| Proud to be an American! [message #57939] |
Tue, 06 September 2005 22:58  |
Pete Ruthenburg
 Messages: 127 Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t and 182
> to
> >> > the
> >> >>> >right ( 50ms=2240 - 192 = 2048)
> >> >>> >Regards,
> >> >>> >Dimitrios
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>I for one am not easy!
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>Yes well, I think because that is too easy !
>:)
>Regards,
>Dimitrios
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:43496148$1@linux...
>>
>> why not just record nothing in Paris. That's what I do. I have a :30 file
>> like that.
>> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>> >Just in wavelab record nothing for 1 sec and then copy this for hundreds
>> of
>> >times until you get say a 5 minute file.
>> >then save as paf.
>> >I will take next question :)
>> >Regards,
>> >Dimitrios
>> >"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
>news:43487b76@linux...
>> >> I made mine by putting Paris in record at the desired sample rate,
>looping
>> >a
>> >> digital input to a mixer in the patchbay for Paris and feeding it
no
>> >audio.
>> >> AA
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message
>> >news:43485317$1@linux...
>> >> >
>> >> > Hey D,
>> >> > Thanks for the Email.
>> >> > I am going to bombard you wiht questions soon.
>> >> > I need to make a ghost of my sytem first.
>> >> > How do you mak a silent PAF file?
>> >> > Sorry if this is a dumb question.
>> >> >
>> >> > "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>> >> >>He,
>> >> >>Yeah well,
>> >> >>I didn't mean to make any harm to your system....
>> >> >>
>> >> >>EDSTransfer 8,16 is better and more relaxed than 8,8.
>> >> >>I use this for 4-5 months now ,no problem at all.
>> >> >>The 8,8 causes slow disk transfers with many tracks.
>> >> >>
>> >> &
|
|
|
|