| paris 2.2 settings [message #87843] |
Mon, 09 July 2007 23:58  |
jp
Messages: 65
Registered: June 2005
|
Member |
|
|
aeqvWKFwE1KVIEaxY
sWPHzDrpoAAINg4AOjhUY2HJEz42aggIIuDQGQ5nsJFYsCBBmiU3VOyZsgQC
ACA6WCQ+EEXJEhk1mmBQssKEiRsGA9fIwIThQ2QdZlyzpuOFBxuQSChQwEHB
iBVhsmQ5AAXCSijPOiwgsBpAkR04GlwhskVDGx0usLGBsCBG/yTCRWrIOLOU
qSYXAlw45STlEyhVU1dZvbLqKqqvBWTFHyWf61evujSUKdMgwQCyaCEzDDJo
mQVNAjPIwEEdvnhzQgoj5JBDA3v1BcdfZ/gQQQ612bAABDjsIeIKS3wwgQ0p
rBBFFmEo0YUfQNxRQw88PGDCBQ9cQEA2QFhBVmknWIBMAhMoiE0OEuyQnQw7
1ABZAm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: paris 2.2 settings [message #87874 is a reply to message #87843] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 11:30  |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
subject of
>> conversation at the moment - I have a few pieces of high-end
>> or "boutique" equipment that I think are worth every penny
>> I paid for them (Chandler TG-2, Soundelux E251-C come to mind)
>> while there are others that are great, but you have to
>> wonder "do they REALLY need to charge that much for that?"
>> I think vintage gear is in another category... that's driven
>> strictly by availability, as, if you're looking to buy a 1073,
>> for example, there are only so many for sale at any given time.
>> Try making an offer of a grand to anyone selling one of those &
>> see if anyone takes you up on it. Unlikely; therefore the market
>> demand is what drives those prices.
>>
>>> In the end , the ears have it.. I can truly state that any
>>> when it comes to summing, almost all analog mixers will sound
>>> better than ITB.. And , a Mackie can get the job done.. Just
>>> like my Soundcraft Ghost get's it done for me..
>>
>> See, but that's your opinion... just because you make a
>> statement like: "I can truly state" or "end of story" (as you
>> did in another recent thread) doesn't mean it's the end of the
>> story for everyone, it just means it's the end of the story for
>> you. I've done enough summing experiments (not too long ago &
>> posted several results & examples here, in fact, as I'm sure
>> you recall) to where I'm convinced that a.) you can indeed hear
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: paris 2.2 settings [message #87883 is a reply to message #87874] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 15:47 |
jp
Messages: 65
Registered: June 2005
|
Member |
|
|
gt;>>Neil<BR>> <BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_00E7_01C7E8B9.7382BC50--Nope, I hear he sold out to The Man and it isn't worth his time anymore. That
said, probably 95% of what's in that books hasn't changed. either because
SX hasn't changed that much or 'cause he's so damn smart he knew the right
stuff to cover.
TCB
Chris Ludwig <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Did that certain somebody do an updated one for version 4?
>;)
>
>Chris
>
>
>TCB wrote:
>> I think I remember someone here writing a book about SX. Who was that
again?
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> "Rich " <studiodog_99@xxxyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Neil - your really into Cubase - is there a good book you would recomend
>> for
>>> reference etc.
>>> I'm still using Paris but have a RME 9636 Card that I use with Cubase
SX3
>>> but have not been confortable enough with the app to use it over Paris...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Neil" <OIOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>>> "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
&
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
