| Portable BU [message #79084] |
Sat, 27 January 2007 15:53  |
DC
Messages: 722 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
into the bathroom to pee in the
>> middle of the night and you'll sit right down into the toilet bowl,
>> hoping whichever sleepy male left the seat up remembered to flush.
>
> So, did you ever make that mistake again? ;-)
>
> Reminds me of two true stories, one related, one maybe not...
>
> 1) My ex-wife and I had that age-old argument. I finally offered an idea
> that stuck - we'd BOTH close the toilet. I especially liked that idea
> because we had a dog that loved to drink out of the thing and dribble
> everywhere. (Female dog, if it matters...) So, one day, I'm sitting
> there, minding my own
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Portable BU [message #79097 is a reply to message #79091] |
Sat, 27 January 2007 22:40  |
dc[3]
Messages: 895 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
but I lost all the magic.
>
> Feed Forward give a very dependable 0-over limiter, although for sound I
> still prefer to use Feed Back mode and finalize with a digital limiter.
> This
> little box offers a lot of options and a lot of mojo.
>
> I do like the 33609 a lot and I'm happy to have it for times when the 5043
> is tied up. For anyone doing demos primarily, or local-band work, it
> would
> be silly to spend the extra money, but if you can afford going up a step,
> you can get really slick results with this unit. I think Rupert is kicking
> ass with the Portico line.
|
|
|
|