|
|
|
|
| Re: think I'll start a retro mastering lab. [message #67967 is a reply to message #67965] |
Tue, 09 May 2006 20:56   |
Deej [1]
 Messages: 2149 Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>will cop more compression. If, in a given band, the left channel is louder
>>>than the right channel, everything in that band will get panned further
>>right,
>>>because the left channel will get compressed / reduced in level more than
>>>the right channel. What's more, some sounds will no doubt cover more than
>>>one frequency band, and as this "repanning" effect is unlikely to be identical
>>>in all frequency bands, one part of a sound may get panned further right,
>>>while another band of it stays where it is, or even moves further left
>depending
>>>what is in that band.
>>>
>>>I would have thought that on material with considerable stereo content,
>>things
>>>will end up all over the shop in terms of stereo imaging.
>>>
>>>On the other hand, there's a very practicle school of thought which says
>>>"If it sounds good, just do it"...
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
|
|
|
|
| Re: think I'll start a retro mastering lab. [message #67970 is a reply to message #67967] |
Tue, 09 May 2006 21:20   |
dc[3]
Messages: 895 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t="_blank">1@linux...
> Don't run a 15' WC cable from your master clock module to two distro
> modules, then use another short WC cable to link the distro modules
> together
> and then run other WC cables of differing lengths to 3 x RME interfaces
> and
> 3 x MECs while also running ADAT sync cables from 3 x Paris ADAT modules
> to
> the ADAT sync inputs of the 3 x RME cards while the digital I/O of the RME
> cards, the Paris modules, all of your external spdif gear and ADAT gear is
> all patched into three different M-Audio Digipatch units which are daisy
> chained to each other using spdif cables in an attempt to allow
> simultaneous
> clocking of everythiong from two different sources derived from the same
> master clock while cross patching all of the digital I/O between various
> lightpipe, coax and optical spdif devices through these digital patchbays
> that, BTW, don't reclock the incoming/outgoing signal.
>
> I know a bunch of you guys were getting ready to do this , but just say
> no.
>
> (I swear there was a valid reason for trying this.........really there
> was)
>
> ;oD
>
>For the past 2 years, I've been recording and producing a fortnightly radio
program that is sent out to all the South Pacific islands around Australia,
(34 copies each month).
I burn them myself 2 at a time at 48x and have not had one rejected by
myself, the client or, indeed, the radio stations.
I think the newer burners and discs are fine for high speed work.
My 2c (AUS)
--
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.com
"Louis Guarino Jr." <kateeba@snet.net> wrote in message
news:44803110$1@linux...
>
> Here is a question that has been bothering me for some time and maybe some
> of you can shed some light on it.
>
> They make these CD/DVD burners so much
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: think I'll start a retro mastering lab. [message #67985 is a reply to message #67978] |
Wed, 10 May 2006 07:36   |
gene lennon
Messages: 565 Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ther
>and then run other WC cables of differing lengths to 3 x RME interfaces
and
>3 x MECs while also running ADAT sync cables from 3 x Paris ADAT modules
to
>the ADAT sync inputs of the 3 x RME cards while the digital I/O of the RME
>cards, the Paris modules, all of your external spdif gear and ADAT gear
is
>all patched into three different M-Audio Digipatch units which are daisy
>chained to each other using spdif cables in an attempt to allow simultaneous
>clocking of everythiong from two different sources derived from the same
>master clock while cross patching all of the digital I/O between various
>lightpipe, coax and optical spdif devices through these digital patchbays
>that, BTW, don't reclock the incoming/outgoing signal.
>
>I know a bunch of you guys were getting ready to do this , but just say
no.
>
>(I swear there was a valid reason for trying this.........really there was)
>
>;oD
>
>Hey deej, I thought at one time you were thinking that clocking with the mytek
as master sounded noticably better. Was that just wax in your ears? :o)
Rod
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>The most stable sync I have achieved with Paris as master and Cubase SX
as
>slave is to run WC cables of even length (I'm using 2' Zaolla cables) from
>the master clock module to the MEC(s). Then, to clock the RME card(s), just
>run serial cables from the MEC ADAT sync out(s) to the RME ADAT sync inputs,
>choose ADAT as the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|