The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » 200+ bucks an hour?
200+ bucks an hour? [message #68887] Fri, 02 June 2006 21:34 Go to next message
dc[3] is currently offline  dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
>> listening to the clip I have on the website. Those snippets
>> >> >> >> are before the re-mastering, so (hopefully) the CD will sound
Re: 200+ bucks an hour? [message #68891 is a reply to message #68887] Sat, 03 June 2006 05:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
r /> >> >> >> >songs I posted oh so long ago (all recorded on Paris in my
>> >> >> >little home studio).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Please check out our website:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >http://www.themateswe
Re: 200+ bucks an hour? [message #68896 is a reply to message #68887] Sat, 03 June 2006 07:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rich Lamanna is currently offline  Rich Lamanna   UNITED STATES
Messages: 316
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
t; >Well, I don't really know who's still here after all this
time,
> >> but
> >> >> I
> >> >> >> >just
> >> >> >> >> >wanted to let those who may be interested, or were interested
> at
> >> >one
> >> >> >> >time,
> >> >> >> >> >or used to be interesed and still just might be interested,
&
Re: 200+ bucks an hour? [message #68905 is a reply to message #68896] Sat, 03 June 2006 09:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
d with PARIS, including your project which is on my list to

>order.
>
>These days Logic on a dual processor box, such as my 2.5GHZ G5, is
>fairly miraculous in capabilities. Not perfect of course, and for years

>it was burdened by some ridiculous bugs. But recent updates have brought

>it to the point where I can recommend it - to the point where it's
>largely a joy to use. Clients really like what I'm creating with it.
>
>The included FX plugins are good to great. The included soft synths
>include some real gems that augment my 3rd party soft synth collection
>nicely. There is a learning curve, but update improvements have made the

Re: 200+ bucks an hour? [message #68926 is a reply to message #68905] Sun, 04 June 2006 03:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
ttle behind RME. I haven't a/b'd them
with the Emu cards to compare there. MOTU's converters are supposedly
significantly improved over the 2408 days (I had one - it was okay, but
probably a little below Paris converters at the time - that's probably since
changed).

Regards,
Dedric

On 7/14/06 1:35 PM, in article 44b7f1e5$1@linux, "macle" <Mates9999@cs.com>
wrote:

>
> Hmmm, yeah, I suppose that's kinda lame... first I post and
> say, "hey, here's my new CD done entirely in Paris". Then 2
> seconds later, "yeah, I'm thinking of dumping Paris...."
>
> But, you know, I'm just curious, 98% chance I'm just going to
> stick with Paris.
>
> I think it's cool that so many have switched but still hang out here! And,
> I think it's interesting (as
Re: 200+ bucks an hour? [message #68989 is a reply to message #68896] Mon, 05 June 2006 04:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rich Lamanna is currently offline  Rich Lamanna   UNITED STATES
Messages: 316
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
cmQ/doxO9otI8iRHkmRdNmV7DWaH TWZzbWVB0iRv
ttt0liN3FohWKP9jafIPWwh3TugNHmAnvTIY5I0pxw0pg3IrFQ5qGY5pDdJp r0gpqXLfHE5r
n4hq1cBrGTJpwFYixxYjrRYrufZps6ErkxYYRIlRj9aOyFIzN/MsH3MiLvMw LTMxGZNvIXNv
7zbpJFMxB7dvA7cxAbdwieJw/RZvG1dwK7OYHjdvJ9My/bLkFNdxGXdzMxdy EzdyXSkz6dYg
OHMWjJbrtpM7SNM5o1MJlPM4WTd2r7N1KQ92Z/c2eRPucJd2Xxc6ZTekfjc3 g5fsclfueBc7
XRd5a9d3b7d5D0o7U/edAMMVFyBuwdM+xzM+53N7uVeotNemvrd7xZf1wnd8 zXf06hP/eyME
P63XPHYPRj3EP1kUQ3GkRTt0RbmKfkVFf+kKf70KRet3RL1PRAF4fwu4f+f3 gAH0RP2X+gi4
gbEPgtFPgiWUggHrReH3qqi3fcE0ucS0s1hmUr0UA3sUSIfLhIV0tkSwAYM0 U5B0hVM4AmG4
hIeUhU+4hmPYA2d4S0m4UjoYAEFYAHFyAS42X2FMBrEFDP01YMmRic1xYAW2 YP10WMvVifkU
ipsYi584WZdYi69Yir34UimGCqsxv0hhUamVAhwVwKJVZZTYYbsYjOVYXed4 U6cYXqGnisOY
DP+1HfEYTw0WYuOYjgnZjsf4UNX0VeFmb/brDTrPiKWsCjtW/4/rmGAL2ZIN uZKj+JLXjFkp
mZOzWJNDGZS3mFwf9o9D1YrFWJSRR
Re: 200+ bucks an hour? [message #68998 is a reply to message #68989] Tue, 06 June 2006 03:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
difficulty with using it, although I'll agree it's not most
> >> intuitive interface they coud've devised. What are you having
> >> trouble with? I'll try to help.
> >>
> >> Neil
> >
> >
>Sounds like a close call - a bit hot to be hiking ridgelines for that long
no doubt. Glad you made it back safely.

The climate here does me the same way - I don't think about it like I should
- it's deceiving. I'll often go a whole day in the studio without drinking
anything, then go trail running... and forget to take my water bottle in the
car to the trailhead...then wonder why I feel weird.

I guess Camelbak's slogan hasn't really sunk in with me yet: "Hydrate or
die". Too subtle perhaps.

Regards,
Dedric


On 7/18/06 9:24 PM, in article 44bda659@linux, "DJ"
<animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:

> Thanks Dedric. I just got in and I'm fried so I'll give it a go tomorr
Re: 200+ bucks an hour? [message #69007 is a reply to message #68998] Tue, 06 June 2006 08:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aaron Allen is currently offline  Aaron Allen   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
essage news:44be3d41$1@linux...
>
> When I build my new console I will need to insert a patchbay into my
chain.
> I have heard some people complain that patchbays severly decrease quality.
> Opinions on that?
> Also, suggestions on good patchbays with XLR inputs and balanced 1/4
ouputs?
>
> Thanks,
> bDavid, what are your concerns with regard with TRS being used for XLR
throughput outside of something requiring special consieration such as
phantom voltage to old pin-3 hot ribbon mics?

W.


"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message news:44be4c87@linux...
> Hey Brandon,
>
> A patching system built from high quality cabling and connectors will have
> little or no effect on the signal quality. I do recommend XLR patching
> for mic lines... TRS would be fine for line level signals. Avoid gold
> connections at the patching point, they are designed to be used where the
> connection is never (or extremely seldom) removed. The gold coating
> prevents oxidization over long periods of time. If used in a patching
> point, the gold will wear off very quickly (negating any benefits). If
> you can provide some details as to your set-up, I can make some
> suggestions.
>
> David.
>
> Brandon wrote:
>> When I build my new console I will need to insert a patchbay into my
>> chain.
>> I have heard some pe
Re: 200+ bucks an hour? [message #69008 is a reply to message #69007] Tue, 06 June 2006 08:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
EK Sound is currently offline  EK Sound   CANADA
Messages: 939
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
ople complain that patchbays severly decrease
>> quality.
>> Opinions on that?
>> Also, suggestions on good patchbays with XLR inputs and balanced 1/4
>> ouputs?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> bBasically, I was going to put all my rackmount gear in a sound proof cabinet
that will be built in to my console.(2- dual channel mic pres, 2- MECS, 2-
RNC's, and what ever else I may add into the equation later)
I need to be able to access the patch points on each device without getting
on my knees and pulling it all out of the cabinet. So, I was going to mount
a patchbay on the side of the cabinet that I can access externally for convienence.

thx,
b



"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>
>When I build my new console I will need to insert a patchbay into my chain.
>I have heard some people complain that patchbays severly decrease quality.
>Opinions on that?
>Also, suggestions on good patchbays with XLR inputs and balanced 1/4 ouputs?
>
>Thanks,
>bIf any of that rack gear is class A or tube (or both) it's going to get hot,
so make sure it has a space above it and make sure your sound proof cabinet
is well ventilated (which pretty much negates the sound
proofing..........and why do you need to sound proof preamps??.........oh
well, anyway.......;O) .

Deej


"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:44be65e6$1@linux...
>
> Basically, I was going to put all my rackmount gear in a sound proof
cabinet
> that will be built in to my console.(2- dual channel mic pres, 2- MECS, 2-
> RNC's, and what ever else I may add into the equation later)
> I need to be able to acces
Re: 200+ bucks an hour? [message #69021 is a reply to message #69008] Tue, 06 June 2006 17:23 Go to previous message
Rich Lamanna is currently offline  Rich Lamanna   UNITED STATES
Messages: 316
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
> >so make sure it has a space above it and make sure your sound proof cabinet
>is well ventilated (which pretty much negates the sound
>proofing..........and why do you need to sound proof preamps??.........oh
>well, anyway.......;O) .
>
>Deej
>
>
>"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:44be65e6$1@linux...
>>
>> Basically, I was going to put all my rackmount gear in a sound proof
>cabinet
>> that will be built in to my console.(2- dual channel mic pres, 2- MECS, 2-
>> RNC's, and what ever else I may add into the equation later)
>> I need to be able to access the patch points on each device without
>getting
>> on my knees and pulling it all out of the cabinet. So, I was going to
>mount
>> a patchbay on the side of the cabinet that I can access externally for
>convienence.
>>
>> thx,
>> b
>>
>>
>>
>> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >When I build my new console I will need to insert a patchbay into my
>chain.
>> >I have heard some people complain that patchbays severly decrease
>quality.
>> >Opinions on that?
>> >Also, suggestions on good patchbays with XLR inputs and balanced 1/4
>ouputs?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >b
>>
>.......errrrrr.......well......uhhhh.......

;oP


"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:t51tb25eebqsf0p6t6eip91lmg3b1icmat@4ax.com...
> and of course your had enough sense not to tell your near widow of
> your little faux pax???
>
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:44:14 -0600, "DJ"
> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>
> >That would be the operative word
> >
> >;o)
>
Previous Topic: RIP Billy Preston
Next Topic: Burn Time vs Accuracy
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Sep 05 10:27:21 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02035 seconds