|
|
| Re: OT Best Brad Paisley CD? [message #60290 is a reply to message #60288] |
Tue, 15 November 2005 17:39   |
John Macy
Messages: 242
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>get the signal close enough on the way in that any touch up can be done
with
>Paris software thus eliminating the latency situations.
>
>I'm guessing that most would find this ludicrous, but if anyone is
>succeeding with such an idea I would be curious.
I started out recording trying to do all my compression in the box, for reasons
of cost and flexibility. However, the tradeoff is not really that simple.
I have found that the performer often "plays" to the compression, especially
during vocals. Think of it in terms of a guitar player playing to the sound
of a sustained amp. You can't really get that after the fact. My epiphany
about this occurred when I put my voice through a Lawson-DW Fearn-Manley
ELOP. For the first time in my recording experience, the damned thing sound
right off the bat like a record. Not necessarily a good record, but a record
nonetheless. :)
>
>Last night I was trying to get our Mac to boot to a Norton Utilities CD by
holding down the *C* key. Wouldn't work, no way, nohow. Leave it to Mac to
require a third party software to defrag a hard drive.This, along with the
joy involved in doing simple things like copying files from a CD must be the
isuck feature.
;o)
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:mqd2q1588bo40rmprm2qloactqhc249ov
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Best Brad Paisley CD? [message #60292 is a reply to message #60290] |
Tue, 15 November 2005 17:59 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
:
>>I'm thinking about trying to get rid of as many software effects as
>>possible. Is the idea of buying 4-5 RNC Compressors for drums along with
>a
>>couple of good compressors for vocals and bass a crazy idea. The goal is
>to
>>get the signal close enough on the way in that any touch up can be done
>with
>>Paris software thus eliminating the latency situations.
>>
>>I'm guessing that most would find this ludicrous, but if anyone is
>>succeeding with such an idea I would be curious.
>
>
>I started out recording trying to do all my compression in the box, for
reasons
>of cost and flexibility. However, the tradeoff is not really that simple.
> I have found that the performer often "plays" to the compression, especially
>during vocals. Think of it in terms of a guitar player playing to the sound
>of a sustained amp. You can't really get that after the fact. My epiphany
>about this occurred when I put my voice through a Lawson-DW Fearn-Manley
>ELOP. For the first time in my recording experience, the damned thing sound
>right off the bat like a record. Not necessarily a good record, but a record
>nonetheless. :)
>>
>>
>I own two RNC's, and they are fabulous. They sound better
than any software I have heard. I highly recommend them.
Chris
Gary Flanigan" <gary_flanigan@ce9.uscourts.gov> wrote:
>
>"Sanbar" <sanbar@wi.rr.com> wrote:
>>I'm thinking about trying to get rid of as many software effects as
>>possible. Is the idea of buying 4-5 RNC Compressors for drums along with
>a
>>couple of good compressors for vocals and bass a crazy idea. The goal is
>to
>>get the signal close enough on the way in that any touch up can be done
>with
>>Paris software thus eliminating the latency situations.
>>
>>I'm guessing that most would find this ludicrous, but if anyone is
>>succeeding with such an idea I would be curious.
>
>
>I started out recording trying to do all my compression in the box, for
reasons
>of cost and flexibility. However, the tradeoff is not really that simple.
> I have found that the performer often "plays" to the compression, especially
>during vocals. Think of it in terms of a guitar player playing to the sound
>of a sustained amp. You can't really get that after the fact. My epiphany
>about this occurred when I put my voice through a Lawson-DW Fearn-Manley
>ELOP. For the first time in my recording experience, the damned thing sound
>right off the bat like a record. Not necessarily a good record, but a record
>nonetheless. :)
>>
>>
>Hey Deej,
To help you avoid a batch of problems:
1) From the word on the street, do NOT use Norton on your Mac. If you've
been using Norton that could explain some of your problems.
If you ever have HD problems, Disk Warrior has a good reputation.
2) You don't have to defrag OSX.
3) What's problem are you having copying files from a CDR? Insert CD,
drag files, done.
No sense knocking yourself out on the Mac, you'll need to keep your head
clear for the new adventurebox system you're building. :^)
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
DJ wrote:
> Last night I was trying to get our Mac to boot to a Norton Utilities CD by
> holding down the *C* key. Wouldn't work, no way, nohow. Leave it to Mac to
> require a third party software to defrag a hard drive.This, along with the
> joy involved in doing simple things like copying files from a CD must be the
> isuck feature.
>
> ;o)
>
>
> "rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:mqd2q1588bo40rmprm2qloactqhc249ova@4ax.com...
>
>>yup...it's called iNoise.
>>
>>On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:46:14 -0700, "DJ"
>><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
>>>news:43a0ae51$1@linux...
>>>
>>>>This sounds like a filtering issue, whether that be a bad ground shield
>
> in
>
>>>>the USB cable or a capacitor in the usb case or the computer. Betcha'
>
> you
>
>>>>have an EFI/RFI issue as a result.
>>>>AA
>>>>
>>>
>>>......or it could be a new Mac *feature*
>>>
>>>;oD
>>>
>>
>
>It's nearly four months since I got my A8V Deluxe board delivered with the
correct revision for dual core, so I must say, if you buyed both dual core
processor and board from the same place as a package, they should know
better than sell you an old revision board that is good over a half year
old, that was made to use with a single core processor. My A8V package was
marked well to show it's ready for Athlon X2 processors and I know the first
bios to work with X2 was version 1013 from 3th June 05. Hope you will figure
it out easily to update the bios.
Erling
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> skrev i melding
news:43a2eccd$1@linux...
> Well, to begin with the mobo has an old revision of the bios which doesn't
> support dual core proces
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
