| Crackling in Cubase, please help [message #91422] |
Sun, 14 October 2007 07:00  |
emarenot
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
s:TapeIt
>
> Work like a charm, and for 20 bucks it does save time for rendering
tracks..
>
> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
> >Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10
drum
>
> >mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a POD DI,
>
> >rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop to create
> a
> >new song each time. I just &
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Crackling in Cubase, please help [message #91426 is a reply to message #91422] |
Sun, 14 October 2007 10:12  |
LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
take?
If you just kept it in record for all songs back to back as one long
file, you are living really close to the edge, brother. If you got a
corruption in an audio file or a crash, the whole session could be out
the window.
OTOH, if you did do separate files for each song, you can simply delete
the tracks you don't want and save the song, then undo the deletes and
do the same with the next one, etc.
DJ wrote:
> Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10 drum
> mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a POD DI,
> rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop to create a
> new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12 songs back to back.
>
> Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
> individually.
>
> This sucks.
>
> One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a pair
> of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on the master
> machine.
>
> Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink
|
|
|
|
| Re: Crackling in Cubase, please help [message #91427 is a reply to message #91422] |
Sun, 14 October 2007 10:11 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
worked like a dream.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi Dimitrios,
Thanks for your kind words!
I've been reading up more on the architecture of the ESP2, and I'm not sure
I can make one plugin instance talk to another. All the memory is inside
the chip, and it's probably all stack based. So, once an instance of a plugin
is loaded, it can only see its own variables. But it is something I'd like
to try and work around, if possible. :)
One thing I did get working, though, is the big reverb. I still have to
figure out what parameters to sent it - there's like 25 of them or something
with next to no documentation, and I have to build a GUI. But
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Crackling in Cubase, please help [message #91430 is a reply to message #91426] |
Sun, 14 October 2007 12:14 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
tereo for insert !?
>Means something like your ducker.
>So as when we have a stereo OH's on channels 1 and 2 then by putting one
>or two instances of compressor that one gets the sync signal from the other
>as to have identical attack release threshold settings ?
>Thanks for what you are doing once again !
>Regards,
>Dimitrios
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote:
>>
>>Thanks, Rob! Let me know if/when it's useful. I'm dying to hear how these
>>things are being used.
>>
>>All the best,
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>
>>"Rob Arsenault" <mani1147athotmaildotcom> wrote:
>>>Way to go Mike, great stuff, thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote in message news:472923eb$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Yo, Yo!
>>>>
>>>> The EQ4+ has been released into the wild!
>>>>
>>>> It's a stereo, 4 band eq that can be set to high pass, low pass, high
>>
>>>> shelf,
>>>> low shelf, band pass, or parametric filters, with metering at every
stage.
>>>>
>>>> How cool is that?
>>>>
>>>> A special thanks goes out to Chuck for his BarbQ. This is basically
>a
>>4
>>>> band stereo version of his plugin on steroids.
>>>>
>>>> Enjoy!
>>>> Download at: www.ensoniq
|
|
|
|
| Re: Crackling in Cubase, please help [message #91432 is a reply to message #91422] |
Sun, 14 October 2007 16:16 |
emarenot
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C81EDB.56E86100
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mike,=20
The eq is awesome as I stated in a personal email.
As I suggested to you, is it possible to get a single bypass
switch to help achieve unity gain with the dry?
It does sound much better than what I expected.
The reverb will be great when it shows up. Keep up
the great work and don't burn out. We need you!
Tom
"Mike Audet" <mike@.....> wrote in message news:472de838$1@linux...
Hi Dimitrios,
Thanks for your kind words!
I've been reading up more on the architecture of the ESP2, and I'm not =
sure
I can make one plugin instance talk to another. All the memory is =
inside
the chip, and it's probably all stack based. So, once an instance of =
a plugin
is loaded, it can only see its own variables. But it is something I'd =
like
to try and work around, if possible. :)
One thing I did get working, though, is the big reverb. I still have =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
