Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » By the way, I'm back... ;o)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: By the way, I'm back... ;o) [message #91125 is a reply to message #91123] |
Sun, 07 October 2007 23:14   |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
a>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Pärt tends to be known for his bleak soundscapes, but the
>>>>pieces featured on the Te Deum disc blend this mood with bursts of joy
> and
>>>
>>>>warmth as well (at times venturing near Morton Lauridsen tonal
>>>>territory.)
>>>
>>>>Pärt is a big fan of using old church modes and scales as the basis for
>>> a
>>>>lot of his compositions, which give them that very old/timeless sense.
>>> It's
>>>>just good, good stuff.
>>>
>>> BTW, do you have a particular release of Te Deum that you like?
>>>
>>> DC
>>
>>
>Two things, Don. First, non of this explains why the Clintons IN PARTICULAR
generate the visceral hatred they do. Nobody seems to hate Russ Feingold
or Barney Frank PERSONALLY. I explain the PERSONAL hatred of the Clintons
the way I do for those reasons.
As far as being a lying, cheating, showboating asshole, well he's a politician.
That's what they are, that's what they do. I think it was HL Menken who said
the definition of an honest politician is that once he's bought he stays
bought. If in a single generation we have a handful of actual decen
|
|
|
|
| Re: By the way, I'm back... ;o) [message #91129 is a reply to message #91119] |
Mon, 08 October 2007 01:58 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ves and society. Then Bill shows up, a draft dodging,
pot
>> smoking, wife cheating hick from the STICKS of Arkansas who by rights
>> should
>> have been a city council member in Little Rock driving a 12 year old El
>> Dorado.
>> He never denied himself a damn thing, from Biggie Fries to fancy cigars
to
>> hummers from interns, and he got to be president fer effs sake. So, he's
>> a personal affront, which I get.
>
>I "dodged" the draft by staying in school. I've never cheated on my wife,
>but before I married I did cheat "with" certain of othe
|
|
|
|
| Re: By the way, I'm back... ;o) [message #91153 is a reply to message #91125] |
Mon, 08 October 2007 13:58 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
thing very Talleyrand'esque about both
>> Bilary/Hilbilly which, in the end, serves their personal interests at the
>> expense of the national interest. Just look at how popular Bill Clinton
>> is after the incredible damage (by omission and incompetence, if nothing
>> else) he did to our national security by allowing the situation in Iraq
>> to fester under the watchful eye of the UN. I think that the enduring
>> "cult of Bill", says more about the idiocy of the American public than it
>> does about the Clinton's though. The Clinton's, being smartn'all,
>> recognize it and feed off it like catfish in a pond full of blood bait.
>>
>>> Lastly, I've been telling my lefty academic friends for years that
>>> they're
>>> going to find religion at some point about states rights. From gay
>>> marriage
>>> to medical pot nearly every pet issue for lefties will get squashed by
>>> federal
>>> lawmakers and the federal judiciary. The lefties are going to have to
>>> fight
>>> for the right of (their own) states to legislate on those issues. They
>>> scream
>>> and yell and hem and haw and tell me I'm nuts but they have yet to come
>>> up
>>> with a compelling argument to counter mine. Conservatives (not the ones
>>> like
>>> me, the other kinds) are going to get their comeuppance probably after
|
|
|
|
| Re: By the way, I'm back... ;o) [message #91166 is a reply to message #91153] |
Mon, 08 October 2007 16:34 |
Martin Harrington
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ou run out of people you like, at which
> point
> you put the same number in each box. Assuming you haven't used the quirk
> to avoid your vote ending up with somebody you dislike, you will always
> end
> up with a full strength vote against one of the two most popular
> candidates.
>
> I actually think our system is really good. If the Australian public knew
> how to use it, and, for that matter, who to vote for for their own best
> interests,
> it would work pretty well methinks.
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
Well........if we had such a system here, then the liberals could get all of
the fraudulent votes from the undocumented alien residents,and a bunch of
dead people that they trot out to pad the rolls with every election cycle,
not publicize this (about as likely as the sun exploding at noon tomorrow)
and use as a "no confidence" bludgeon to grind every ballot to a halt here.
Cool!!!After more testing, I'm not sure it's the UAD's after all. I ghosted back
to a version of the UAD that I could render (4.6) and rendered all plugs.
When bouncing the mix with no UAD's I still got a couple of clicks...these
happen in different places. Not repeatable. I think your explanation maybe
closer than you think. Maybe I'm just pushing the system to the edge. This
is a 24 bit mix, tracks and bounce. When I rendered the UAD plugs I created
several new tracks as I was doing a bit of parallel compression. That makes
sensse. Before, when testing, I just got rid of the UAD plugs...no compesastion
for the tracks, just for the test...in other words...no new new tracks added=no
new overhead-UAD plugs=no pops. Rendering the UAD plugs=more overhead because
of higher track count that offsets the UAD plugs that are now gone=pops.
Rod
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Rod,
>In my P3 days when it got to the edge I'd get those clicks too.
>I understand you don't really get three times the power from three UADs.
>Maybe their resources are also on the brink?
>
>Hey Mike, aft
|
|
|
|
| Re: By the way, I'm back... ;o) [message #91167 is a reply to message #91166] |
Mon, 08 October 2007 17:11 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
er I get the P4 happening again I'll take you up on the =
>Hyperthreading fix.
>Tom
> "Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote in message news:471f6311$1@linux...
>
> Hi Rod,
>
> I'll post some instructions on my website later today.
>
> I think what is happening is that the PCI bus is tying up the 1 cpu =
>and samples
> are overflowing a buffer and not making it to disk. With a second =
>CPU. it
> may be enough to keep things moving smoothly. We'll just have to try
=
>it.
>
> All the best,
>
> Mike
>
> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> >Yeah, I'll take you up on that. So you think by turning =
>hyperthreading on,
> >and usuing your dual core fix, which will fix the hyperthreading =
>issue,
> it
> >will fix the problem?
> >Just to give you a little more info. I just tried a bounce to disk of
=
>a
> mix
> >that only contained 1 track of UAD plugs..Uad Fairchild and =
>Cambridge. I
> >still got clicks and pops (about 6 total). when I get rid of all the
=
>UAD
> >plugs there are no clicks or pops.
> >I have 3 UAD cards.
> >I'd be willing to give it a try. Thanks
> >Rod
> >"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi Rod,
> >>
> >>I'm pretty sure this happens because there aren't enough CPU =
>resources.
> >
> >>If you have hyperthreading turned off, I've been using a dual core =
>fix
> for
> >>a couple of months now with no issues. We could try turning =
>hyperthreading
> >>on and using the fix to see if that solves the crackle.
> >>
> >>Good luck!
> >>
> >>Mike=20
> >>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Well...I had to go out of town for a couple days and since I've got
=
>back
> >>I've
> >>>been trouoble shooting the problem I posted about last week.
> >>>I've definatly got it narrowed down to the UAD plugs. Now I think =
>it may
> >>>be a bad UAD card. Not sure yet, still more tests to do tommorrow.
=
>It's
> >>either
> >>>a software rev. mismatch with Paris, or a card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: By the way, I'm back... ;o) [message #91184 is a reply to message #91168] |
Tue, 09 October 2007 06:32 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
or informing the public of a perfectly
> legal way to vote.
>
> Go figure.
>
> But that's the system. Basically if you number each candidate sequentially
> in order of preference, until you run out of people you like, at which point
> you put the same number in each box. Assuming you haven't used the quirk
> to avoid your vote ending up with somebody you dislike, you will always end
> up with a full strength vote against one of the two most popular candidates.
>
> I actually think our system is really good. If the Australian public knew
> how to use it, and, for that matter, who to vote for for their own best interests,
> it would work pretty well methinks.
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.Same here, Melodyne is quite good. The only thing that's different than
Autotune etc is that it records the file to be corrected, and plays _that_
file back
as opposed to being real time. Which means if you make any edit changes on
the track later, you have to re-process it in Melodyne plug-in, otherwise
you won't hear them.
Ted
"Ab" <ab.vangoor@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
>Yes, you can set Pitch'nTime as the default plug-in instead of Logic's
>pitch an timing algorythms. Afaik, it's P'nT LE only (licensed on an iLok
>dongle).
>I don't know about the waves plug-in, but I suppose it's possible.
>For serious pitch an timing corrections I highly recommend Melodyne Plug-in,
>or better still the full version.
>
>Regards,
>Ab
>
>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>Does Logic allow pitch and time changing using plugins like Pitch'n'TIme
>and
>>the Waves Transform bundle's Shifter?
>>
>>Thanks!
>
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon May 25 15:02:08 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08370 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
