| Lightweight nice sounding PA speakers...? [message #99873] |
Mon, 04 August 2008 23:12  |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
A/ySd1GYBEIvFK9L38YvFiFYEK9L38Yv4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|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lightweight nice sounding PA speakers...? [message #99894 is a reply to message #99890] |
Tue, 05 August 2008 12:16  |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
." target="_blank">1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Hey networking gurus!
>>>>
>>>> I need a good supple Cat 6 cable to make patch cords out of for field
>>>> work.
>>>>
>>>> I have thousands of feet of install cable but it is stiff and does not
>>>> stand
>>>> up well to field use. Do you know of a Cat. 6 cable that is more like
>>>> a
>>>> mic
>>>> cable; strong and supple, that will hold up to onsite field use?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>>
>>>> DC
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Martin H
>> Lend An Ear Sound
>>
>
>FYI, there may still be on going litigation???
Check this out:
http://store.psystar.com/
"Nappy" <juggler9@rock.com> wrote:
>
>Martin,
>A quad core is in the plan for me. Can I e-mail you if I run into trouble?
>Were can I get the Boot-kable-bumby.iso disk?
>
>respect
>Nappy
>
>Martin Harrington <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>It's very easy...I've built 2 boxes now, one a quad core with 4gb ram and
>>the other a dual core with 2gb ram.
>>The quad core, (studio), is even running a legit copy of OSX 10.5.4 ..I
>>haven't done the upgrade yet, not till I finish my current project, but
>I'm
>>assured that the auto updates from apple don't break the install.
>>
>>It was setup using a boot disk (Boot-Kable-Bumby.iso) and then swapping
>to
>>the retail OSX disk for the install and back to the boot disk to finish
>the
>>install.
>>
>>Martin H
>>
>>
>>On 28/10/08 2:36 PM, in article 49067a93$1@linux, "Nappy"
>><juggler9@rock.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Why don't you build a Hackintosh ? I'm going to try my hand at it.
>>> http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>>>
>>> Check the hardware components for compatible hardware. I picked
>>> up a ASUS P5K Deluxe/Wifi that I'm going to try. I hope to dual boot
this
>>> system with XP and OSX. Wish me luck.
>>>
>>> respect
>>> Nappy
>>>
>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm really thinking of getting a new Mac Pro for running..Logic Pro
via
>>> Mac
>>>> OS, Nuendo..Via boot camp, Pro Tools, and of course Paris..
>>>>
>>>> This has been my dream setup for work.. I think it's finally coming
true..
>>>>
>>>> "LaMont" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lightweight nice sounding PA speakers...? [message #99896 is a reply to message #99894] |
Tue, 05 August 2008 13:03 |
Tyrone Corbett
Messages: 253
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TC
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>Martin H
>>Lend An Ear Sound
>>
>The key search word you're looking for then is "armored" cable. It's out
there, I usually have my rep at http://www.gocsc.com spec that stuff up. It
is not cheap, but if it's what's needed to get the job done w/o failures,
well....
I have heard from local TV guys that there is also multi pair/multi type
armored available, and there of course is armored fiber (multimode and
single mode) for the cleanest possible data transfers. Camera guys are using
this stuff in the field, right now. Check with Belden? They're usually on
top of this kind of thing, I'd start with them.
AA
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4907ec83$1@linux...
>
> Supple would be nice, but rugged for field use is more important.
>
> DC
>
>
> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>right, but for those we're talking armored. That's not exactly supple.
>>AA
>>
>>
>>"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
>>news:C52E2855.12A5%lendan@bigpond.net.au...
>>> Cat 5 and 6, (especially 6) are being used constantly on film sets to
>>> provide audio and video sends to various centres on set.
>>> It's a cheap reliable way of sending analogue data, and all it needs is
> a
>>> fairly inexpensive convertor at each end.
>>>
>>> Martin H
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29/10/08 1:51 PM, in article 4907d3d6$1@linux, "Aaron Allen"
>>> <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Doubtful to find that bro, the CAT6 standards are harder than 5e, and
>
>>>> it's
>>>> not going to be getting any easier as network cables are requiring more
>
>>>> and
>>>> more standards for speed.
>>>>
>>>> AA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4907cbb3$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey networking gurus!
>>>>>
>>>>> I need a good supple Cat 6 cable to make patch cords out of for field
>>>>> work.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have thousands of feet of install cable but it is stiff and does not
>>>>> stand
>>>>> up well to field use. Do you know of a Cat. 6 cable that is more
>>>>> like
>
>>>>> a
>>>>> mic
>>>>> cable; strong and supple, that will hold up to onsite field use?
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> DC
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Martin H
>>> Lend An Ear Sound
>>>
>>
>>
>If you happen to want either one of mine I can send you a zip file with the
bmps in it. Instructions are on the WIKI. Jim
&quo
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lightweight nice sounding PA speakers...? [message #99899 is a reply to message #99890] |
Tue, 05 August 2008 15:07 |
|
|
.iso) and then swapping
>>to
>>>the retail OSX disk for the install and back to the boot disk to finish
>>the
>>>install.
>>>
>>>Martin H
>>>
>>>
>>>On 28/10/08 2:36 PM, in article 49067a93$1@linux, "Nappy"
>>><juggler9@rock.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you build a Hackintosh ? I'm going to try my hand at it.
>>>> http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>>>>
>>>> Check the hardware components for compatible hardware. I picked
>>>> up a ASUS P5K Deluxe/Wifi that I'm going to try. I hope to dual boot
>this
>>>> system with XP and OSX. Wish me luck.
>>>>
>>>> respect
>>>> Nappy
>>>>
>>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm really thinking of getting a new Mac Pro for running..Logic Pro
>via
>>>> Mac
>>>>> OS, Nuendo..Via boot camp, Pro Tools, and of course Paris..
>>>>>
>>>>> This has been my dream setup for work.. I think it's finally coming
>true..
>>>>>
>>>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah Baby!!! Congrats!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TC <tc@spammetodeathyoubastards.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just wanted to let everyone know that I've now got Paris running
>>on
>>>> my
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dual core Intel Mac Pro running bootcamp Win XP with a VirtuaVia Pcie
>>>> to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pci expansion kit that I put in a rackmount ATX case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a 2 card system so far, soon to be 4. I've got 2 adat cards
>>in
>>>>>
>>>>>>> the mec, haven't tested those yet, but I've got Mike Audet's last
>>>>>>> library compile installed from Sept 18th.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, there you go. Paris running on a new Mac.. yippie kai-ay mofos!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We don't need no newfangled daw! (Ok, I'll be running this as the
>>>>>>> summing mixer of a PTHD/Logic TDM rig, but it's still pretty cool).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks again Kerry for your help refreshing my brain on the setup
>stuff.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>&
"... being bitter is like swallowing poison and waiting for the other guy to die..." - anon
|
|
|
|
| Re: Lightweight nice sounding PA speakers...? [message #99900 is a reply to message #99896] |
Tue, 05 August 2008 15:10 |
|
|
gt; Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TC
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Martin H
>>>Lend An Ear Sound
>>>
>>At work, we're IE only. The problems I have are lack of pace with Outlook
2007. Things like color coordinations, being able to see more than one day
at a time, the entire look/feel of the left pane not matching outlook,
tasks/contacts/calendar/etc... Public folders are screwy in placements. It's
*not* a good user experience, and I can see no reason for it to be that way
in the GUI other than shitty coding. It seems like with every release of OWA
it's always far behind in features versus Outlook, and that makes no sense.
No right click for menu drop downs. We run a companyweb on MS exchange on a
MS 2k3 SBS server using MS-IIS - MS products the whole way.. And it still
isn't right? Puh-leeeez. I hear they're looking to try to compete with
Google on web based office products. Good luck with that path, MS. Better
than the previous version isn't cutting it when the previous version sucks..
day late/dollar short rings a bell here.
You?
AA
"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote in message news:490869c2$1@linux...
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> I'm curious what difficulties you are having with OWA. Accessing with non
> IE browsers, etc.
>
> Chuck
> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>I wish they'd just get OWA up to flippin speed.
>>AA
>>
>>
>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:49076d9e$1@linux...
>>>
>>> http://apnews.excite.com/article/20081028/D943M27G0.html
>>
>>
>rick <parnell68athotmaildotcom> wrote:
>it would be funny if they went after the 2-10 paris people on
>this...wouldn't it.
Well I guess I won't have any thing to worry about because I don't have a
hackentosh. FYI, Apple doesn't prosecute end users, Microsoft does!!!!!
>
>On 29 Oct 2008 16:12:39 +1000, "James McCloskey"
><excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>FYI, there may still be on going litigation???
>>
>>Check this out:
>>http://store.psystar.com/
>>
>>"Nappy" <juggler9@rock.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Martin,
>>>A quad core is in the plan for me. Can I e-mail you if I run into trouble?
>>>Were can I get the Boot-kable-bumby.iso disk?
>>>
>>>respect
>>>Nappy
>>>
>>>Martin Harrington <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>>>It's very easy...I've built 2 boxes now, one a quad core with 4gb ram
and
>>>>the other a dual core with 2gb ram.
>>>>The quad core, (studio), is even running a legit copy of OSX 10.5.4 ..I
>>>>haven't done the upgrade yet, not till I finish my current project, but
>>>I'm
>>>>assured that the auto updates from apple don't break the install.
>>>>
>>>>It was setup using a boot disk (Boot-Kable-Bumby.iso) and then swapping
>>>to
>>>>the retail OSX disk for the install and back to the boot disk to finish
>>>the
>>>>install.
>>>>
>>>>Martin H
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 28/10/08 2:36 PM, in article 49067a93$1@linux, "Nappy"
>>>><juggler9@rock.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you build a Hackintosh ? I'm going to try my hand at it.
>>>>> http://wiki.osx86project.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>>>>>
>>>>> Check the hardware com
"... being bitter is like swallowing poison and waiting for the other guy to die..." - anon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
