Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Cleartone guitar strings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Cleartone guitar strings [message #97754 is a reply to message #97753] |
Fri, 04 April 2008 09:19   |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
m good for it.
Try for a sample based click if possible.
Tom
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:487fd789@linux...
>
> Tom, you can assign cubase to play any sound you want for the click, under
> "metronome" .
> I find the click very easy to set up in Paris. set the project tempo, then
> control C, control L, type in 600 or whatever, and hit enter. (I have a
> click
> sample sitting on track 16, beat 1 of my default ppj.
> Rod
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Hey Mike,
>>
>>I could have used a click a million times so far. Syncing up
>>cubase for a simple click is an extra effort I try to avoid. Will this
>>trigger on board sound(s) paf or wav I hope? I'm a sidestick kind
>>of click guy and not the cubase sign wave annoying beep. Less steps
>>are a good thing for me.
>>
>>Great idea!
>>Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:487fabd9$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Comments? Thoughts?
>>
>>
>cont me inI really think it's quicker that pulling up the metromone plug in protools.
Just get your sample of one click edited real tight, and put it on whatever
track you want at the very beggining of your default ppj. If you decide you
don't like the tempo you selected, just control z to undo the past multiple,
change the tempo on the project page and control L again. The number of copies
will still be there. I find 600 works for most songs if the time sig is 4/4.
sometimes I have
|
|
|
|
| Re: Cleartone guitar strings [message #97755 is a reply to message #97754] |
Fri, 04 April 2008 09:44 |
Kerry Galloway
Messages: 56
Registered: December 2008
|
Member |
|
|
to up it to 900.
Rod
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>Rod,
>
>That's sounds easy as pie man. I wish I new about it
>seven years ago. I'll give it a whirl. Makes sense now that
>I think about it. Never used Control L before.
>
>Mike,
>The beep sound is abrasive to me and certainly disconcerting
>to classical and most acoustic players. The idea of getting four
>tempo choices is very cool though.
>
>If this isn't a boat load of work I'd say do it. I'm good for it.
>Try for a sample based click if possible.
>
>Tom
>
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:487fd789@linux...
>>
>> Tom, you can assign cubase to play any sound you want for the click, under
>> "metronome" .
>> I find the click very easy to set up in Paris. set the project tempo,
then
>> control C, control L, type in 600 or whatever, and hit enter. (I have
a
>> click
>> sample sitting on track 16, beat 1 of my default ppj.
>> Rod
>> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>Hey Mike,
>>>
>>>I could have used a click a million times so far. Syncing up
>>>cubase for a simple click is an extra effort I try to avoid. Will this
>>>trigger on board sound(s) paf or wav I hope? I'm a sidestick kind
>>>of click guy and not the cubase sign wave annoying beep. Less steps
>>>are a good thing for me.
>>>
>>>Great idea!
>>>Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:487fabd9$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Comments? Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>Also, make sure you have the grid set to bars, with minor time divisions,
and snap to grid is selected.
Rod
"Rod Lincoln" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Cleartone guitar strings [message #97782 is a reply to message #97761] |
Sat, 05 April 2008 12:15 |
Wayne Carson
Messages: 86
Registered: June 2007
|
Member |
|
|
;>>> once have been² has some minor academic/historical interest to me, but
>> as
>>> a
>>>> "minority case" - a returning user after years of absence - I naturally
>>> come
>>>> to it from the perspective of ³where we are right now². Iım not interested
>>>> in ³might have beens² any more - Iım interested in what we might achieve
>>>> starting from here and going forward.
>>>>
>>>> So while it's true we were larger long ago, a hard floor of 125 real users
>>>> is a good strong number, an excellent number, for aficionado-driven efforts
>>>> for a discontinued niche market DAW to go forward with. Itıs much larger
>>>> than some aficionado groups for other pieces of discontinued technology,
>>> and
>>>> some of those smaller groups have got quite a lot of very meaningful work
>>>> done. And 400 users worldwide may not be Nuendo numbers but for small
>>>> developers itıs nothing to sneeze at.
>>>>
>>>> Hope this is of interest!
>>>>
>>>> - Kerry
>>>>
>>>
>>
>There are quite a few still. John Macy, Jamie K. Deej is close.
AA
"Ron Bloom" <concerts4u@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:4882498a$1@linux...
>
> Hey Guys,
>
> My name is Ron and this is my first post, but have had the system since
> 1999.
> Please add me to your number and I am thrilled to find an active site for
> Paris. I have spent about 4 hours today trying to learn more. My brain has
> forgotten much since I just dusted my system off after a few years of not
> being set up.
>
> Hey anyone know of any body in the Denver Colorado area that is a user?
>
> Thanks guys for the help in advance.
> ron
> "Kim W." <no@way.com> wrote:
>>
>>Spot on, Rod.
>>I know two guys that have never posted.
>>Hell, I built and configured their host comps for them.
>>One is a friend who is happily using my "spare parts",
>>(a mec with 8-in, a c-16 and two EDS's) as a stand alone system.
>>I also know *of* several other users, but not personally.
>>They're out there...
>>Kim
>>
>>
>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Yeah, it could be a litle bigger. I know of two Paris users I'm in
>>>regular
>>>contact with, that to my knowledge, have never posted on this sight. So
>>I'm
>>>thinking there might be a few more of us that post here that might have
>>similar
>>>contacts that just don't post. Probably not a large number, but then
>>>again,
>>>maybe more than you might think. For example, if ther are 400 users world
>>>wide, and 100 of them have 2 people they know of (like me) that have
>>>never
>>>posted, that's 200 more users right there.
>>>Or not, I don't know. just thinking.
>>>Rod
>>>Kerry Galloway <kg@kerrygalloway.com> wrote:
>>>>Hi folks. Hereıs one of a series of updates/info posts (and - brace
>>>>yourselves - some action requests) which Iıll be putting in separate
>>>>posts.
>>>>
>>>>Iıve been working on some basic infrastructure that I reckon we need to
>>>>support any forward motion. Blog/wiki/networking/development rig are
>>>>certainly part of that infrastructure but we also had a serious need for
>>>>hard info - things like current community size and composition etc. If
>>we
>>>>want to tell outside developers who we are as a community, we better
>>>>know
>>>>who we are first, and I had the suspicion that my "spitball"
>>>>guesstimates
>>>>weren't doing us much justice.
>>>>
>>>>Now, Iım not trained in data collection and analysis but I do fine at
>>>>research and detective work, and what I lack in skills I cheerfully
>>>>supplement with grunt work. I wanted to share one of the results of that
>>>>basic research with you all.
>>>>
>>>>Iıve seen the question ³how big is the PARIS community?² asked several
>>times
>>>>before. As far as I know we never got a definitive answer. We've now got
>>>a
>>>>fairly firm "floor" for the size of the current PARIS user community.
> It
>>>>stands at an eye-opening (at least to me) 125 current users - and
>>>>rising,
>>>so
>>>>if anything thatıs an undercount. Mike Audet and I have independently
> come
>>>>to an estimate of the user community worldwide (including PARIS users
> who
>>>>don't come to the NG) as being in the vicinity of a healthy 400 current
>>>>users.
>>>>
>>>>Surprised? Not bad for eight years after discontinuation!
>>>>
>>>>Iıll be clear - this is not derived from the number of NG posters - itıs
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Cleartone guitar strings Breakage (Post Script) [message #97879 is a reply to message #97870] |
Wed, 09 April 2008 13:14 |
tonehouse
Messages: 184
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
this cable..
I dunno.
But it is working and I only aged a year or so.
computers...
grrrrrrr
DCI love summer.
We shot a big summer festival last weekend (80k people). One of the acts
was Steve Winwood who has been around approximately forever. He sounded
great, and he and his band even dug out some of old Traffic stuff.
Despite the heat (around 100f), it was a really fun shoot.
Just felt like sharing...
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.comWhen one pulls in the two mixdown tracks from a project, in PARIS 3.0, into
a new project (the two tracks hard left/right), then does some
effects/editing on them, there are two options to finish: one would be to
render the tracks with native inserts and then export them, or do another
mixdown of them. Seems I recall someone saying that something was lost by
just doing the rendering. But I'm wondering what happens to the tracks by
doing a mixdown of a mixdown? Is the original panning affected? Or any
other anomalies? At times I only need to burn one tune to a CD and would
rather not mess with another application..
TIA,
EdnaAnybody have Appleworks for OSX?
James?
They discontinued it and I have a zillion files that use it...
TIA
DCNever mind..
I copied it from the Mini's HD and it opened right up...
DC
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>
>Anybody have Appleworks for OSX?
>
>James?
>
>They discontinued it and I have a zillion files that use it...
>
>TIA
>
>DCDoes the cable say CAT6 on it anywhere, or CAT5 or CAT5e?
If not the former, there's your problem.
AA
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:488932a0$1@linux...
>
> Well, I am typing this to you on the new Mac Pro...
>
> So far transfers and everything is going OK
>
> Unfortunately, I spent3 hours today, much of it on the phone with
> Apple trying to make the ethernet work. We even erased the drive
> and reinstalled the OS...
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 09 07:40:54 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.16535 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
