|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Family Album, V.2 [message #85081 is a reply to message #84699] |
Wed, 23 May 2007 14:34  |
Deej [4]
 Messages: 1292 Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
o tracks-0ver
50, with eq & comps -30..vsti's 4, verbs 3....The asio/vst pipe starts to
shrink..And it's very audible..
My hope and others are with 64bit, steinberg/Digi, Cakewalk, Motu and others
can over this bottle neck, and let us (Mixers) Mix like we are use to.(Massive
Head Room).. You know like Paris..
They are gettign there.. With every update to ProTools (LE, Mpowered and
HD) the suming get's better and better.
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>Chris,
>
>Unless a _lot_ of things have changed since I last talked to an audio developer,
>all of the audio DSP is being done in the floating point and (if you're
lucky)
>the vector units on the chips. So is there _any_ advantage to an app coded
>in 64 bits other than RAM access? Second, considering that only a handful
>of converters (in either direction) can even pas 20 bits of meaningful data,
>why on earth would I _want_ DSP to be done on words larger than 32 bit float?
>
>Maybe I'm missing something really really simple here, but I know, uh, a
>little bit about computers, and I just don't understand the hype.
>
>
|
|
|
|