|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Somebody's gotta' do it [message #83599 is a reply to message #83593] |
Mon, 23 April 2007 15:19   |
JeffH
 Messages: 307 Registered: October 2007 Location: Wamic, OR
|
Senior Member |
|
|
d Paris, but
> I think he's fit in here. We have a few Sam heads around here, don't
> we?...Bill?.........who else???
>
>
>I've been using their plugs for years and they really are pretty
outstanding. For example, the Optimizer mastering limiter was the best I
had heard in a plug until the UAD limiter, which does beat it.
For some reason they never added anything or changed their interface for
the past several years. They are DX plugs.
Bill L
Rich wrote:
> "I wanna build some small pc's with DSPFX isa audio cards as standalone processors."
>
> What ISA DSPFX cards your refering to??
>I have four of them and no ac needed... One more
reason for a big ass power supply in the computer...
"Robert" <studiomanitou@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Hi Tom and Kim, I have a 442 sittin here in my hand and I am 100% sure =
>that it runs off the EDS cable connection =3D no external power needed.
>
>Hope this helps
>Rob
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
>news:464ab95b@linux...
> Sure. That would be good.
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message =
>news:464ab80b$1@linux...
>
>
> Yeh, I could be wrong. The MEC would take a lot of extra grunt =
>though as
> it has all those slots. On the 442 you only have to run what's built
=
>in.
>
> I can try and remember to check tonight if you like... won't be =
>for about
> 6 hours though.
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
>
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Kim,
> >Well Dave from out your way is telling me it's 240v.
> >I should think it needs a plug in the wall? .
> >The MEC sure does. A 442 is basically the
> >master section of a MEC Right?
> >The IF2 doesn't need a power cord.
> >
> >If you're right then there should be no problem.
> >Tom
> >
> > "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message =3D
> >news:464ab139$1@linux...
> >
> >
> > Generally 240V stuff is rated at 220-250. Many Asian countries =
>use =3D
> >220, and
> > even within Australia there are areas that use 250V. Indeed some
=
>=3D
> >country
> > areas have 260V I think.
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Somebody's gotta' do it [message #83616 is a reply to message #83600] |
Mon, 23 April 2007 21:30   |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ment of their tablet.
One thing is for sure, if Apple releases a tablet, they will act like it's
something brand new as if they invented, and tell you it's the coolest thing
since sliced bread; )
Articles with illustration for Apples patten for a tablet from 2004-2005
http://www.macobserver.com/article/2005/05/10.18.shtml
http://www.engadget.com/2005/05/10/apples-patented-the-table t-mac/
OWC's ModBook
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/ModBook
http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/01/04/owc/index.php
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>When they gonna make a tablet?
>
>AA
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4649e911$1@linux...
>>
>> http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/index.cfm?newsid=18032&am p;pagtype=allchandate
>
>It's the only way I work now. As I posted in the past, my physical machine
has absolutely nothing installed on it. I install and run everything in
a series of VMs. There are a couple of options for XP.
1. Microsoft Virtual PC 2007. Free download. Highly optimized for windows.
Tight integration with physical PC (file copy, drag and drop, cut and paste,
display resolutions).
2. Virtual Box. Open Source. Free download. Cool.
3. VMWare. Cost$. Probably the best there is, if only because of the expansive
feature set.
There's nothing inherently dangerous about a VM, and I run a bunch of linux
distros just fine. In fact, the physical machine is 100% isolated from anything
the VM may do.
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>What's the go hear?
>
>I want to get an isolated copy of Linux running under Windows XP on my work
>laptop here. What's the go? Is it dangerous at all?
>
>What's the popular option software wise?
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.It's been rumored for a while. A third party has come out with an expensive
conversion. Apple tries to not step on their third party venders. It will
depend on how far along they are in development of their tablet.
One thing is for sure, if Apple releases a tablet, they will act like it's
something brand new as if they invented it, and tell you it's the coolest
thing
since sliced bread; )
Articles with illustration for Apples patten for a tablet from 2004-2005
http://www.macobserver.com/article/2005/05/10.18.shtml
http://www.engadget.com/2005/05/10/apples-patented-the-table t-mac/
OWC's ModBook
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/ModBook
http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/01/04/owc/index.php
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>When they gonna make a tablet?
>
>AA
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4649e911$1@linux...
>>
>> http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/index.cfm?newsid=18032&am p;pagtype=allchandate
>
>Can two CPU's that are rated differently work in the same dual socket mobo?
I've got a possibility of buying an Opteron 2220 Socket F which is rated at
2.8GHz for an extremely good price, but there is only one. Myt mobo uses
dual CPU's and I was wondering if I can use an Opteron 2218rated at 2.6 GHz
in the other socke
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Somebody's gotta' do it [message #83628 is a reply to message #83622] |
Tue, 24 April 2007 06:20   |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ted from
>>anything
>>>the VM may do.
>>>
>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What's the go hear?
>>>>
>>>>I want to get an isolated copy of Linux running under Windows XP on my
>>work
>>>>laptop here. What's the go? Is it dangerous at all?
>>>>
>>>>What's the popular option software wise?
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>Kim.
>>>
>>
>Thad,
Good point!
Chuck
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>In addition to what Chuck said, you also can have all of your 'dirty' apps
>web browsers, games, flash players, development suites, and all of that
crap,
>on your audio box. It's completely segmented.
>
>Lastly, for me my desktop at work is an XP box but everything I code I put
>on a linux/perl/apache box, so I can write all of that in it's native environment
>and just copy it over to the right folders on the web server and it's done.
>
>
>TCB
>
>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>
>>What's the advantage of running a virtual machine? I don't get
>>that sort of thing at all - how does it differ from a regular
>>PC setup?
>>
>>Neil
>>
>>
>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I agree wholeheartedly with Chuck. VMWare is probably the best option
in
>>terms
>>>of features and quality, it works with damn near anything. If they made
>>a
>>>deb for it that worked I'd probably buy it for my linux box. Virtual box
>>>is also very good, though it's only truly open source if you build it
from
>>>source, the binaries are under a different license. In practice this means
>>>absolutely nothing. Of course I haven't tried the MSoft option as I'm
avoiding
>>>their software whenever possible.
>>>
>>>Ubuntu Feisty installs easily into both Virtual Box and VMWare, as does
>>Debian
>>>Etch. I haven't tried a Debian testing or unstable netinstall but my guess
>>>is they'd work fine. SuSE as well, but at this point for me running SuSE
>>>is practically as offensive as running XP.
>>>
>>>Good luck, and if you have any questions related to Debian (if you go
that
>>>route) or (to a lesser extent) Ubuntu feel free to post here or email
me
>>>off list.
>>>
>>>TCB
>>>
>>>"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>It's the only way I work now. As I posted in the past, my physical machine
>>>>has absolutely nothing installed on it. I install and run everything
>in
>>>>a series of VMs. There are a couple of options for XP.
>>>>
>>>>1. Microsoft Virtual PC 2007. Free download. Highly optimized for windows.
>>>> Tight integration with physical PC (file copy, drag and drop, cut and
>>paste,
>>>>display resolutions).
>>>>
>>>>2. Virtual Box. Open Source. Free download. Cool.
>>>>
>>>>3. VMWare. Cost$. Probably the best there is, if only because of the
expansive
>>>>feature set.
>>>>
>>>>There's nothing inherently dangerous about a VM, and I run a bunch of
>linux
>>>>distros just fine. In fact, the physical machine is 100% isolated from
>>>anything
>>>>the VM may do.
>>>>
>>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>What's the go hear?
>>>>>
>>>>>I want to get an isolated copy of Linux running under Windows XP on
my
>>>work
>>>>>laptop here. What's the go? Is it dangerous at all?
>>>>>
>>>>>What's the popular option software wise?
>>>>>
>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>Kim.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C797C3.640DEE80
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yep
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:464b3942$Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: Somebody's gotta' do it [message #83631 is a reply to message #83621] |
Tue, 24 April 2007 06:40   |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
s power from the =
MEC.<BR>> =20
<BR>> Deej<BR>> <BR>> =
<BR>> "Tom=20
Bruhl" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>=20
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">mailto:arpegio@comcast.net</A>>>=
;=20
wrote<BR>> in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:464a966e$1@linux">news:464a966e$1@linux</A>...<BR>> =
=20
I might snag a 442 from down under. What's the easiest way=20
to<BR>> convert a 442 from 240v to=20
110v?<BR>> Tom<BR>> <BR>>=20
<BR>> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
spam,=20
and you?<BR>> <A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C797C3.640DEE80--Every single last one... regardless of origin...
David.
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> So all 442s are the same then???
> This one's from Australlia.
> Tom
>
> "EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com <mailto:askme@nospam.com>> wrote in
> message news:464b1c31$1@linux...
> BZZZZZZZZZZz.... Wrong! ;-)
>
> David.
>
> DJ wrote:
>
> > Tom,
> >
> > No plug on a 442. It gets it's power from the MEC.
> >
> > Deej
> >
> >
> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net <mailto:arpegio@comcast.net>
> <mailto:arpegio@comcast.net>> wrote
> > in message news:464a966e$1@linux...
> > I might snag a 442 from down under. What's the easiest way to
> > convert a 442 from 240v to 110v?
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> > http://www.polesoft.com/refer.htmlguys-
does this mean you have rendered all copy protection schemes irrelevant?
How do dongles work into this?
-steve
"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>
>Thad,
>
>Good point!
>
>Chuck
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>In addition to what Chuck said, you also can have all of your 'dirty' apps
>>web browsers, games, flash players, development suites, and all of that
>crap,
>>on your audio box. It's completely segmented.
>>
>>Lastly, for me my desktop at work is an XP box but everything I code I
put
>>on a linux/perl/apache box, so I can write all of that in it's native environment
>>and just copy it over to the right folders on the web server and it's done.
>>
>>
>>TCB
>>
>>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>What's the advantage of running a virtual machine? I don't get
>>>that sort of thing at all - how does it differ from a regular
>>>PC setup?
>>>
>>>Neil
>>>
>>>
>>>"TCB&qu
|
|
|
|
| Re: Somebody's gotta' do it [message #83635 is a reply to message #83631] |
Tue, 24 April 2007 07:40   |
erlilo
 Messages: 405 Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;
>>>>>It's the only way I work now. As I posted in the past, my physical
machine
>>>>>has absolutely nothing installed on it. I install and run everything
>>in
>>>>>a series of VMs. There are a couple of options for XP.
>>>>>
>>>>>1. Microsoft Virtual PC 2007. Free download. Highly optimized for windows.
>>>>> Tight integration with physical PC (file copy, drag and drop, cut and
>>>paste,
>>>>>display resolutions).
>>>>>
>>>>>2. Virtual Box. Open Source. Free download. Cool.
>>>>>
>>>>>3. VMWare. Cost$. Probably the best there is, if only because of the
>expansive
>>>>>feature set.
>>>>>
>>>>>There's nothing inherently dangerous about a VM, and I run a bunch of
>>linux
>>>>>distros just fine. In fact, the physical machine is 100% isolated from
>>>>anything
>>>>>the VM may do.
>>>>>
>>>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What's the go hear?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I want to get an isolated copy of Linux running under Windows XP on
>my
>>>>work
>>>>>>laptop here. What's the go? Is it dangerous at all?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What's the popular option software wise?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00E1_01C797CD.E22B5910
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks you guys.
"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:464b5890@linux...
Every single last one... regardless of origin...
David.
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> So all 442s are the same then???
> This one's from Australlia.
> Tom
>=20
> "EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com <mailto:askme@nospam.com>> wrote in
> message news:464b1c31$1@linux...
> BZZZZZZZZZZz.... Wrong! ;-)
>=20
> David.
>=20
> DJ wrote:
>=20
> > Tom,
> >=20
> > No plug on a 442. It gets it's power from the MEC.
> >=20
> > Deej
> >=20
> >
> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net =
<mailto:arpegio@comcast.net>
> <mailto:arpegio@comcast.net>> wrote
> > in message news:464a966e$1@linux...
> > I might snag a 442 from down under. What's the easiest =
way to
> > convert a 442 from 240v to 110v?
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> > http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_00E1_01C797CD.E22B5910
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks you guys.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"EK Sound" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:askme@nospam.com">askme@nospam.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
href=3D"news:464b5890@linux">news:464b5890@linux</A>...</DIV>Every =
single last=20
one... regardless of origin...<BR><BR>David.<BR><BR>Tom Bruhl =
wrote:<BR>>=20
So all 442s are the same then???<BR>> This one's from =
Australlia.<BR>>=20
Tom<BR>> <BR>> "EK Sound" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:askme@nospam.com">askme@nospam.com</A> <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:
|
|
|
|
|
|