Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and..........
| So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and.......... [message #79050] |
Fri, 26 January 2007 19:14  |
![Deej [4] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [4] is currently offline")
Deej [4]
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>www.slicehost.com
>
>for hosting some projects for me and my band. $70 per month gets you 400GB
>bandwidth, 1GB RAM, 40GB disk space on a shared server, and it's reserved.
>They'll actually let you use other resources on the host as long as you're
>not sucking resources from someone else's account, but they will promise
>you this much.
>
>I happened upon them because they are Debian friendly (learning another
linux
>distro is about as interesting to me as a poke in the eye with a sharp stick),
>but I'm sure there are similar options for other OS's.
>
>That said, if the guy you're talking about cashed out at a good price, it's
>hard to blame him. My guess is if he's been running a successful, well subscribed
>web community for a long time if you average out his hourly wage it's literally
>less than five dollars per hour. But I'd be surprised if the actual hosting/bandwidth
>was a real issue.
>
>TCB
>
>"Uptown Jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>Howdy.
>>
>>I was wondering about user forums and hit counts and hardware and
>>electricity. How many users can Kim's setup handle, for instance? You
>>measure that sort of thing in "hits", right? What is Kim's setup, anyway?
>>How much power does it use per month? How much hardware and power is
>>necessary for a site that attracts, say, 3,000 people? 10,000? 50,000?
>>
>>I was wondering these things because a beloved user forum, "Chowhound",
>has
>>gone completely to shit since being sold by the founder to CNet. They've
>>absolutely wrecked the thing, and many of the old-school Hounds have left
>>the building, so to speak. The founder claims
|
|
|
|
| Re: So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and.......... [message #79053 is a reply to message #79050] |
Fri, 26 January 2007 20:12  |
audioguy_editout_
Messages: 249
Registered: December 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
wo presets for finding just the right
>combination, or automating a change between the two - very smooth sound
when
>morphing.
>
>I'm sure they will have a free demo in time - worth watching. I'll post
a
>link when the review is done. There's a lot more to cover there - lot's
of
>recallability and features that you don't find in other plugins.
>
>Regards,
>Dedric
>
>I think it's mostly what I pointed out. Build your own servers, oversell the
space because most people won't use anywhere near their allotted share, so
you make 12 slices out of a server that could handle 4 if they were all at
full load. Let slices borrow from each other most of the time, and then balance
demanding slices across hardware when necessary. Bandwidth is cheap.
Anyway, I'm thinking about a $20 slice for me as a Debian playground for
a couple of uses.
TCB
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>From Twenty Bucks?!?!?
>
>Strewth. That's cheap. Those are some sensational deals. Not sure how they're
>making money. How can you even offer somebody 400GB of net bandwidth for
>$70? Can I have that at my home please? ;o)
>
>That's amazing...
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>There's also the possibility of virtual hosting. I'm thinking seriously
>about
>>using these guys
>>
>>www.slicehost.com
>>
>>for hosting some projects for me and my band. $70 per month gets you 400GB
>>bandwidth, 1GB RAM, 40GB disk space on a shared server, and it's reserved.
>>They'll actually let you use other resources on the host as long as you're
>>not sucking resources from someone else's account, but they will promise
>>you this much.
>>
>>I happened upon them because they are Debian friendly (learning another
>linux
>>distro is about as interesting to me as a poke in the eye with a sharp
stick),
>>but I'm sure there are similar options for other OS's.
>>
>>That said, if the guy you're talking about cashed out at a good price,
it's
>>hard to blame him. My guess is if he's been running a successful, well
subscribed
>>web community for a long time if you average out his hourly wage it's literally
>>less than five dollars per hour. But I'd be surprised if the actu
|
|
|
|
| Re: So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and.......... [message #79054 is a reply to message #79050] |
Fri, 26 January 2007 20:43 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
al hosting/bandwidth
>>was a real issue.
>>
>>TCB
>>
>>"Uptown Jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>Howdy.
>>>
>>>I was wondering about user forums and hit counts and hardware and
>>>electricity. How many users can Kim's setup handle, for instance? You
>>>measure that sort of thing in "hits", right? What is Kim's setup, anyway?
>>>How much power does it use per month? How much hardware and power is
>>>necessary for a site that attracts, say, 3,000 people? 10,000? 50,000?
>>>
>>>I was wondering these things because a beloved user forum, "Chowhound",
>>has
>>>gone completely to shit since being sold by the founder to CNet. They've
>>>absolutely wrecked the thing, and many of the old-school Hounds have left
>>>the building, so to speak. The founder claims adamantly that he couldn't
>>>afford to keep the site up and running, that it was going to go away
>>>entirely if he didn't get deep pockets in on the action, but it somehow
>>>doesn't add up for me. I was wondering if he's telling the truth or lying
>>to
>>>hide a greedy streak.
>>>
>>>Jimmy
>>>
>>>
>>
>2 places during that install as I recall - one in your choosen directory
installed path ( in this case, that'd be C:\ParisPro) and the system
directory is the windows\system32\ensoniq\plugins folder (from memory, not
anywhere near a paris rig at the moment).....
AA
"Jeff Hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
news:45dcea9b$1@linux...
>I assume the right path is where I installed parispro or is it to the
>ensoniq directory in the windows folder?
>
> JH
>
> Aaron Allen wrote:
>> Sounds to me like the subsystem FX patch didn't have the right install
>> path. Be 'very' observant of where it's installing that patch.
>>
>> Uninstall the patch completely.
>> Restart PC.
>> Install patch - watch that path! - install tries to add a line to it.
>> Restart PC.
>> Give it a try.
>>
>> AA
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and.......... [message #79055 is a reply to message #79054] |
Fri, 26 January 2007 21:49 |
Deej [4]
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> "Jeff Hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:45dce294$1@linux...
>>
>>>Aaron Allen wrote:
>>>
>>>>XP?
>>>>
>>>>"Jeff Hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:45dc82ba$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I tried a reinstall to address issues. No EDS effects show up.
>>>>>Repeated the process same thing. VST's are showing up. Installing to
>>>>>c:\ParisPro.
>>>>>
>>>>>Where to next?
>>>>>
>>>>>Hoov
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>yes...
>>>
>>>Hoov
>>
>>Ok so if you partition a hard drive into two partitions which one will be
on the outside of the disk and which will be on the inside of the disk?
How do you know?
I want to seperate my audio drive into 2 partitions.
One for recording and tracking (on the outside of the platter)
and the other for mixing etc...(inside of the platter).
I will be using Partition Magic 8.
thx
bMain response--it doesn't matter anymore. Disk performance is about 100th
on the list of issues for DAWs.
Secondary response. The outside of the disk will have the highest throughput,
i.e. number of MB/s. The lowest _latency_ will be when files are contiguous,
regardless of which part of the disk they are on. Latency is a function how
much time the head of the drive spends seeking, i.e. not doing anything while
moving to the part of the drive where it will read, while throughput is a
function of how fast the drive is spinning. The outer part of the drive spins
marginally faster. A 10k drive has more throughput than a 7.2k drive.
None of which matters, at all, these days. Just format it and start recording.
TCB
"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>
>Ok so if you partition a hard drive into two partitions which one will be
>on the outside of the disk and which will be on the inside of the disk?
>How do you know?
>I want to seperate my audio drive into 2 partitions.
>One for recording and tracking (on the outside of the platter)
>and the other for mixing etc...(inside of the platter).
>I will be using Partition Magic 8.
>thx
>b
>Dude, with 400GB of internet bandwidth...
....I can stream a radio station at 32k to 12 million listeners!
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>I think it's mostly what I pointed out. Build your own servers, oversell
the
>space because most people won't use anywhere near their allotted share,
so
>you make 12 slices out of a server that could handle 4 if they were all
at
>full load. Let slices borrow from each other most of the time, and then
balance
>demanding slices across hardware when necessary. Bandwidth is cheap.
>
>Anyway, I'm thinking about a $20 slice for me as a Debian playground for
>a couple of uses.
>
>TCB
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>From Twenty Bucks?!?!?
>>
>>Strewth. That's cheap. Those are some sensational deals. Not sure how they're
>>making money. How can you even offer somebody 400GB of net bandwidth for
>>$70? Can I have that at my home please? ;o)
>>
>>That's amazing...
>>
>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>There's also the possibility of virtual hosting. I'm thinking seriously
>>about
>>>using these guys
>>>
>>>www.slicehost.com
>>>
>>>for hosting some projects for me and my band. $70 per month gets you 400GB
>>>bandwidth, 1GB RAM, 40GB disk space on a shared server, and it's reserved.
>>>They'll actually let you use other resources on the host as long as you're
>>>not sucking resources from someone else's account, but they will promise
>>>you this much.
>>>
>>>I happened upon them because they are Debian friendly (learning another
>>linux
>>>distro is about as interesting to me as a poke in the eye with a sharp
>stick),
>>>but I'm sure there are similar options for other OS's.
>>>
>>>That said, if the guy you're talking about cashed out at a good price,
>it's
>>>hard to blame him. My guess is if he's been running a successful, well
>subscribed
>>>web community for a long time if you average out his hourly wage it's
literally
>>>less than five dollars per hour. But I'd be surprised if the actual hosting/bandwidth
>>>was a real issue.
>>>
>>>TCB
>>>
>>>"Uptown Jimmy" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and.......... [message #79058 is a reply to message #79055] |
Sat, 27 January 2007 01:46 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
of issues for DAWs.
>>>>>Secondary response. The outside of the disk will have the highest
>>>>>throughput,
>>>>>i.e. number of MB/s. The lowest _latency_ will be when files are
>>>>>contiguous,
>>>>>regardless of which part of the disk they are on. Latency is a function
>>
>>>>>how
>>>>>much time the head of the drive spends seeking, i.e. not doing anything
>>
>>>>>while
>>>>>moving to the part of the drive where it will read, while throughput
is
>> a
>>>>>function of how fast the drive is spinning. The outer part of the drive
>>
>>>>>spins
>>>>>marginally faster. A 10k drive has more throughput than a 7.2k drive.
>>>>>None of which matters, at all, these days. Just format it and start
>>>>>recording.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>TCB
>>>>>
>>>>>"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ok so if you partition a hard drive into two partitions which one will
>> be
>>>>>>on the outside of the disk and which will be on the inside of the disk?
>>>>>>How do you know?
>>>>>>I want to seperate my audio drive into 2 partitions.
>>>>>>One for recording and tracking (on the outside of the platter)
>>>>>>and the other for mixing etc...(inside of the platter).
>>>>>>I will be using Partition Magic 8.
>>>>>>thx
>>>>>>b
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Chris Ludwig
>>>> ADK
>>>> chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
>>>> www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
>>>> (859) 635-5762
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>Dimitrios,
If the spdif out of the A/D converter is fed to the Pulsar spdif input, then
the Pulsar would be receiving clock signal from the AD. To my knowledge, a
device can't be clocked from it's own digital output, only from a signal
arriving at it's digital input if it is set to slave so the AD would not be
clocked from the Mytek.unless it has a BNC clock input that can be fed a WC
signal.
As for the DAC-1, I use this and it will basically lock to the incoming
clock signal from Paris/Mytek and then upsample this signal before
converting it back to analog. The newer units upsample to 192k. Mine
upsamples to 96k.
That's pretty cool that you got VSTi to work with Paris.
;o)
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:45dda357$1@linux...
>
> Hi,
> I would like to ask:
> My pulsar card is wordclocked from Mytek so the spdif input of the card
> ,probably,
> is driven from this clock.
> FIRST QUESTION: I have a prototype AD converter (very nice) that has spdif
> output. Now connecting this output to the Pulsar spdif input would the
> ACTUAL
> ad converter sound be CLOCKED ?
> Up till now I was using Behringer ultramath converter which was accepting
> the ad's spdif out and reclocked with mytek's wordclock using the bnc
> (wordclock)
> input on behringer.
> Do you think like I do that now this AD's spdif output will be clocked by
> simply connected to Pulsar spdif input (which Pulsar is clocked as a whole
> from Mytek) ?
>
> Second question is , if I buy an external DA converter like Benchmark DAC1
> (anyone using it ?) and connect it to Paris spdif out (Paris is
> wordclocked
> already from Mytek) will my DA sound be CLOCKED with the rest of my
> devices
> getting clock from Mytek ?
>
> I know that these questions might sound obvious to be answered but I wanna
> be sure !!!!!
> Thanks
> Dimitrios....or at least more dynamic........
;o)
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:45dda3a7$1@linux...
>
> I think when you record to a drive done with MaxBlast, though, everything
> sound warmer.
>
> TCB
>
> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>Damn right!!!.....though I always heard that if you use Partition Magic,
> at
>>some point, the *magic* is bound to happen.
>>
>>;o)
>>
>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:45dd23e8$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Don't forget to use that wonderful MaxBlast application Maxtor includes
>
>>> for
>>> formatting!
>>>
>>> TCB
>>>
>>> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>>> (gasp!!!!....sputter.!!!!!)................Brandon!!!!...... .don't
>>>>listen
>>> to
>>>>these guys!!!!........spend at least two weeks testing different drives
>>> and
>>>>permutations of drive arrays, like RAID 0, or 0-1 with both SCSI and
>>>>SATA
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and.......... [message #79061 is a reply to message #79054] |
Sat, 27 January 2007 02:46 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ern here the inner workings of the mac.
>
> let the phone calls begin.At least nothing melted!
Cheers,
TC
DJ wrote:
> both #3 slots?...........Well....at least it's consistent.
>
> "rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4egrt21q7l7staqknpkpduvsk64scql7sc@4ax.com...
>> both #3 ram slots would go bad on my dual 2.3. i've swapped ram into
>> the slots and nothing but putting the ram into slots #4 they both show
>> up fine. it would be nice that when stuff like this happens the puter
>> would let you know. the only reason i found out was due to showing
>> the intern here the inner workings of the mac.
>>
>> let the phone calls begin.
>
>Hi all,
Ok, I've decided to keep my 737sp, and I just bought a 747 for the 2-buss. I recently also got a red type b mic, which I really like!
Now, I've got a Rode K2 here which has never really done it for me either (on mainly vox and acoustic gtrs). Anyone found good uses for these? Tube replacement maybe?
I know it's not ever a great idea to sell mics, but I just find it's one of those mics that I have to fight with, say compared to the type b. It's not as clear or present to my ears.
I've got a good friend who loves the K2 mic on cello (above some much higher end mics), but I don't think I'll be recording cello anytime soon..
Any thoughts?
Cheers,
TCHey...someone posted a "Mens Top Ten Rules" a while back. I can't seem to
find it now. Does anyone have it???
RodYeah, I'm not philosophically opposed to the guy cashing in on his good
idea. My main problems are:
1. He lied to us, assuming that none of us knew enough about IT to know
better. He flat lied to us.
2. The forum was wonderful, and now it is bordering on sucky.
3. It may have been his idea, but like any user forum, it is not his. It is
the sum of its many people-parts. Period. If it was just his idea, it would
have been nothing. It was the community that was of value, and now it's
gone.
I'm really pissed.
Jimmy
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:45dced2f$1@linux...
>
> There's also the possibility of virtual hosting. I'm thinking seriously
about
> using these guys
>
> www.slicehost.com
>
> for hosting some projects for me and my band. $70 per month gets you 400GB
> bandwidth, 1GB RAM, 40GB disk space on a shared server, and it's reserved.
> They'll actually let you use other resources on the host as long as y
|
|
|
|
| Re: So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and.......... [message #79062 is a reply to message #79050] |
Sat, 27 January 2007 04:17 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ou're
> not sucking resources from someone else's account, but they will promise
> you this much.
>
> I happened upon them because they are Debian friendly (learning another
linux
> distro is about as interesting to me as a poke in the eye with a sharp
stick),
> but I'm sure there are similar options for other OS's.
>
> That said, if the guy you're talking about cashed out at a good price,
it's
> hard to blame him. My guess is if he's been running a successful, well
subscribed
> web community for a long time if you average out his hourly wage it's
literally
> less than five dollars per hour. But I'd be surprised if the actual
hosting/bandwidth
> was a real issue.
>
> TCB
>
> "Uptown Jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >Howdy.
> >
> >I was wondering about user forums and hit counts and hardware and
> >electricity. How many users can Kim's setup handle, for instance? You
> >measure that sort of thing in "hits", right? What is Kim's setup, anyway?
> >How much power does it use per month? How much hardware and power is
> >necessary for a site that attracts, say, 3,000 people? 10,000? 50,000?
> >
> >I was wondering these things because a beloved user forum, "Chowhound",
> has
> >gone completely to shit since being sold by the founder to CNet. They've
> >absolutely wrecked the thing, and many of the old-school Hounds have left
> >the building, so to speak. The founder claims adamantly that he couldn't
> >afford to keep the site up and running, that it was going to go away
> >entirely if he didn't get deep pockets in on the action, but it somehow
> >doesn't add up for me. I was wondering if he's telling the truth or lying
> to
> >hide a greedy streak.
> >
> >Jimmy
> >
> >
>Hey guys, just added the fourth EDS card to my system via the Avid 7 Channel
PCI Extender Chassis. I did not check the IRQ's after installation, just
figured I'd fire it up and see what would happen. All seems to be working
just dandy. After the fact, I went in to check the IRQ's and noticed that
2 cards share IRQ 5 and the other 2 cards share IRQ 11.
Just curious to know if this matters at all.
Tyronewell my ass is beginning to sag a bit...
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:38:39 -0800, TC
<tc@spammetodeathyoubastards.org> wrote:
>At least nothing melted!
>
>Cheers,
>
>TC
>
>DJ wrote:
>> both #3 slots?...........Well....at least it's consistent.
>>
>> "rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4egrt21q7l7staqknpkpduvsk64scql7sc@4ax.com...
>>> both #3 ram slots would go bad on my dual 2.3. i've swapped ram into
>>> the slots and nothing but putting the ram into slots #4 they both show
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and.......... [message #79070 is a reply to message #79067] |
Sat, 27 January 2007 09:42 |
Deej [4]
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ou can -
> > to give them a bigger laugh.
> >
> > On 23 Feb 2007 04:57:47 +1000, "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Hey...someone posted a "Mens Top Ten Rules" a while back. I can't seem
to
> >>find it now. Does anyone have it???
> >>Rod
> >
>
>"Sarah" <sarahjane@sarahtonin.com> wrote in message news:45de3627$1@linux...
> That's pretty funny. But next lifetime you may come back female. You'll
> be about 8 years old and wander sleepily into the bathroom to pee in the
> middle of the night and you'll sit right down into the toilet bowl, hoping
> whichever sleepy male left the seat up remembered to flush.
So, did you ever make that mistake again? ;-)
Reminds me of two true stories, one related, one maybe not...
1) My ex-wife and I had that age-old argument. I finally offered an idea
that stuck - we'd BOTH close the toilet. I especially liked that idea
because we had a dog that loved to drink out of the thing and dribble
everywhere. (Female dog, if it matters...) So, one day, I'm sitting there,
minding my own business, when Mimi runs in the room doing the pee dance like
you wouldn't believe. OK, so I finish up, stand, turn around and flush and
close the lid out of habit, then turn to the sink. A moment later I hear an
un-Godly sound behind me! Turns out that she hadn't paid attention to the
fact that I closed the lid and she'd done the
spin-around-while-dropping-the-pants routine, only to plant her butt on the
lid and pee all over herself! (And of course get mad at ME!)
2) My current wife and I have two kids. For a while there, the bathroom was
really starting to smell like pee. I scrubbed (yes, me, the guy...) the
entire toilet, the floor, the wall, the tub, etc, but the smell just
wouldn't go away! Dang... Well, one night I was on the computer and I
heard my son get up and go into the bathroom. Something didn't seem right,
so I walked over and looked in - my son, who seemed to be sleep walking, had
opened the doors under the sink and was peeing away into the cabinet! We
had a lot of bathtub sponge toys, so they had been soaking it all up...
> Men should sit to pee anyway. Not to humiliate or emasculate them, but
> just to prevent the drips and splatter and the fine mist of urine coating
> the toilet area from the overspray.
Have you ever lifted the seat and looked at the bottom side of it? Must be
splash back from people who sit down... ;-)
> Guys like to pee outside . . . it satisfies a primitive urge to mark
> territory. Just make sure you spit
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and.......... [message #79080 is a reply to message #79070] |
Sat, 27 January 2007 12:58 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
damantly that he
>couldn't
>> >> >afford to keep the site up and running, that it was going to go away
>> >> >entirely if he didn't get deep pockets in on the action, but it
>somehow
>> >> >doesn't add up for me. I was wondering if he's telling the truth or
>lying
>> >> to
>> >> >hide a greedy streak.
>> >> >
>> >> >Jimmy
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>Thanks..much appreciated...and funny!
Rod
rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>that would be me....
>
>
>The Guys' Rules
>At last a guy has taken the time to write this all down
>
> Finally , the guys' side of the story.
>( I must admit, it's pretty good.)
>We always hear " the rules "
>From the female side.
>
>
>Now here are the rules from the male side.
>These are our rules!
>Please note.. these are all numbered "1"
>ON PURPOSE!
>
>
>1. Men are NOT mind readers.
>
>1. Learn to work the toilet seat.
>You're a big girl. If it's up, put it down.
>We need it up, you need it down.
>You don't hear us complaining about you leaving it down.
>
>1. Sunday sports It's like the full moon
>or the changing of the tides.
>Let it be.
>
>1. Shopping is NOT a sport.
>And no, we are never going to think of it that way.
>
>1. Crying is blackmail.
>
>1. Ask for what you want.
>Let us be clear on this one:
>Subtle hints do not work!
>Strong hints do not work!
>Obvious hints do not work!
>Just say it!
>
>1. Yes and No are perfectly acceptable answers to almost every
>question.
>
>1. Come to us with a problem only if you want help solving it. That's
>what we do.
>Sympathy is what your girlfriends are for.
>
>1. A headache that lasts for 17 months is a Problem.
> See a doctor.
>
>1. Anything we said 6 months ago is inadmissible in an argument.
>In fact, all comments become null and void after 7 Days.
>
>1. If you won't dress like the Victoria 's Secret girls, don't Expect
>us to act like soap opera guys.
>
>1. If you think you're fat, you probably are.
>Don't ask us.
>
>1. If something we said can be interpreted two ways and one of the
>ways makes you sad or angry, we meant the other one
>
>1. You can either ask us to do something
>Or tell us how you want it done.
>Not both.
>If you already know best how to do it, just do it yourself.
>
>1. Whenever possible, Please say whatever you have to say during
>commercials.
>
>1. Christopher Columbus did NOT need directions and neither do we.
>
>1. ALL men see in only 16 colors, like Windows default settings.
>Peach, for example, is a fruit,
|
|
|
|
| Re: So I was actually reading the Cubase 4 manual and.......... [message #79082 is a reply to message #79080] |
Sat, 27 January 2007 13:27 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>1. If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, Expect an answer
>you don't want to hear.
>
>1. When we have to go somewhere, absolutely anything you wear is
>fine... Really .
>
>1. Don't ask us what we're thinking about unless you are prepared to
>discuss such topics as baseball, the shotgun formation,
>or golf.
>
>1. You have enough clothes.
>
>1. You have too many shoes.
>
>1. I am in shape. Round IS a shape!
>
>1. Thank you for reading this.
>Yes, I know, I have to sleep on the couch tonight;
>
>
>But did you know men really don't mind that? It's like camping.
>
>Pass this to as many men as you can -
>to give them a laugh.
>
>Pass this to as many women as you can -
>to give them a bigger laugh.
>
>On 23 Feb 2007 04:57:47 +1000, "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Hey...someone posted a "Mens Top Ten Rules" a while back. I can't seem
to
>>find it now. Does anyone have it???
>>Rod
>My wife needs to get an audio interface/mic pre and a mic for voice over
work (she does radio/TV spots and such). It will be connected to a G4
iBook, so it can be USB or Firewire.
I would suggest one of the MOTU firewire interfaces since I've had good
experiences with MOTU. But she only really needs one channel so those
would be buying more than she needs.
This was mentioned here recently, is it decent?
http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/Lambda/
Any other suggestions?
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.comJamie,
I recently spec'd a VO system for a friend in the western part of the state
in a similar situation - looking for good quality but not overkill - I'm
going with the TC Konnekt 8 for him as it's pres have gotten great reviews
(haven't heard it yet, so take that for what its' worth - in that price
range it probably is the best of the bunch).
For a mic, the Blue Bluebird is a great mic for VO - nice even, clear
response across the board - smooth highs too which isn't common in sub-$1k
mics.
Regards,
Dedric
On 2/22/07 9:25 PM, in article 45de6ce4$1@linux, "Jamie K"
<Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
> My wife needs to get an audio interface/mic pre and a mic for voice over
> work (she does radio/TV spots and such). It will be connected to a G4
> iBook, so it can be USB or Firewire.
>
> I would suggest one of the MOTU firewire interfaces since I've had good
> experiences with MOTU. But she only really needs one channel so those
> would be buying more than she needs.
>
> This was mentioned here recently, is it decent?
> http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/Lambda/
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.comMore similarities than differences. Amazing. I do like the 5043 a lot as
it's still got a little bit of an organic edge to it and I can use it for
tracking, but the UAD-1 33609 is standing toe-to-toe with the Portico as a
channel insert in a mix. I never thought I'd see the day when it was hard to
tell the difference between a software plugin and a very high end hardware
processor.Yeah, I keep the lid down, too, to keep my cat out of the toilet water.
Good trick on Mimi, though. :)
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Sep 05 08:56:23 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03542 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
