Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Serato Pitch'n'Time vs. Waves Transform vs. ???
| Serato Pitch'n'Time vs. Waves Transform vs. ??? [message #54992] |
Tue, 28 June 2005 06:50  |
|
|
d) enough
>to just chase and kill hamas people. it was the last
>time arafat could actually claim to have an influence on
>whether there would be terror or not, at least a very very
>big influence on how much terror there would be.
And what could you possibly dislike about the present Israeli
leadership? Draggin settlers out by the scruff of the neck,
responding to the worst terrorism with measured and rational
responses, and showing great restraint. See, this is the problem
with europe. In your arrogance, because of living in a land that
cannot envision war, you assume all violence is failure, and that
there must be a way to negotiate and finess this stuff.
Sup
Gantt Kushner
Gizmo Recording Company
Silver Spring, MD
www.gizmorecording.com
|
|
|
|
| Re: Serato Pitch'n'Time vs. Waves Transform vs. ??? [message #55001 is a reply to message #54992] |
Tue, 28 June 2005 09:34  |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
at if we all were to meet somewhere, with no discussion of
our personal politics, we would get along famously. Don't get me wrong, this
kind of discourse is good. It helps us understand each other better, if even
just a little. My wish is that we can all have these discussions, and even
when they've been heated, at the end still be the great international
community of PARIS people. That's it, the ICPP! Well, er...maybe a different
acronym would be better. Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that I
respect you all, weather we share the same view or not.
Tony
On 7/14/05 10:05 PM, in article 42d7280a$1@linux, "justcron"
<justcron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote:
> Usually I just feel like I'm banging my head against the wall trying to make
> a point... I still do to a certain extent
|
|
|
|
| Re: Serato Pitch'n'Time vs. Waves Transform vs. ??? [message #55013 is a reply to message #54992] |
Tue, 28 June 2005 15:28 |
Ab
Messages: 37
Registered: June 2005
|
Member |
|
|
ss_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:42d74105@linux...
> Sorry man,
>
> Overwhelmed by the numbers.
>
thought maybe it was the beers... hehe just jokin...
its been real... my brain is about to go into standbyNot that every question can be "perfect" but if the outset of this test is
to determine or assist in determining the political locale of an individual
or group, "better" questions would be best whereas "imperfect" presumptuous
ones, it could be said, are clandestine at worst, indiscriminate at best.
Case in point, when I tested, I found myself feeling a little tweaked that
almost every question, for me, was answered with "disagree" when, in fact,
changing or adding or subtracting just one word from the question could have
and would have yielded an "agree" response to an identical question.
Is it therefore not implausible to think that the formulations of these
questions intentionally poses an emotional sub-plot to cause a more liberal
respondent to think or feel he is an agreeable person, to continue answering
emotionally whereas, a more conservative thinker, by same questions, could
reasonably be made to feel out of step and hi
|
|
|
|
| Re: Serato Pitch'n'Time vs. Waves Transform vs. ??? [message #56348 is a reply to message #55013] |
Thu, 28 July 2005 07:33 |
Miguel Vigil [1]
Messages: 258
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ives that I purchased some time ago
>> to use as audio drives for Paris, running under win98.
>> I had no problems formatting them, but soon after commencing a job,
>> all hell broke loose. Cross-linked files everywhere.
>> I pulled the first and tried the second...same thing.
>> Never had this problem with any 120gb drives.
>> Is there something I am missing? Does 98 not like anything above
>> 120gb? I have since used one of the drives in my cubase box
>> running XP, and there's no sign of any problems.
>> I hope I don't have to stick to 120's for my remaining Paris
>> years.
>> Thanks
>> Kim
>
>Kim,
In case you haven't been watching the threads... with the gigabyte motherboard,
I sorted out all the issues in the end. I beleive there was a dodgy WinXP
disk involved in most of my issues, and in the end I discovered that the
board I got was faulty, as the SATA ports on the board died in the end, and
it's now been taken back to the store for replacement.
But, in the middle there, I did get the thing running perfectly. I spent
a weekend with Paris loaded with all my plugins, switching from project to
project and playing different things, and she was running perfectly. Once
I got everything properly loaded, I couldn't fault it.
So despite all the troubles I had, I'd still recommend this board. It's extremely
quick, and seems capable of being extremely stable as well, so long as you
use a working XP disk and don't get a faulty board. ;o)
Cheers,
Kim.
"Kim W." <no@way.com> wrote:
>
>Hi, all.
>I've got a couple of WD1600jb drives that I purchased some time ago
>to use as audio drives for Paris, running under win98.
>I had no problems formatting them, but soon after commencing a job,
>all hell broke loose. Cross-linked files everywhere.
>I pulled the first and tried the second...same thing.
>Never had this problem with any 120gb drives.
>Is there something I am missing? Does 98 not like anything above
>120gb? I have since used one of the drives in my cubase box
>running XP, and there's no sign of any problems.
>I hope I don't have to stick to 120's for my remaining Paris
>years.
>Thanks
>KimHey, Thanks for the info, Kim.
It was an "Ultra" wasn't it? There seem to be a few variants of
this board, the differences between which I don't know.
Kim
"Kim" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: Serato Pitch'n'Time vs. Waves Transform vs. ??? [message #56362 is a reply to message #56348] |
Thu, 28 July 2005 15:32 |
Ab
Messages: 37
Registered: June 2005
|
Member |
|
|
/>
>>of them,but he will never become one of them and
>>at
>>some point he will realize that he has been use to do the
>>dirty work for them.
>
>Nappy,
>
>I remember being a college kid and having to rent small houses
>and apartments. The landlord can throw your butt out at any
>time for any reason. One of them got tossed out of his in-laws
>house for beating his wife and ordered me out on one day notice! I
>had just moved in 3 days earlier. I said only with a complete refund
>of every nickel. He refused, and told me he would sue me for
>damaging the house (which I did not do) if I did not get out that
>night. I did not, and ended up defending myself in court (lost)
>and on appeal (settled for a few hundred). Fun huh?
>
>Why am I telling you this? Because an experience like that will
>make a flaming Bolshevik out of anyone. An experience like
>what you are describing will result in the way you feel. It's only
>reasonable that this is so.
>
>Two problems though.
>
>1. Your model does not account for the black leaders who not only
>do great work, but will bend for no one. Rice and Powell are prime
>examples. I do not believe that *anyone* pulls their strings.
>And frankly, although we know there is still racism out there,
>the hate shown towards conservative black leaders by liberals of
>all colors, is often much, much worse than any racism they have
>experienced. It starts with the idea that they are just puppets.
>
>And how will your model hold up if Rice becomes president?
>Think she will be one of the bosses then? But she will STILL be
>slandered by the left for not being one of them, won't she?
>
>This is not what King had in mind is it?
>
>
>2. The fundamental difference between the left and the right on
>this is NO LONGER "do we like black people?" any more. This is not
>1961. (and honestly, look at liberal cities like San Fran and
>Portland OR and try to find some black people) The fundamental
>difference today is whether we believe that the government should
>provide equal opportunities or equal results. The right believes
>that the government should provide equal opportunites, but the
>left believes that unequal results automatically equal racism.
>
>The left believe this because it keeps them in power and keeps
>people coming back to them for handouts, creating a permanent
>underclass of black victims on the bottom and white liberals on top with
>handouts.
>
>But of course, equal opportunity does not always give equal results.
>And that offends those with socialistic bents. Unfortunately for
>them, the methods of providing equal results always fail, and
>pretty much everyone knows it.
>
>Why do African immigrants do so much better than many black
>americans? They do. Better grades, better jobs. It clearly is
>not the genes.
>
>Racism isn't just sinful, it's stupid.
>
>It's the damn culture, not the people. Read Thomas Sowell on this.
>That culture, derived from slave owners, has a history all the way
>back to england, scotland and ireland, and every group, white or
>black that embraces it, sees the same phenomena that black
>american culture currently suffers from.
>
>I spent most of my life in academia, and I have done more than
>have black friends. I have mentored and led young black men.
>Today, nearly all are succesful and many are professionals, and it
>all started with changing the way they think. Racism is not the
>issue. It's like "whack-a-mole", we need to hammer it wherever it
>pops up, but that won't change things. W
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 23 20:24:54 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03104 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
