The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » what is the best way to do sample rate conversion.
what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56113] Wed, 20 July 2005 17:22 Go to next message
Jeremy Luzier is currently offline  Jeremy Luzier   UNITED STATES
Messages: 102
Registered: November 2005
Senior Member
information graph because it said
>>>>> LA
>>>>> Times on it, then when pressed as to your preferred credible sources,
>>>>> you
>>>>> said LA Times *could* be credible, and that all
Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56117 is a reply to message #56113] Wed, 20 July 2005 18:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rod Lincoln is currently offline  Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
size=3D2>My Shezero drivers show up under System =
Devices not=20
Sound,Video and Game Controllers</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>on XP. Is this normal??</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>My Ensoniq Paris MIDI driver does show up =
under=20
Sound,Video and Game Controllers though.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Everything seems to be working right =
accept the=20
external inserts.</FONT></P>
<P>&nbsp;</P></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C5B186.65668A00--This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_Nex
Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56119 is a reply to message #56117] Wed, 20 July 2005 18:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
brandon_goodwin@REMOVETHISsbcglobal.net" target="_blank">brandon_goodwin@REMOVETHISsbcglobal.net> wrote in message =
news:431b8f42$1@linux...
My Shezero drivers show up under System Devices not Sound,Video and =
Game Controllers

on XP. Is this normal??

My Ensoniq Paris MIDI driver does show up under Sound,Video and Game =
Controllers though.

Everything seems to be working right accept the external inserts.



------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C5B194.BFABF140
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>
Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56122 is a reply to message #56113] Thu, 21 July 2005 02:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
hh!!!!! What a deal I missed!!!!!!
Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56124 is a reply to message #56122] Thu, 21 July 2005 06:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cujo is currently offline  cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
highway)
out of
> >>> it.. I've also got an Accord with a (I think) 12 gallon tank that I
can get
> >>> almost 400 miles out of on the highway.
> >>>
> >>>
Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56125 is a reply to message #56122] Thu, 21 July 2005 06:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
Both are paid for and have been for years.
> >>>
> >>> Next for me will be hybrids. No doubt about it at all. I may buy an
old
> >>> pickup truck to park next to the horse trailer to use occasionally for
short
> >>> hauls of horses and hay. That all the action it's going to see.
> >>>
Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56126 is a reply to message #56122] Thu, 21 July 2005 07:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie K is currently offline  Jamie K   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
/> > >>>
> >>> "rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:

Report message to a moderator

Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56129 is a reply to message #56125] Thu, 21 July 2005 12:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
AABAAEAAAEaAAUAAAABAAAAYgEbAAUAAAABAAAAagEoAAMAAAABAAIAAAEx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Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56131 is a reply to message #56126] Thu, 21 July 2005 12:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
r /> 2VODHCuTV/gpAHGrvZ/V+h++p5/Uc7LtAdiPx7Hsa9lNrS1wrc4sZY3GZ6t9
m6N/rWs/9FKvX0zquSDcNjXNE7rXDhupqxqsb7Y72N2f6D/i1GIEHU15lcAT
sCfJq3+lBB4ghruAXD2xX+a1m73f9/Wx9Ushjrn1El1kbw0wWOA1d6rT9Kv+
r/OfzPp+p6dixLsO9k78gbvzg2qR+7/hH73IFPULsK15r2utB0JZ7XQ4We+p
pq93qMreyz9/9J/wiljrsbpbOJjuKt9kxbS+oNcdxYBtdO6Wzs2ud/pa3ez/
ALaRdeOZP3rlvqt9aMTqtzccD7NltE/Znkv9RgHp2OxLne++xlbW23Y1zK8j
/D/rHv8AT6iddNTMzpCUxR81QlY8me7+V/r4pKPbv958UkP4Lv4v/9PupMHQ
ySR4RHgnJdrpp2k/3JoHzk+0HhKNOxlVj5tkKDj3Hxk8KTd+unPadAokafJK
Bt8ABygphlZDcbGuyr3EUY1brrXN1IZWPUs2M/Odt
Re: what is the best way to do sample rate conversion. [message #56133 is a reply to message #56124] Thu, 21 July 2005 16:18 Go to previous message
Dedric Terry is currently offline  Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
Senior Member
Glja2V0Lm1vZERhdGU8L2tl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Previous Topic: PPJ and FXs presets...
Next Topic: super dumb Q: stereo FX
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri May 08 01:48:09 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00889 seconds