Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Anyone using FX Teleport here?
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66074 is a reply to message #66067] |
Sun, 02 April 2006 14:41   |
Edna Sloan
Messages: 304
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt; >
>>>
>>>
>>> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>>> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>Hey guys, not to worry.
I understand that she was "baby syncing" and eventually the bump will fade
out live on Saturday Night.
;)
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>I couldn't resist :)
>
>ARGH!! Now that song's been in my head all day!
>
>A friend of mine was telling me how at his work, the elevator makes a "ding
>do
ng" sound when it arrives at your floor, in which apparantly the note drops
>a fifth from the ding to the dong, and it is at just the right pitch to
remind
>him of the start of the song "Feelings, nothing more than..."
>
>Hence he spends most days at his work quietly humming to himself "Feelings,
>nothing more than..."
>
>Now I know how he feels.
>
>"I'm not that innocent!"
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>>
>>http://www.arcamax.com/cgi-bin/news/story/1004/69422/127918
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>>http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>>
>>
>Ooops!
Gee, it must be Friday.
"Mark McDermott" <mark@stateofwail.com> wrote:
>
>Hey guys, not to worry.
>
>I understand that she was "baby syncing" and eventually the bump will fade
>out live on Saturday Night.
>
>;)
>
>"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>Heh, I meant plugs.......
>>AA
>>
>>"D
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66076 is a reply to message #66074] |
Sun, 02 April 2006 15:33 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>>> > Craig
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>>>> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>This looks kind of cool. Tony
www.toontrack.com
Toontrack News
At long last Toontrack Musics all new dfh EZdrummer shipped from the
manufacturer wednesday the 26th of april. It should reach distribution in
all territories some time at the end of next week. This in turn means that
our pre-order customers will receive their EZdrummer boxes in the week after
that. World renowned songwriter/player/producer Jeff Bova had this to say
about EZdrummer
"The missing link for me in multitrack drum libraries has been true world
class recorded drums. Add to that my favorite drum room on the planet --
Studio A at Avatar. No room brings drums to life quite like this legendary
space. EzDrummer combines this with their great new interface and in so
doing brings me back to creating with a new passion and energy."
Jeff Bova - Grammy winning producer/musician (Luther Vandross, Celine Dion,
Meat Loaf, Iron Maiden, Blondie, R. Kelly, Nick Lachey)
We hope that, you, our friends and fellow musicians will feel the same. That
EZdrummer will be a tool to make composing and producing more intuitive and
bring new passion and energy to your creativity.
We would like to take the opportunity to thank the fantastic player and the
producers that has worked on EZ with us, Pat Thrall, Neil Dorfsman and Nir
Z. What they´ve contributed to this product is truly fantastic and brings
the best of the best to every songwriters and producers laptop. Everyone
stand by for more where that came from.
Also, to the Team and the Betatesters for EZ. Once again you´ve surpassed
all our expectations. EZ has been developed in record time and the end
result is really something extraordinary. You make us proud to be able to
work with you.
Finally, many thanks to our great distributors, and retailers all over the
world for working the EZ marketing and sales since it´s unveiling in
January.
Love,
Toontrack CrewThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0060_01C66AD1.87922990
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jef,
I am in the same boat as you. After looking them all over
Kontakt 2 looks/sounds like the best aside from Giga. I'm not
convinced it's not a buggy piece though. I'd like to hear
from someone here who has experience with it.
Tom
"jef knight" <thestudio@allknightmusic.com> wrote in message =
news:44523838$Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66079 is a reply to message #66076] |
Sun, 02 April 2006 16:56 |
Edna Sloan
Messages: 304
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
lt;/FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>from someone here who has experience =
with=20
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"jef knight" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:thestudio@allknightmusic.com">thestudio@allknightmusic.com=
</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
href=3D"news:44523838$1@linux">news:44523838$1@linux</A>...</DIV>Hey =
Dudes and=20
Dudettes...<BR><BR>I've got a project coming up that will neccessarily =
include=20
orchestra <BR>and some other fiddly-bits that my synths won't do =
convincingly.=20
So, <BR>I've gotta get a soft sampler.<BR>Having looked at a few of =
the sample=20
libraries like vienna and kirk <BR>hunter, it seems to me that NI =
Kontakt 2 is=20
the way to go. Now, as some <BR>of you may have guessed, I a big =
steinberg=20
<BR>fan...cubase/nuendo/wavelab/etc.. but having dld'd =
an..ahem..."working=20
<BR>demo"....cough, cough.. of Halion, I wasn't as impressed with it =
as I=20
<BR>thought I'd be. Wasn't happy with the interface and it seemed to =
be=20
<BR>pretty pretty demanding. I already *have* those guys in the =
studio, I=20
<BR>don't need my tools to all passive-aggressive =
too....lol<BR><BR>Before I=20
shell out any actual dough for this cookie, what's you take on <BR>the =
whole=20
thing and, more importantly, on Kontact/Halion pro's'n=20
con's.<BR><BR>cheers<BR><BR>jef</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML >
------=_NextPart_000_0060_01C66AD1.87922990-- http://www.harmony-central.com/Events/WNAMM99/Midiman/DigiPa ch-12x6.html
I have 3 x of these in my rack.
I don't think they make them any more, but they are very versatile and they
come up from time to time on EBay. The optical I/O transfers 8 channel ADAT
with no problem at all.
DJ
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:445237ce$1@linux...
>
> Hi,
> Anyone familiar with whats available in the digital patchbay area ?
> Cheap is the right word ?
> I mostly need it for adat transfer/switching...
> If there are extra spdifs thats a plus.
> Regards,
> DimitriosHere is the direct link:
http://www.savioursofsoul.de/Christian/VST/posihfopit.zip
Regards,
Dedric
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4452464f$1@linux...
>
> Can you post the free version?
>
> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>BTW - this one isn't so great for the mix bus or mastering, at least in
>>analog mode. It isn't linear phase, but minimum phase, so it does affect
>>depth and space adversely. Pretty cool on tracks though.
>>
>>PLParEQ is a more accurate for stereo material (linear phase), but there
>>isn't a free version any longer.
>>
>>On 4/27/06 11:24 AM, in article 4450fdaf$<
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66083 is a reply to message #66079] |
Sun, 02 April 2006 19:29 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
spdifs thats a plus.
>> Regards,
>> Dimitrios
>
>Hi,
I checked yesterday that adat channels 5 & 6 on a ADAT card inside a mec
does not pass audio at all.
Is this a bug or could be a defected adat card ?
But a defected acrd should not pass audio on all channels , right ?
XP here with three mecs and three adat cards.
Regards,
DimitriosI got channels 3-6 out ... I think that is part of the XP/adat card/Aux send
thing ... Have you tried moving it around to a different slot ... I know
that is how we solved some of the same problems we had with aux sends doing
the same thing out of the 8-out analog card ...
Good luck ... let me know what you figure out.
Jan
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:44531b42$1@linux...
>
> Hi,
> I checked yesterday that adat channels 5 & 6 on a ADAT card inside a mec
> does not pass audio at all.
> Is this a bug or could be a defected adat card ?
> But a defected acrd should not pass audio on all channels , right ?
> XP here with three mecs and three adat cards.
> Regards,
> DimitriosHi to all.
After long search and tryouts here is what I USE AND PROPOSE TO all of you
if you wanna take Paris a step forward...
1. You will need mecs with adat cards. I have three mecs each having one
adat card.
2. You will need (in my case I have three) one pulsar card which have in
"adat" option which means 24 adat channels in/out on board.
That card has six Sharcs on board dsp's and works full 32bit INTEGER not
floating...
In my case I have 3 pulsars with a total of 56 adat channels for a more complicated
system.
One used Pulsar card goes for around 450-550 $.
Adat option is hard to find as they mostly sell as classic option (16 adat
channels, spdif, analog in/out)
Anyway I recently found and bought one "adat" Pulsar.
3. You better use a second computer for pulsar that could run your midi sequencer
(cubase ?)too...
Now you connect your adat cards to pulsar card and define your pulsar project
with a tremendous looking and capable patchbay !
Card has 3 midi ins and outs too !!
Pulsar sells with great on board DSP plugins and fantastic sounding synthesizers.
Card sell either with studio pack which has the VINCO a great 1176 simulator
on par with UAD1 plug, a wonderful graphic eq, a PSYQ ( a BBE clone) exciter
and optimaster a must have mastering device !!
Sound is a s pristine as it can get.
The mixers inside Pulsar are said to be clones of Sony Oxford !!
Wonderfdul graphics and endless routing possibilities.
The latencies involved in taking one adat channel from Paris inside Pulsar
is 15 samples bidirectional.
E#ach normal plugin introduces average 2 samples with VINCO around 16 samples
and TRANSIENT DESIGNER (yes this incredible device for Pulsar !!) around
37 samples.
You can have 4 stereo instances of Transient Designer ( you buy that extra)
maximum or 6 mono.
There is also ATTACKER a cut version of Transient and cheaper (99$) which
has no release control only attack ( and what a punch !!)
There are numerous plugins like ditherers, compressors, eq's, modulators,
delays etc you can use in your Patch bay settings.
So the latency involved for a normal digital "bouncing" from Paris to pulsar
(plugin) and back to Paris is under 80 samples.
Now using a great free delay plug (millidelay) I make that the track is exactly
80 samples LATE !!
Means that I have only to0 nudge back 1 in Paris editor !!
Handy right ?
Anyway the normal 17-26 around samples latency normal processing is not much
at all to even think of compensating !
Remeber using a rencomp as DX inside Paris gives you a 64 samples latency
!!
With that latency you can have enormous processing inside Pulsar...
Got the picture.
The system looks like one intergrated system with great possibilities.
Now NEW plugin have been introduced which are guitar amp simulators (best
out there !!!) and the best mastering EQ I have ever laid my hands on it
!!.
Well the mastering eq BX-digital costs a mere 600$ alone but believe me it
is worth it every penny..
What we all dreamed of Paris should be can be realised with this intergration.
Now with sysnthesizers and samplers (Yes Pulsar has samplers !!) Enormous
sounding AKAI clones samplers. They load Akai sound libraries. The synthesizers
have the Moog, Oberheim,DX,Prophet,PPG clones that sound so exceptional you
want believe.
The drawback with synths is that they eat much dsp for voices.
Thus I have bought three cards for a total of 18 dsps for that.
There are also pulsar cards that each has 15 dsps on board !!.
They sell around 800-900 $ used but imagine the power you get.
In another post I will describe exactly my system.
If somebody would want to jump on that train I will galdly provide him all
the help needed.
Regards,
DimitriosI've seen them go for $100.00 to 350.00. Usually $150.00 to $250. I believe
they do 24bit 48K.
James
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>
>Thanks DJ,
>What are they worth used nowadays ?
>Do they pass 24bit audio ?
>Because I see they were made around 1998 so maybe 24bit was not supported
>on ADAT FORM...
>Doesn't this need
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66091 is a reply to message #66087] |
Sun, 02 April 2006 21:23 |
Edna Sloan
Messages: 304
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> > >> >>
> > >> >>I have 3 x of these in my rack.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>I don't think they make them any more, but they are very versatile
> and
> > >> they
> > >> >>come up from time to time on EBay. The optical I/O transfers 8
> channel
> > >> ADAT
> > >> >>with no problem at all.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>DJ
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message
> > >news:445237ce$1@linux...
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Hi,
> > >> >>> Anyone familiar with whats available in the digital patchbay area
> > ?
> > >> >>> Cheap is the right word ?
> > >> >>> I mostly need it for adat transfer/switching...
> > >> >>> If there are extra spdifs thats a plus.
> > >> >>> Regards,
> > >> >>> Dimitrios
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000305000603060706040905
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
ya, me too. Don seem to think it's viable. My take on Giga is that it
take soooo much horsepower to run it that it requires it's own comp.
jef
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> Jef,
> I am in the same boat as you. After looking them all over
> Kontakt 2 looks/sounds like the best aside from Giga. I'm not
> convinced it's not a buggy piece though. I'd like to hear
> from someone here who has experience with it.
> Tom
>
>
>
> "jef knight" <thestudio@allknightmusic.com
> <mailto:thestudio@allknightmusic.com>> wrote in message
> news:44523838$1@linux...
> Hey Dudes and Dudettes...
>
> I've got a project coming up that will neccessarily include orchestra
> and some other fiddly-bits that my synths won't do convincingly. So,
> I've gotta get a soft sampler.
> Having looked at a few of the sample libraries like vienna and kirk
> hunter, it seems to me that NI Kontakt 2 is the way to go. Now, as
> some
> of you may have guessed, I a big steinberg
> fan...cubase/nuendo/wavelab/etc.. but having dld'd
> an..ahem..."working
> demo"....cough, cough.. of Halion, I wasn't as impressed with it as I
> thought I'd be. Wasn't happy with the interface and it seemed to be
> pretty pretty demanding. I already *have* those guys in the studio, I
> don't need my tools to all passive-aggressive too....lol
>
> Before I shell out any actual dough for this cookie, what's you
> take on
> the whole thing and, more importantly, on Kontact/Halion pro's'n
> con's.
>
> cheers
>
> jef
>
--------------000305000603060706040905
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
ya, me too. Don seem to think it's viable. My take on Giga is that it
take soooo much horsepower to run it that it requires it's own comp.<br>
jef<br>
<br>
Tom Bruhl wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid4452607e@linux" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Jef,</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">I am in the same boat as you. After
looking them all over</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Kontakt 2 looks/sounds like the best
aside from Giga. I'm not</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">convinced it's not a buggy piece
though. I'd like to hear</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">from someone here who has experience
with it.</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Tom</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">
<div>"jef knight" <<a href="mailto:thestudio@allknightmusic.com">thestudio@allknightmusic.com</a>>
wrote in message <a href="news:44523838$1@linux">news:44523838$1@linux</a>...</div>
Hey Dudes and Dudettes...<br>
<br>
I've got a project coming up that will neccessarily include orchestra <br>
and some other fiddly-bits that my synths won't do convincingly. So, <br>
I've gotta get a soft sampler.<br>
Having looked at a few of the sample libraries like vienna and kirk <br>
hunter, it seems to me that NI Kontakt 2 is the way to go. Now, as some
<br>
of you may have guessed, I a big steinberg <br>
fan...cubase/nuendo/wavelab/etc.. but having dld'd an..ahem..."working <br>
demo"....cough, cough.. of Halion, I wasn't as impressed with it as I <br>
thought I'd be. Wasn't happy with the interface and it seemed to be <br>
pretty pretty demanding. I already *have* those guys in the studio, I <br>
don't need my tools to all passive-aggressive too....lol<br>
<br>
Before I shell out any actual dough for this cookie, what's you take on
<br>
the whole thing and, more importantly, on Kontact/Halion pro's'n con's.<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
<br>
jef</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------000305000603060706040905--I think Kontakt is great software, lots of options for making your own sounds
or importing other libraries. Lots of 'experimental' sounding filters and
f/x as well and good external f/x integration. Also, very good sounds ship
with it. I'm not sure if it's public knowledge but the sample library is
mostly done by some crazy Germans whose company name rhymes with Bellow Fools.
I have HALion as well and don't use it much.
Two other options to consider. First, VSampler from MAZ so
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66092 is a reply to message #66087] |
Sun, 02 April 2006 21:32 |
Edna Sloan
Messages: 304
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
und
http://www.maz-sound.com/index.php?show=product&id=2
Is a _great_ soft sampler. For under $200 it will do 99% of what most samplists
need and it has _super_ VST effect integration. So if you don't like the
delay in the sampler, stuck your favorite VST delay on it. And how about
a UAD stereo Fairchild where higher velocity lowers the threshold of the
compressor? Squeezes a little more on the loud sections and lets the softer
stuff chime through. Very nice.
Also, for string sounds, while I'm not a huge fan of HALion the HALion strings
module is pretty good and dead easy to program.
TCB
jef knight <thestudio@allknightmusic.com> wrote:
>Hey Dudes and Dudettes...
>
>I've got a project coming up that will neccessarily include orchestra
>and some other fiddly-bits that my synths won't do convincingly. So,
>I've gotta get a soft sampler.
>Having looked at a few of the sample libraries like vienna and kirk
>hunter, it seems to me that NI Kontakt 2 is the way to go. Now, as some
>of you may have guessed, I a big steinberg
>fan...cubase/nuendo/wavelab/etc.. but having dld'd an..ahem..."working
>demo"....cough, cough.. of Halion, I wasn't as impressed with it as I
>thought I'd be. Wasn't happy with the interface and it seemed to be
>pretty pretty demanding. I already *have* those guys in the studio, I
>don't need my tools to all passive-aggressive too....lol
>
>Before I shell out any actual dough for this cookie, what's you take on
>the whole thing and, more importantly, on Kontact/Halion pro's'n con's.
>
>cheers
>
>jefThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C66C89.F5514060
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yeah Jeff and Tom, you definitely need a separate, dedicated computer to =
run Giga properly in my experience.
Rich
"jef knight" <thestudio@allknightmusic.com> wrote in message =
news:4454ee9a$1@linux...
ya, me too. Don seem to think it's viable. My take on Giga is that it =
take soooo much horsepower to run it that it requires it's own comp.
jef
Tom Bruhl wrote:=20
Jef,
I am in the same boat as you. After looking them all over
Kontakt 2 looks/sounds like the best aside from Giga. I'm not
convinced it's not a buggy piece though. I'd like to hear
from someone here who has experience with it.
Tom
"jef knight" <thestudio@allknightmusic.com> wrote in message =
news:44523838$1@linux...
Hey Dudes and Dudettes...
I've got a project coming up that will neccessarily include =
orchestra=20
and some other fiddly-bits that my synths won't do convincingly. =
So,=20
I've gotta get a soft sampler.
Having looked at a few of the sample libraries like vienna and =
kirk=20
hunter, it seems to me that NI Kontakt 2 is the way to go. Now, as =
some=20
of you may have guessed, I a big steinberg=20
fan...cubase/nuendo/wavelab/etc.. but having dld'd =
an..ahem..."working=20
demo"....cough, cough.. of Halion, I wasn't as impressed with it =
as I=20
thought I'd be. Wasn't happy with the interface and it seemed to =
be=20
pretty pretty demanding. I already *have* those guys in the =
studio, I=20
don't need my tools to all passive-aggressive too....lol
Before I shell out any actual dough for this cookie, what's you =
take on=20
the whole thing and, more importantly, on Kontact/Halion pro's'n =
con's.
cheers
jef
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C66C89.F5514060
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type =
content=3Dtext/html;charset=3DISO-8859-1>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1543" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=3D#000000 bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Yeah Jeff and Tom, you definitely need a separate,=20
dedicated computer to run Giga properly in my =
experience.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Rich</FONT><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"jef knight" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:thestudio@allknightmusic.com">thestudio@allknightmusic.com=
</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
href=3D"news:4454ee9a$1@linux">news:4454ee9a$1@linux</A>...</DIV>ya, =
me too. Don=20
seem to think it's viable. My take on Giga is that it take soooo much=20
horsepower to run it that it requires it's own comp.<BR>jef<BR><BR>Tom =
Bruhl=20
wrote:=20
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=3Dmid4452607e@linux type=3D"cite">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Jef,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I am in the same boat as you. =
After=20
looking them all over</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Kontakt 2 looks/sounds like the =
best aside from=20
Giga. I'm not</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>convinced it's not a buggy piece =
though. =20
I'd like to hear</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>from someone here who has =
experience with=20
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: rgb(0,0,0) 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"jef knight" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:thestudio@allknightmusic.com">thestudio@allknightmusic.com=
</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:44523838$1@linux">news:44523838$1@linux</A>...</DIV>Hey =
Dudes=20
and Dudettes...<BR><BR>I've got a project coming up that will =
neccessarily=20
include orchestra <BR>and some other fiddly-bits that my synths =
won't do=20
convincingly. So, <BR>I've gotta get a soft sampler.<BR>Having =
looked at a=20
few of the sample libraries like vienna and kirk <BR>hunter, it =
seems to=20
me that NI Kontakt 2 is the way to go. Now, as some <BR>of you may =
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66094 is a reply to message #66087] |
Sun, 02 April 2006 23:13 |
Edna Sloan
Messages: 304
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
@linux...
>
> I haven't been around much lately, and I just took a look at the "For
Sale"
> site. Wow! So much Paris stuff for sale! It made me wonder... Who (or
> is it "whom"?), besides me, is still using Paris as their main system?
I'm
> getting pretty frustrated about not being able to use most of the new
plugins.
> I have to dive into PT (LE) or Digital Performer to do some of the more
> modern tricks, and then import files back to Paris. But it still sounds
> SOOOO good to me. I have a client who moved here from New Orleans after
> Katrina. He had done a bunch of recording in a studio there (he is pretty
> much a techno-phobe, so he doesn't know what format) and he says the
quality
> of the ruff mixes from my little Paris studio kills the stuff he did down
> there. He says he's just gonna have to record it all again here.
>
> Anyway... If I knew what I could get that'd sound as good (and that I
could
> afford!) I'd switch, but for now, I'm still a Paris dude.
>
> Peace ('cause we still need it!),
>
> Gantt
>
>I'm definitely not going any where! A two system set up is the way to go
if you want to do all the tricks, IMHO. No matter what digital system you
buy, it will be considered out of date before you know it. Better to invest
in the best analog gear, like high quality mic pres and compressors, than
another DAW. As long as the industry standards are 16bit 44.1, MP3, and
Paris sounds good, there is no good reason for me to switch. I can make
a great recording with Paris, and I already own it!
If I was going to blow 30K, I would rather invest it for my retirement.
The only reason I would get in to a full blown PT rig, is if I was running
a commercial studio in a major market, and I'd be losing business if I didn't.
If that was the situation, I would lease and write it off as a business
expense. No need here.
That's my $0.02
James
"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>I haven't been around much lately, and I just took a look at the "For Sale"
>site. Wow! So much Paris stuff for sale! It made me wonder... Who (or
>is it "whom"?), besides me, is still using Paris as their main system?
I'm
>getting pretty frustrated about not being able to use most of the new plugins.
> I have to dive into PT (LE) or Digital Performer to do some of the more
>modern tricks, and then import files back to Paris. But it still sounds
>SOOOO good to me. I have a client who moved here from New Orleans after
>Katrina. He had done a bunch of recording in a studio there (he is pretty
>much a techno-phobe, so he doesn't know what format) and he says the quality
>of the ruff mixes from my little Paris studio kills the stuff he did down
>there. He says he's just gonna have to record it all again here.
>
>Anyway... If I knew what I could get that'd sound as good (and that I could
>afford!) I'd switch, but for now, I'm still a Paris dude.
>
>Peace ('cause we still need it!),
>
>Gantt
>
>I had a similar problem with an adat card passing all channels to ksp8 and I
thought it was the adat card.
It turned out to be the ksp. If you want to verify your adat card actually
works, try looping it back
ie....
EK Sound" wrote in message
> To check the Paris adat card, simply plug an optical cable from the out to
> the in, and see if all 8 signals show up on the returns.
Hope that helps.
-Paul
"Ted" <sonicartproductions@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:44531fbc@linux...
>I got channels 3-6 out ... I think that is part of the XP/adat card/Aux
>send thing ... Have you tried moving it around to a different slot ... I
>know that is how we solved some of the same problems we had with aux sends
>doing the same thing out of the 8-out analog card ...
> Good luck ... let me know what you figure out.
> Jan
>
>
>
> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:44531b42$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi,
>> I checked yesterday that adat channels 5 & 6 on a ADAT card inside a mec
>> does not pass audio at all.
>> Is this a bug or could be a defected adat card ?
>> But a defected acrd should not pass audio on all channels , right ?
>> XP here with three mecs and three adat cards.
>> Regards,
>> Dimitrios
>
>Nope......not a chance.
;o)
"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4455655b$1@linux...
>
> I haven't been around much lately, and I just took a look at the "For
Sale"
> site. Wow! So much Paris stuff for sale! It made me wonder... Who (or
> is it "whom"?), besides me, is still using Paris as their main system?
I'm
> getting pretty frustrated about not being able to use most of the new
plugins.
> I have to dive into PT (LE) or Digital Performer to do some of the more
> modern tricks, and then import files back to Paris. But it still sounds
> SOOOO good to me. I have a client who moved here from New Orleans after
> Katrina. He had done a bunch of recording in a studio there (he is pretty
> much a techno-phobe, so he doesn't know what format) and he says the
quality
> of the ruff mixes from my little Paris studio kills the stuff he did down
> there. He says he's just gonna have to record it all again here.
>
> Anyway... If I knew what I could get that'd sound as good (and that I
could
> afford!) I'd switch, but for now, I'm still a Paris dude.
>
> Peace ('cause we still need it!),
>
> Gantt
>
>Wow.
Well and succinctly said.
Jimmy
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:44556c59$1@linux...
>
> I'm definitely not going any where! A two system set up is the way to go
> if you want to do all the tricks, IMHO. No matter what digital system you
> buy, it will be considered out of date before you know it. Better to
invest
> in the best analog gear, like high quality mic pres and compressors, than
> another DAW. As long as the industry standards are 16bit 44.1, MP3, and
> Paris sounds good, there is no good reason for me to switch. I can make
> a great recording with Paris, and I already own it!
>
> If I was going to blow 30K, I would rather invest it for my retirement.
> The only reason I would get in to a full blown PT rig, is if I was running
> a commercial studio in a major market, and I'd be losing business if I
didn't.
> If that was the situation, I would lease and write it off as a business
> expense. No need here.
>
> That's my $0.02
> James
>
> "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >I haven't been around much lately, and I just took a look at the "For
Sale"
> >site. Wow! So much Paris stuff for sale! It made me wonder... Who (or
> >is it "whom"?), besides me, is still using Paris as their main system?
> I'm
> >getting pretty frustrated about not being able to use most of the new
plugins.
> > I have to dive into PT (LE) or Digital Performer to do some of the more
> >modern tricks, and then import files back to Paris. But it still sounds
> >SOOOO good to me. I have a client who moved here from New Orleans after
&g
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66150 is a reply to message #66067] |
Wed, 05 April 2006 06:11 |
Rob Arsenault
Messages: 152
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
in the car, and it is wimpy.
>>>
>>> If you want an 8db boost at 100, you need a speaker that does not
>>> already have one so you can add it yourself in the music, not the
>>> playback gear.
>>>
>>> Also, "learning the room/monitors" etc only works if you will settle
>>> for just "OK" sound. If you want to just nail it, you need to really
>>> hear it. My project has drums, percussion, 4 voices, 3 guitars,
>>> keys and bass. And they all want to hear themselves... So I simply
>>> must be able to hear or the mix will be crap.
>>>
>>> DC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.htmlThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0038_01C66D8C.09423220
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David,
I am totally functional now using the Lucid.
The clincher must have been the wiring in series.
I did have to start at 48k to get all my EDS cards functioning
though. The B card didn't like starting at 44.1 and wouldn't
give any output until Paris first booted at 48k. Because of this
I think I have to use a default project to get going. I wouldn't
want or even be able to save a new Paris.exe right?
I did lose the EDSTransfer line as well as UseHouseSync=3D1.
Thanks David and Deej for the tips that got me to this point!
You guys are the greatest.
Tic Toc,
Tom
"Dave(EK Sound)" <audioguy_editout_@shaw.ca> wrot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66156 is a reply to message #66153] |
Wed, 05 April 2006 07:44 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
pear as you get close to the speaker, and
reappear right at my listening position. I also deliberately measured
the anomaly at only 75db or so, so I am sure I am not hearing
reflections. BTW, the proportion of boost does not increase with
level, so it is not coming back from the room.
I *really* have to get rid of this desk. It also really buggers the
sub's response because of all the chambers and loading it creates.
I will know more shortly.
thanks for the help everyone!
DC
"Neil" <IOUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>You might also just try hanging a bass trap directly above the
>listening position (if you've got a flat ceiling), or a couple
>feet in front of the listening position (if you've got
>a "proper" control room slanted-type ceiling). That'll suck up
>several db's worth of reflected freq's in your problem range.
>
>Just a simple homemade absorber should work to test it out...
>glue a sheet of OC-703 to a piece of 1/4" MDF, wrap a pretty
>color of cloth around it for appearance's sake & hang it from
>eyelet screws attached to each corner of the MDF... won't
>absorb as much lows as a proper bass trap, but it'll have
>enough mass to cut down some of it, and for 15 bucks worth of
>goodies you might be able to keep your desk. If it cuts down
>some, but not quite enough, then at least you'll know if
>hanging one or two proper bass traps in that position will get
>the job done.
>
>Neil
>
>
>"DC" <dc@spamthemoon.com> wrote:
>>
>>EK Sound <askme@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>It's probably near field early reflections from the desk surface.
>>>This has always been an issue with meter bridge mounted monitors. In
>>>the past, I used to sit the nearfields on stands behind the console at
>
>>>a height that would prevent any direct reflection from the desk
>>>surface... maybe try something like that...
>>>
>>>David.
>>
>>
>>A friend who designs monitors calls it the "baffle step effect" which
>>is another way of saying that the reflections are so early that they
>>essentially become a part of the front baffle of the speaker.
>>
>>I used to have the speakers higher and behind the desk and they
>>sounded really awful there precisely because of refections and
>>loading of the area behind the desk.
>>
>>The only real solution is to get rid of the desk. I am going to try
>>this tomorrow and see if it fixes things. I bet it will.
>>
>>more to follow
>>
>>DC
>>
>I am thinking that the only real solution is having absolutely nothing
between me and the speakers except a couple of C-16's and a
computer KB. Some of my mastering buddies do this and it
sure seems to work.
No studio furniture, no racks , no desk, no table with stuff on it.
I'll know more soon.
DC
"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
> http://www.jcwhitney.com/autoparts/Product/showCustom-0/Pr-p _Product.CATENTRY_ID:2002977/c-10101/Nty-1/p-2002977/Ntx-mod e+matchallpartial/N-10101/tf-Browse/s-10101/Ntk-AllTextSearc hGroup?Ntt=damping
>
>Something like this might help you out. I'm going through the same kind
of
>thing for the umpteenth time in my career, looking hard at it myself.
>
>AA
>
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.org> wrote in message news:4456b31d$1@linux...
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66189 is a reply to message #66156] |
Wed, 05 April 2006 18:24 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>has<BR>>=20
>> been a little sluggish but stable at upwards of 35 tracks =
>>most<BR>> of=20
>> the time with lots of plugs. Never a problem printing =
>>basics<BR>>=20
>> which is usually 18 tracks or so.<BR>> Tom<BR>>=20
>><BR>></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>>
>>
>Cool! glad to be of help!
Enjoy!
David.
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> David,
> I am totally functional now using the Lucid.
> The clincher must have been the wiring in series.
> I did have to start at 48k to get all my EDS cards functioning
> though. The B card didn't like starting at 44.1 and wouldn't
> give any output until Paris first booted at 48k. Because of this
> I think I have to use a default project to get going. I wouldn't
> want or even be able to save a new Paris.exe right?
>
> I did lose the EDSTransfer line as well as UseHouseSync=1.
>
> Thanks David and Deej for the tips that got me to this point!
> You guys are the greatest.
> Tic Toc,
> Tom
>
>
>Hey there,
I could be wrong, but I don't think Paris will accept other control
surfaces. There's kinda no provision within the interface for switching
to something other than the c-16.
....big drag for me as well, as i'd like to get some flyin' faders goin'
on instead of the null arrows....
cheers
jef
Matthias Steinke wrote:
>Hi Parisians (I'm pleased that I'm not the only one left who's still got something
>going for the kit ;-),
>
>can anybody advise me on how to get Paris to interact with a DM-3200. The
>idea is ultimately to replace the good old C-16s with the DM-3200 if this
>makes sense?
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>It's "who"... :-)
I have basically moved into an almost entirely VSTi-based world. So I've
been on Cubase now for a while, while PARIS collects dust.
I loved PARIS, though. I got my bundle III in 1998 and another card the
next year. I was in this group before it was even a group, exchanging emails
with Chuck and Michele Hobbs.
It definitely feels weird to be selling any of it at all. But I'll keep
visiting here for sure. There are great big wads of great people here.
And that's the real reason this group has stayed together this long.
Best,
StefanThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_004B_01C66DE5.67F62200
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David,
If I add an RME or Lynx card in the future that requires WC then
I will need to change to parallel right? Do all the cables have to
be identical length in that case? Even to the Lynx? Is there
a length that is too long for the signal? My run to the control room
could be as long as 25-30' although I don't see that being necessary=20
at this time.
Tom
PS I didn't hear a great difference in playback but expect to hear more
when WC is used for tracking also. I'll keep listening for the detail.
"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message =
news:4457830c$1@linux...
Cool! glad to be of help!
Enjoy!
David.
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> David,
> I am totally functional now using the Lucid.
> The clincher must have been the wiring in series.
> I did have to start at 48k to get all my EDS cards functioning
> though. The B card didn't like starting at 44.1 and wouldn't
> give any output until Paris first booted at 48k. Because of this
> I think I have to use a default project to get going. I wouldn't
> want or even be able to save a new Paris.exe right?
> =20
> I did lose the EDSTransfer line as well as UseHouseSync=3D1.
> =20
> Thanks David and Deej for the tips that got me to this point!
> You guys are the greatest.
> Tic Toc,
> Tom
> =20
> =20
>
------=_NextPart_000_004B_01C66DE5.67F62200
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>David,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If I add an RME or Lynx card in the =
future that=20
requires WC then</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I will need to change to parallel =
right? Do=20
all the cables have
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66194 is a reply to message #66189] |
Wed, 05 April 2006 19:43 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
o the sound of
> my studio mons, but this is an inexpensive approach that you may want to
> try, assuming you have access to a decent audio system.
>
> Gene
>
> P.S. Timbuktu Pro adds a fair amount of strain on my Paris system so this
> can be problematic on complex mixes. I recently tried doing a "Two box
mix"
> running Timbuktu Pro on my Mac running Performer. I wired a pair of super
> long MIDI cables so I can also run my MorotMix along with the laptop. It's
> a cool setup but still mostly academic since I have never preferred a mix
> I have done this way.
>
> Next to try. my wireless laptop setup works well all around my house and
> yard, so- Mix in my car! If I run the long MIDI cables out my bedroom
window,
> I think I can also use the MotorMix.
>
>
>
> "DC" <DC@spammersinhell.org> wrote:
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Hey, I am finding this out the hard way. My mix of the live project is
> >coming along nicely, except for all the acoustic anomalies I am
> >discovering.
> >
> >This is un-freaking believeable, but the analyzer proved it.
> >What I found is that putting speakers on top of typical audio
> >furniture causes *huge* frequency-response problems. No matter
> >how you do it.
> >
> >All these sort of things:
> >
> >http://www.omnirax.com
> >
> >http://www.argosyconsole.com/
> >
> >http://custom-consoles.com/recording_studio_furniture.php
> >
> >Every one of them, cause huge increases in the low mids by acting
> >as an extension of the front baffle of the speaker. Speaker
> >freq. response is measured in anechoic chambers, so speakers are
> >designed to be flat in that environment. When you put them on
> >the top of a table or console, or even nearby to a table or console,
> >you get a significant boost in low-mids (typically, but it depends on
> >the size of the new baffle surface). In my case it results in an 8db
> >boost at 100hz. !!!!
> >
> >DAMN! How am I supposed to mix like this? So, I am off to find
> >a very small desk that will just fit 2 C-16's with the computer KB
> >underneath, and the speakers are going back on the heavy stands.
> >
> >Why doesn't anyone offer studio furniture that deals with this?
> >
> >More to come as I dig into this problem...
> >
> >DC
> >
> >
> >
>Hey Gene, were you ever able to get the MotorMix to work with Paris? Anybody
try the K2 with Paris?
JamesI'm not doubting you at all, but that's strange, wouldn't you say???......I
mean, daisy chaining, theoretically, is not the optimal way to
clock......but, O'yeah, I forgot, we're talking Paris here.
;oP
"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:445780d9@linux...
> That would be because you have 3 interfaces... you *have* to do it
> that way. With only 2 interfaces, it works better the way Tom has done it.
>
> David.
>
> Rod Lincoln wrote:
> > So your saying that you've got a word clock cable running frum your
Lucid
> > to the 1st Mec, then the 2nd cable running from mec 1 to mec 2? That's
really
> > strange. I guess different MOBO, CPU etc could all play a part. I'm
running
> > all word clock cables from the Lucid to each device (2 mecs, 442, RME
card).
> > never had a hiccup.
> > Rod
> >
> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>And Rod too!!!
> >>
> >> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
> >>news:4456f480@linux...
> >> David,
> >> I am totally functional now using the Lucid.
> >> The clincher must have been the wiring in series.
> >> I did have to start at 48k to get all my EDS cards functioning
> >> though. The B card didn't like starting at 44.1 and wouldn't
> >> give any output until Paris first booted at 48k. Because of this
> >> I think I have to use a default project to get going. I wouldn't
> >> want or even be able to save a new Paris.exe right?
> >>
> >> I did lose the EDSTransfer line as well as UseHouseSync=3D1.
> >>
> >> Thanks David and Deej for the tips that got me to this point!
> >> You guys are the greatest.
> >> Tic Toc,
> >> Tom
> >>
> >>
> >> "Dave(EK Sound)" <audioguy_editout_@shaw.ca> wrote in message =
> >>news:445592a2@linux...
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> Connecting between MEC's doesn't defeat it at all... the=20
> >> conversion *will* be clocked by the external Generator=20
> >> regardless of how it is connected. With fewer than three=20
> >> interfaces, it seems to work better this way.
> >>
> >> I never use a default project. I create template projects=20
> >> and open them up once Paris has been launched. This has=20
> >> *always* worked for me. I would try deleting the 8,8=20
> >> line... I don't recall the default installation having this=20
> >> line in it. I believe this is something that Edmund and BT=20
> >> had worked out when he was hav
|
|
|
|
| Re: Anyone using FX Teleport here? [message #66202 is a reply to message #66194] |
Wed, 05 April 2006 21:35 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
If I add an RME or Lynx card in the future that requires WC then
I will need to change to parallel right? Do all the cables have to
be identical length in that case? Even to the Lynx? Is there
a length that is too long for the signal? My run to the control room
could be as long as 25-30' although I don't see that being necessary=20
at this time.
Tom
PS I didn't hear a great difference in playback but expect to hear =
more
when WC is used for tracking also. I'll keep listening for the =
detail.
"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message =
news:4457830c$1@linux...
Cool! glad to be of help!
Enjoy!
David.
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> David,
> I am totally functional now using the Lucid.
> The clincher must have been the wiring in series.
> I did have to start at 48k to get all my EDS cards functioning
> though. The B card didn't like starting at 44.1 and wouldn't
> give any output until Paris first booted at 48k. Because of this
> I think I have to use a default project to get going. I wouldn't
> want or even be able to save a new Paris.exe right?
> =20
> I did lose the EDSTransfer line as well as UseHouseSync=3D1.
> =20
> Thanks David and Deej for the tips that got me to this point!
> You guys are the greatest.
> Tic Toc,
> Tom
> =20
> =20
>
------=_NextPart_000_016C_01C66DD7.F7D27940
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm clocking 9 devices from a =
Mytek WC which=20
is being distributed by Lucid distro boxes. The cables range in length =
from 1/2=20
meter to 2 meters. This setup is working fine for me.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Deej</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A href=3D"news:44578a42@linux">news:44578a42@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>David,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If I add an RME or Lynx card in the =
future that=20
requires WC then</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I will need to change to parallel =
right? Do=20
all the cables have to</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>be identical length in that =
case? Even to=20
the Lynx? Is there</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a length that is too long for the =
signal? =20
My run to the control room</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>could be as long as 25-30' although I =
don't see=20
that being necessary </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>at this time.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>PS I didn't hear a great =
difference in=20
playback but expect to hear more</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>when WC is used for tracking =
also. I'll=20
keep listening for the detail.</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"EK Sound" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:askme@nospam.com">askme@nospam.com</A>> wrote in =
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:4457830c$1@linux">news:4457830c$1@linux</A>...</DIV>Cool! =
glad to=20
be of help!<BR><BR>Enjoy!<BR><BR>David.<BR><BR>Tom Bruhl =
wrote:<BR>>=20
David,<BR>> I am totally functional now using the Lucid.<BR>> =
The=20
clincher must have been the wiring in series.<BR>> I did have to =
start at=20
48k to get all my EDS cards functioning<BR>> though. The B =
card=20
didn't like starting at 44.1 and wouldn't<BR>> give any output =
until=20
Paris first booted at 48k. Because of this<BR>> I think I =
have to=20
use a default project to get going. I wouldn't<BR>> want or =
even be=20
able to save a new Paris.exe right?<BR>> <BR>> I did =
lose the=20
EDSTransfer line as well as UseHouseSync=3D1.<BR>> <BR>> =
Thanks=20
David and Deej for the tips that got me to this point!<BR>> You =
guys are=20
the greatest.<BR>> Tic Toc,<BR>> Tom<BR>> =
<BR>> =20
<BR>></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_016C_01C66DD7.F7D27940--Hi Tom,
No change to Paris is needed unless you add an additional interface.
Identical length cables are not necessary, or practical. You *must*
use high quality cable and connections though, this is very important.
I have our WC gen in with the console housing and my cable runs
(Canare LV61S with proper crimp connections) vary from 1' to the
longest run of about 25'... no problems.
As for the extra detail, the difference will be slight but it will be
there. The most noticeable difference will be with a project from
scratch.
David.
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> David,
> If I add an RME or Lynx card in the future that requires WC then
> I will need to change to parallel right? Do all the cables have to
> be identical length in that case? Even to the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue May 26 10:55:39 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.26288 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
