along way to go. The
>>>>>>parents will be smart, and reserved with their praise and exposure of
>>>>>>the child to the public.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then you can end up with another Mozart, but it is rare today; fame
>>>>>>is too much of a drug to most people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I've seen these kids end up featured soloists with major symphonies
>>>>>>and I've seen them disappear. It's all in the parents and the
>>>>>>teachers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>DC
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://www.s140891385.onlinehome.us/Hosted/wizardsofwinter.w mv..> well. Maybe he rips through Bach o
Previous Topic: Optimum Stereo Signal Recording with the Jecklin Disk
Next Topic: Good alternative to M-audio Digipatch 12x6.... Must see!!!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 16 00:28:02 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.45653 seconds