The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » OT: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

OT: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling [message #55016]

Tue, 28 June 2005 20:12

Nei
Messages: 108
Registered: November 2006

Senior Member

/> It's more or less an open-air museum now.

It was definitely a first-strike scenario if there were no
nukes involved... whoev

Report message to a moderator

Re: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling [message #55018 is a reply to message #55016]

Tue, 28 June 2005 20:35

Deej [3]

Messages: 181
Registered: June 2005

Senior Member

vacation - which
means more of your reserve troops would have been away in
Spain, Italy, etc. Even some of your active troops would try to
get away then to be with friends & family, etc,; so mainly
skeleton staffs would have been left to man their posts in the
German element.
b.) On a **weekend** in August... since you guys like to take
off at noon on Fridays (at least you did then - dunno if that's
still a common practice), so that there would be ev

Report message to a moderator

Re: OT: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling [message #55019 is a reply to message #55016]

Tue, 28 June 2005 20:43

Messages: 327
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

en less
troops in place. Coming over at 3am on a Sunday Morning would
be nice & quiet & stealthy, don't you think? Or since they
didn't have much in the way of night vision capabilities, a
Sunday afternoon woul

Report message to a moderator

Re: OT: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling [message #55033 is a reply to message #55019]

Wed, 29 June 2005 01:59

rick

Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

;Neil
> >
>"justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote:
>
>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:42d71a43$1@linux...
>>
>> "justcron" <

Report message to a moderator

Re: OT: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling [message #55048 is a reply to message #55033]

Wed, 29 June 2005 08:30

Deej [3]

Messages: 181
Registered: June 2005

Senior Member

because of the fact that theres a not too bad
track record of deescalation in history)

> You haven't convinced me that Rabin could
>have pulled it off.

i didnt expect to. heck, i dont know it myself.

>Here's how the palestinians could have peace in a week:
>
>Go Ghandi on them. Sit down, inb the streets, renounce violence forever.
>Ask the world for justice. They would get their demands in a week
>or less, and if israel didn't like it, the american people would force it
>on them by witholding any more aid.

yes. too bad it wouldnt work because their religious
fanatic idiots. theres a reason why i talked so much
about the good timing of rabin. you gotta force religious
idiots into their own good. too bad the timing wasnt quite
right and a handful of steps at a time was still to
extreme of a dialog for some extremist idiots. it
wasnt even an islamic extremist idiot but a jewish one
who ultimatively destroyed it all - but it could very
well have been one.

> Why do you euros never demand a DAMN THING from the
>arabs and the palestinians,

Report message to a moderator

Re: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling [message #55053 is a reply to message #55016]

Wed, 29 June 2005 08:40

Brian Porick

Messages: 31
Registered: June 2005

Member

wants his post totally going berserk and
extremely to the right. and if theres a classic
debate in germany if ive ever seen one, its the debate
about whether its good that its a principal no-no to
openly criticize anything thats even remotely related
to anything jewish. there are extremists that have a problem
with that (they call it a sick case of non-judmentalism...sounds
familiar), i personally think its only adequate and should

Report message to a moderator

Re: OT: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling [message #55067 is a reply to message #55048]

Wed, 29 June 2005 11:41

rick

Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

br />
That was painful for you wasn't it? I should appreciate the effort,
but you really should admit how awful their actions are more often,
and leave off the excuses. Then we can treat them as adults
and hold them to a standard of civilized behavior. Do you have any
idea how patronizing, not to say racist, it is to hold a double
standard where you understand terrorists, but condemn the only
democracy in the middle east?

>from their point of view, theyre actually doing exactly
>the same thing - use brute force. they dont have planes,
>so they use suicide bombers.

They don't have planes because their mullahs told them they don't
need scientific progress 1000 years ago, and they use suicide
bombers because they are a degraded culture, rotten from within
from their religion, and used as cannon fodder by their cynical leaders.

>if you were on their side,
>its what you would recommend. and if the enemy threatened to
>use more power, youd recommend that the enemy gets a
>demonstration of your force.

BULLSHIT! If I was on their side, I would advise them to go Ghandi,
renounce all violence, and appeal to the wolrd for justice. And I
would be the George Washington of a new Palestine. The problem
is that they have no one like that and they would kill them if they
did.

>im not saying its the ultimate solution. i find pretending
>to have absolute solutions (a very popular practice here,
>or so it seems) rather silly. im trying to have a civiliced
>discu

Report message to a moderator

Re: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling [message #55087 is a reply to message #55016]

Thu, 30 June 2005 00:37

Rich Lamanna

Messages: 316
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

ogress. I kinda understand more where people are coming from. Its
>> admirable to think the best about humans and believe the government is
>> acting in our best interest. I know people are ultimately concerned with
>> their own security and survival.
>>
>> The politicalcompass thing was helpful to show that political beliefs are
>> really a complex combination of issues, at the very least needing 2 axes...
>> liberal/conservative context is hardly useful to categorize people.
>>
>> Some people say you shouldn't catch feelings over a message b

Report message to a moderator

Re: First Victim of Supreme Court Land Seizure Ruling [message #55090 is a reply to message #55053]

Wed, 29 June 2005 23:20

excelav

Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit

Senior Member

br /> > presumed agreement between questioner and respondent on political issues.
>
> Dubya Mark Wilson
>
> "justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote in message
> news:42d585d3$1@linux...
>> the questions are simplistic while complex. they're trying to score you
>> on an axis with imperfect questions.
>
>As a rule people only call into radio shows and post to blogs and such
to have THEIR world view reinforced. Not to have in depth discussions
about other people

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Attn: piano guys -- HELP!!!!
Next Topic:	If I dont' get one of these I'll die.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu May 07 05:30:28 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04303 seconds