| Gear lust What is on your list? [message #81850] |
Tue, 20 March 2007 23:15  |
dc[3]
Messages: 895 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
states I've lived in--Wisconsin, Minnesota,
> and
>>Connecticut--are some of the bluest of blue states, but are surprisingly
>>gun friendly. I guess it's the old farm boy traditions in the midwest, in
>>WI one doesn't even need a permit to carry and even handguns don't have
> to
>>be registered, the law says only that one should 'exercise caution' when
>>carrying a firearm.
>>
>>TCB
>>
>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Nobody carries a gun because it's statistically a smart thing to do. At
>>>least
>>>>if they're being honest with themselves they aren't. In fact, we're far
>>>more
>>>>likely to hurt/kill ourselves or a family member with it than a
>>>>threatening
>>>>stranger.
>>>
>>>This is incredibly misleading.
>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Gear lust What is on your list? [message #81857 is a reply to message #81850] |
Wed, 21 March 2007 03:50   |
Sarah
 Messages: 608 Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
But I can’t let some of these comments go without any response. So…
No comment.
Gene
PS I think I’ll go here for a good argument:
http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety .htm
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>
>"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>>OK, have it your way:
>>
>>Men are inherently evil.
>>Women are inherently good.
>>Testosterone is responsible for all the misery in the world.
>>All men should be castrated at birth, except for a few designated breeders.
>>
>>There, now your arguments make sense. I'm not sure who you're arguing
with,
>
>>however, since I haven't said anything like that.
>
>ArrggHHHHHH!
>
>ANDREA DWORKIN HAS RISEN FROM THE GRAVE!!
>
>Ok, excuse me a sec while I drive this stake in what passed for a heart
>with her....
>
>There, that's better...
>
>My arguments make sense in the context of your points, not your
>silly strawman above. The raising of boys plays no role in the issue
>of crazy mass murderers. Surely you know this by now?
>
>Allowing boys to cry? Please...
>
>Face it, women don't have a clue how to be men. All those thousands of
>years men tried to make women fit into their cartoon version of
>themselves, and now women want men to do the same damned thing
>back to us? Nah... No sale.
>
>Here's what raising boys to be women's version of "men" has caused:
>The highest divorce rate in history.
>"Men" who feel no need to tell women the truth. Ever.
>"Men's" actual respect for women is lower than ever.
>The highest number of young men growing up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Gear lust What is on your list? [message #81874 is a reply to message #81857] |
Wed, 21 March 2007 09:42   |
Deej [4]
 Messages: 1292 Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
.JamieKrutz.com
> "Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>> I can’t argue with you anymore DC.
>>
>> I can only imagine where I fall on your Manly-Man scale (Or 99% of all the
>> men I know for that matter.) Not only am I not a cowboy, I don’t even chew
>> tobacco.
>>
>> But I can’t let some of these comments go without any response. So…
>>
>> No comment.
>>
>> Gene
>>
>> PS I think I’ll go here for a good argument:
>> http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety .htm
>>
>>
>>
>> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>>>> OK, have it your way:
>>>>
>>>> Men are inherently evil.
>>>> Women are inherently good.
>>>> Testosterone is responsible for all the misery in the world.
>>>> All men should be castrated at birth, except for a few designated breeders.
>>>>
>>>> There, now your arguments make sense. I'm not sure who you're arguing
>> with,
>>>> however, since I haven't said anything like that.
>>> ArrggHHHHHH!
>>>
>>> ANDREA DWORKIN HAS RISEN FROM THE GRAVE!!
>>>
>>> Ok, excuse me a sec while I drive this stake in what passed for a heart
>>> with her....
>>>
>>> There, that's better...
>>>
>>> My arguments make sense in the context of your points, not your
>>> silly strawman above. The raising of boys plays no role in the issue
>>> of crazy mass murderers. Surely you know this by now?
>>>
>>> Allowing boys to cry? Please...
>>>
>>> Face it, women don't have a clue how to be men. All those thousands of
>>> years men tried to make women fit into their cartoon version of
>>> themselves, and now women want men to do the same damned thing
>>> back to us? Nah... No sale.
>>>
>>> Here's what raising boys to be women's version of "men" has cau
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Gear lust What is on your list? [message #81951 is a reply to message #81947] |
Thu, 22 March 2007 10:12   |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
d the good fortune to attend a small private school
>> that has a core philosophy based on mutual respect and individual
>> rights. Kids feel safe, happy, accepted, and the inevitable conflicts
>> are worked through in a forthright way that often as not makes friends
>> out of antagonists. I've been involved with this school for eleven
>> years now, and have seen this positive approach succeed with sour and
>> withdrawn children time and time again.
>>
>> Not to suggest that simple justice will prevent mental illness -- but,
>> man, it's a great place to start.
>>
>> -- chas.
>>
>>
>> On 21 Apr 2007 00:03:59 +1000, "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Gear lust What is on your list? [message #81969 is a reply to message #81923] |
Thu, 22 March 2007 15:57   |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
rrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>Not now silly.........later when I know how evil it really is so I can
>>appreciate, take full responsibility for and properly savor the grief that
>
>>it will cause in my life when I intentionally, and with aforethought, make
>
>>the transition.................however, from what I'm hearing, there may
>be
>>some *real* advantages to Vista as far as performance of multicore CPU's.
>
>>Win XP multicore support is more of a kludge, or so I'm hearing (though
>
>>Vista itself may be a kludge too). The ability to run lots of RAM is always
>
>>a good thing and if Vista is better at supporting multicore CPU's perhaps
>it
>>would be preferable to XP-64.
>>
>>God forbid I should buy a Mac.
>>
>>;oD
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4629399a@linux...
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeh I'm not sure why you'd want to go Vista Deej.
>>>
>>> That is why I posted the Linux on a laptop question the other day. If
>at
>>> all possible my Windows career is going to stop on XP. I'll still need
>at
>>> least one XP or 98 install for Paris, but I can run everything else on
>
>>> Linux...
>>>
>>> ...audio software may be another thing, though I'm confident 2 years
from
>>> now we'll see movement towards Linux from mainstream audio apps also.
>
>>> Meanwhile,
>>> I imagine they will continue to support XP.
>>>
>>> XP support will be around a long while, as 98 was. Remember the bad press
>>> Windows ME got? And 98 ended up outlasting ME because of this. Now look
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Gear lust What is on your list? [message #81981 is a reply to message #81959] |
Thu, 22 March 2007 18:20   |
Nil
Messages: 245 Registered: March 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
m" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>I wouldn't think it's like you to buy a Mac... I mean, for starters
>>they're
>>reliable...
>>
>>...and secondly, there's a point of view from which you could say that a
>>Mac is "the easy way" to run Linux. ;o) And since when did you start doing
>>things the easy way? ;o)
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>>
>>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>>Not now silly.........later when I know how evil it really is so I can
>
>>>appreciate, take full responsibility for and properly savor the grief
>>>that
>>
>>>it will cause in my life when I intentionally, and with aforethought,
>>>make
>>
>>>the transition.................however, from what I'm hearing, there may
>>be
>>>some *real* advantages to Vista as far as performance of multicore CPU's.
>>
>>>Win XP multicore support is more of a kludge, or so I'm hearing (though
>>
>>>Vista itself may be a kludge too). The ability to run lots of RAM is
>>>always
>>
>>>a good thing and if Vista is better at supporting multicore CPU's perhaps
>>it
>>>would be preferable to XP-64.
>>>
>>>God forbid I should buy a Mac.
>>>
>>>;oD
>>>
>>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4629399a@linux...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeh I'm not sure why you'd want to go Vista Deej.
>>>>
>>>> That is why I posted the Linux on a laptop question the other day. If
>>at
>>>> all possible my Windows career is going to stop on XP. I'll still need
>>at
>>>> least one XP or 98 install for Paris, but I can run everything else on
>>
>>>> Linux...
>>>>
>>>> ...au
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Gear lust What is on your list? [message #81989 is a reply to message #81986] |
Thu, 22 March 2007 18:56   |
audioguy_editout_
 Messages: 249 Registered: December 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
my=20
>>>>>>PCI cards and allow them to interface PCIe anyway?</FONT></P>
>>>>>><P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The reason I'm tempted to make the move
>>>> =
>>>>>>now (besides=20
>>>>>>wanting the horsepower) is that although the prices of the CPU's =
>>>>>>will be=20
>>>>>>coming down over the next few months, so will the price I'll be able
>>to
>>>>>=
>>>>>>get for=20
>>>>>>my Magma's since they are 32 bit units (although 2 x of them are
>>>>>>capable
>>>>>=
>>>>>>of=20
>>>>>>integrating the PCIe host card so this gives them a little added value
>>>> =
>>>>>>on=20
>>>>>>EBay).</FONT></P>
>>>>>><P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Any thoughts?</FONT></P>
>>>>>><P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </P>
>>>>>><P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </P>
>>>>>><P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </P>
>>>>>><P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </P></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>
>He it is funny how many times what you declare is what you are !
>There is so much literature on interenet as how good peluso capsules sound
>as aopposed to the chines ones...etc..
>I tried the best they make and the more expensive one on a Neumann M149
taking
>out the neumann capsule to hear how it sounds.
>Man the sound was so bad !
>Thin distorted on highs no low mids at all...
>Thats why my microphones will have the M7 capsule from Neumann...
>Regards,
>Dimitrios
>
Neumann doesn't make an M& capsule anymore. Gefell does.Thanks again Neil, TCB, DJ, Dimitrios, and Graham! I've passed along
your insights!
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Graham Duncan wrote:
> Heh, screw it. Buy the Gefells and don't bother wondering if your
> cheaper stuff is almost as good. How's that? ;)
>
> GrahamRegarding M7,
I can find M7 capsules though from Neumann ...
Regarding Peluso well maybe the one I tried was one from the crap one...
I bought three of them and then sold them right away...
Regards,
Dimitrios
"Gary Flanigan" <gary_flanigan@ce9.uscourts.gov> wrote:
>
>"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>
>>He it is funny how many times what you declare is what you are !
>>There is so much literature on interenet as how good peluso capsules sound
>>as aopposed to the chines ones...etc..
>>I tried the best they make and the more expensive one on a Neumann M149
>taking
>>out the neumann capsule to hear how it sounds.
>>Man the sound was so bad !
>>Thin distorted on highs no low mids at all...
>>Thats why my microphones will have the M7 capsule from Neumann...
>>Regards,
>>Dimitrios
>>
>Neumann doesn't make an M& capsule anymore. Gefell does.How does this work anyway? Since all hardware has to have 64bit compatible
drivers, I suppose I'd have to have a 64bit compatible Magma for all my PCI
cards in order to use this, right?
If that were the case, then I could still run Cubase 4 in 32 bit emulation
but I could access 8GB RAM? Is that correct?
TIAUbuntu didn't inherit only a package manager from Debian. All Debian releases
are named after a character in Toy Story. Sid, Etch, Potato, etc. It's just
mo
|
|
|
|
|
|