The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » Digital Performer Question

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Digital Performer Question

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Digital Performer Question [message #75805]

Fri, 10 November 2006 12:04

Gantt Kushner

Messages: 545
Registered: June 2006
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland, ...

Senior Member

t screens that don't correspond to what's actually playing
> due
>>to latency and praying that I can get thru 10 minutes with no strange
>>noises.
>>
>>
>>Today is one of those days that, if I had 20 or 30 grand t

Gantt Kushner
Gizmo Recording Company
Silver Spring, MD
www.gizmorecording.com

Report message to a moderator

Re: Digital Performer Question [message #75807 is a reply to message #75805]

Fri, 10 November 2006 11:31

Carl Amburn

Messages: 214
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

nly talking about Pro-Tools. But a little perspective.
There
>> are still alot (read more) Pro-Tool Mix3 setups than HD setups. So, you
don;t
>> have to upgrade the various Digi setups if you wan to..
>
>
>Well maybe the converters :)
>>
>> I was talking about PAris, Pro Tools, Soundscape..Radar.
>>
>Paris would really be the only one that was close enough functionality
>wise to be compared to Pro Tools. The other are really just glorified
>hard disk recorders.
>
>
>> P.S.
>> I personaly would not for over the mo

Report message to a moderator

Re: Digital Performer Question [message #75813 is a reply to message #75805]

Fri, 10 November 2006 11:54

Tony Benson

Messages: 453
Registered: June 2006

Senior Member

rism rack.
>
> ;o)Yes of course Dj, but whay have are not giving the user's (customers) what
they want.
The user(customers) don;t want more plugings from UAD, but just a faster
DSP card to run more of whthe plugins they have..

But, UAD just releases another plugin to seemingly apease the customer base.
However, it's not working..

"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
>They are making a profit and having a life with it?
>
>;o)
>
>"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:4571c8a4$1@linux...
>>
>> Good Post Decric ..
>>
>> There was this debate (last year) on gearslutz about the UAD card issue

>> and
>> it was an overwhelming fact that most of the users would gladly pay "more"
>> money for a "faster" DSP card..
>>
>> And to be honest, I think I would galdly pay more for the UAD if it had

>> more
>> horsepower than he current model(s).
>>
>> Soemthing n

Report message to a moderator

Re: Digital Performer Question [message #75814 is a reply to message #75805]

Fri, 10 November 2006 12:47

gene lennon
Messages: 565
Registered: July 2006

Senior Member

ot quite right in UAD land with concernng the UAD powered
>> plugins
>> business model. Factor in this :
>>
>> -Their plugins have never been hacked, nor iare being sold on the black

>> market.
>>
>> So, unlike other Plugin manufactuers, their seeing a real profit and not
>> loses on plugins.
>> So what gives..??
>>
>>
>> c Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>On 12/2/06 9:31 AM, in article 45719c34$1@linux, "LaMont"
>>><jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> They recently interviewd the UAD guys and the big question was put to
>> them:
>>>> 'Why not add more power to the card"?
>>>>
>>>> UAD: answer was : Because they could not find a "cost-effective "DSp

>>&g

Report message to a moderator

Re: Digital Performer Question [message #75825 is a reply to message #75814]

Fri, 10 November 2006 13:37

Gantt Kushner

Messages: 545
Registered: June 2006
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland, ...

Senior Member

tion of I/O
>>-optical audio i.o..Nice (more on this later)
>>-DVD/RW.
>>-Space to add 4 more drives..
>>
>>They had it running apple's boot-camp, so I was able to boot into Win Xp
>>pro.
>>
>>Verdict:
>>I am very impressed with this unit. The speed and efficiency that it ran
>>Win-Xp pro was as smooth and fast as I ever seen.
>>
>>The Apple rep : explained to me the me that the on-board audio (via the
optical
>>i/os) were capable of of 24/94 bit sample rate with a very respectable
latency
>>via the use of Audio units drivers. And the S/N rating ranks the on-board
>>audio interface right up there with best of them. I played a few songs
from
>>a cd I brought to test. The mac Pro had a decent pair of M-audio monitors.
>>Man, the audio was professional. The only need that I can see someone needed
>>another audio interface is to add I/o..And it stands, if you only need
2
>>inputs, then the on-board sound interface will more than suffice.
>>
>>On the Os-x side of things, I have to say that I've never, read NEVER :)
>>seen Os-X run this fast!!! :) On previous macs, Os-x always felt a bit
like
>>"a Cheetah stuck in the quick sand"..
>>
>>Now, on these intel -multi-core cpus, this is

Gantt Kushner
Gizmo Recording Company
Silver Spring, MD
www.gizmorecording.com

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	OT:timely e-mail delivery
Next Topic:	Guys, thanks for the help...

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat May 09 08:12:15 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06481 seconds