Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Tremolo - TremKing Vibrato System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Tremolo - TremKing Vibrato System [message #95484 is a reply to message #95479] |
Sun, 03 February 2008 17:12   |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
printed on the front page. Registration is automatic (ie open to
> any
>>>> PARIS user, past or present, no matter how casual a user) and takes all
>>> of
>>>> about thirty seconds.
>>>>
>>>> A further note on registration - it's open for all. The technology
> exists
>>> to
>>>> take it private, to require admin approval for who registers, etc etc;
> it
>>>> can be made very secure. However I'd like to start by assuming "if I
> need
>>> to
>>>> secure it, I'll secure it, but until then, welcome one and all!". So
>>>> registration is automatic, nobody "approves it".
>>>>
>>>> Plans for this Wiki are fairly ambitious, but I'd hope realistic and
>>>> sustainable. For example - amongst ot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Tremolo - TremKing Vibrato System [message #95492 is a reply to message #95488] |
Sun, 03 February 2008 22:11   |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
back again, and at a time when
I can be present and check their work.
That said, the group, for me at least, usually works, which is, err, better
than usually not working. ;o)
Cheers,
Kim.> It MIGHT be the cable from the street to the house, but who knows
If it's a cable, test it with standard CAT test equipment like a Fluke
MicroScanner.
If it's fiber, make them test it for dB loss or hit it with an OTDR. Or use
a 4.9mW red laser to look for leaks/bends/fractures/reflection issues...
Do you know perhaps, IF it's fiber, is the fiber running single or
multimode? (FYI, single is faster, more sensitive)
Tell you a funny story about the local cable company. I moved a few years
ago, twice (not recommended). While in my interim place, I decided to go
ahead and get cable modem internet. 5 mb, sweet cool. So, I get all these
wierd intermittent issues that the LC company can't seem to see. I finally
get pissed off enough after weeks of this unable to connect or stay
connected to throw the modem in the back seat of my car and drive down to
their office. For giggle, I decided to hound them on the phone while I'm on
the highway. I ask them to check my connection. *no, sir we see your modem
just fine*. Asked him to repeat that. Asked again. I explained the modem was
in my backseat of my car going about 70 MPH with me, would he like to
rephrase that answer. I gave them a real hard time about that, complete with
"must be a new kind of wireless modem, right" sorta of grief. What I think
they did is typo my MAC address, and all this time they'd been looking at
somebody else's gear, swearing and promising it was me it was my gear and I
didn't know what I was doing. Many toes were tasted by them that day.
AA
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4806e28f$1@linux...
>
>
> So...
>
> The Telco says it's not their problem. I say it's not mine.
>
> It MIGHT be the cable from the street to the house, but who knows.
>
> Suffice to say I'm going to have to get them back again, and at a time
> when
> I can be
|
|
|
|
| Re: Tremolo - TremKing Vibrato System [message #95494 is a reply to message #95492] |
Sun, 03 February 2008 23:58   |
Aaron Allen
 Messages: 1988 Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
able modem internet. 5 mb, sweet cool. So, I get all these
>wierd intermittent issues that the LC company can't seem to see. I finally
>get pissed off enough after weeks of this unable to connect or stay
>connected to throw the modem in the back seat of my car and drive down to
>their office. For giggle, I decided to hound them on the phone while I'm
on
>the highway. I ask them to check my connection. *no, sir we see your modem
>just fine*. Asked him to repeat that. Asked again. I explained the modem
was
>in my backseat of my car going about 70 MPH with me, would he like to
>rephrase that answer. I gave them a real hard time about that, complete
with
>"must be a new kind of wireless modem, right" sorta of grief. What I think
>they did is typo my MAC address, and all this time they'd been looking at
>somebody else's gear, swearing and promising it was me it was my gear and
I
>didn't know what I was doing. Many toes were tasted by them that day.
>
>AA
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4806e28f$1@linux...
>>
>>
>> So...
>>
>> The Telco says it's not their problem. I say it's not mine.
>>
>> It MIGHT be the cable from the street to the house, but who knows.
>>
>> Suffice to say I'm going to have to get them back again, and at a time
>> when
>> I can be present and check their work.
>>
>> That said, the group, for me at least, usually works, which is, err,
>> better
>> than usually not working. ;o)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
>
>Now *that* is certainly a great idea. A PARIS hardware database would be
insanely cool, and is much needed. I recently tried to search through the
newsgroup for mobo information and it's pretty daunting to pull data out;
newsgroups aren't ideal formats for data storage/retrieval.
Problem for me is - I'm not a PC guy. I haven't followed the debate on
mobos/drivers/BIOS/video card - I don't even know what the relevant pieces
of info are, what kind of data fields we want... This is all stuff I'd be
asking here in a month's time myself. So I'd have to rely on someone else to
create an Excel database - to figure out what it needs to look like - and to
start collecting that info up into one spreadsheet.
But someone more knowledgeable than I wants to create it as a spreadsheet,
and if we get a few machines in the database to start with, I could serve it
here, and I've already started researching what kind of graphic front-end I
might be able to build for it.
Maybe we should give this idea its own thread, see if other PC gurus might
want to get on board?
- K
On 4/16/08 9:54 PM, in article 4806e0a9$1@linux, "Aaron Allen"
<know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>> PPS: If you think of other types of PARIS-related files it might be handy
>> to
>> create upload/download functionality for on the Wiki - PARIS wallpaper,
>> skins, track sheet
|
|
|
|
| Re: Tremolo - TremKing Vibrato System [message #95501 is a reply to message #95494] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 09:39   |
Nei
Messages: 108 Registered: November 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/video card - I don't even know what the relevant pieces
> of info are, what kind of data fields we want... This is all stuff I'd be
> asking here in a month's time myself. So I'd have to rely on someone else
> to
> create an Excel database - to figure out what it needs to look like - and
> to
> start collecting that info up into one spreadsheet.
>
> But someone more knowledgeable than I wants to create it as a spreadsheet,
> and if we get a few machines in the database to start with, I could serve
> it
> here, and I've already started researching what kind of graphic front-end
> I
> might be able to build for it.
>
> Maybe we should give this idea its own thread, see if other PC gurus might
> want to get on board?
>
> - K
>
> On 4/16/08 9:54 PM, in article 4806e0a9$1@linux, "Aaron Allen"
> <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>
>>> PPS: If you think of other types of PARIS-related files it might be
>>> handy
>>> to
>>> create upload/download functionality for on the Wiki - PARIS wallpaper,
>>> skins, track sheets, tables, cheatsheets - I'm happy to entertain
>>> suggestions.
>>
>> Definitely... a question I used to get a lot is "what is your system and
>> what are your system settings?"
>>
>> If you can set up a repository for say, Athlon/Intel /by speed /CPU core
>> type/RAM amount/OS type, etc as a searchable database, this might bail
>> someone outta hot water if they can DL a known good config file for a
>> simliar system. Since it's txt, it should take next to no room on your
>> server, and it would be a great resource for checking syntax (stuff like
>> MidiPlay=Disable) in the config file when troubleshooting gets
>> frustrating.
>>
>> Also, check your email inbox, got something in there for ya.
>> AA
>>
>>
>> "Kerry Galloway" <kg@kerrygalloway.com> wrote in message
>> news:C42C2031.AB60%kg@kerrygalloway.com...
>>> Hey all -
>>>
>>> I'm testing "user file upload/download" functionality on the PARISWiki.
>>> This
>>> is so if you come up with a cool preset you'd like to share, you can
>>> easily
>>> upload a.ppj containing it directly to the server, where it will then
>>> immediately become visible/available to the community as a download.
>>>
>>> The "help needed" here is this: I need to get a handle on how this works
>>> for
>>> people outside my own IP/cookies. I know it works for me, I need to
>>> verify
>>> that I have the proper permissions set so it also works for others.
>>>
>>> So what would be great is if some folks can try uploading a test file
>>> (perfect choice would be to open any text editor, create a blank
>>> document
>>> and save it as TEST.txt) - then try downloading it.
>>>
>>> Ideal would be to test it under the following four conditions:
>>>
>>> 1) Not logged into the Wiki - uploading
>>> 2) Not logged in to the Wiki - downloading
>>> 3) Logged in to the Wiki - uploading
>>> 4) Logged in to the Wiki - downloading
>>>
>>> If you try this out, let me know in this thread what your
>>> success/failure
>>> was like in each condition, and once I have enough info I'll go ahead
>>> and
>>> create something similar for each plugin.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> - Kerry
>>>
>>> PS: no need to upload FX presets quite yet, I want to sort the best
>>> format
>>> options out first so all users regardless of OS or PARIS version can
>>> make
>>> immediate use of the pre
|
|
|
|
| Re: Tremolo - TremKing Vibrato System [message #95524 is a reply to message #95501] |
Mon, 04 February 2008 19:21  |
Aaron Allen
 Messages: 1988 Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
about this stuff join a campaign
>> or run for office.
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>>> Thad, I think he blew the right notes this time. Did you listen?
>>>
>>> TCB wrote:
>>>> Hollywood blowhard.
>>>>
>>>> Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>>>>> http://adage.com/brightcove/single.php?title=1506582278
>>>>>
>>>>> Right on.
>If you're still serious about building an XP box for Paris, I'm still
onboard to help you configure it up, if you run into any snags.
..
AA
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4807ff5e$1@linux...
>
> Vary cool to hear Jamie. And you have the option to add up to a 30"
> monitor
> if you want to expand your desk top. My next Mac may not be a Mac. Apple
> needs a sub $1,000.00 tower.
>
> Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>
>>I'm slowly integrating the new Macbook Pro into the workflow (thanks
>>Chris!). Logic 8 runs great on it. 4GB RAM, 512 graphics RAM, 250GB HD,
>
>>2 firewire and three USB2 ports, expansion port, HiDef LED-lit display
>>and OSX 10.5.
>>
>>Right now I'm using it to animate and edit a 20 minute video project
>>using a variety of 2D and 2D software and FCP. Haven't done any head to
>
>>head tests against the dual G5 yet but it feels a bit faster, and on a
>>quick, non-scientific 3D rendering test it was about 10-15% faster,
>>although the G5 was also running more other stuff at the time.
>>
>>As far as OSX 10.5, pretty cool so far. I'm glad Apple finally got
>>around to supporting multiple desktops, I've been missing that since
>>BeOS...
>>
>>So my preliminary conclusions are that the MBP is a nice laptop, and the
>
>>G5 still does pretty well for an old timer. Nice to have a couple of
>>boxes to divide the work.
>>
>>Next week I'll tackle installing all the Native Instruments stuff onto
>>the MBP.
>>
>>Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>Wash your car and water your lawn real well before you call him.
Hehe, well we're on water restrictions. We're not allowed to do either of
those. ;o)
>Seriously, if it gets expensive I'm sure a collection would probably be
>taken up. Let us know.
I don't think it will be that much. It's more just annoying.
Cheers,
Kim.
>
>AA
>
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4806f710$1@linux...
>>
>>
>> Funny you should say that you know, because when you call the fault line
>> there is an option to test your line before talking to anybody. I selected
>> that and after a few seconds it said "This function is currently
>> unavailable"
>> and I moved on, and yet once I spoke with somebody they offered to test
>> it.
>> Perhaps their tests aren't working?
>>
>> That said, they are not debating that there is a fault.
>>
>> I can ring them back now and hammer them a bit more. I've tested a few
>> pieces
>> of gear and nothing works properly, and the other "tell all" is that I
can
>> kinda tell from the weather and time of day whether it will be working.
If
>> it's midday and sunny and 25C then it's fine, but if it's 6am and raining
>> then it will barely connect. That's usually a cable issue for mine.
>>
>> So I'll just have to call them and get another tech out, preferably this
>> weekend so I can be there. If it's between the house and the street though
>> I have to pay, but I don't think it's stupidly expensive so hey...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
>>
>> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>> It MIGHT be the cable from the street to the house, but who knows
>>>
>>>If it's a cable, test it with standard CAT test equipment like a Fluke
>>>MicroScanner.
>>>
>>>If it's fiber, make them test it for dB loss or hit it with an OTDR. Or
>> use
>>>a 4.9mW red laser to look for leaks/bends/fractures/reflection issues...
>>>
>>>Do you know per
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue May 05 23:34:50 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03022 seconds
|