Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » There's a new preamp in town
| There's a new preamp in town [message #63805] |
Wed, 25 January 2006 22:47  |
![Deej [1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [1] is currently offline")
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
and companies in my neck on the woods ( Motown)
> GM, Ford Chrysler who have for decades provided Top Tier health care for
> it's employees and retires. No deductibles, no co pays..Nada ..But the Big
> 3's generosity has been the exception and not the rule of "So-Caled"
Fortune
> 500 companies. Who have for years demanded that employees "payout" big
sums
> of their income to (Aka: Pay for)pay for healthcare. So, with the Big-3
coming
> out stating that it can no longer provide Top Tier Health care any longer,
> they are not just "Blowing-Smoke". They are speaking the truth!!..
>
> So, what do we do. Do we continue to play the "rich" Republican game of
> stuffing the pockets of Big Bussinees insurance companies?
Who,btw(heathinsureance
> companies)swear that they are being fleeced by both the Pharacuticals and
> the Hospitals. Thy, the health insurance industry for years have been
victims
> of massive fraud from both small local clinics all the way to your largest
> hospitals. Pharmacuticals compnies charge hositals 5 times the amount for
> a single pill!! Who then pass that cost of a single pill to you and I.
> It's maddness of epic porportions. It's got to end.
> Most americans are only all castastrophe away from wiping out a families
> assett's.
>
> Yes, my southeren neighbor Canada had a rough start with it's National
Heathcare
> system as well as Euroup, but both have never "Re-tracked" the systems and
> both have smoothed out. Is it perfect? No, but is better than the mess we
> have now??
>
> So, I wish poor working stiffs stop championing the "Rich" societies
causes.
> Who's anti heath care rhectoric has been: 'Do you want your goverment"
involved
> with healthcare?" Then chuckle(no no)..
> In case you missed it, the so-calld middle class is shrinking daily,a nd
> the divide btw rich and others(poor) is the wideset it's ever been in the
> history of our nation. We are being "FLEECED" for the Rich and their
coffers.
> Gas prices, home heating, electricity. All time highs. Even more, the rich
> do'nt care.
>
> There was a time in America where by if you were rich and owned a company
> or corporation you felt and obligation to the common working man and
woman.
> Now, you got boards in New-York calling the shots. Who'
|
|
|
|
| Re: There's a new preamp in town [message #63806 is a reply to message #63805] |
Thu, 26 January 2006 00:25  |
gene lennon
Messages: 565
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
s only mission is
> to "Return To Share Holder Value". Well, theirs nothing wrong with RTSV.
> It's what free market is all about. it's very American. However, how much
> "Return is Enough"?? At what cost to the working stiffs is this affecting
> their "Quality of Life"?
>
> Greed is alive and kicking in America. Like the Character in "Wall-Street"
> Gordon Geko: Greed is Good.. However, today their is Too-Much Greed.. And
> it's not Good.
> LaMont
>
> "John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
> >
> >A man owned a recording studio in Texas. The Texas Wage & Hour Dept.
claimed
> >he was not paying proper wages to his help. They sent an agent out to
interview
> >& investigate the accusations.
> >Upon arrival at the studio the agents demanded, "We need a list of your
> employees
> >and how much you pay them,"
> >The studio owner replied, "There's my main engineer who's been with me
for
> >3 years. I pay him $800 a week plus benefits."
> >The studio manager has been here for 18 months, "I pay her $500 per week
> >plus benefits".
> >Then there's the half-wit who works here about 18 hours every day and
does
> >about 90% of all the work around here. He makes $10 per week, and I buy
> him
> >a bottle of bourbon every Saturday night."
> >"That's the guy I want to talk to - the half-wit," says the agent.
> >"That would be me," replied the studio owner.
> >
>I've got one of the older IT 1210 model around here. It definitely lowers
the noise floor. I did have one preamp that was setting up some 60Hz racket
and this thing cured it. O yeah, and it only weighs about 60 lbs.
;o)
"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:4404ce94$1@linux...
> If you have a bag full of cash laying around...
>
> http://www.furmansound.com/products/pro/blncd/it-20.php
>
> David.
>
> Cujo wrote:
>
> > Ok, I was working whit a singer last night tryin out my NOS tube,
> > The mic was sounding nice, then I hear a faint hum.
> > Argg, I made sure the body of the mic was tight, and all that.
> > So today I decided to test (The client never even heard the hum)
> > Turns out it is not the mic, but seems to be coming from my compressor
rack.
> > Nothing has changed although it is an old house, but I did have it
grounded
> > last summer.
> > Oh and yeas the power is sort mickey mouse with 6 way surge protectors,
> > I am going to do some trouble shooting, but I am t
|
|
|
|
| Re: There's a new preamp in town [message #63807 is a reply to message #63806] |
Wed, 25 January 2006 23:58 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
hinking about a
conditioner,
> > I ahve heard they don;t do a hell of a lot though.
> > Anyone have any ideas?
> >Ok, I using Sonar 5 as Master on PC 1 just For Midi Sequencer with Gigastudio
with a Echo Layla24/96 and a Midisport8x8
2 Mecs w BNC cables for WC on PC 2 w uno midisport
3 eds cards
WinXP
512 Ram
1 boot drive and 1 audio drive
I Have everthing setup to Sync sonar to paris thru midisport,i enable channels
to record to,
on the transport i enable lock press record then press play on
sonar, everything is sync, i can hear the tracks, the funnie thing is that
its not recording the tracks, now when i undo the lock on the transport of
paris and do everything manualy like press record on paris and play on sonar
it does record the tracks, anybody know anything about this ??FYI, there is a reasonably priced insurance policy called catastrophic health
insurance. This insurance policy covers any cost over 10K. The idea is
that if you were seriously injured or ill and you had a huge hospital bill
it would cover every thing over 10K. Now that the fat cats in Washington
have taken away Chapter 7 bankruptcy from we the people, a huge hospital
bill could wipe your family out. with catastrophic health insurance, you
could recover financially from a 10K hospital bill. Catastrophic health
would be better than no health insurance at all.
James
"LaMont" <jjdpro@amertitech.net> wrote:
>
>That's funny :)
>
>But, the reality is thatbig corporations like Walmart and others are not
>providing heath insurance to it's employees. I'm and independent Consultant,
>and I pay for my familys heath insurance and it's not cheap. It's really
>draining the budget. i really don't know how long we can keep this up. Thank
>God no one in the family has been sick or been in a bad accident.
>
>As well as, I really don't understand people in this country who don't think
>the citizens of this country need a National heath care plan(Aka Free!!)
>
>
>This sick game btw the pharmacuticals and the Heathcare providers and the
>healthinsurance companies who are using "We the people" as pawns for their
>greed and posturing. This can't go on any longer. Too many hard-working
well
>meaning Americans are suffering without healthcare coverage.
>
>On one hand I can understand companies in my neck on the woods ( Motown)
>GM, Ford Chrysler who have for decades provided Top Tier health care for
>it's employees and retires. No deductibles, no co pays..Nada ..But the Big
>3's generosity has been the exception and not the rule of "So-Caled" Fortune
>500 companies. Who have for years demanded that employees "payout" big sums
>of their income to (Aka: Pay for)pay for healthcare. So, with the Big-3
coming
>out stating that it can no longer provide Top Tier Health care any longer,
>they are not just "Blowing-Smoke". They are speaking the truth!!..
>
>So, what do we do. Do we continue to play the "rich" Republican game of
>stuffing the pockets of Big Bussinees insurance companies? Who,btw(heathinsureance
>companies)swear that they are being fleeced by both the Pharacuticals and
>the Hospitals. Thy, the health insurance industry for years have been victims
>of massive fraud from both small local clinics all the way to your largest
>hospitals. Pharmacuticals compnies charge hositals 5 times the amount for
>a single pill!! Who then pass that cost of a single pill to you and
|
|
|
|
| Re: There's a new preamp in town [message #63819 is a reply to message #63805] |
Thu, 26 January 2006 07:21 |
jef knight[1]
Messages: 201
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I Have everthing setup to Sync sonar to paris thru midisport,i enable
>> channels
>> to record to,
>> on the transport i enable lock press record then press play on
>> sonar, everything is sync, i can hear the tracks, the funnie thing is
>> that
>> its not recording the tracks, now when i undo the lock on the transport
>> of
>> paris and do everything manualy like press record on paris and play on
>> sonar
>> it does record the tracks, anybody know anything about this ??
>
>In this thread some of you have wished we had "free" health care like other
nations. You do realize there is no such thing as free health care? You
would pay for it in your taxes, and remember this: Anything the government
gives you costs twice as much and works 1/2 as well as if you bought it from
another plain old citizen. I don't want national health coverage - I want
quality health care availability.
The other thing to remember is that if you are like me and almost never get
sick, you will be paying etra for the people who get sick alot.
Bill
"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
news:C02D05D4.1834%dterry@keyofd.net...
> So true. If nothing else, we've cornered the market for greed.
>
> We're self-employed to, and have either paid more than we could afford,
> had
> less coverage than we could afford should something happen, or gone
> without
> for most of the past ten years. I pray everyday nothing happens or we'll
> be
> done in a heartbeat.
>
> I guess that's the new American reality - living one step away from
> financial catastrophe. Corporations have forgotten who they serve -
> people
> - and so has much of our country. Pharmaceutical companies aren't
> struggling, oil companies post record profits even when a hurricane hits a
> home run in their backyard (that's what I call serious insurance),
> "reality"
> TV is booming, and more people have to give up health care and go into
> debt.
> Webster doesn't need to define the word irony any more.
>
> The American dream may eventually become an American tragedy.
>
> Regards,
> Dedric
>
> On 3/2/06 10:18 AM, in article 44071ae9$1@linux, "LaMont"
> <jjdpro@amertitech.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> That's funny :)
>>
>> But, the reality is thatbig corporations like Walmart and others are not
>> providing heath insurance to it's employees. I'm and independent
>> Consultant,
>> and I pay for my familys heath insurance and it's not cheap. It's really
>> draining the budget. i really don't know how long we can keep this up.
>> Thank
>> God no one in the family has been sick or been in a bad accident.
>>
>> As well as, I really don't understand people in this country w
|
|
|
|
| Re: There's a new preamp in town [message #63820 is a reply to message #63819] |
Thu, 26 January 2006 08:50 |
erlilo
Messages: 405
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ho don't
>> think
>> the citizens of this country need a National heath care plan(Aka Free!!)
>>
>>
>> This sick game btw the pharmacuticals and the Heathcare providers and the
>> healthinsurance companies who are using "We the people" as pawns for
>> their
>> greed and posturing. This can't go on any longer. Too many hard-working
>> well
>> meaning Americans are suffering without healthcare coverage.
>>
>> On one hand I can understand companies in my neck on the woods ( Motown)
>> GM, Ford Chrysler who have for decades provided Top Tier health care for
>> it's employees and retires. No deductibles, no co pays..Nada ..But the
>> Big
>> 3's generosity has been the exception and not the rule of "So-Caled"
>> Fortune
>> 500 companies. Who have for years demanded that employees "payout" big
>> sums
>> of their income to (Aka: Pay for)pay for healthcare. So, with the Big-3
>> coming
>> out stating that it can no longer provide Top Tier Health care any
>> longer,
>> they are not just "Blowing-Smoke". They are speaking the truth!!..
>>
>> So, what do we do. Do we continue to play the "rich" Republican game of
>> stuffing the pockets of Big Bussinees insurance companies?
>> Who,btw(heathinsureance
>> companies)swear that they are being fleeced by both the Pharacuticals and
>> the Hospitals. Thy, the health insurance industry for years have been
>> victims
>> of massive fraud from both small local clinics all the way to your
>> largest
>> hospitals. Pharmacuticals compnies charge hositals 5 times the amount for
>> a single pill!! Who then pass that cost of a single pill to you and I.
>> It's maddness of epic porportions. It's got to end.
>> Most americans are only all castastrophe away from wiping out a families
>> assett's.
>>
>> Yes, my southeren neighbor Canada had a rough start with it's National
>> Heathcare
>> system as well as Euroup, but both have never "Re-tracked" the systems
>> and
>> both have smoothed out. Is it perfect? No, but is better than the mess we
>> have now??
>>
>> So, I wish poor working stiffs stop championing the "Rich" societies
>> causes.
>> Who's anti heath care rhectoric has been: 'Do you want your goverment"
>> involved
>> with healthcare?" Then chuckle(no no)..
>> In case you missed it, the so-calld middle class is shrinking daily,a nd
>> the divide btw rich and others(poor) is the wideset it's ever been in the
>> history of our nation. We are being "FLEECED" for the Rich and their
>> coffers.
>> Gas prices, home heating, electricity. All time highs. Even more, the
>> rich
>> do'nt care.
>>
>> There was a time in America where by if you were rich and owned a company
>> or corporation you felt and obligation to the common working man and
>> woman.
>> Now, you got boards in New-York calling the shots. Who's only mission is
>> to "Return To Share Holder Value". Well, theirs nothing wrong with RTSV.
>> It's what free market is all about. it's very American. However, how much
>> "Return is Enough"?? At what cost to the working stiffs is this
>> affecting
>> their "Quality of Life"?
>>
>> Greed is alive and kicking in America. Like the Character in
>> "Wall-Street"
>> Gordon Geko: Greed is Good.. However, today their is Too-Much Greed.. And
>> it's not Good.
>> LaMont
>>
>> "John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> A man owned a recording studio in Texas. The Texas Wage & Hour Dept.
>>> claimed
>>> he was not paying proper wages to his help. They sent an agent out to
>>> interview
>>> & investigate the accusations.
>>> Upon arrival at the studio the agents demanded, "We need a list of your
>> employees
>>> and how much you pay them,"
>>> The studio owner rep
|
|
|
|
| Re: There's a new preamp in town [message #63823 is a reply to message #63819] |
Thu, 26 January 2006 09:37 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
care?" Then chuckle(no no)..
>> In case you missed it, the so-calld middle class is shrinking daily,a
nd
>> the divide btw rich and others(poor) is the wideset it's ever been in
the
>> history of our nation. We are being "FLEECED" for the Rich and their
coffers.
>> Gas prices, home heating, electricity. All time highs. Even more, the
rich
>> do'nt care.
>>
>> There was a time in America where by if you were rich and owned a company
>> or corporation you felt and obligation to the common working man and woman.
>> Now, you got boards in New-York calling the shots. Who's only mission
is
>> to "Return To Share Holder Value". Well, theirs nothing wrong with RTSV.
>> It's what free market is all about. it's very American. However, how much
>> "Return is Enough"?? At what cost to the working stiffs is this affecting
>> their "Quality of Life"?
>>
>> Greed is alive and kicking in America. Like the Character in "Wall-Street"
>> Gordon Geko: Greed is Good.. However, today their is Too-Much Greed..
And
>> it's not Good.
>> LaMont
>>
>> "John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> A man owned a recording studio in Texas. The Texas Wage & Hour Dept.
claimed
>>> he was not paying proper wages to his help. They sent an agent out to
>>> interview
>>> & investigate the accusations.
>>> Upon arrival at the studio the agents demanded, "We need a list of your
>> employees
>>> and how much you pay them,"
>>> The studio owner replied, "There's my main engineer who's been with me
for
>>> 3 years. I pay him $800 a week plus benefits."
>>> The studio manager has been here for 18 months, "I pay her $500 per week
>>> plus benefits".
>>> Then there's the half-wit who works here about 18 hours every day and
does
>>> about 90% of all the work around here. He makes $10 per week, and I buy
>> him
>>> a bottle of bourbon every Saturday night."
>>> "That's the guy I want to talk to - the half-wit," says the agent.
>>> "That would be me," replied the studio owner…
>>>
>>
>Oh, yes, the other guitar man in my group had one for a while which was stolen.
My impressons though were not all that great, I was very "Hi Fi" and clear
and rich, but I'd take a vintage Reverbarocket any day. No I have a Laney
VC50 and VC 30 which I like much better. I alway felt the mesa lacked identity
or soemthing. Also, although it was clean and rich, it alway had a tube rattle
rasp at the end of notes, we had it worked on, and re tubed, but this did
not go away. take all this in stride though, as I am fairly peculiar in my
tastes and this may have been a funky unit. I will say it was almost "Generic"
in a very slick way.
"Jeremy Luzier" <j.luzier@comcast.net> wrote:
>a Mesa Boogie Tremoverb 2 x 12 combo amp.
>
>What were your thoughts impressions??
>
>A little research shows that this is versatile, well-loved amp (even among
>owners of a wide range of styles).
>
>p.s. i hope no-one minds such an off topic post.
>
>Bill, that's the kind of thinking that billionar prpoganda they spew out to
convince us that free health care would be abad idea.
You are right, it not free,but rather, it's our money This is still our nation..
They(the Gov)work for us. Not, we work for them. You can forget aboutt 'affordable'
& quality. Do you really think that doctors will perform thier best when
they too are beeing "fleeced"??
To me and others, the word free is a play on words. How can it be labled
free , when we 've already paid for it.???
"Bill Lorentzen" <bill@lorentzen.ws> wrote:
>In this thread some of you have wished we had "free" health care like other
>nations. You do realize there is no such thing as free health care? You
>would pay for it in your taxes, and remember this: Anything the government
>gives you costs twice as much and works 1/2 as well as if you bought it
from
>another plain old citizen. I don't want national health coverage - I
|
|
|
|
| Re: There's a new preamp in town [message #63838 is a reply to message #63820] |
Thu, 26 January 2006 13:53 |
jef knight[1]
Messages: 201
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Licensing agreement (Campus Agreement, School Agreement,
> Academic Open, Academic Select), does that mean it is licensed
> for a full Microsoft® operating system (OS), such as Windows?*
>
> ANSWER: No. Microsoft Volume Licensing only licenses a school or
> institution for an upgrade for Windows, and sometimes for a downgrade
> to an earlier version of Windows. There are only three ways for an
> education institution to obtain a full operating system:
>
> § Acquire the Full-Packaged Product from a retail store.
>
> § Acquire a new PC with an OEM version of the operating system
> preinstalled.
>
> § Acquire an OEM license with additional hardware from your
> system builder.
>
>
>
> 5. *What underlying full operating system license qualifies for
> Windows operating system upgrade licenses offered through
> Microsoft Academic Volume Licensing programs?*
>
> ANSWER. For upgrade eligibility for licenses acquired through Academic
> Open or Academic Select, refer to the current Microsoft Product List
> available at
> http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/resources/default.asp#pro dlist.
>
>
>
> In order to qualify for the Windows OS Upgrades offered through Campus
> Agreement or School Agreement, you or your users must have a valid
> license for a Microsoft Windows operating system on each PC on which
> the software is run.
>
>
>
> 6. *What is the difference between OEM product and Full-Packaged
> Product (FPP)?*
>
> ANSWER. OEM products are intended to be preinstalled on hardware
> before the end user purchases the product. They are "shrink wrapped"
> and do not come in a box like the retail products do. Full-Packaged
> Product (FPP) is boxed with CD(s), manuals, and the EULA and is sold
> in retail stores in individual boxes. The End User License Agreements
> (commonly referred to as "EULAs") for OEM and FPP products are
> slightly different. One main difference is that an OEM operating
> system license (such as the license for Windows) cannot be transferred
> from its original PC to another PC. However, the FPP version of
> Windows may be transferred to another PC as long as the EULA, manual
> and media (such as the backup CD) accompany the transfer to the other
> PC. Also, when a customer purchases an OEM product, the OEM license
> requires the OEM to provide support for the product.
>
>
>
> 7. *How do I know whether I have a genuine OEM license for my
> operating system?*
>
> ANSWER. Microsoft has a website that helps customers determine if
> they have acquired genuine Microsoft products at
> http://www.microsoft.com/howtotell. After reviewing the site, if you
> believe that your Microsoft product may be suspect or counterfeit, you
> should report this suspected piracy in the tool provided on the
> website. Alternatively, you may call 1-800-RULEGIT or e-mail
> piracy@microsoft.com to report any suspected counterfeit or pirated
> software.
>
>
>
> 8. *What do I do if I realize that I do not have a full license for
> Windows, or if I received a donated PC that did not come with an
> operating system license?*
>
> ANSWER. If you do not have a genuine operating system license, you
> can acquire a Full-Packaged Product (FPP) version of the product from
> your local retail store. Or you may purchase an OEM version of an
> operating system from a Microsoft System Builder, subject to the
> requirement that you purchase hardware with that OEM version of the
> product. At that time, you should receive a genuine EULA, Certificate
> of Authenticity (COA), and manual. Visit the Microsoft How to Tell
> website to determine whether you have genuine software and licensing;
> http://www.microsoft.com/piracy/howtotell.
>
>
>
> 9. *Can I transfer my operating system license from an old PC to a
> new one?*
>
> ANSWER. Not unless it was purchased as a Full-Packaged Product from a
> retail store (i.e., Windows in a box). Current OEM licenses for all
> Microsoft operating system products are not transferable from one
> machine to another. The End User License Agreement (EULA) governs the
> terms for transfer of licenses. Some EULAs for copies of certain
> older OEM operating system products (i.e., MS-DOS®, Windows® 3.1, and
> Windows for Workgroups 3.1) distributed in 1995 or earlier
|
|
|
|
| Re: There's a new preamp in town [message #63840 is a reply to message #63823] |
Thu, 26 January 2006 13:55 |
jef knight[1]
Messages: 201
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
>
> 11. *Rather than purchase completely new PCs, my organization
> performs in-place upgrades to the hardware on many of our
> computers. We often times only replace the motherboard,
> processor, and memory. Since the COA is still on the case and
> the OS is still installed on the hard drive, this computer is
> still licensed, right?*
>
> ANSWER. Generally, you may upgrade or replace all of the hardware
> components on your computer and maintain the license for the original
> Microsoft OEM operating system software, with the exception of an
> upgrade or replacement of the motherboard. An upgrade of the
> motherboard is considered to result in a "new personal computer."
> Microsoft OEM operating system software cannot be transferred from one
> computer to another. Therefore, if the motherboard is upgraded or
> replaced for reasons other than a defect then a new computer has been
> created, the original license expires, and a new full operating system
> license (not upgrade) is required. This is true even if the computer
> is covered under Software Assurance or other Volume License programs.
>
>
>
> 12. *If I upgrade some of my PC components, do I have to purchase
> a new operating system?*
>
> ANSWER. The answer depends on the components that are upgraded or
> changed in the PC. The operating system licenses must remain with the
> device that retains the motherboard, chipsets, and chassis that
> include the serial number of the device. The operating system may be
> installed on a new/replacement hard drive as long as the operating
> system is first removed from the old hard drive.
>
>
>
> Please refer to the section on "Modifications to hardware and how they
> affect the activation status of Windows XP" in the following link for
> a more detailed explanation regarding specific hardware changes. The
> same hardware component changes that can be made to a PC before
> requiring re-activation of Windows XP are the same changes that can be
> made before a PC is considered to be "new" - and when a new license
> for OEM software is required.
>
>
>
> http://microsoft.com/piracy/basics/activation/windowsproduct activationtechnicalmarketbulletin.doc
>
>
>
> 13. *Am I allowed to "downgrade" with my OEM operating system
> license?*
>
> ANSWER: OEM Operating system licenses (with the exception of Windows
> XP Professional) do not include downgrade rights.
>
>
>
> The Windows XP EULA grants you a "downgrade" right, that is the right
> to install and run a previous version of Microsoft Windows. However,
> under the terms of the EULA, the Windows XP EULA remains applicable.
> In order to downgrade, it is necessary for you to accept the terms of
> the Windows XP EULA by going through the initial start-up process and
> accepting the Windows XP license. Thereafter, you (or the OEM, on your
> behalf if authorized) may delete Windows XP from the computer and
> install a prior version of Microsoft Windows. You user may not
> install a prior version unless your have deleted Windows XP from the
> computer system. The EULA specifically provides that neither the OEM
> nor Microsoft will provide support for the downgraded version or
> supply the media from which you will copy the downgraded version. You
> (or the OEM on your behalf) may use the media from any genuine
> Microsoft software for which it is legally licensed to install the
> downgrade software, for example: Select, Open, Retail (FPP) or system
> builder (E2E) media. (Note that the installation of a prior version
> of Microsoft Windows using media supplied in connection with another
> legally licensed computer does not affect the license status of such
> other computer (i.e. You do not have to delete the earlier version
> from the other PCs) - Microsoft is simply authorizing you to use this
> media to accomplish the downgrade on the new computer system.) You
> retain the right to reinstall Windows XP at any time, provided you
> also delete the prior version.
>
>
>
> Windows XP Professional is the only MICROSOFT OEM software product
> which grants such a downgrade right.
>
>
>
> 14. *Can I transfer my upgrade (VUP [Version Upgrade], CUP
> [Competitive Upgrade], PUP [Product Upgrade], UA [Upgrade
> Advantage], SA [Software Assurance]) operating system licenses
> from an old PC to a new one?*
>
> Example. A customer had an older machine that came pre-installed with
> MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 and the customer then acquired a Windows 98
> upgrade license via the Academic Select Program. If the customer
> decided to donate the machine to a charity, could he or she remove
> Windows 98 from that machine and then transfer the Windows 98 upgrade
> license to a different machine within their organization?
>
> ANSWER. No. Under Academic Select and Academic Open, operating
> system upgrade licenses are tied to the machines on which they are
> first installed. If a customer acquires an upgrade license via one of
> those programs and then installs that upgrade on a given machine, the
> upgrade license is then tied to that machine and may not be
> transferred to another machine, regardless of whether or not the
> upgraded software is removed from the original machine. Upgrades are
> simply product upgrades to the original license. They do not
> constitute new licenses in themselves.
>
>
>
> 15. *Do the same OEM licensing terms apply to server products as
> they do to desktop operating system pr
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 13 01:56:20 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02045 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
