Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Spam!
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70149 is a reply to message #70087] |
Sun, 09 July 2006 15:19   |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
/>
>>>>
>>>>So for me, at 80 bucks delivered, (versus the $400 ToneLab) I don't really
>>>
>>>>need to hear the sounds in the STOMP II nearly as much as needing to
know
>>>
>>>>that (Deej) someone with reputable ears has played it, heard it, likes
>it,
>>>
>>>>makes zero complaint about noise level or fidelity and has general
>>>>positives
>>>
>>>>about it.
>>>>
>>>>W.
>>>>
>>>>"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:44e77888$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not just get a ToneLab SE for 5 times the cost and know that you
>got
>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>> real SHIT !
>>>>>
>>>>> "Dubya Mark Wilson" <mark.xspam@avidrecording.com> wrote:
>>>>>>In stock again - ordered today. Free shipping... sweet deal -- even
>if
>>>>> it
>>>>>>has only ONE great sound in it.
>>>>>>W.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.org> wrote in message news:44e0efff$1@linux...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a Yamaha MagicStomp.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Yamaha-Magicstomp-II- Guitar-Effects-Processor?sku=151560
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks like they are out until the 18th.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DC
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>"I have actually thought long and hard about going over there myself. If there
was something I could do other than get in the way. and I didn't have a family
to support, I might check
with the military to see if there's a *geezers batallion*. "
DJ, Ae you kidding!! Friend, The Dom himself(Rumsfeld) does not want to be
there!! Rice, Bush, Cheney, all of the Generals have pretty much "abandoned
Ship" or have you not heard??
It's a mess!! We have egg all over our faces in the middle east. We have
"LOST!!!" the both the political and the tactical" war in Iraq and the middle
east..
Then, to add insult to injury, we(with Isreal)fight a 30plus day war to save
face and beat the hezbollahs..Well, again, we lost the political battle and
the Hezbollahs did not fall. Then, there's the on-goining Afganistan battle
where the Taliban is holding it's ground..
So, my "sharp" shooting friend, what good are your skills, if you incounter
a road-side care bomb??
Nothing. ///Stay home, and record. Leave the these propoganda wars to the
war-lords..No need in good patriots like yourself to be wasted like our kids
over in the middle east for such a lousy reason.
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>I hate the idea of war as much as you do. I have actually thought long and
>hard about going over there myself. If there was something I could do other
>than get i
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70150 is a reply to message #70102] |
Sun, 09 July 2006 15:39 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
n the way. and I didn't have a family to support, I might check
>with the military to see if there's a *geezers batallion*. I don't have
any
>formal military training, but I know how to handle firearms, and I'm deadly
>accurate.
>It would piss off my wife to no end and I'm 56 and 'purt'near used up so
I
>don't know how well this old body would handle the rigours of battlefield
>combat and the heat, but I'll guarantee you that I would have no problem
at
>all if muy son or daughter joined a volunteer army and that army was called
>on to fight, I would support them 100%.
>
>If the democratic party wins the election, they'd better be ready to fight.
>Our enemies aren't going to stop attacking us just because of a regime
>change here. The politics of the left are much more abhorrent to them than
>those of the right. They are, however, quite happy to allow the left to
do
>their political infighting for them here. The weaker and less resolved we
>are the better they like it.
>
>Here's what you're in for amigo:
> http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=54 26
>
>The human rights section and the women's section is especially wonderful.
>Enjoy.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>DJ
>
>
>
>"LaMOnt" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:44e8083f$1@linux...
>>
>> Hopefully the opposing party, they would stand for our constitutional
>rights
>> and it's Liberties..
>>
>> Even more, the opposing party would not be thrill seeking war mongers,
>who's
>> only agenda is to spread freedom thru out he world (ha hah). I would hope
>> any opposing party will grow some balls and speak out against this
>tierany.
>> There are just as many Democrats who signed on with the Bush(ites).. But
>> as we saw with the begining of the mid term primaries, those Democrats
who
>> were with the Bush(ites) went down with ship.
>>
>> Evenmore.The thougth of spreading democracy into a region were war is
>second
>> nature for over 10,000 years is laughable at best. Those fold over there(
>> Iran, Iraq,Saudi Aurabia, Seria, afganistan,) will Never stop fighting
or
>> give in to so called democracy..Never.
>> Will you send you son or daughter over to fight??
>> I thoguht so..
>>
>> "DJ" <
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70151 is a reply to message #70120] |
Sun, 09 July 2006 16:28 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
get="_blank">animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>> >These days(I'm not kidding) I'll take my chances with the
>terrorist..Why??
>> >At least I know what my enemy stands for. My other enemy (Us
>Goverment.aka
>> >Bush administration) is an enemy that's supposed to be for me and the
>good
>> >of this union.
>> >
>> >.........and if there was an election today, what would the opposing
>party
>> >stand for LaMont?
>> >
>> >"LaMOnt" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:44e79af9$1@linux...
>> >>
>> >> Steve, that link you posted does not make a good enough argument to
>debut
>> >> the "Loose Change movie (documentary).
>> >>
>> >> I'm not a conpriracist, but I've never believed the US govermnet's
>stories
>> >> on 911. IMHO, we are dealing with a some really power hungry, sadistic,
>> >neo-conservatives
>> >> in the white house and his fellow neo cons.
>> >>
>> >> They are evil to the core. And have, dragged this nation down to the
>> >pits!!!..
>> >> It's really ashame that we 2 years left with these evil neo-cons. They
>> are
>> >> as anti american as the as the so-called terrorist. Impeachment
>hearings
>> >> should start immediatly.!
>> >>
>> >> And to think, we let them Impeach Clinton.. Now, with our civil
>liberties
>> >> being taken from us, a Patriot act which gives the Gov and police the
>> >right
>> >> to do anything they want. And a phony department names Department of
>> >Homeland
>> >> security, which is a weak as 2 minute cornflakes all under the shamof
>> >making
>> >> us "feel safe"!! Safe from what ?? The terrorist??or
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70152 is a reply to message #70151] |
Sun, 09 July 2006 16:33 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
our Goverment???
>> >>
>> >> These days(I'm not kidding) I'll take my chances with the
>terrorist..Why??
>> >> At least I know what my enemy stands for. My other enemy (Us
>Goverment.aka
>> >> Bush administration) is an enemy that's supposed to be for me and the
>> good
>> >> of this union. Not, to make us feel threaten, un-patriotic, fearful,
>> and
>> >> distrustful of it's workings.They are threating is taking away
>> >"free-speech,
>> >> and most importantly, 'A right to decent!~!!" ..
>> >>
>> >> I love the poeple of this Nation. For we are a great people!!! But,
we
>> are
>> >> under the leadership of a wanna be dictator!!and his cronnies..
>Lastly,
>> >> most americans feel 'Less Safe " now than 2002.. Wanna bet? Let's first
>> >ask
>> >> the good folks from New Orleans & Mississippi and Alabama .. That
>showed
>> >> every American how our Goverment would repsond if we were attacked..???
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "steve the artguy" <artguy@somethingorother.net> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >"Nappy" <mgrant01@san.rr.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>> http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-1272980089639960023& amp;q=loose+chang
>e
>> >> >
>> >> >Nappy-
>> >> >
>> >> >first of all, it's great to see you again!
>> >> >
>> >> >second of all, I was pretty impressed by Loose Change.
>> >> >Then some months later I read this:
>> >> >
>> >> >http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/loose_change/index.html
>> >> >
>> >> >Check it out!
>> >> >
>> >> >-steve
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>I'm with DJ on this one Lamont. If we even consider saying we would rather
support the terrorists, they've already won. The
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70153 is a reply to message #70122] |
Sun, 09 July 2006 16:40 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
only step remaining is to
invite them in to take over - they don't really want your support, or to see
you hate Bush - they just want us gone, done, out of sight, out of mind.
Don't expect the Democratic party to win any friends in the Middle East.
Trying to please everyone to keep from offending anyone never works (the sad
state of the Dem platform) - you just end up without a platform to stand on
and nothing to show for your efforts. The terrorists won't stop until the
US is destroyed. At this point it doesn't matter whether we are Republican,
Democrat, Independent, or whatever - if we fight and fear our own country
and each other more than the terrorists that not only threaten our country,
but many others, we will be overtaken, either politically, militarily, or
economically.
Be careful what you wish for...
Despite the bizarre happenings of the last several years (including
Clinton's era, 9/11, and the Iraq war), I believe in my gut that we've been
protected from something that would make 9/11 look like a fender bender in a
Walmart parking lot - or maybe it's been postponed. Who's doing the
protecting is a matter of belief, and it isn't justification on my part in
any way - it's a serious gut feeling I've had for a long time, and I've only
had a few like this in my lifetime - all were right, but feel free to take
it with a grain of salt. Considering that we seem to be rebelling against
the very notion that our country is in danger from a threat we really would
rather not recognize because we might offend someone (viewing Islamic
extremists with almost apology and sympathy), rather th
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70154 is a reply to message #70143] |
Sun, 09 July 2006 17:03 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
an actually being
concerned about what this growing terrorist movement means, our future as a
country looks rather grim.
I think it is important to be aware that al Quaeda's motivation seems to
have grown far beyond their organization (the UK/plane hijacking plot just
foiled was only loosely tied to al Quaeda). At this point, taking out al
Quaeda would hardly make a dent in the threat.
Just my .02,
Dedric
On 8/20/06 1:15 AM, in article 44e80c10@linux, "DJ"
<animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> I hate the idea of war as much as you do. I have actually thought long and
> hard about going over there myself. If there was something I could do other
> than get in the way. and I didn't have a family to support, I might check
> with the military to see if there's a *geezers batallion*. I don't have any
> formal military training, but I know how to handle firearms, and I'm deadly
> accurate.
> It would piss off my wife to no end and I'm 56 and 'purt'near used up so I
> don't know how well this old body would handle the rigours of battlefield
> combat and the heat, but I'll guarantee you that I would have no problem at
> all if muy son or daughter joined a volunteer army and that army was called
> on to fight, I would support them 100%.
>
> If the democratic party wins the election, they'd better be ready to fight.
> Our enemies aren't going to stop attacking us just because of a regime
> change here. The politics of the left are much more abhorrent to them than
> those of the right. They are, however, quite happy to allow the left to do
> their political infighting for them here. The weaker and less resolved we
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70155 is a reply to message #70152] |
Sun, 09 July 2006 17:06 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
>
> are the better they like it.
>
> Here's what you're in for amigo:
> http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=54 26
>
> The human rights section and the women's section is especially wonderful.
> Enjoy.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> DJ
>
>
>
> "LaMOnt" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:44e8083f$1@linux...
>>
>> Hopefully the opposing party, they would stand for our constitutional
> rights
>> and it's Liberties..
>>
>> Even more, the opposing party would not be thrill seeking war mongers,
> who's
>> only agenda is to spread freedom thru out he world (ha hah). I would hope
>> any opposing party will grow some balls and speak out against this
> tierany.
>> There are just as many Democrats who signed on with the Bush(ites).. But
>> as we saw with the begining of the mid term primaries, those Democrats who
>> were with the Bush(ites) went down with ship.
>>
>> Evenmore.The thougth of spreading democracy into a region were war is
> second
>> nature for over 10,000 years is laughable at best. Those fold over there(
>> Iran, Iraq,Saudi Aurabia, Seria, afganistan,) will Never stop fighting or
>> give in to so called democracy..Never.
>> Will you send you son or daughter over to fight??
>> I thoguht so..
>>
>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>> These days(I'm not kidding) I'll take my chances with the
> terrorist..Why??
>>> At least I know what my enemy stands for. My other enemy (Us
> Goverment.aka
>>> Bush administration) is an enemy that's supposed to be for me and the
> good
>>> of this union.
>>>
>>> .........and if there was an election today, what would the opposing
> party
>>> stand for LaMont?
>>>
>>> "LaMOnt" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:44e79af9$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Steve, that link you posted does not make a good enough argument to
> debut
>>>> the "Loose Change movie (documentary).
>>>>
>>>> I'm not a conpriracist, but I've never believed the US govermnet's
> stories
>>>> on 911. IMHO, we are dealing with a some really power hungry, sadistic,
>>> neo-conservatives
>>>> in the white house and his fellow neo cons.
>>>>
>>>> They are evil to the core. And have, dragged this nation
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70156 is a reply to message #70155] |
Sun, 09 July 2006 17:28 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
down to the
>>> pits!!!..
>>>> It's really ashame that we 2 years left with these evil neo-cons. They
>> are
>>>> as anti american as the as the so-called terrorist. Impeachment
> hearings
>>>> should start immediatly.!
>>>>
>>>> And to think, we let them Impeach Clinton.. Now, with our civil
> liberties
>>>> being taken from us, a Patriot act which gives the Gov and police the
>>> right
>>>> to do anything they want. And a phony department names Department of
>>> Homeland
>>>> security, which is a weak as 2 minute cornflakes all under the shamof
>>> making
>>>> us "feel safe"!! Safe from what ?? The terrorist??or our Goverment???
>>>>
>>>> These days(I'm not kidding) I'll take my chances with the
> terrorist..Why??
>>>> At least I know what my enemy stands for. My other enemy (Us
> Goverment.aka
>>>> Bush administration) is an enemy that's supposed to be for me and the
>> good
>>>> of this union. Not, to make us feel threaten, un-patriotic, fearful,
>> and
>>>> distrustful of it's workings.They are threating is taking away
>>> "free-speech,
>>>> and most importantly, 'A right to decent!~!!" ..
>>>>
>>>> I love the poeple of this Nation. For we are a great people!!! But, we
>> are
>>>> under the leadership of a wanna be dictator!!and his cronnies..
> Lastly,
>>>> most americans feel 'Less Safe " now than 2002.. Wanna bet? Let's first
>>> ask
>>>> the good folks from New Orleans & Mississippi and Alabama .. That
> showed
>>>> every American how our Goverment would repsond if we were attacked..???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "steve the artguy" <artguy@somethingorother.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Nappy" <mgrant01@san.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>>> http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-1272980089639960023& amp;q=loose+chang
> e
>>>>>
>>>>> Nappy-
>>>>>
>>>>> first of all, it's great to see you again!
>>>>>
>>>>> second of all, I was pretty impressed by Loose Change.
>>>>> Then some months later I read this:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/loose_change/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Check it out!
>>>>>
>>>>> -steve
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>This is a good idea man, ala NY drum sub compression.
http://www.barberelectronics.com/tonepress.htm
AA
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:44e7d9d3$1@linux...
>
> The TC chrous is a lovely pedal. Really the best chorus pedal out there.
>
>
> This flanger looks a
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70177 is a reply to message #70154] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 09:01 |
Miguel Vigil [1]
Messages: 258
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>I don't think the administration or the democrats want to close the borders.
It wouldn't be politically prodent. whoever does that loses the hispanic
vote.
>My questions are: Whatever happed to "We" US people will let you guys fight
your little war, and you'll "Bush-ites" will give us cheap gas??<
Where did you get that? Can you quote a source. That was the Clinton mantra
my friend. The ecenomy appears to be good so let's keep whistling in the
dark aned not rock the boat while the threats gather on the horizon. If 911
would have happened a year earlier, the blame would have been clear to even
you.
>Well, we all got reamed with no grease on all fronts.. I live on a boader
state-city (Cannda/Windor Ontario).. I guess since we're not geting the
infl;ux
of hispanics like you guys in the southwest, there is not a big brew ha..No,
up here, it's about Jobs, Jobs, Jobs, Jobs and Gas$$$$ Gas $$$$ Gas$$$$..<
I've got no problem with peoiple who happen to be from Mexico or anywhere
else. I've got a problem with an uncontrolled border and with terrorists..As
far as jobs jobs jobs are concerned, perhaps you should consider the reason
why the detroit auto industry doesn't produce cars that people want to buy
anymore. Compared to what is available from the foriegn competitors, they
are overpriced crap my friend. If they built the Honda spec, the car would
cost so much that no one would buy it because of the amount of union lard
that is ladled onto the price tag of each vehicle so they cut corners and
build cheap because that the only way they can achieve a copmpetitive price
point. They have been crap since the early 70's.
"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:44e95d65$1@linux...
>
> Hey DJ,
> Do you think that just maybe the Bush(ites) don't want to close the
borders?
> I mean, hes' the great protector and all..Right?
> Just maybe they have something more elaborate up their collective sleeves
> Humm??
>
> Maybe they want another 911..TO:
>
> -Really convince the american people that "total globalization" and
expansion
> is the only way..
>
> -spread democracy to e
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70179 is a reply to message #70177] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 08:58 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
; >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >> >>Or did we suddenly decide to support terrorism just to spite the
current
> >> >administration? Seems like a sad way to decide what you believe in
and
> >> >stand for. Sell out to the least unpopular - just like we did when
> >teaming
> >> >with Ossama against Russia in Afghanistan, except this time it's the
> >> >American public, not military leaders.<
> >> >
> >> >This is exactly what has happened. If the left can't get Bush at the
> >ballot
> >> >box, then let's get the media allies onboard and just take the whole
> >damned
> >> >country down if that's what it takes to pursue the progressive
ideology.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
> >> >news:C10E111B.2942%dterry@keyofd.net...
> >> >> On 8/20/06 12:33 PM, in article 44e8aad4@linux, "DJ"
> >> >> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The Bush(ite)popularity polls show them @ around 33-36 percent.
> That
> >> >says
> >> >> >> that most of the folks who voted for him does not suppport him or
> >that
> >> >> > "sham"
> >> >> >> Iraq war.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The *sham Iraq war was started by Sadaam Hussein in 1991 and was
> >still
> >> >going
> >> >> > strong, aided by the UN, French and Russians when Bush took
office.
> >> >>
> >> >> And let's also not forget that the Iraq war we went to fight is over
> -
> >> the
> >> >> Hussein regime is no longer; no WMDs in sight, done. But instead,
> we
> >> are
> >> >> now playing intervention peace maker to help the Iraq government
with
> >> what
> >> >> has turned into a nightmare rather than a transition. The greatest
> >number
> >> >> of deaths from this "war" have happened directly because of the
> >insurgency
> >> >> of terrorists (car bombs, roadside bombs, snipers, etc) - not at the
> >hands
> >> >> of the old Iraqi military or Hussein, but by outsider terrorists and
> >thugs
> >> >> (the
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70183 is a reply to message #70179] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 09:38 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>hope is in life." - Chuck Colson
>
>Dedric
>
>On 8/21/06 1:05 AM, in article 44e95b3a$1@linux, "LaMont"
><jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> What I'm saying is (from aprevious post) is that I feel that this
>> administration
>> are killers. They killed our young soldiers for a stupid cause.
>> As to my I'll take the terroist" statement..Well, Dedric ask an Iraqi
citizen
>> about who they think are the terrorist???
>>
>> As for that statement being unchristian. Well who said that the American
>> policy is the "Thee" authority of Christianity???
>> My views are not slanderer not in fear of speaking against a burgeoning
>> tyranny.
>>
>>
>> I know full well I don't speak for the entire Christian population, only
>> Jesus does. But, faith in a Man, is stupid..
>>
>> Yes, I feel that the Bush(ites) are evil. Evil lying politians. So, if
you
>> take that as being slanted, then so beit.
>>
>> So, you and the other 33-36 percent can keep on fighting the war on terror
>> ,and find your WMD's or what ever.
>> I'm not buying it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>> Lamont, saying you would rather back terrorists (cold blooded killers)
is
>>> about as far from Christian belief as I've ever heard. It is not the
way
>> we
>>> believe or talk as Christians, based completely on what the Bible teaches.
>>>
>>> If you don't like Bush, that's fine, but stereotyping and slandering
people
>>> while claiming you speak for the whole of Christianity in the same breath
>> is
>>> wrong. No two ways about it my friend. No, you do not speak for
>>> Christianity as a faith. Democrat or Republican, your approach is simply
>>> political hyperbole. Please don't confuse your political views with
faith.
>>>
>>> On 8/20/06 10:46 PM, in article 44e93a92$1@linux, "LaMont"
>>> <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dj, you rally believe this "If the left can't get Bush at the ballot
ox,
>> then
>>>> let's get the media allies on board and just take the whole damned country
>>>> down if that's what it takes to pursue the progressive ideology.."
>>>>
>>>> This is not about the left or the tight, dems & reps. you have drank-ed
>> the
>>>> kool-aid of the Bush(ites).. Most Republicans have abandoned ship long
>> time
>>>> ago and are now willing to stand up and disagree with the President.Callit
>>>> Mid-term elections.
>>>>
>>>> One thing is for sure, any other Republican president would not have
gone
>>>> down this road.. This is a Neo-Con road. This has nothing to do with
left
>>>> or right. The bush(ites0 have "SCREWED" it's on base party. Can some
say
>>>> "Boarders"..? Judge Appointments, Taxes , Deficit.. Bush is more Liberal
>>>> than our last 2 liberal presidents...Imagine that.?? He keeps spending
>> and
>>>> spending with reckless abandonment.
>>>> Bush (I love this) is playing both sides of the Ilse as well as Clinton
>> did.
>>>> AND , he does not care if he screws those who support him.. All those
>> poor
>>>> working folks in the red states, now pay 3.00 bucks at the pump(LOL)..!!
>>>> Oh yeah.. Faith based initiatives".. ??(Jeopardy music) ...
>>>>
>>>> No, I'm an conservative Christian.. Most of my family are Conservative
>>>> Democrats.
>>>> In Michigan, that means you are Pro union and proud of it..They Michigan
>>>> Dems are not weak, scared. Having Most them like my Dad and uncles have
>> fought
>>>> (union) hard battles wars) for better working conditions and fair pay.
>> Some
>>>> lives were lost. That kind of spirit can be found in all Northern (Blue
>>>> Collar)
>>>> Blue states... Most of us are hunters and great fishermen. We love our
>> guns..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, you play that dems & repubs game all you like. But, both whites
and
>> non
>>>> whites in our neck of the woods can smell a Rat!! and that schicht is
>> coming
>>>> from the white house..
>>>> No, we have bigger problems to worry about than some played up war form
>> some
>>>> imperialistic games. We have our jobs, gas prices, educating our
>>>> children..than
>>>> to bogged down in a stupid so -called war..
>>>> You say that's being minded and soft..I say, We are not drinking the
>>>> kool-aid..
>>>> So, if the 33 percent of you get your kicks out of prepping for war,
then
>>>> be my guess. Go out play war all you want. Stay on the "edge" ... Watch
>> Fox
>>>> new network all day and night...By the way: Since the Hezbollah/Israeli
>> war
>>>> came to ahead, the networks have cut to a more Pressing story......
>>>> They found the Jonbenet Ramsey murderer!!......
>>>>
>>>> Fox news has all hand on deck and a camera man waiting for this kook
to
>> get
>>>> off the plane!! a few stories about the war. Ohh..I guess, since we
were
>>>> losing that war, in was not new worthy.
>>>>
>>>> Now, you say...What are the Dems going to.. Well, they can't do much
worse
>>>> than that last regime..I mean, do i feel safer because Bush is in office???
>>>> No.. I feel safe for me and my family because God is still on thrown!!
>> He
>>>> is my protector..Every man (boy , girl) has an appointed time to live
>> and
>>>> to die. Me and ,ine put our trust in God's hands, not a President(Republican
>>>> or Democrat)..
>>>>
>>>> See, those you who are fearful because you've put your hope and faith
>> and
>>>> trust in a Man!! Well, Men, will fail you all the time. Those of us
who
>>>> are believing Christians, should know better to put our hope, faith
and
>> trust
>>>> in a Man.. That's suicide and stupid!
>>>> Even worst,putting your Hope, trust, and faith in a Politician..
>>>> are we that stupid ??
>>>> Next regime please..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Or did we suddenly decide to support terrorism just to spite the current
>>>>> administration? Seems like a sad way to decide what you believe in
and
>>>>> stand for. Sell out to the least unpopular - just like we did when
teaming
>>>>> with Ossama against Russia in Afghanistan, except this time it's the
>>>>> American public, not military leaders.<
>>>>>
>>>>> This is exactly what has happened. If the left can't get Bush at the
>> ballot
>>>>> box, then let's get the media allies onboard and just take the whole
>> damned
>>>>> country down if that's what it takes to pursue the progressive ideology.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:C10E111B.2942%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>>>>> On 8/20/06 12:33 PM, in article 44e8aad4@linux, "DJ"
>>>>>> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Bush(ite)popularity polls show them @ around 33-36 percent.
That
>>>>> says
>>>>>>>> that most of the folks who voted for him does not suppport him or
>> that
>>>>>>> "sham"
>>>>>>>> Iraq war.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The *sham Iraq war was started by Sadaam Hussein in 1991 and was
still
>>>>> going
>>>>>>> strong, aided by the UN, French and Russians when Bush took office.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And let's also not forget that the Iraq war we went to fight is over
>> -
>>>> the
>>>>>> Hussein regime is no longer; no WMDs in sight, done. But instead,
we
>>>> are
>>>>>> now playing intervention peace maker to help the Iraq government with
>>>> what
>>>>>> has turned into a nightmare rather than a transition. The greatest
>> number
>>>>>> of deaths from this "war" have happened directly because of the insurgency
>>>>>> of terrorists (car bombs, roadside bombs, snipers, etc) - not at the
>> hands
>>>>>> of the old Iraqi military or Hussein, but by outsider terrorists and
>> thugs
>>>>>> (the words of a couple of different US soldiers just back from Iraq
>> I
>>>>>> recently talked with).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or did we suddenly decide to support terrorism just to spite the current
>>>>>> administration? Seems like a sad way to decide what you believe in
>> and
>>>>>> stand for. Sell out to the least unpopular - just like we did when
>>>>> teaming
>>>>>> with Ossama against Russia in Afghanistan, except this time it's the
>>>>>> American public, not military leaders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's really easy to blame someone for everything we don't like or
can't
>>>>>> accept - whether it's finding fault for hurricane Katrina, terrorism,
>>>> or
>>>>> hot
>>>>>> coffee at McDonalds. But it is quite another thing to actually understand
>>>>>> and count the cost of the way of life that we all agree to in dark
>>>>>> compromise every single day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess I won't be surprised if an Islamic extremist is elected president
>>>>> in
>>>>>> the next 8-12 years.... game over. Go directly to jail. Do not pass
>>>> Go
>>>>> or
>>>>>> collect $200. I'm only partly serious here, but you guys are turning
>>>> me
>>>>>> into a pessimist. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>maybe if we
really had that, we wouldn't be in Iraq *and* the Iraqi people would still
be free to make their own decisions out from under the crushing weight of a
dictator's thumb. But sadly, we've chosen to adopt the hypocritical facade
that Hollywood and the news media feeds us. <
Had we pulled together and presented a united front, like we did in WWII,
this might well be an entirely different scenario right now. The left and
their media shills use the loophole that there is *no declaration* of war to
skate on what would otherwise be considered to be treason and then scream
about how many kids have been killed in this conflict while encouraging
those who are killing them to keep up the good work because if they just
keep on doing it, we will set a deadline for withdrawal.
"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
news:C10F1E68.2AAA%dterry@keyofd.net...
> I wasn't referring to whether the war is right or wrong or whether I liked
> Bush or not, just your approach and mindset isn't representing
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70185 is a reply to message #70183] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 10:06 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>> down this road.. This is a Neo-Con road. This has nothing to do with
left
> >>> or right. The bush(ites0 have "SCREWED" it's on base party. Can some
say
> >>> "Boarders"..? Judge Appointments, Taxes , Deficit.. Bush is more
Liberal
> >>> than our last 2 liberal presidents...Imagine that.?? He keeps spending
> > and
> >>> spending with reckless abandonment.
> >>> Bush (I love this) is playing both sides of the Ilse as well as
Clinton
> > did.
> >>> AND , he does not care if he screws those who support him.. All those
> > poor
> >>> working folks in the red states, now pay 3.00 bucks at the
pump(LOL)..!!
> >>> Oh yeah.. Faith based initiatives".. ??(Jeopardy music) ...
> >>>
> >>> No, I'm an conservative Christian.. Most of my family are Conservative
> >>> Democrats.
> >>> In Michigan, that means you are Pro union and proud of it..They
Michigan
> >>> Dems are not weak, scared. Having Most them like my Dad and uncles
have
> > fought
> >>> (union) hard battles wars) for better working conditions and fair pay.
> > Some
> >>> lives were lost. That kind of spirit can be found in all Northern
(Blue
> >>> Collar)
> >>> Blue states... Most of us are hunters and great fishermen. We love our
> > guns..
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So, you play that dems & repubs game all you like. But, both whites
and
> > non
> >>> whites in our neck of the woods can smell a Rat!! and that schicht is
> > coming
> >>> from the white house..
> >>> No, we have bigger problems to worry about than some played up war
form
> > some
> >>> imperialistic games. We have our jobs, gas prices, educating our
> >>> children..than
> >>> to bogged down in a stupid so -called war..
> >>> You say that's being minded and soft..I say, We are not drinking the
> >>> kool-aid..
> >>> So, if the 33 percent of you get your kicks out of prepping for war,
then
> >>> be my guess. Go out play war all you want. Stay on the "edge" ...
Watch
> > Fox
> >>> new network all day and night...By the way: Since the
Hezbollah/Israeli
> > war
> >>> came to ahead, the networks have cut to a more Pressing story......
> >>> They found the Jonbenet Ramsey murderer!!......
> >>>
> >>> Fox news has all hand on deck and a camera man waiting for this kook
to
> > get
> >>> off the plane!! a few stories about the war. Ohh..I guess, since we
were
> >>> losing that war, in was not new worthy.
> >>>
> >>> Now, you say...What are the Dems going to.. Well, they can't do much
worse
> >>> than that last regime..I mean, do i feel safer because Bush is in
office???
> >>> No.. I feel safe for me and my family because God is still on thrown!!
> > He
> >>> is my protector..Every man (boy , girl) has an appointed time to live
> > and
> >>> to die. Me and ,ine put our trust in God's hands, not a
President(Republican
> >>> or Democrat)..
> >>>
> >>> See, those you who are fearful because you've put your hope and faith
> > and
> >>> trust in a Man!! Well, Men, will fail you all the time. Those of us
who
> >>> are believing Christians, should know better to put our hope, faith
and
> > trust
> >>> in a Man.. That's suicide and stupid!
> >>> Even worst,putting your Hope, trust, and faith in a Politician..
> >>> are we that stupid ??
> >>> Next regime please..
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >>>>> Or did we suddenly decide to support terrorism just to spite the
current
> >>>> administration? Seems like a sad way to decide what you believe in
and
> >>>> stand for. Sell out to the least unpopular - just like we did when
teaming
> >>>> with Ossama against Russia in Afghanistan, except this time it's the
> >>>> American public, not military leaders.<
> >>>>
> >>>> This is exactly what has happened. If the left can't get Bush at the
> > ballot
> >>>> box, then let's get the media allies onboard and just take the whole
> > damned
> >>>> country down if that's what it takes to pursue the progressive
ideology.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
> >>>> news:C10E111B.2942%dterry@keyofd.net...
> >>>>> On 8/20/06 12:33 PM, in article 44e8aad4@linux, "DJ"
> >>>>> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The Bush(ite)popularity polls show them @ around 33-36 percent.
That
> >>>> says
> >>>>>>> that most of the folks who voted for him does not suppport him or
> > that
> >>>>>> "sham"
> >>>>>>> Iraq war.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The *sham Iraq war was started by Sadaam Hussein in 1991 and was
still
> >>>> going
> >>>>>> strong, aided by the UN, French and Russians when Bush took office.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And let's also not forget that the Iraq war we went to fight is over
> > -
> >>> the
> >>>>> Hussein regime is no longer; no WMDs in sight, done. But instead,
we
> >>> are
> >>>>> now playing intervention peace maker to help the Iraq government
with
> >>> what
> >>>>> has turned into a nightmare rather than a transition. The greatest
> > number
> >>>>> of deaths from this "war" have happened directly because of the
insurgency
> >>>>> of terrorists (car bombs, roadside bombs, snipers, etc) - not at the
> > hands
> >>>>> of the old Iraqi military or Hussein, but by outsider terrorists and
> > thugs
> >>>>> (the words of a couple of different US soldiers just back from Iraq
> > I
> >>>>> recently talked with).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Or did we suddenly decide to support terrorism just to spite the
current
> >>>>> administration? Seems like a sad way to decide what you believe in
> > and
> >>>>> stand for. Sell out to the least unpopular - just like we did when
> >>>> teaming
> >>>>> with Ossama against Russia in Afghanistan, except this time it's the
> >>>>> American public, not military leaders.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's really easy to blame someone for everything we don't like or
can't
> >>>>> accept - whether it's finding fault for hurricane Katrina,
terrorism,
> >>> or
> >>>> hot
> >>>>> coffee at McDonalds. But it is quite another thing to actually
understand
> >>>>> and count the cost of the way of life that we all agree to in dark
> >>>>> compromise every single day.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I guess I won't be surprised if an Islamic extremist is elected
president
> >>>> in
> >>>>> the next 8-12 years.... game over. Go directly to jail. Do not
pass
> >>> Go
> >>>> or
> >>>>> collect $200. I'm only partly serious here, but you guys are
turning
> >>> me
> >>>>> into a pessimist. ;-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>Here's who I use.
www.globat.com
No problems.
Tony
"Dale" <dalebradleycello@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:44e96aea$1@linux...
>
> I've been referred to networksolutions.com, but they seem a little pricey
> once you get out of the bargain basement services.
>
> what are some other options that y'all are happy with?
>
> Thanks, DaleWow - we agree :-) 1&1 is a MS platinum partner and one of the top hosters
out there for reliability and security. One small problem is that they won't
host any unmanaged .Net code, so you can't use OLEDB database connections,
but that probably isn't an issue for you :-)
Chuck
"john" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>1and1.com
>
>"Dale" <dalebradleycello@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>I've been referred to networksolutions.com, but they seem a little pricey
>>once you get out of the bargain basement services.
>>
>>what are some other options that y'all are happy with?
>>
>>Thanks, Dale
>Dedric..No...You don;t confuse the two. I know who I am and who is lord of
my life (Jesus). Just because we differ on Us politics and events, does not
mean that people who Christians who think like me are not.
Politics & religion: Let's see..This current regime used relifion(Christianity)
to get re-eletced. Tell them to "not confuse the two"!!
Did not Jesus say the following:
Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven
Blessed are they who mourn,
for they shall be comforted
Blessed are the meek,
for that shall possess the earth
Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for justice
for they shal be satisfied
Blessed are the merciful
for they shall obtain mercy
Blessed are the clean of heart,
for they shall see God
Blessed are the peacemakers
for they shall be called children of God
Blessed are they who suffer persecution for justice sake,
for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven
Blessed are you when men reproach you, and
persecute you, and speaking falsely, say all manner of evil against you,
for my sake.
That's what I know and belive. You can can continue to belive is this false
bravado you call Patriotism and love by it.
As for me and my family, we will continue to ride in our mini vans, and drink
slurpies while heading down to Costcos..
Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>I wasn't referring to whether the war is right or wrong or whether I liked
>Bush or not, just your approach and mindset isn't representing Christianity
>in any way - these are just your political views. Don't confuse the two.
>It does more harm than good.
>
>On the war and our country itself...
>
>I have personally talked to several US soldiers who have been there, and
>have talked to Iraqis, in person - not what you think you hear from the
news
>media, or from a disgruntled private that just signed up with the Army to
>get a free education and wrote a book about it, but mid-level officers and
>doctors (e.g. not party line toters either) - and the Iraqis do appreciate
>that we ended the tyrannical regime they were under. I was blown away by
>the real world accounts I heard that completely contradict what the news
>media would have us believe (even if you support the war, this you would
>start to wonder who's doing the most lying) - these guys are Christians,
and
>spent their time there building schools, restoring power, providing aid
to
>military and citizens alike - working with the people, not just working
the
>media.
>
>If you think that is of no value, then it would be interesting to hear what
>our own ancestor countrymen would say of the civil war - was the cost of
>hundreds of thousands of lives, homes, farms, schools, women and children,
>and political turmoil worth it "just" to end slavery? Given what our
>country seems to think of the Iraqi people - ignorant, victims of the US
>military, better off under a murderous dictator, etc - I would have to say
I
>seriously doubt we would go down that road again. We would rather sit by
>and smugly to say that we weren't responsible for people dying - "we're
>better than that - we make great bystanders and self-righteous,
>self-absorbed pacifists". We would rather ride around in our Detroit-built,
>union proud SUVs, sucking down expensive gasoline, buying frivolous luxuries
>right and left from companies that help choke the atmosphere with production
>pollution, watching movies that cost more than the food budget for Sudan
and
>complain about our government on the way home because we are embarrassed
>that France and Germany don't like us, and because it's more popular to
hate
>the President than actually do something to fix any of the above problems.
>
>Whether you like it or not, there is a direct parallel, and a sad one -
DJ
>is right, we are weak - not militarily, but as a people. We have no common
>bond of morality, ethics, integrity, patriotism, and honor - maybe if we
>really had that, we wouldn't be in Iraq *and* the Iraqi people would still
>be free to make their own decisions out from under the crushing weight of
a
>dictator's thumb. But sadly, we've chosen to adopt the hypocritical facade
>that Hollywood and the news media feeds us. We are more interested in
>political correctness and putting on the appearance of righteousness than
>actually living it. I'm not in anyway saying war is righteous - it is just
>a fact of a world that in majority doesn't have a moral value system. And
at
>the same time we are justifying our intellectually superior pacifism by
>turning a blind eye to true evil and in fact doing exactly what you claim
>others are doing - putting faith in Man. Mine isn't in any man on this
>planet. Completely independently of the government, we are yet again
>selling out our pride and integrity as people to the lowest cost bidder
in
>exchange for a mask of fabricated peace, temporary freedom and empty
>compassion. We have more in common now with Hollywood 2006 than
>Philadelphia 1776, much less 0 BC.
>
>"Where is the hope? I meet millions who tell me that they feel demoralized
>by the decay around us. Where is the hope? The hope that each of us have
is
>not in who governs us, or what laws are passed, or what great things that
we
>do as a nation. Our hope is in the power of God working through the hearts
>of people, and that¹s where our hope is in this country; that¹s where our
>hope is in life." - Chuck Colson
>
>Dedric
>
>On 8/21/06 1:05 AM, in article 44e95b3a$1@linux, "LaMont"
><jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> What I'm saying is (from aprevious post) is that I feel that this
>> administration
>> are killers. They killed our young soldiers for a stupid cause.
>> As to my I'll take the terroist" statement..Well, Dedric ask an Iraqi
citizen
>> about who they think are the terrorist???
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70187 is a reply to message #70185] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 10:16 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>> about as far from Christian belief as I've ever heard. It is not the
way
>> we
>>> believe or talk as Christians, based completely on what the Bible teaches.
>>>
>>> If you don't like Bush, that's fine, but stereotyping and slandering
people
>>> while claiming you speak for the whole of Christianity in the same breath
>> is
>>> wrong. No two ways about it my friend. No, you do not speak for
>>> Christianity as a faith. Democrat or Republican, your approach is simply
>>> political hyperbole. Please don't confuse your political views with
faith.
>>>
>>> On 8/20/06 10:46 PM, in article 44e93a92$1@linux, "LaMont"
>>> <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dj, you rally believe this "If the left can't get Bush at the ballot
ox,
>> then
>>>> let's get the media allies on board and just take the whole damned country
>>>> down if that's what it takes to pursue the progressive ideology.."
>>>>
>>>> This is not about the left or the tight, dems & reps. you have drank-ed
>> the
>>>> kool-aid of the Bush(ites).. Most Republicans have abandoned ship long
>> time
>>>> ago and are now willing to stand up and disagree with the President.Callit
>>>> Mid-term elections.
>>>>
>>>> One thing is for sure, any other Republican president would not have
gone
>>>> down this road.. This is a Neo-Con road. This has nothing to do with
left
>>>> or right. The bush(ites0 have "SCREWED" it's on base party. Can some
say
>>>> "Boarders"..? Judge Appointments, Taxes , Deficit.. Bush is more Liberal
>>>> than our last 2 liberal presidents...Imagine that.?? He keeps spending
>> and
>>>> spending with reckless abandonment.
>>>> Bush (I love this) is playing both sides of the Ilse as well as Clinton
>> did.
>>>> AND , he does not care if he screws those who support him.. All those
>> poor
>>>> working folks in the red states, now pay 3.00 bucks at the pump(LOL)..!!
>>>> Oh yeah.. Faith based initiatives".. ??(Jeopardy music) ...
>>>>
>>>> No, I'm an conservative Christian.. Most of my family are Conservative
>>>> Democrats.
>>>> In Michigan, that means you are Pro union and proud of it..They Michigan
>>>> Dems are not weak, scared. Having Most them like my Dad and uncles have
>> fought
>>>> (union) hard battles wars) for better working conditions and fair pay.
>> Some
>>>> lives were lost. That kind of spirit can be found in all Northern (Blue
>>>> Collar)
>>>> Blue states... Most of us are hunters and great fishermen. We love our
>> guns..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, you play that dems & repubs game all you like. But, both whites
and
>> non
>>>> whites in our neck of the woods can smell a Rat!! and that schicht is
>> coming
>>>> from the white house..
>>>> No, we have bigger problems to worry about than some played up war form
>> some
>>>> imperialistic games. We have our jobs, gas prices, educating our
>>>> children..than
>>>> to bogged down in a stupid so -called war..
>>>> You say that's being minded and soft..I say, We are not drinking the
>>>> kool-aid..
>>>> So, if the 33 percent of you get your kicks out of prepping for war,
then
>>>> be my guess. Go out play war all you want. Stay on the "edge" ... Watch
>> Fox
>>>> new network all day and night...By the way: Since the Hezbollah/Israeli
>> war
>>>> came to ahead, the networks have cut to a more Pressing story......
>>>> They found the Jonbenet Ramsey murderer!!......
>>>>
>>>> Fox news has all hand on deck and a camera man waiting for this kook
to
>> get
>>>> off the plane!! a few stories about the war. Ohh..I guess, since we
were
>>>> losing that war, in was not new worthy.
>>>>
>>>> Now, you say...What are the Dems going to.. Well, they can't do much
worse
>>>> than that last regime..I mean, do i feel safer because Bush is in office???
>>>> No.. I feel safe for me and my family because God is still on thrown!!
>> He
>>>> is my protector..Every man (boy , girl) has an appointed time to live
>> and
>>>> to die. Me and ,ine put our trust in God's hands, not a President(Republican
>>>> or Democrat)..
>>>>
>>>> See, those you who are fearful because you've put your hope and faith
>> and
>>>> trust in a Man!! Well, Men, will fail you all the time. Those of us
who
>>>> are believing Christians, should know better to put our hope, faith
and
>> trust
>>>> in a Man.. That's suicide and stupid!
>>>> Even worst,putting your Hope, trust, and faith in a Politician..
>>>> are we that stupid ??
>>>> Next regime please..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Or did we suddenly decide to support terrorism just to spite the current
>>>>> administration? Seems like a sad way to decide what you believe in
and
>>>>> stand for. Sell out to the least unpopular - just like we did when
teaming
>>>>> with Ossama against Russia in Afghanistan, except this time it's the
>>>>> American public, not military leaders.<
>>>>>
>>>>> This is exactly what has happened. If the left can't get Bush at the
>> ballot
>>>>> box, then let's get the media allies onboard and just take the whole
>> damned
>>>>> country down if that's what it takes to pursue the progressive ideology.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:C10E111B.2942%dterry@keyofd.net...
>>>>>> On 8/20/06 12:33 PM, in article 44e8aad4@linux, "DJ"
>>>>>> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Bush(ite)popularity polls show them @ around 33-36 percent.
That
>>>>> says
>>>>>>>> that most of the folks who voted for him does not suppport him or
>> that
>>>>>>> "sham"
>>>>>>>> Iraq war.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The *sham Iraq war was started by Sadaam Hussein in 1991 and was
still
>>>>> going
>>>>>>> strong, aided by the UN, French and Russians when Bush took office.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And let's also not forget that the Iraq war we went to fight is over
>> -
>>>> the
>>>>>> Hussein regime is no longer; no WMDs in sight, done. But instead,
we
>>>> are
>>>>>> now playing intervention peace maker to help the Iraq government with
>>>> what
>>>>>> has turned into a nightmare rather than a transition. The greatest
>> number
>>>>>> of deaths from this "war" have happened directly because of the insurgency
>>>>>> of terrorists (car bombs, roadside bombs, snipers, etc) - not at the
>> hands
>>>>>> of the old Iraqi military or Hussein, but by outsider terrorists and
>> thugs
>>>>>> (the words of a couple of different US soldiers just back from Iraq
>> I
>>>>>> recently talked with).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or did we suddenly decide to support terrorism just to spite the current
>>>>>> administration? Seems like a sad way to decide what you believe in
>> and
>>>>>> stand for. Sell out to the least unpopular - just like we did when
>>>>> teaming
>>>>>> with Ossama against Russia in Afghanistan, except this time it's the
>>>>>> American public, not military leaders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's really easy to blame someone for everything we don't like or
can't
>>>>>> accept - whether it's finding fault for hurricane Katrina, terrorism,
>>>> or
>>>>> hot
>>>>>> coffee at McDonalds. But it is quite another thing to actually understand
>>>>>> and count the cost of the way of life that we all agree to in dark
>>>>>> compromise every single day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess I won't be surprised if an Islamic extremist is elected president
>>>>> in
>>>>>> the next 8-12 years.... game over. Go directly to jail. Do not pass
>>>> Go
>>>>> or
>>>>>> collect $200. I'm only partly serious here, but you guys are turning
>>>> me
>>>>>> into a pessimist. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>No no no...Your president and his fellow neo-cons did not want to call it
war. CNN and Fox called it war from day #1..
"war on terror", middle-east conflict, "spreading democracy"...And many others
came directly from the whitehouse.
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>maybe if we
>really had that, we wouldn't be in Iraq *and* the Iraqi people would still
>be free to make their own decisions out from under the crushing weight of
a
>dictator's thumb. But sadly, we've chosen to adopt the hypocritical facade
>that Hollywood and the news media feeds us. <
>
>Had we pulled together and presented a united front, like we did in WWII,
>this might well be an entirely different scenario right now. The left and
>their media shills use the loophole that there is *no declaration* of war
to
>skate on what would otherwise be considered to be treason and then scream
>about how many kids have been killed in this conflict while encouraging
>those who are killing them to keep up the good work because if they just
>keep on doing it, we will set a deadline for withdrawal.
>
>
>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>news:C10F1E68.2AAA%dterry@keyofd.net...
>> I wasn't referring to whether the war is right or wrong or whether I liked
>> Bush or not, just your approach and mindset isn't representing
>Christianity
>> in any way - these are just your political views. Don't confuse the two.
>> It does more harm than good.
>>
>> On the war and our country itself...
>>
>> I have personally talked to several US soldiers who have been there, and
>> have talked to Iraqis, in person - not what you think you hear from the
>news
>> media, or from a disgruntled private that just signed up with the Army
to
>> get a free education and wrote a book about it, but mid-level officers
and
>> doctors (e.g. not party line toters either) - and the Iraqis do appreciate
>> that we ended the tyrannical regime they were under. I was blown away
by
>> the real world accounts I heard that completely contradict what the news
>> media would have us believe (even if you support the war, this you would
>> start to wonder who's doing the most lying) - these guys are Christians,
>and
>> spent their time there building schools, restoring power, providing aid
to
>> military and citizens alike - working with the people, not just working
>the
>> media.
>>
>> If you think that is of no value, then it would be interesting to hear
>what
>> our own ancestor countrymen would say of the civil war - was the cost
of
>> hundreds of thousands of lives, homes, farms, schools, women and children,
>> and political turmoil worth it "just" to end slavery? Given what our
>> country seems to think of the Iraqi people - ignorant, victims of the
US
>> military, better off under a murderous dictator, etc - I would have to
say
>I
>> seriously doubt we would go down that road again. We would rather sit
by
>> and smugly to say that we weren't responsible for people dying - "we're
>> better than that - we make great bystanders and self-righteous,
>> self-absorbed pacifists". We would rather ride around in our
>Detroit-built,
>> union proud SUVs, sucking down expensive gasoline, buying frivolous
>luxuries
>> right and left from companies that help choke the atmosphere with
>production
>> pollution, watching movies that cost more than the food budget for Sudan
>and
>> complain about our government on the way home because we are embarrassed
>> that France and Germany don't like us, and because it's more popular to
>hate
>> the President than actually do something to fix any of the above problems.
>>
>> Whether you like it or not, there is a direct parallel, and a sad one
- DJ
>> is right, we are weak - not militarily, but as a people. We have no
>common
>> bond of morality, ethics, integrity, patriotism, and honor - maybe if
we
>> really had that, we wouldn't be in Iraq *and* the Iraqi people would still
>> be free to make their own decisions out from under the crushing weight
of
>a
>> dictator's thumb. But sadly, we've chosen to adopt the hypocritical
>facade
>> that Hollywood and the news media feeds us. We are more interested in
>> political correctness and putting on the appearance of righteousness than
>> actually living it. I'm not in anyway saying war is righteous - it is
>just
>> a fact of a world that in majority doesn't have a moral value system.
And
>at
>> the same time we are justifying our intellectually superior pacifism by
>> turning a blind eye to true evil and in fact doing exactly what you claim
>> others are doing - putting faith in Man. Mine isn't in any man on this
>> planet. Completely independently of the government, we are yet again
>> selling out our pride and integrity as people to the lowest cost bidder
in
>> exchange for a mask of fabricated peace, temporary freedom and empty
>> compassion. We have more in common now with Hollywood 2006 than
>> Philadelphia 1776, much less 0 BC.
>>
>> "Where is the hope? I meet millions who tell me that they feel demoralized
>> by the decay around us. Where is the hope? The hope that each of us have
>is
>> not in who governs us, or what laws are passed, or what great things that
>we
>> do as a nation. Our hope is in the power of God working through the hearts
>> of people, and that¹s where our hope is in this country; that¹s where
our
>> hope is in life." - Chuck Colson
>>
>> Dedric
>>
>> On 8/21/06 1:05 AM, in article 44e95b3a$1@linux, "LaMont"
>> <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > What I'm saying is (from aprevious post) is that I feel that this
>> > administration
>> > are killers. They killed our young soldiers for a stupid cause.
>> > As to my I'll take the terroist" statement..Well, Dedric ask an Iraqi
>citizen
>> > about who they think are the terrorist???
>> >
>> > As for that statement being unchristian. Well who said that the American
>> > policy is the "Thee" authority of Christianity???
>> > My views are not slanderer not in fear of speaking against a burgeoning
>> > tyranny.
>> >
>> >
>> > I know full well I don't speak for the entire Christian population,
only
>> > Jesus does. But, faith in a Man, is stupid..
>> >
>> > Yes, I feel that the Bush(ites) are evil. Evil lying politians. So,
if
>you
>> > take that as being slanted, then so beit.
>> >
>> > So, you and the other 33-36 percent can keep on fighting the war on
>terror
>> > ,and find your WMD's or what ever.
>> > I'm not buying it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>> >> Lamont, saying you would rather back terrorists (cold blooded kille
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70279 is a reply to message #70268] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 00:40 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
ween two contradictory belief systems (Christianity vs.
>> Atheism/Agnosticism for example), one belief would have to be false to
>> the
>> point of being considered non-existent.
>>
>> Sidebar - Blaise Pascal had an interesting comment on the idea of
>> conflicting beliefs:
>> "Pascal's wager":
>>
>> "Either Christianity is true or it's false. If you bet that it's true,
>> and
>> you believe in God and submit to Him, then if it IS true, you've gained
>> God,
>> heaven, and everything else. If it's false, you've lost nothing, but
>> you've
>> had a good life marked by peace and the illusion that ultimately,
>> everything
>> makes sense. If you bet that Christianity is not true, and it's false,
>> you've lost nothing. But if you bet that it's false, and it turns out to
>> be
>> true, you've lost everything and you get to spend eternity in hell."
>>
>> On 8/17/06 5:05 PM, in article 44e4f4b2@linux, "Jamie K"
>> <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yet we must succeed at communicating between groups as diverse as
>>> Christians and Muslims, or for a tougher example, AELC Lutherans and
>>> Wisconsin Synod Lutherans. I'm only half joking about that last one...
>>
>> Agreed. The church we attend here isn't one of the largest (about 1000),
>> but has held two community discussion forums (both got local press) - the
>> first was to disc
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70291 is a reply to message #70149] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 09:25 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
">44e79ad8@linux">news:44e79ad8@linux</A>...<BR>Hi =
> >all,<BR><BR>I just=20
> > moved to the Boston area(arlington) and was wondering how many =
> >Paris<BR>users=20
> > there are here. I used to post regularly years ago but my studio =
> >
> > has<BR>been down for close to 3 years now. Just got it back up =
> >and=20
> > thought I'd<BR>check in here to see how things are going with my =
> >fellow Paris=20
> > users.<BR><BR>peace,<BR>TRossi<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft =
> >Lockspam=20
> > to fight spam, and you?<BR><A=20
> > =
>
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
> >.html</A>=20
> > <BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
> >
> >
>It does,
I got mine last night, Played with it for about an hour.
Its inspiring. Its.....magic!!
db
"Dubya Mark Wilson" <mark.xspam@avidrecording.com> wrote in message
news:44e775be$1@linux...
> In stock again - ordered today. Free shipping... sweet deal -- even if it
> has only ONE great sound in it.
> W.
>
> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.org> wrote in message news:44e0efff$1@linux...
> >
> > It's a Yamaha MagicStomp.
> >
> >
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Yamaha-Magicstomp-II- Guitar-Effects-Processor?sku=151560
> >
> > Looks like they are out until the 18th.
> >
> > DC
>
>God Bless you and your family, Nappy...!
I Am,
El Miguel
"Nappy" <mgrant01@san.rr.com> wrote in message news:44e9dba3$1@linux...
>
> Thanks Mike,
> I feel like your Dad!
>
> respect
> Nappy
>
>
> "Mike R." <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Hey Nappy. Always good to see your name on the NG. Hang in there dude.
>>
>>W, my dad had half his thyroid removed. The doc told him "no golf for the
>>rest of the summer." He was out on the links in three weeks. My
>>friend's
>>aunt just had her entire thyroid removed. As it was causing some pain in
>>her shoulder, she's feeling great --and for unknown reasons (she believes
>>it's due to the lose of the thyroid) she reports feeling much more
>>energetic. Nevertheless, having gone through the problem with my father,
> I
>>know its hard to feel some sense of relief until its over. Take care.
>>MR
>>
>>"Dubya Mark Wilson" <mark.xspam@avidrecording.com> wrote in message
>>news:44e6a2b4@linux...
>>> You're hanging tough bro. Excellent! I hope and pray everything goes
>>> better than anticipated. Side note: my wife received a phone call today
>>> following and MRI yesterday for a recent neck injury (totalled one of
> our
>>> cars). Doc says he sees cancer on her thyroid gland. Meeting and
>>> discussions to be set for Monday of this coming week. Not what I wanna
>>> hear. She's badly shaken by the news. I'm just kinda stuck emotionally
>>> until I learn more and we know what we're looking at. At this point,
> we
>>> can't both cave in... somebody's gotta hold the line.
>>>
>>> W.
&
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70298 is a reply to message #70291] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 14:03 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
lank">http://www.museresearch.com/receptor_on_the_road.php
> Hosted By Factory Rep Ted Rackley ! < Former Steinberg Rep >
> Special pricing for the PARIS Community
>
> Check out our new Showroom:
> http://www.eastcoastmusic.com/starr_rd1.htm
>
> * Also Group Buy's on RME, UAD , TC Electronics BFD,WAVES,
> Steinberg,MOTU,REAL TRAPS,Korg, Roland, Yamaha,Tascam,
> Studio Projects, Toft,Presonus ADL, SE Mics and many more !
> Check out the new SE Reflexion :
> http://www.seelectronics.com/rf.html
>
> * I'll post some pricing later
>
> Workshops Coming Soon :
> RME - Samplitude - Sequioa
> Steinberg / NUENDO/ Wavelab
> Newbie Night - Great for all newcomers
> APPLE / Mac Nights - LOGIC / Garage Band * The new Intel Mac's
> Digital Video - Final Cut Pro / VEGAS plus many more
> Digital Photography
> Digital Animation ( Hosted by famous Author Mercer Mayer )
> HIP-HOP how to be a HIP-HOP producer with SUPREME KING - Jazzy JAY
> Plus many many more :)
>
>
>
>
> Dog Days of Summer Scratch 'n Dent Sale
> http://www.eastcoastmusic.com/blowout.htm
> At this time of year people are at the beach or getting their kids ready
> to go
> back to school but they're not shopping. It's no secret that retail sales
> are
> slow at this time of year. Now you can take advantage of the slow season
> and if
> you move quickly grab 'one of a kind' savings.
>
> We have to move much of our current inventory during the summer dog days
> to
> make room for new arrivals and so we're offering INSANE PRICES on select
> items.
> Prices are SLASHED since some items could have a small ding, there may be
> a
> used piece or two and others, well maybe our buyer just spent too much
> time in
> the sun. Anyway, there's just one of each in-stock item...no orders or
> reservations. First come - first served and when that piece is gone,
> that's
> all. (however, we'll happily make your day with a KILLER DEAL on a
> different
> piece!)
>
> Don't miss out on your chance to take advantage of this PRICE MELTDOWN
>
> ECMM has an URGENT NEED for your USED GEAR. It's likely that you have some
> equipment that you no longer use. Perhaps you've been thinking about
> trading up
> but just haven't made it happen yet. Well, your timing couldn't be better
> because as long as this shortfall lasts we will be OFFERING AT LEAST 10%
> MORE
> than we ever have before!
>
> We're looking for everything; guitars, drums, pro audio, PA gear,
> keyboards…ANYTHING. Bring your equipment in anytime during store hours.
> PLEASE NOTE: NO PHONE CALLS PLEASE. In order to evaluate any trade-in, the
> item
> has to be seen to estimate its condition so you are encouraged to bring
> your
> gear to the store. However, if you feel compelled to contact us about your
> trade before coming in, please use this email link:
> trades@eastcoastmusicmall.com
>
>
> Morgan
> morganp@ntplx.net
> Eastcoast Music Mall
> 800-901-2001
>Brandon,
Have you checked with a urologist? You might want to go with the next size
up though. :>)
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Tony
"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:44eb2447$1@linux...
I need an electric piston.
Or
Maybe an electric acuator.
Basically just a rod that is incased by a cylinder and extends and retracts
when voltage is applied.
It needs to be maybe 4-6inches long and can apply a good amount of
pressure.
I can't find this from web searches.
Obviousely, I don't know the correct terminology.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
--
BrandonThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0040_01C6C5EE.B6CA08E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I haven't done this in years. I have the authorization codes.
Where do I input them? Do I need to install new software
too?
I'm talking about MEQ-5 and the Cambridge EQ.
Tom
UAD sent me an email stating that Paris was not supported...
I know that?!?! Arghh. But why can't they answer my question
anyway? Are they software police now too?
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam,
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70303 is a reply to message #70298] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 14:55 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
hing: do the
>>> >sides of the box open up? If it were mine I would make sure I had fast
>>> >access to the guts of the computer. Personally I have always kept mine
>>> >in closets.
>>> >
>>> >Also, whatever you use for the foam, remeber there will b a lot of dust
>>>
>>> >building up over time, so use something that will not trap it or hold
> it.
>>> >
>>> >brandon wrote:
>>> >> All,
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> I am in the middle of making my studio console and am
>>> >> building a sound proof computer compartment into it.
>>> >> I was wondering where I can purchase the foam that needs to line
>>> >> the enclosure. I need something about 1/4 inch thick for the
>>> >> ventalation maze, but something thicker could go in the main
>>> >> compartment.
>>> >>
>>> >> OH yeah.... Cheap please...
>>> >>
>>> >> Thx
>>> >> b
>>>
>>
>>
>At least the form factor.
http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2006/Rain-Recording-Eve nt.html
JamesOh, check out the price, about a grand more!
James
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>At least the form factor.
>
> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2006/Rain-Recording-Eve nt.html
>
>James$1595.00 MSRP! Yikes, a Windows Mac Mini at only twice the price!
Let the flames begin! ;>)
Tony
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:44eb426a$1@linux...
>
> At least the form factor.
>
> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2006/Rain-Recording-Eve nt.html
>
> JamesI was willing to go as high as $400 !!!
"Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote:
>$1595.00 MSRP! Yikes, a Windows Mac Mini at only twice the price!
>
>Let the flames begin! ;>)
>
>Tony
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:44eb426a$1@linux...
>>
>> At least the form factor.
>>
>> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2006/Rain-Recording-Eve nt.html
>>
>> James
>
>I started keeping a little Olympus voice recorder around, just to
put song ideas onto. By the time I start up the computer and
get Paris going, the idea is usally gone, especially if it is 3am.
Thank God for my patient wife.
DC
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>I couldn't agree with this sentiment more.
>
>For the last few years I've been mucking about with my music, creating very
>little, largely because of the sound of this or that not being up to scratch.
>Or some production issue or another.
>
>Recently I've found a whole new way of working. It voilates half of my "It's
>all about the sound" ideas and comes back to the basics of putting down
a
>song, as quickly as possible, while the energy for that song is there and
>fresh. I've set up a whole bunch of my favourite sounds, which could still
>be tweaked, but I'm focussing on using them, not tweaking. I've got a Digitech
>GNX-4 which I use in loop mode to do the basic recording (not Paris). Once
>I have a bunch of loops all prepared I can simply switch the wav files over
>to Paris, drop them in an order I like and the song is done. I then add
vocals
>very quickly and move on to another song.
>
>So far I've only done one tune, but it was last week, and it worked, and
>worked well for mine. I had fun, I like the product, and the sound is not
>too shabby anyhow. It's the quickest way to work I've ever found, and I
like
>it.
>
>As Nike would say... "Just do it".
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinguitarcenter.org> wrote:
>>
>>There is a new piece up on my guitar blog.
>>
>>http://dcguitarjournal.blogspot.com/
>>
>>It's called
>>
>>Stop Obsessing and Play Some Music
>>
>>Take a look if you can.
>>
>>DC
>>
>>
>I'm thinking about using my old G4 w/ Digital performer to allow me access
to the new UAD-1 and Waves plugins while using Paris on my newer G4. I need
an interface for DP that'll have little or no latency. I'm thinking about
the 828 (firewire) or the 2408 MK. 3 (PCI card). Do any of you folks have
enough experience w/ them to advise me?
Thanks!
ganttTyrone, and anybody else, for that matter:
1. What version of Autotune are you using with Paris 3.0?
2. Is it true that newer versions of Autotune sound better than older versions,
and if so, at what version did the program start sounding significantly better?
Thanks to everyone, as always.
JimmyThe only rub here I believe is that the current UAD software is OSX
only (which won't run on a G4)... which means you would not be able to
run any of the newer UA plugs like the Neve EQ.
David.
Gantt Kushner wrote:
> I'm thinking about using my old G4 w/ Digital performer to allow me access
> to th
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70304 is a reply to message #70303] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 15:19 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
e new UAD-1 and Waves plugins while using Paris on my newer G4. I need
> an interface for DP that'll have little or no latency. I'm thinking about
> the 828 (firewire) or the 2408 MK. 3 (PCI card). Do any of you folks have
> enough experience w/ them to advise me?
>
> Thanks!
>
> gantt http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=domestic News&storyid=2006-08-22T173033Z_01_N22395766_RTRUKOC_0_U S-LEISURE-DYLAN.xml&src=rss&rpc=22This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C6C5FC.69516410
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Okay now the question is has anybody had any problems with UAD-1 ver =
4.3?
Wrap with fxPansion 3.3 still?
Deej?
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:44eb3cee$1@linux...
I haven't done this in years. I have the authorization codes.
Where do I input them? Do I need to install new software
too?
I'm talking about MEQ-5 and the Cambridge EQ.
Tom
UAD sent me an email stating that Paris was not supported...
I know that?!?! Arghh. But why can't they answer my question
anyway? Are they software police now too?
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C6C5FC.69516410
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Okay now the question is has anybody =
had any=20
problems with UAD-1 ver 4.3?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Wrap with fxPansion 3.3 =
still?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Deej?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A href=3D"news:44eb3cee$1@linux">news:44eb3cee$1@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I haven't done this in years. I =
have the=20
authorization codes.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Where do I input them? Do I =
need to install=20
</FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>new software</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>too?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm talking about MEQ-5 and the =
Cambridge=20
EQ.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>UAD sent me an email stating that =
Paris was not=20
supported...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I know that?!?! Arghh. =
But why can't=20
they answer my question</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>anyway? Are they software =
police now=20
too?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE ></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0072_01C6C5FC.69516410--sent you some notes.I'm running an 828 on my G5 with DP and loving it. Performance is good at
128 buffer size and that's very low latency. I don't know what performance
would be like on an older G4 and as Gantt said, you'll probably want to be
running OSX. I was running OSX on my dual 1GHz G4, but it might be too much
for an older G4. I'm currently running PARIS on the Dually G4 and DP on a
Dual 2GHz G5 and I'm pretty happy with the performance.
Tony
"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:44eb4f69$1@linux...
>
> I'm thinking about using my old G4 w/ Digital performer to allow me access
> to the new UAD-1 and Waves plugins while using Paris on my newer G4. I
> need
> an interface for DP that'll have little or no latency. I'm thinking about
> the 828 (firewire) or the 2408 MK. 3 (PCI card). Do any of you folks have
> enough experience w/ them to advise me?
>
> Thanks!
>
> ganttthen he wouldn't be able to run paris on osx...c-22
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:31:51 -0500, "Tony Benson"
<tony@standinghampton.com> wrote:
>I'm running an 828 on my G5 with DP and loving it. Performance is good at
>128 buffer size and that's very low latency. I don't know what performance
>would be like on an older G4 and as Gantt said, you'll probably want to be
>running OSX. I was running OSX on my dual 1GHz G4, but it might be too much
>for an older G4. I'm currently running PARIS on the Dually G4 and DP on a
>Dual 2GHz G5 and I'm pretty happy with the performance.
>
>Tony
>
>
>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:44eb4f69$1@linux...
>>
>> I'm thinking about using my old G4 w/ Digital performer to allow me access
>> to the new UAD-1 and Waves plugins while using Paris on my newer G4. I
>> need
>> an interface for DP that'll have little or no latency. I'm thinking about
>> the 828 (firewire) or the 2408 MK. 3 (PCI card). Do any of you folks have
>> enough experience w/ them to advise me?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> gantt
>Hi Rick,
I think Gantt wants to run PARIS on his newer G4 and DP with a MOTU
interface on his older G4.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70308 is a reply to message #70291] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:14 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
>>>Take a look if you can.
>>>
>>>DC
>>>
>>>
>>
>I have a MOTU 828MII, have used it with a G4 and now a dual G5. Very
solid piece of gear. Much better than the original 828, the 828MII is
reliable and well designed.
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
Tony Benson wrote:
> Hi Rick,
>
> I think Gantt wants to run PARIS on his newer G4 and DP with a MOTU
> interface on his older G4. That's the way I understood his question anyway.
> He could run OSX on the DP machine, but the performance might not be great
> on an older G4.
>
> Anyway, I like the 828 MkII Firewire interface. The pre amps are pretty
> clean and they have a decent amount of gain available. Actually, the 828 is
> my "no color" pre amp right now. I've got 16 channels of Trident ixOne, an
> HHB Fat Man II, and an Aphex 107, but they all are pretty "colorful" pres.
> Until I can afford a Great River, Gracie, True Systems, etc., the 828 will
> cover things.
>
> MOTU's new UltraLite interface looks pretty nice also.
> http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/ultralite/
>
> Tony
>
>
> "rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:8vpme2hrmh00klvuanjh13b02bqj3tpub3@4ax.com...
>> then he wouldn't be able to run paris on osx...c-22
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:31:51 -0500, "Tony Benson"
>> <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm running an 828 on my G5 with DP and loving it. Performance is good at
>>> 128 buffer size and that's very low latency. I don't know what performance
>>> would be like on an older G4 and as Gantt said, you'll probably want to be
>>> running OSX. I was running OSX on my dual 1GHz G4, but it might be too
>>> much
>>> for an older G4. I'm currently running PARIS on the Dually G4 and DP on a
>>> Dual 2GHz G5 and I'm pretty happy with the performance.
>>>
>>> Tony
>>>
>>>
>>> "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:44eb4f69$1@linux...
>>>> I'm thinking about using my old G4 w/ Digital performer to allow me
>>>> access
>>>> to the new UAD-1 and Waves plugins while using Paris on my newer G4. I
>>>> need
>>>> an interface for DP that'll have little or no latency. I'm thinking
>>>> about
>>>> the 828 (firewire) or the 2408 MK. 3 (PCI card). Do any of you folks
>>>> have
>>>> enough experience w/ them to advise me?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> gantt
>
>Thanks, all
Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>Dale wrote:
>> I've been referred to networksolutions.com, but they seem a little pricey
>> once you get out of the bargain basement services.
>>
>> what are some other options that y'all are happy with?
>>
>> Thanks, Dale
>
>I use www.1and1.com. I am very satisfied with their service.Hey, good one. I write my songs on an unplugged electric (or an acoustic,
or a piano). I don't worry about the sound until it's time to record it.
My main problem is how to get all these babies recorded before I turn 90. I
guess it's really just one obsession or another . . . I obsess over finished
compositions. (And now for a limited time, you can hear some of these
compositions at www.sarahtonin.com/wayward.htm and perhaps add a lovely
packaged collection to your music library.)
Aah, any opportunity for a shameless plug.
Thanks
Sarah
PS: Makes an excellent gift!
"DC" <dc@spammersinguitarcenter.org> wrote in message
news:44ea1310$1@linux...
>
> There is a new piece up on my guitar blog.
>
> http://dcguitarjournal.blogspot.com/
>
> It's called
>
> Stop Obsessing and Play Some Music
>
> Take a look if you can.
>
> DC
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinvenezuela.org> wrote in message news:44e9f957$1@linux...
>
> I am for a cease for on all political and/or religious topics, and
> a cowpie in the m
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70311 is a reply to message #70304] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 21:29 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
Basically just a rod that is incased by a cylinder and extends and =
retracts
when voltage is applied.
It needs to be maybe 4-6inches long and can apply a good amount of
pressure.
I can't find this from web searches.=20
Obviousely, I don't know the correct terminology.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
--=20
Brandon
------=_NextPart_000_008F_01C6C616.DB17FB80
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://store.newart.com/pacpumcylhow.html">http://store.newart.co=
m/pacpumcylhow.html</A></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Brandon" <<A href=3D"mailto:a@a.com">a@a.com</A>> wrote in =
message=20
<A href=3D"news:44eb2447$1@linux">news:44eb2447$1@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I need an electric piston.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Or </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Maybe an electric acuator.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Basically just a rod that is incased by a =
cylinder and=20
extends and retracts</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>when voltage is applied.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>It needs to be maybe 4-6inches long and can =
apply a good=20
amount of</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>pressure.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>I can't find this from web searches. =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Obviousely, I don't know the correct=20
terminology.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Any help would be appreciated.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial>Thanks,</FONT></DIV><FONT face=3DArial>
<DIV><BR>-- <BR>Brandon</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_008F_01C6C616.DB17FB80--When did it turn 06?
--
Erick Kent
"Dubya Mark Wilson" <mark.xspam@avidrecording.com> wrote in message
news:44eabb25@linux...
> Just got an email dated June 28, 2009.... we're still doing '06,
> right?!?!?!
> W.
>
>
>
>One of 3 Neve's like it on the planet (or so I'm told), it's
basically two 8000-series boards fitted together:
http://www.sonicranch.com/neve1console.html
Live room attached to this particular control room...
http://www.sonicranch.com/bigtrackingroom2.htmlholy crap!
--
Erick Kent
"Neil" <OIUOI@OIU.com> wrote in message news:44eba035$1@linux...
>
> One of 3 Neve's like it on the planet (or so I'm told), it's
> basically two 8000-series boards fitted together:
>
> http://www.sonicranch.com/neve1console.html
>
>
> Live room attached to this particular control room...
> http://www.sonicranch.com/bigtrackingroom2.html
>Jimmy, I'm running Autotune ver 3.0 with Paris. I have not tried any other
versions.
Tyrone
"Uptown Jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>Tyrone, and anybody else, for that matter:
>
>1. What version of Autotune are you using with Paris 3.0?
>
>
>2. Is it true that newer versions of Autotune sound better than older versions,
>and if so, at what version did the program start sounding significantly
better?
>
>Thanks to everyone, as always.
>Jimmy
>more fun..... anybody heard of / tried these?
http://www.4mspedals.com/Hey Aaron I've been hip to the shuttle and that form factor for years, which
is a lot bigger than the Mac Mini. This is the first PC that I've seen that
is the size of the Mac Mini, basically 6.5 x 6.5 x 2", about the size of
an external hard drive. Dell has a 10 x 10 x 3.5" machine, and WinBook has
a 9 x 8 x 2".
If you really want to see some copycat stuff go watch the WWDC keynote speech
where they compare Mac OSX to Windows Vista. Or go look at the look of iTunes,
especially the older version of iTunes and compare it to Windows Media player
11. Check out the disk logo with the musical note, and the buttons with
the Aqua look!
WWDC Keynote speech:
http://events.apple.com.edgesuite.net/aug_2006/event/index.h tml
iTunes logo, upper right corner:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
Windows Media, Aqua button, and third picture down, they slid the aqua note
off the disk and went with Apple's original blue theme.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/player/11/defa ult.aspx
I guess I'm being a bit petty, but after years of MS copying Apple, it makes
a Mac guy ill to see MS get the credit. When it comes to MS there's no accounting
for innovation or originality. If they didn't buy it, they stole it!
I have to laugh though when I hear that MS has spent over 9 billion on office
2007 and vista and they still don't have their shit together. By the way
that's billion with a "B"!
Oh shit! I think I just started the next Mac vs. PC war; )
James
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>uhh.. this isn't news for PC's. It's been available for some time now. Even
>Dell has micro chassis offerings that rock.
>
>http://sys.us.shuttle.com/BuildXPC.aspx?id=1176
>
>AA
>
>
>"Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote in message
>news:44eb4407@linux...
>> $1595.00 MSRP! Yikes, a Windows Mac Mini at only twice the price!
>>
>> Let the flames begin! ;>)
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:44eb426a$1@linux...
>>>
>>> At least the form factor.
>>>
>>> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2006/Rain-Recording-Eve nt.html
>>>
>>> James
>>
>>
>
>I think they were looking for Sarah Connor . . .
S
"Dubya Mark Wilson" <mark.xspam@avidrecording.com> wrote in message
news:44eabb25@linux...
> Just got an email dated June 28, 2009.... we're still doing '06,
> right?!?!?!
> W.
>
>
>
>Wow! I'll the monitors in the live room probably cost more than my whole
set up.
Speaking of the live room, looks very "live"
"Erick Kent" <erick at thefollower.com> wrote:
>holy crap!
>
>--
>Erick Kent
>"Neil" <OIUOI@OIU.com> wrote in message news:44eba035$<
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70329 is a reply to message #70308] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 12:05 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
wrote:
>
>Hey Gene,
>
>Do you think the latency is low enough to use the 2408 w/ DP as a real time
>FX processor? Actually, I guess w/ reverb a little pre-delay wouldn't hurt.
> I don't know about UAD-1 FX, given the card's own latency...
>
>Thanks!
>
>Gantt
>
How low you set the buffers depends largely on how powerful the processor
is and how hard you are working it. I have never tried to use software effects
during live recording, but I have used DP as a “Live” rack when mixing in
Paris. I still needed to shift tracks in most cases to be 100% happy with
the results.
I’m spoiled that I have hardware to do this on the way in.This is from the logs of a high traffic database/VM server
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
Filtering for string "system uptime"
4331 \\VMSERV The system uptime is 31593759 seconds.
Tue Aug 22 12:00:00 2006
Type: INFORMATION
Source: EventLog
End of report
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
That means a few hours over a year with no crashes/reboots/etc. Yes, it's
behind on security patches (not a year behind, we're selective), but only
two non-standard ports are allowed inbound and we've restricted all of the
services we can on it, and it's behind our PIX. So we're taking more chances
on it than we would with a web server out in the soup. But it gets banged
on all day every day running native apps and five VMs, so don't let anyone
tell you a properly configured M$oft box can't be stable.
TCBDebian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian
Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian
Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian
Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian Debian
Debian
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Hey Aaron I've been hip to the shuttle and that form factor for years, which
>is a lot bigger than the Mac Mini. This is the first PC that I've seen
that
>is the size of the Mac Mini, basically 6.5 x 6.5 x 2", about the size of
>an external hard drive. Dell has a 10 x 10 x 3.5" machine, and WinBook
has
>a 9 x 8 x 2".
>
>If you really want to see some copycat stuff go watch the WWDC keynote speech
>where they compare Mac OSX to Windows Vista. Or go look at the look of
iTunes,
>especially the older version of iTunes and compare it to Windows Media player
>11. Check out the disk logo with the musical note, and the buttons with
>the Aqua look!
>
>WWDC Keynote speech:
> http://events.apple.com.edgesuite.net/aug_2006/event/index.h tml
>
>iTunes logo, upper right corner:
>http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
>
>Windows Media, Aqua button, and third picture down, they slid the aqua note
>off the disk and went with Apple's original blue theme.
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/player/11/defa ult.aspx
>
>I guess I'm being a bit petty, but after years of MS copying Apple, it makes
>a Mac guy ill to see MS get the credit. When it comes to MS there's no
accounting
>for innovation or originality. If they didn't buy it, they stole it!
>
>I have to laugh though when I hear that MS has spent over 9 billion on office
>2007 and vista and they still don't have their shit together. By the way
>that's billion with a "B"!
>
>Oh shit! I think I just started the next Mac vs. PC war; )
>
>James
>
>
>"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>uhh.. this isn't news for PC's. It's been available for some time now.
Even
>
>>Dell has micro chassis offerings that rock.
>>
>>http://sys.us.shuttle.com/BuildXPC.aspx?id=1176
>>
>>AA
>>
>>
>>"Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote in message
>>news:44eb4407@linux...
>>> $1595.00 MSRP! Yikes, a Windows Mac Mini at only twice the price!
>>>
>>> Let the flames begin! ;>)
>>>
>>> Tony
>>>
>>>
>>> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:44eb426a$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> At least the form factor.
>>>>
>>>> http://news.harmony-central.com/Newp/2006/Rain-Recording-Eve nt.html
>>>>
>>>> James
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>If it was an 8068III I'd be drollin'... post Siemens never really
wowed me. Nice room though...
David.
Neil wrote:
> One of 3 Neve's like it on the planet (or so I'm told), it's
> basically two 8000-series boards fitted together:
>
> http://www.sonicranch.com/neve1console.html<
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70331 is a reply to message #70311] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 12:24 |
macle
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
gt;I think that is a good idea. I have a couple of others coming up
first.
Hey, I fell in love with the sound samples on this box, and
impulsively ordered one up:
http://www.foxroxelectronics.com/
Click on Paradox TZF
He wants it to only be at the end of the signal chain so that
his box works on the fully effected tone.
Seems like a bitchin' box. I should have it in a couple weeks
DC
"Chuck Duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Don,
>
>What do you think about a basic article about signal chain for a guitar
rig?
> Something like this - given the following hypothetical equipment in a chain
>ahead of the amp:
>
>1. Compressor
>2. Overdrive/distortion
>3. EQ
>4. Verb
>5. Wah
>
>Discussing the different way pedals can be ordered, the sounds/tones acheived
>by different orders, pitfalls of ordering certain ways, ways you definitely
>don't want to order, etc..
>
>Chuck
>
>Did you save a project and then close Paris with the loop function enabled?
If so, this is likely the reason. Open the project, disable the loop
function, save the project under a new name and you should be good (if this
is he error I think it is). This code is one of the *features* that isn't
mentioned in the manual.
good luck,
DJ
"Greg O" <studio2590@infostations.com> wrote in message
news:44ec5fc8$1@linux...
>
> Does anyone know what: _tpt QueProject Error in setting direction. Error
code
> 1879048261/70000045 mean?
> Just started showing up when
> during recording session. I'm running on a G4- 9.2.2
> Please help! Thanks, Greg O
>..back-up...rewind. Gene's post adressed an issue I did not consider. Although
I use Autotune ver. 3, I have not ventured down the "graphical" mode , as
I have read a number of posts stating that there is a problem with this.
My usage of Autotune has primarily been for abstract color, so for me, "auto"
mode works flawlessly. Sorry if I caused any confusion here.
Tyrone
"gene lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"Uptown Jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>>Tyrone, and anybody else, for that matter:
>>
>>1. What version of Autotune are you using with Paris 3.0?
>>
>>
>>2. Is it true that newer versions of Autotune sound better than older versions,
>>and if so, at what version did the program start sounding significantly
>better?
>>
>>Thanks to everyone, as always.
>>Jimmy
>>
>
>I’m still using 1.3
>It’s the only version that ever worked properly in Graphical Mode for me.
>Later versions work fine in Auto mode. It could be just me!
>Gene
>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>you have friends????
Nah, but I can't spell acquain... err... akwayntenc... ahh
ferget it.
:)On my G5 with the buffer set to 128 in DP, I'm guessing approx. 3ms latency.
I've never bothered to find out how to check the exact figure as it's been
low enough that I don't really care. I don't know if an older G4 would run
well at that buffer setting though. I have a feeling not. With insert type
effects i.e. EQ's, Comps, etc., the whole track will be delayed with
whatever latency you have out and back in, and will need to be compensated
for when returning the send to the mix. With send type FX, Reverb,
Delay,etc. you can probably dial stuff in to work with no compensation,
unless you're trying to sync tempo delays or something like that. I haven't
actually messed with the type scenario you are asking about, so I can' t
give too much solid advice. I can only say that the 828 MkII is a solid
piece of gear and I would think with a good fast comp. you could do what
you're wanting to do. I would be leery about a 833 MHz G4 being fast enough
though. Sorry.
Tony
"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:44ebc842$1@linux...
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> Yes, you're right - My thought is to run Paris on my new DP 1.25 gHz G4 in
> OS 9.2.2 ans Digital Performer on my old 833 mHz G4. I'm hoping to be
> able
> to use the Waves IR-L reverb and some of the UAD-1 plugins (like the Neve
> EQ!!!) in real time. Is the latency of the 828 MkII low enough to pull
> that
> off? I figure there'll be issues w/ the UAD-1 FX, since the card has it's
> own latency issues. I can't understand how DJ manages to make it all work
> in real time on his system!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gantt
>
> "Tony Benson" <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote:
>>Hi Rick,
>>
>>I think Gantt wants to run PARIS on his newer G4 and DP with a MOTU
>>interface on his older G4. That's the way I understood his question
>>anyway.
>
>>He could run OSX on the DP machine, but the performance might not be great
>
>>on an older G4.
>>
>>Anyway, I like the 828 MkII Firewire interface. The pre amps are pretty
>
>>clean and they have a decent amount of gain available. Actually, the 828
> is
>>my "no color" pre amp right now. I've got 16 channels of Trident ixOne,
> an
>>HHB Fat Man II, and an Aphex 107, but they all are pretty "colorful" pres.
>
>>Until I can afford a Great River, Gracie, True Systems, etc., the 828 will
>
>>cover things.
>>
>>MOTU's new UltraLite interface looks pretty nice also.
>>http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/ultralite/
>>
>>Tony
>>
>>
>>"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:8vpme2hrmh00klvuanjh13b02bqj3tpub3@4ax.com...
>>> then he wouldn't be able to run paris on osx...c-22
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:31:51 -0500, "Tony Benson"
>>> <tony@standinghampton.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm running an 828 on my G5 with DP and loving it. Performance is good
> at
>>>>128 buffer size and that's very low latency. I don't know what
>>>>performance
>>>>would be like on an older G4 and as Gantt said, you'll probably want to
> be
>>>>running OSX. I was running OSX on my dual 1GHz G4, but it might be too
>
>>>>much
>>>>for an older G4. I'm currently running PARIS on the Dually G4 and DP on
> a
>>>>Dual 2GHz G5 and I'm pretty happy with the performance.
>>>>
>>>>Tony
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:44eb4f69$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm thinking about using my old G4 w/ Digital performer to allow me
>
>>>>> access
>>>>> to the new UAD-1 and Waves plugins while using Paris on my newer G4.
> I
>>>>> need
>>>>> an interface for DP that'll have little or no latency. I'm thinking
>
>>>>> about
>>>>> the 828 (firewire) or the 2408 MK. 3 (PCI card). Do any of you folks
>
>>>>> have
>>>>> enough experience w/ them to advise me?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> gantt
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>I am NOT raising any of this again. I just noticed this new book
and thought some of you may be interested.
I will have no commments on it, or on anything else related to these issues.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog/911mythsblogalso
I've dealt with this issue quite a bit.
I've even caused it on purpose to try to figure out how to fix
it.
(recording with looping on (with no punch points) will cause it)
Anyway, in ALL cases that I've seen, the error seems to be caused
by a corrupted segment on the playing field.. actually, I believe
it is caused by a corrupted crossfade, to be specific.
Whenever, I get this error, I remove the last take/edit from the
playing
field
(between the dialogs popping up), save, quite and restart paris.
At this point, the problem seems to go away.
Good luck!
Try increasing your disk cache and overview sizes in the Config menu. On
the problem project, clear the Undo buffer and delete the Markers.
I never have that problem anymore (like once every 6 months now) since I
increased my disk cache size to 128MB and my overview to 21000KB.
BT
Pablo wrote:
> My paris system has gotten into the habit of crashing
> very often, and the message I get is:
>
> _tptQueProject:Error in queing Project Error code 1879048233/70000029
>
> It automatically closes after this and I lose whatever I haven't
> saved (obviously). Today, while in the mixing stage of the recording,
|
|
|
|
| Re: Spam! [message #70337 is a reply to message #70329] |
Fri, 14 July 2006 15:41 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>
>> I would bet on your paris.cfg file needing optimizing.
>> C:\program files\ensoniq\paris\paris.cfg
>>
>> This is what mine is set to:
>>
>>
>> *** PARIS Configuration ***
>>
>> *** ENGINE configuration parameters ***
>> * Cache Size in MB
>> CacheSize=128
>>
>> * Overview cache size in KB
>> OvwCacheSize=8192
>>
>> * I/O configuration
>> IOSize=256
>>
>> * SubMix Cache Size in KB
>> SubMixCacheSize=256
>>
>> ManualRecDelay=4096
>>
>> RecXFadeLen=20
>> Use32BitWinMTC=0
>>
>> DisableDirectX=0
>>
>> MasterOutputCard=0
>>
>> ScrubMaxRate=1
>>
>> WheelSensitivity=20
>>
>> WheelInertia=68
>>
>> CSProVersion=ABCDEFGH
>>
>> VSTDirectory=C:\vsts\
>>
>> MIDIPlayDisabled=1
>>
Thanks John....I'll give this a try. I'm very new to this program
and not sure what crossfades are yet,sorry.Greg, What is your setup? Mec, C16, cards, Pc type? Post questions here.
It's a very helpful NG.
"Greg O" <studio2590@infostations.com> wrote:
>
>John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>And don't forget to go here:
>>
>>www.kfocus.com/paris
>>
>>John wrote:
>>> The looping is a button on the C16 and on the transport window that has
>a
>>> start and end point to loop over and over. You probably don't have that
>>> on if you don't know what it is.
>>>
>>> Have you been doing any crossfades?
>>>
>>> I would bet on your paris.cfg file needing optimizing.
>>> C:\program files\ensoniq\paris\paris.cfg
>>>
>>> This is what mine is set to:
>>>
>>>
>>> *** PARIS Configuration ***
>>>
>>> *** ENGINE configuration parameters ***
>>> * Cache Size in MB
>>> CacheSize=128
>>>
>>> * Overview cache size in KB
>>> OvwCacheSize=8192
>>>
>>> * I/O configuration
>>> IOSize=256
>>>
>>> * SubMix Cache Size in KB
>>> SubMixCacheSize=256
>>>
>>> ManualRecDelay=4096
>>>
>>> RecXFadeLen=20
>>> Use32BitWinMTC=0
>>>
>>> DisableDirectX=0
>>>
>>> MasterOutputCard=0
>>>
>>> ScrubMaxRate=1
>>>
>>> WheelSensitivity=20
>>>
>>> WheelInertia=68
>>>
>>> CSProVersion=ABCDEFGH
>>>
>>> VSTDirectory=C:\vsts\
>>>
>>> MIDIPlayDisabled=1
>>>
>Thanks John....I'll give this a try. I'm very new to this program
>and not sure what crossfades are yet,sorry.They wrote a book too, Don. Totally shoots the conspiracy theories of a
government involvement and cover-up to itsy-bitsy pieces with cold hard
complete factual and multiple independent verifications per point. The book
project began with a completely open question and a willingness to examine
all the evidence and let the answers be whatever they were. If you're
afraid of the real story, don't read this book.
W.
"DC" <dc@spammersinnyc.com> wrote in message news:44eca694$1@linux...
>
> I am NOT raising any of this again. I just noticed this new book
> and thought some of you may be interested.
>
> I will have no commments on it, or on anything else related to these
> issues.
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog/911mythsblogWell, by golly, if it was written by engineers, it must be accurate within
+-1.5dB.
;o)
"DC" <dc@spammersinnyc.com> wrote in message news:44eca694$1@linux...
>
> I am NOT raising any of this again. I just noticed this new book
> and thought some of you may be interested.
>
> I will have no commments on it, or on anything else related to these
issues.
>
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog/911mythsblogThe stuff in the 911 movie on the internet, said that the pentagon wasn't
hit by a jet, then it was a two engine NAVY jet, so which is it? Then it
was a different kind of jet, or a military drone that was painted to look
like a airline jet. So which is it? According to these deceivers, it's
everything other than what it really was. I guess we didn't really see Airliners
crash in to the World Trade Center on 9/11, it was just smoke and mirrors.
The Government payed all the people that were supposed to be on those flights
and their families and friends to move to a private government island and
keep quiet. All this stuff is just propaganda.
Our government is so mismanaged and disorganized, it couldn't find it's ass
with both hands and a road map, much less pull this 911 conspiracy off.
Please, It's bull shit! The 911 conspiracy movie is just somebody's political
agenda.
Unfortunately, people are going to believe what they want, regardless of
the truth, that is right in front of them, because, it conveniently fits
their agenda.
Evil always denies the truth first.
James
"DC" <dc@spammersinnyc.com> wrote:
>
>I am NOT raising any of this again. I just noticed this new book
>and thought some of you may be interested.
>
>I will have no commments on it, or on anything else related to these issues.
>
>http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog/911mythsblog"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>Well, by
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 06 00:17:37 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.41042 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
