|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No Spec! ??? [message #84623 is a reply to message #84613] |
Tue, 15 May 2007 11:48  |
Dedric Terry
 Messages: 788 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
follow why you would lose 4 bits...ADAT is ADAT, and to the
> best
> of my knowledge there are no ADDA convertors that go above 24 bit...can
> you
> elaborate on how/where you would lose bit information?
>
> FYI: 20bit recordings have a dynamic range around 106 db or so...far
> greater
> than CDs, tape, etc, so the only one who would really notice would be you,
> and then only if you looked at your bit metering....
>
>
>
> "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>Anyone have any experience w/ these? I'm thinking about picking up a used
>>one for doing remote recording. It has direct analog outs and ADAT outs
>>but if I run the 24 bit outs of the Digimax into Paris' ADAT card I'll
>>lose
>>4 bits. Do you think anyone will notice? I could also just run the
>>direct
>>outs into Paris' AD converters...
>>
>>Gantt
>That's Hot
snorty
"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>His real name is Mr. Snortyhorse.
>
>;o)
>
>
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:466d617c@linux...
>>
>> "Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote:
>>>Is Rod Lincoln your real name, or do you just call yourself that because
>>
>>>you're hot?
>>
>> Both
>> :o)
>> HRL
>>
>>
>>
>>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>news:466d5671$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> There's a project currently being mixed by a protools mix guy here in
>>
>>>> Kansas
>>>> City, that I tracked my drums for in Paris at my place. He mentioned
to
>>
>>>> the
>>>> guy I did the work for that I was tracking too hot. I've never heard
a
>>
>>>> comment
>>>> like this before, and I've done plenty of stuff. The thing is, I've
>>>> heard
>>>> really good things about this engineer, and the mixes I've heard so
far
>>
>>>> sound
>>>> pretty good.
>>>> I don't have any overs when I track, but I usually get as much level
as
>> I
>>>> can before that. Usually within 3db from zero on Paris. There's no
>>>> compression
>>>> before the convertors.
>>>> He says the plugs sound better if the tracks aren't cut too hot. I think
>>>> it's his methodology of using plugs with less head room. I've had plugs
>>
>>>> clip
>>>> (UAD) but I'll just insert a plug like the Paris vst eq before it (no
>> eq
>>>> just lower the trim)and that takes care of it.
>>>> Anyway, for the sake of being opened minded, I'd be interested in any
>>
>>>> thoughts
>>>> on this. Especially from you guys who use protools or native platforms.
>>>> Rod
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>Oh so the little lady didn't want to get her fingers dirty pushing some
buttons and "Oh, no!" turning a knob! Women!!!
Sarah wrote:
> Yeah, the midi fader sets the intial volume, but then the contol changes override
> it. I was trying to avoid changing the volume in the synth module (I hate
> the staring at the little window while I push the cursor buttons and roll
> the data wheel), but that is what I wound up doing.
>
> Thanks all, for the advices.
>
> S
>
>
>
> Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>> You should have a MIDI fader option on the left of the track. Or you
>> could just turn down the output vol of the synthesizer. ;-)
>>
>> Sarah wrote:
>>> OK, I was fine tuning an little MIDI arrangement in Cubase (v.5) and I
> had
>>> this track with some continuous controller data (specifically, some ramping
>
>>> up and down of the master volume). All I wanted to do was select all
> of
>>> that data and change the value of it, i.e., to turn down the overall volume
>
>>> but retain the ups and downs. I tried different approaches and could
> only
>>> change the value of one piece of the ramp at a time. There must be a
> way to
>>> raise or lower the whole thing, right? What am I missing here?
>>>
>>> I miss my Hybrid Arts SMPTE-Track. Simple, intuitive, reliable . . .
> hmm .
>>> . . I do still have my Atari 104
|
|
|
|