|
|
|
|
| Re: Mecs+442+clock help needed... [message #57910 is a reply to message #57909] |
Tue, 06 September 2005 12:28   |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
oot this freekin pc lol
>Scott
>xpYou might change your mind after listening to this. Portico is definitely on
my short list............I wouldn't mind having two of them.
http://www.3daudioinc.com/3db/showthread.php?t=6617
"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message news:43474871$1@linux...
>
> Yeah you are the second guy to remind me of these
> Although once a lunchbox is purchased the API stuff is cheaper.
> Also, after a few years or working in a studio with a NEVE board as well
> as doing some stuff on a Tweed, I think I want ot move awy from Neve for
> a while.
>
>
> "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> >Hey Cujo,
> >
> >Have you given the new Rupert Neve Portico's a listen?
> >
> >I can't imagine them sucking...
> >
> >
> >el miguel
> >
> >
> >"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message
news:43434da4$1@linux...
> >>
> >>
> >> Ok, One more pre question
> >> Anyone here own any Shadow Hill stuff?
> >> They look wonderfull, But looks aint everything, I have heard they are
> >more
> >> special than say the Great Rivers.
> >> I'd love more opinions
> >> It looks well made..and by grabbing an API rack, it will be more cost
> >effective
> >> in the long run, as API modules are relatively inexpensive..
> >> Hm.
> >>
> >
> >
>Very airy, for a u67 I thought it sounded almost whispy. Oh and super quiet.
I'd like to know what was on the piano, sounds like Royers?
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>You might change your mind after listening to this. Portico is definitely
on
>my short list............I wouldn't mind having two of them.
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mecs+442+clock help needed... [message #57912 is a reply to message #57910] |
Tue, 06 September 2005 12:32 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ith a NEVE board as well
>> as doing some stuff on a Tweed, I think I want ot move awy from Neve for
>> a while.
>>
>>
>> "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >Hey Cujo,
>> >
>> >Have you given the new Rupert Neve Portico's a listen?
>> >
>> >I can't imagine them sucking...
>> >
>> >
>> >el miguel
>> >
>> >
>> >"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>news:43434da4$1@linux...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ok, One more pre question
>> >> Anyone here own any Shadow Hill stuff?
>> >> They look wonderfull, But looks aint everything, I have heard they
are
>> >more
>> >> special than say the Great Rivers.
>> >> I'd love more opinions
>> >> It looks well made..and by grabbing an API rack, it will be more cost
>> >effective
>> >> in the long run, as API modules are relatively inexpensive..
>> >> Hm.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>Yeah this is they way I was thinking you could do it a while ago.
But I thought Senderella was not wokring unless you did the 8.8 ine in tghe
config.
wasn't that supposed to cause overheating?
Also I guess we'd want Chainer for more inserts for this.
I need to get my head around these new numbers as I use that old DX wrapper
where aI do 4x100 to the left then sample slide 1058 or whatever to the right
again.
You are an intrepid man D, the idea of messing with my working system gives
me nightmares
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>Now the most obvious trick I missed (well didn't think that would work but
>it does !) was to just to nudge the audio tracks you wanna use with
>senderella for 100ms to the left and just put in a slot after senderella
>voxengo (free) sample delay 384 samples to the right.
>Remember 100ms=4480 samples - 384 = 4096
>That is if you use Spinaudio wrapper that lowers buffer with a 4096 UAD
>plugin latency.
>If you will use multifxvst then use 50ms nudge to the left and 182 to the
>right ( 50ms=2240 - 192 = 2048)
>Regards,
>Dimitrios
>
>D, can yu send it to me as well?
I may get some courage soon from somewhere.
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>NP
>Dimitrios
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote in message news:4346dc9b$1@linux...
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Rod
>> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>> >Rod, I have sent it to you...
>> >Regards,
>> >Dimitrios<
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mecs+442+clock help needed... [message #57913 is a reply to message #57912] |
Tue, 06 September 2005 12:34 |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
>> >"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:43468f5e$1@linux...
>> >>
>> >> D..where's the 4 slot free version? I can't find it.
>> >> Rod
>> >> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>> >> >I don't know if anyone has come up to this but the free FFX4 DX
>chainer
>> >> or
>> >> >the commercial buy of FFX16 can load the UAD plugins with VU
>indications
>> >> and
>> >> >Preset handling.
>> >> >The latency is 4096 for a normal UAD plugin instance.
>> >> >Regards,
>> >> >Dimitrios
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>He,
Yeah well,
I didn't mean to make any harm to your system....
EDSTransfer 8,16 is better and more relaxed than 8,8.
I use this for 4-5 months now ,no problem at all.
The 8,8 causes slow disk transfers with many tracks.
Yes your old UAD1 wraps are 16384 samples long....
Chainer is a way to go.
But download this Spinaudio lite for free to wrap around chainer to lower
the latency to 4096 samples.
That is 1/4 of your "working" latency.
If you are adventureous inserts the FREE multifxvst inside chainer and then
load UAD to go down to 2048 samples ! latent around 40ms...
Not bad right ?
Yes you were right about the compensation but at that special time it did
not work for me !!
I guess I did something wrong then.
Now this is a great method of compensating.
Senderella is a great adventure to be taken for Paris.
I hope and someone else will try it too and test it ...
I will post all that I know about senderella and wrapping and compensating
in one long updated post....
Cheers,
Dimitrios
"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message news:4347d7f0@linux...
>
> Yeah this is they way I was thinking you could do it a while ago.
> But I thought Senderella was not wokring unless you did the 8.8 ine in
tghe
> config.
> wasn't that supposed to cause overheating?
> Also I guess we'd want Chainer for more inserts for this.
>
> I need to get my head around these new numbers as I use that old DX
wrapper
> where aI do 4x100 to the left then sample slide 1058 or whatever to the
right
> again.
>
> You are an intrepid man D, the idea of messing with my working system
gives
> me nightmares
>
>
> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
> >Now the most obvious trick I missed (well didn't think that would work
but
> >it does !) was to just to nudge the audio tracks you wanna use with
> >senderella for 100ms to the left and just put in a slot after senderella
> >voxengo (free) sample delay 384 samples to the right.
> >Remember 100ms=4480 samples - 384 = 4096
> >That is if you use Spinaudio wrapper that lowers buffer with a 4096 UAD
> >plugin latency.
> >If you will use multifxvst then use 50ms nudge to the left and 182 to the
> >right ( 50ms=2240 - 192 = 2048)
> >Regards,
> >Dimitrios
> >
> >
>i'm using a pair of dual-concentric monitors that can be used standing
up or on their sides. when using speakers on their sides is it best
to have the drivers closest to the middle, or set up with the drivers
at the ends? i realize some of this is personal preference, but was
wondering what folks thought.
thanks much.
jonIf the enclosures are front ported, I would place the ports
on the out
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mecs+442+clock help needed... [message #57914 is a reply to message #57912] |
Tue, 06 September 2005 12:32 |
TC
Messages: 327
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
side so the HF does not have to travel through
port turbulence.
my $.02
David.
jon chaikin wrote:
> i'm using a pair of dual-concentric monitors that can be used standing
> up or on their sides. when using speakers on their sides is it best
> to have the drivers closest to the middle, or set up with the drivers
> at the ends? i realize some of this is personal preference, but was
> wondering what folks thought.
>
> thanks much.
>
> jonFlippin through the old Beatles Session book today.
Can anyone tell me what that mic is that always hangs over Ringo's kit?
It seems to be in photos spaning the groups career. Seems like they stuck
with waht worked.
This thing sort of look like an SM81.
I had read that Emmerick liked a precurser to the coles ribbon, but I see
that on Pauls bass cab. Me thinx that was not correct.
The kick mic looks like a d12.
A guy I know has something like that but If i recall he has a different element.
There is one photo showing a pair of U47's one upright, the other hanging
upside down below it. I would guess there was no stereo recording on those
sessions. but it looks almost like an M/S pair set up..
Hmm...Hey D,
Thanks for the Email.
I am going to bombard you wiht questions soon.
I need to make a ghost of my sytem first.
How do you mak a silent PAF file?
Sorry if this is a dumb question.
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>He,
>Yeah well,
>I didn't mean to make any harm to your system....
>
>EDSTransfer 8,16 is better and more relaxed than 8,8.
>I use this for 4-5 months now ,no problem at all.
>The 8,8 causes slow disk transfers with many tracks.
>
>Yes your old UAD1 wraps are 16384 samples long....
>Chainer is a way to go.
>But download this Spinaudio lite for free to wrap around chainer to lower
>the latency to 4096 samples.
>That is 1/4 of your "working" latency.
>If you are adventureous inserts the FREE multifxvst inside chainer and then
>load UAD to go down to 2048 samples ! latent around 40ms...
>Not bad right ?
>Yes you were right about the compensation but at that special time it did
>not work for me !!
>I guess I did something wrong then.
>Now this is a great method of compensating.
>Senderella is a great adventure to be taken for Paris.
>I hope and someone else will try it too and test it ...
>
>I will post all that I know about senderella and wrapping and compensating
>in one long updated post....
>Cheers,
>Dimitrios
>"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message news:4347d7f0@linux...
>>
>> Yeah this is they way I was thinking you could do it a while ago.
>> But I thought Senderella was not wokring unless you did the 8.8 ine in
>tghe
>> config.
>> wasn't that supposed to cause overheating?
>> Also I guess we'd want Chainer for more inserts for this.
>>
>> I need to get my head around these new numbers as I use that old DX
>wrapper
>> where aI do 4x100 to the left then sample slide 1058 or whatever to the
>right
>> again.
>>
>> You are an intrepid man D, the idea of messing with my working system
>gives
>> me nightmares
>>
>>
>> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>> >Now the most obvious trick I missed (well didn't think that would work
>but
>> >it does !) was to just to nudge the audio tracks you wanna use with
>> >senderella for 100ms to the left and just put in a slot after senderella
>&
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mecs+442+clock help needed... [message #57915 is a reply to message #57913] |
Tue, 06 September 2005 12:41 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt; >voxengo (free) sample delay 384 samples to the right.
>> >Remember 100ms=4480 samples - 384 = 4096
>> >That is if you use Spinaudio wrapper that lowers buffer with a 4096 UAD
>> >plugin latency.
>> >If you will use multifxvst then use 50ms nudge to the left and 182 to
the
>> >right ( 50ms=2240 - 192 = 2048)
>> >Regards,
>> >Dimitrios
>> >
>> >
>>
>
> http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?p=450412#post4504 12"Mike Claytor" <claytor@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?p=450412#post4504 12
Zombies, eh?
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..............brains!I made mine by putting Paris in record at the desired sample rate, looping a
digital input to a mixer in the patchbay for Paris and feeding it no audio.
AA
"Cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message news:43485317$1@linux...
>
> Hey D,
> Thanks for the Email.
> I am going to bombard you wiht questions soon.
> I need to make a ghost of my sytem first.
> How do you mak a silent PAF file?
> Sorry if this is a dumb question.
>
> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>He,
>>Yeah well,
>>I didn't mean to make any harm to your system....
>>
>>EDSTransfer 8,16 is better and more relaxed than 8,8.
>>I use this for 4-5 months now ,no problem at all.
>>The 8,8 causes slow disk transfers with many tracks.
>>
>>Yes your old UAD1 wraps are 16384 samples long....
>>Chainer is a way to go.
>>But download this Spinaudio lite for free to wrap around chainer to lower
>>the latency to 4096 samples.
>>That is 1/4 of your "working" latency.
>>If you are adventureous inserts the FREE multifxvst inside chainer and
>>then
>>load UAD to go down to 2048 samples ! latent around 40ms...
>>Not bad right ?
>>Yes you were right about the compensation but at that special time it did
>>not work for me !!
>>I guess I did something wrong then.
>>Now this is a great method of compensating.
>>Senderella is a great adventure to be taken for Paris.
>>I hope and someone else will try it too and test it ...
>>
>>I will post all that I know about senderella and wrapping and compensating
>>in one long updated post....
>>Cheers,
>>Dimitrios
>>"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message news:4347d7f0@linux...
>>>
>>> Yeah this is they way I was thinking you could do it a while ago.
>>> But I thought Senderella was not wokring unless you did the 8.8 ine in
>>tghe
>>> config.
>>> wasn't that supposed to cause overheating?
>>> Also I guess we'd want Chainer for more inserts for this.
>>>
>>> I need to get my head around these new numbers as I use that old DX
>>wrapper
>>> where aI do 4x100 to the left then sample slide 1058 or whatever to the
>>right
>>> again.
>>>
>>> You are an intrepid man D, the idea of messing with my working system
>>gives
>>> me nightmares
>>>
>>>
>>> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>> >Now the most obvious trick I missed (well didn't think that would work
>>but
>>> >it does !) was to just to nudge the audio tracks you wanna use with
>>> >senderella for 100ms to the left and just put in a slot after
>>> >senderella
>>> >voxengo (free) sample delay 384 samples to the right.
>>> >Remember 100ms=4480 samples - 384 = 4096
>>> >That is if you use Spinaudio wrapper that lowers buffer with a 4096 UAD
>>> >plugin latency.
>>> >If you will use multifxvst then use 50ms nudge to the left and 182 to
> the
>>> >right ( 50ms=2240 - 192 = 2048)
>>> >Regards,
>>> >Dimitrios
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>Hey Mike, Wann
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mecs+442+clock help needed... [message #57916 is a reply to message #57914] |
Tue, 06 September 2005 12:42 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
a mod a mic for me????
"Mike Claytor" <claytor@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Mike Claytor" <claytor@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>> http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?p=450412#post4504 12
>
>Zombies, eh?
>
>
>
>mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..............brains!This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---=_linux43488518
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Man, my plate is mucho full. I've got projects a year old that i need to finish!
Really, all i've done is take the Royer mod and apply it to different mics.
It's REAL easy if ya know which end of the soldering iron is the hot end.
If yer clueless on this stuff (and if memory serves, you're not!) it's still
an easy project.
Keep the capsule and body and just wire in the Royer circuit, etc.
I've got geetars, pre-amps, mics, landscaping, truck repair, etc. stacked
up on me and just can't take on any outside stuff at this time.
deadline stress is bad for Mikey!
....and hey! Texas beat OU and we've got a.......cabrito, although it looks
like a Doberman to me....on a spit! Dobey tacos and ice cold beer! Yeah buddy!!!
life is ......weird.
"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>Hey Mike, Wanna mod a mic for me????
>
>
>"Mike Claytor" <claytor@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Mike Claytor" <claytor@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php3?p=450412#post4504 12
>>
>>Zombies, eh?
>>
>>
>>
>>mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..............brains!
>
---=_linux43488518
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name="doberman-Q.jpg"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="doberman-Q.jpg"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|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
