The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Debunking audiophile voodoo
Debunking audiophile voodoo [message #73881] Wed, 11 October 2006 20:17 Go to next message
animix is currently offline  animix   UNITED STATES
Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
> >>I think it can be done for that price point - I mean look at
>>various units like the EMu 1812, the TC unit I just linked to
>
Re: Debunking audiophile voodoo [message #73885 is a reply to message #73881] Wed, 11 October 2006 21:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dc[3] is currently offline  dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
blank">hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:453d9ba4$1@linux...
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Chuck,
> >> >>
> >> >> There was talk some time ago (oh how the years wander on...) of
> > somebody
> >> >> making an EDS chip emulator, which would then allow various
> >> >> possibilities,
> >> >> which one would assume would include:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1) a "Virtual" EDS card driver which emulates all the functionality
of
> > an
> >> >> EDS card down to the last bit, and hence plugs right into Paris
> > allowing
>
Re: Debunking audiophile voodoo [message #73892 is a reply to message #73885] Thu, 12 October 2006 05:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
"Kris" . is currently offline  "Kris" .
Messages: 27
Registered: June 2006
Junior Member
gt; going
>> >> >> through the card itself.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This would sure sort out the issues if anybody with enough knowhow
> and
>> >> > dedication
>> >> >> got on board. Suddenly any app could have the Paris mix bus, not to
>> >> > mention
>> >> >> the paris EQ... that would pretty much put an end to all this
>> >> >> shennigans
>> >> >> i would think.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> Kim.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >DJ,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Listen I know you love messing with this stuff, but I think we
>> >> >> >need
>> >> >> >to
>> >> > focus
>> >> >> >on how to get the mixes we want out of an all native system.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >It just doesn't make any sense to me to get onboard with another
>> > weird,
>> >> >> proprietary
>> >> >> >dsp system. Creamware is as weird, oddball nad proprietary as it
>> > gets.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Why bother with it? Why bother with UAD or anything else. It
>> >> >> >just
>> >> > doesn't
>> >> >> >make sense to me.
>> >> >> >
>> >> &g
Re: Debunking audiophile voodoo [message #73899 is a reply to message #73892] Thu, 12 October 2006 08:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dc[3] is currently offline  dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
they could sell off all their inventory
>of
>>Paris hardware.
>>
>>I find it kind of funny that Malcolm Toft joined Ted Fletchers company
after
>>that and EMU OEMed their mic pres for the new EMU hardware. I want to
think
>>I made that connection.
>>
>>If you really want this product, you can make it happen by calling manufactures
>>and telling them what you want, just pick wisely! If you get enough people
>>to call over time things will happen. The price is another story.
>>
>>Many years ago, I told the drum hardware designer at Alesis, that I wanted
>>a drum module with dry drum sounds so I could effect them the way I wanted
>>in the studio. I also told them that I wanted a built in effect processor
>>for live use and studio work. I also wanted more triggers, more outputs,
>>headphone output with volume knob, and a audio in put so I could practice
>>to music. To my surprise, they built it in the DM PRO drum module.
>>
>>I made many suggestions to Greg Mackie that became products. Only problem
>>was, the ideas were bastardize, sliced and diced in to multiple products
>>and they charged three to four times more than I suggested for each product.
>> These companies want to slice and dice every thing and make big bucks.
>
>>If you want it all it's an expensive add on. I've talked to many of them
>>as a dealer, they think they can make more money selling little recording
>>boxes to bedroom guitar players or DJs. They think and their marketing
>data
>>shows that they can make more money selling the little boxes than big DAWs.
>>
>>
>>The attitude is, if you want to play in the big time, you'll go with PT,
>>SX, or Nuendo with third party hardware. Nobody really wants to go up
against
>>PT because it's already established in the market.
>>
>>The other issue is hardware becoming obsolete too quickly. Building DSPs
>>in to a system is a bit of a risk. They think native systems are good
enough,
>>and that is what most people want, and if they need more, like systems
with
>>DSPs, that PT already fills that Pro end of the market.
>>
>>However if enough people talk to these companies, something will happen.
>>
>>That's my 0.02
>>
>>James
>>
>>"Neil" <OIUOIU@.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Been researching this one a bit...
>>>
>>>http://www.tcelectronic.com/Default.asp?Id=7618
>>>
>>>Seems pretty good, has onboard DSP, taking a load off your
>>>CPU... has a nice monitoring interface - simpler than TotalMix,
>>>coupla mic inputs & DI's, as well, BUT... only has 4 balanced
>>>analog i/o's... so you gotta buy 4 of 'em to do 16 channels
>>>pure. ALSO... no BNC/word clock... WTF? Trying to get
>>>prorietary on us with a unit like THIS!!!??? We have to ONLY
>>>use these together with each other? Can't sync anything-digital-
>>>else???
>>>
>>>Handy, nice for "semiprosumer" applications, but another
>>>opportunity to really go after the pro market wasted, IMO -
>>>they have the technology, they have the tinker toy set, they
>>>just didn't "go pro" with it... Paris didn't either at the
>>>time, and neither did Emu with their 1812/1212, etc - although
>>>the onboard DSP & good convertors plus a few other features
>>>coulda got them there. Is everyone afraid of alsihad? Is that
>>>it? Is that why all things like this come out as small-time
>>>entrants targeted at price points in the home recording level
>>>only?
>>>
>>>As the subject line says: Close, but no cigar.
>>>
>>>Here's the thing... Yeah there are other options like MADI
>>>units that can get you 1,569,878,760,000 channels of i/o, but
>>>who needs that much, and then you also need a half dozen
>>>lightpipe interfaces, and stringing all that shit together &
>>>making it hum is mickey-mouse, too, IMO.
>>>
>>>Someone needs to developthe following:
>>>
>>>***A superb convertor box with 16 channels in & out, throw in a
>>>couple of d.i./mic pres & lightpipe/SPDIF ports if you want,
>>>but really what the world needs is more single-box 16 channel
>>>interfaces.. with 16 channels of pure analog i/o. Don't be
>>>afraid of going a full rack space long & 2 rack spaces deep,
>>>fer pete's sakes! Not everything has to be a single-space
>>>and/or a half-racker!
>>>*** It should have on-board DSP effects - like the TC unit or
>>>the new/soon to be discontinued EMU stuff, for example.
>>>price as sucky ones - yes, you can.
>>>*** It should have an ASIO driver that can allow for up to 16
>>>channels/submixes of passive analog summing (or if not that, at
>>>least DSP summing through something other than the PC's CPU)
>>>your box & return to 2 new channels in the DAW app - if you can
>>>do onboard DSP EFX, you can do onboard summing, too, yes sir
>>>you KNOW you can!
>>>***Throw in a copy of CubaseLE if you wanna... no need for a
>>>complete/full-out app like SX or Nuendo - people can indeed buy
>>>that separately if they want.
>>>*** MIDI i/o... duh.
>>>***Absolutely make it expandable to be able to easily link 2
>>>or mo
Re: Debunking audiophile voodoo [message #73910 is a reply to message #73899] Thu, 12 October 2006 10:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
&quot;Kris&quot; . is currently offline  &quot;Kris&quot; .
Messages: 27
Registered: June 2006
Junior Member
ecoming obsolete too quickly. Building DSPs
>>>in to a system is a bit of a risk. They think native systems are good
>enough,
>>>and that is what most people want, and if they need more, like systems
>with
>>>DSPs, that PT already fills that Pro end of the market.
>>>
>>>However if enough people talk to these companies, something will happen.
>>>
>>>That's my 0.02
>>>
>>>James
>>>
>>>"Neil" <OIUOIU@.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Been researching this one a bit...
>>>>
>>>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Debunking audiophile voodoo [message #73941 is a reply to message #73910] Thu, 12 October 2006 17:50 Go to previous message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
dDzlvh6LEfJCSDc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Previous Topic: Is this wrong?
Next Topic: 93% off Akai Quad Comp Compressor/Expander VST Plug-In???
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 31 04:19:23 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03552 seconds