|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Unhandled Exception showing up [message #67974 is a reply to message #67954] |
Wed, 10 May 2006 03:25   |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
is
> > all patched into three different M-Audio Digipatch units which are daisy
> > chained to each other using spdif cables in an attempt to allow
> > simultaneous
> > clocking of everythiong from two different sources derived from the same
> > master clock while cross patching all of the digital I/O between various
> > lightpipe, coax and optical spdif devices through these digital
patchbays
> > that, BTW, don't reclock the incoming/outgoing signal.
> >
> > I know a bunch of you guys were getting ready to do this , but just say
> > no.
> >
> > (I swear there was a valid reason for trying this.........really there
> > was)
> >
> > ;oD
> >
> >
>
>Well OF COURSE, they're *radio* guys....
heh heh Just kidding Martin.
Louis, the answer is that good engineers disagree on this.
Try it yourself, both ways, (say 48x and 2x) have a friend play the
CD's without telling you which is which and see if you can spot the hi
speed one and the lo-speed one.
We would love to get your opinions after doing this.
DC
"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>For the past 2 years, I've been recording and producing a fortnightly radio
>program that is sent out to all the South Pacific islands around Australia,
>(34 copies each month).
>I burn them myself 2 at a time at 48x and have not had one rejected by
>myself, the client or, indeed, the radio stations.
>I
think the newer burners and discs are fine for high speed work.
>My 2c (AUS)
>--
>Martin Harrington
>www.lendanear-sound.com
>
>"Louis Guarino Jr." <kateeba@snet.net> wrote in message
>news:44803110$1@linux...
>>
>> Here is a question that has been bothering me for some time and maybe
some
>> of you can shed some light on it.
>>
>> They make these CD/DVD burners so much faster now days. But then we are
>> told not to use the fastest speeds to burn because the results won't be
as
>> accurate. I have a 16X DVD burner, but a friend of mine that does video
>> for a living told me not to go over 4X. I can burn CD's at 48X, but
I
>> found
>> that anything over 12X produces CD's that dont' play well in my stereo.
>>
>>
>> So WHEN would you use the "fastest" speeds these machines offer? Just
>> data
>> with verification? Or never?
>>
>> Just for the record, I have a built in Super drive in my Mac duo core
iMac
>> that has a MATSHITA DVD-R UJ-846 and I also have a Lacie external
>> firewire
>> D2 DVD +/-RW drive.
>>
>> Any good articles someone can link me to that explains all this better?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Lou
>
>I have one and simply love it. Morgan gave me a great deal on a base
model, and I upgraded the RAM and harddrive for pretty cheap.
I mostly use the soft synths, and there are so many nice free ones
that come with it, that I have yet so shell out money for any
commercial ones.
It comes with a bunch of nice effects too, and what is really cool is
that you can plug in a guitar/bass into a DI port and use the effects
directly with the instrument.
If you are a gigging musician who would like to get some VST(i) into
your act but have problems lugging a computer around, the Receptor is
worth consideration. Big name acts are taking racks of these things on
the road now, and it is really catching on.
- Paul Artola
Ellicott City, Maryland
On 3 Jun 2006 06:37:43 +1000, "Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote:
>
>www.museresearch.com
>
>Looks like the Receptor can do both effects and instruments.
>
>It looks really cool, but a good unit with enough memory and
>RAM is
|
|
|
|
| Re: Unhandled Exception showing up [message #67976 is a reply to message #67974] |
Wed, 10 May 2006 05:00 |
Don Nafe
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
am, and you?
>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>>
>>I've bee fine tuning my system. I was still getting some wierdness
(crackling and an occasional motorboating sound) out of my Multiface AD?DA's
when using them as I'O for external processors in Cubase SX. I had 2 x HDSP
9652's in PCI slots 2 & 3 of my mobo with the Multiface PCI in the Magma
along with the 4 x UAD cards. Nothing was sharing an IRQ with my AGP card,
but still, I need to use the Multiface AD/DA's when I mix, so I remembered
that Chris Ludwig telling me that the P750 would share an IRQ with an HDSP
card without any problem. It's not that I didn't believe him exactly, it's
just that I *never* had success with this, no matter what OS I was using,
but I needed to do something to solve this problem............soooo.......I
pulled the Multiface PCI out of the Magma, moved the RME cards so that I've
got an HDSP 9652 in PCI 1 sharing with the P750, an HDSP 9652 in PCI slot 2
and the Multiface PCI in slot 3.
The system runs better than it did when nothing was sharing with the AGP and
the noise issues with the Multiface seem to have been cured.
This si the first time I've *ever* been successful sharing an IRQ between
the AGP and an audio interface.
Go figure.Well, it is faulting.. I established that already. However, regarding that
fact, why am I consistently seeing the errors on 'only' the fast burned CDs?
The obvious fact is that there are more errors. My burner is at best a year
old, and this seems to be consistent across several of my burners, using a
multitude of different programs. While not exactly scientific, it's just not
worth it when it's proven in my mind that it creates problems. The other
factor I'm thinking here is you are likely using good CD players and
convertors. Have you tried this test with a cheapo player to see if it's
still the same result?
AA
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:4480a7e0$1@linux...
>
> I'd say this means you have a nearly faulty CD player, but that's me.
>
> Remember Derek, who used to hang out here? We went over this once ad
> infinitum
> and Derek and I tested this way. We ripped and burned the same track over
> and over again. Like twenty rips and then twenty burns, one was burned at
> 2X and one at 32X. After the last rip we did the flip the phase trick and
> heard . . . nothing. These days I could probalby run a diff on the audio
> files to compare them bit for bit, but that's enough proof to me that a
> properly
> functioning CD player will get the same data off of CDs that are properly
> burned, regardless of speed.
>
> Also, if this is true, why don't faster hard drives involve more errors
> that
> slower ones? They have to write data just like CD burners do.
>
> TCB
>
> "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>Whether or not I can hear anything, here is all the proof I need: My car
>
>>deck is slowly making it's way to the graveyard. Faster burns won't play
> in
>>it. Slower ones do. That says to me w/o any doubts that the faster burns
> are
>>either mishapen (more elliptical) or they have higher errors or both.
>>I burn 'em slow for masters.
>>
>>AA
>>
>>
>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:44808fe2$1@linux...
>>>
>>> I can't.
>>>
>>> "DC" <dc@spamyermama.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>When prepping CDs for duplication I usually burn slower, at 4X or 8X,
> but
>>>>>I think that's largely superstition.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It's not. Most people can clearly hear the difference between a
>>>>CD written at 24 or higher and one written at 4 or lower.
>>>>
>>>>DC
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>>
>>
>Sweet.. that's the one.
AA
"Chris Lang" <yo@yo.yo> wrote in message news:4480a197$1@linux...
>
> www.museresearch.com
>
> Looks like the Receptor can do both effects and instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
