Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » SE3 mics
| SE3 mics [message #60433] |
Sat, 19 November 2005 09:43  |
Chris Wargo
Messages: 45
Registered: November 2005
|
Member |
|
|
O.com" target="_blank">spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote in message
> news:43a316ff$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: SE3 mics [message #60459 is a reply to message #60443] |
Sun, 20 November 2005 11:13  |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ot really that
simple.
> > I have found that the performer often "plays" to the compression,
especially
> >during vocals. Think of it in terms of a guitar player playing to the
sound
> >of a sustained amp. You can't really get that after the fact. My
epiphany
> >about this occurred when I put my voice through a Lawson-DW Fearn-Manley
> >ELOP. For the first time in my recording experience, the damned thing
sound
> >right off the bat like a record. Not necessarily a good record, but a
record
> >nonetheless. :)
> >>
> >>
> >
>Funny, we don't track drums with compressors either, so far.
Everything else? Lots of it.
Jimmy
"Gantt Kushner" <gizmo@his.com> wrote in message
news:43A30A8E.F1E7B43@his.com...
> The RNC is a great little box for the bucks. If you're talking about
tracking
>
> thru compressors, I'd say this: I frequently (but not always) track
vocals,
> bass, guitars and horns thru compressors, usually dbx 160X for vocs, UREI
> LA-4's for guitars and bass (although the 160X is nice for them too) and
horns,
>
> then RNC (I have 3 of 'em). I never track drums thru compressors! Nor do
I
> ever gate drums. I would always rather have the un-compressed drum tracks
> first, then compress as needed after. In fact, I frequently don't
compress
> drums, even in the mix...
>
> Just my .02 worth.
>
> Gantt
>
> Sanbar wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking about trying to get rid of as many software effects as
> > possible. Is the idea of buying 4-5 RNC Compressors for drums along with
a
> > couple of good compressors for vocals and bass a crazy idea. The goal is
to
> > get the signal close enough on the way in that any touch up can be done
with
> > Paris software thus eliminating the latency situations.
> >
> > I'm guessing that most would find this ludicrous, but if anyone is
> > succeeding with such an idea I would be curious.
>Life seems to be good without the VIA drivers, t least on the AGP. Looks
like the AGP is OK and the cards are OK. I was worried that I might be
having a hardware problem but life is good without the VIA drivers.
I didn't Ghost before I loaded these drivers (hey!!!!.......... these were
the mobo drivers!!!!......what could go wrong ? ;o) so I had to reformat the
new system drive and load Windows XP again. I've got both the Matrox video
cards working nicely now and I'm Ghosting the system drive as we speak.
I'm thinking of loading the Matrox universal driver, though I have found the
default Matrox drivers that is in XP to be a bit less troublesome because it
doesn't laod all of the extra Power Desk features, none of which I use.
(Yawn........was up until 4AM jacking around with this thing.........need
coffee..........).
"erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote in message news:43a3e23c$1@linux...
> Doug, this seems to again be a long story for you. Have you tested with
the
> new Matrox G450 certified drivers from sept.05. I had no luck with the new
> driver on my sForce Epox 9NDA3+ board but maybe VIA will eat it? The new
> driver is for WinXP.
>
> Erling
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> skrev i melding
> news:43a3bb
|
|
|
|
| Re: SE3 mics [message #60461 is a reply to message #60459] |
Sun, 20 November 2005 11:57 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
getting
> >> > squirrellier by the minute on current OS. I ghosted it and pulled
the
> >> > drive. Now I have got a brand new WD 80G 8MB cache formatted and I
> >> installed
> >> > Win XP. Immediate problems with my Matrox graphics cards right after
I
> >> > installed the VIA 4in1 drivers for the mobo. It's gonna be a
hellacious
> >> > weekend I'm afraid.
> >> >
> >> > ;o{
> >> >
> >> > "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:43a39439$1@linux...
> >> > >
> >> > > "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
> >> > > >You posted good vibes 'before` getting the Magma in and Paris
> > running?
> >> > > >Oh man, now you've done it..........
> >> > >
> >> > > Hehe... [snigger snigger]
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>My threads are specifically designed for mucking...........remember, that's
*mucking*.........with an *M*.
;o)
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43a43ddf$1@linux...
>
> Sorry about mucking up Deej's thread. I wasn't looking to start the whole
> Mac vs. PC debate. I was just thinking out loud. I go through this same
> kind of thing every time I build a new PC or upgrade, it's kind of a PITA.
> I was just wondering if upgrading an Apple Intel mac will have the same
> kind of issues? I hope they get it right. I wonder if Apple will have
affordable
> upgrade paths? Knowing Apple, they will probably solder in the processors
> so you have to buy a whole new computer to upgrade.
>
> This machine will be a whole new beast, I for one , will not be the first
> to dive in! It will be interesting to see how these systems perform and
> what problems they will have with them. People are already talking about
> hacking them to run dual boot, with XP and Mac OS. Dual boot would be
cool.
>
> I'm thinking, that even though Apple will be using Intel hardware software
> locking technology, some body will hack the new Mac OS and run it on a
standard
> PC with the new chip set. So it might be cheaper to wait.
>
> I guess will know more Jan. 9th. A $299 Mac mini with a built in TV tuner
> would be vary cool. A dual boot, multi processor tower with standard PCI
> slots that could run Paris XP and Mac OSX would be even cooler!
>
> Anybody have any thoughts?
>
> JamesI was down an the local Mac store here yesterday. I played around with a new
monster G5. I must say that *elegant in every way* was my
impression..........but that's my impression of Pro Tool HD system too.
IMO, with both of them, the purchaser becomes the *screwee* whenever the
moneymonkey needs a new injection of cash. Thing is, with a little tweaking,
I can achieve at least an equal, if not better result with alternative
platforms and not become one with the Borg.
;o)
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43a43ddf$1@linux...
>
> Sorry about mucking up Deej's thread. I wasn't looking to start the whole
> Mac vs. PC debate. I was just thinking out loud. I go through this same
> kind of thing every time I build a new PC or upgrade, it's kind of a PITA.
> I was just wondering if upgrading an Apple Intel mac will have the same
> kind of issues? I hope they get it right. I wonder if Apple will have
affordable
> upgrade paths? Knowing Apple, they will probably solder in the processors
> so you have to buy a whole new computer to upgrade.
>
> This machine will be a whole new beast, I for one , will not be the first
> to dive in! It will be interesting to see how these systems perform and
> what problems they will have with them. People are already talking about
> hacking them to run dual boot, with XP and Mac OS. Dual boot would be
cool.
>
> I'm thinking, that even though Apple will be using Intel hardware software
> locking technology, some body will hack the new Mac OS and run it on a
standard
> PC with the new chip set. So it might be cheaper to wait.
>
> I guess will know more Jan. 9th. A $299 Mac mini with a built in TV tuner
> would be vary cool. A dual boot, multi processor tower with standard PCI
> slots that could run Paris XP and Mac OSX would be even cooler!
>
> Anybody have any thoughts?
>
> JamesI'm most interested in the laptop side.
If Apple can deliver a dual core laptop at a reasonable price, and if
the major production software is updated quickly, then it could be an
amazing system.
Just have to wait and see...
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
James McCloskey wrote:
> Sorry about mucking up Deej's thread. I wasn't looking to start the whole
> Mac vs. PC debate. I was just thinking out loud. I go through this same
> kind of thing every time I
|
|
|
|
| Re: SE3 mics [message #60470 is a reply to message #60461] |
Sun, 20 November 2005 14:20 |
Morgan
Messages: 133
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;upgrade paths? Knowing Apple, they will probably solder in the
> processors
>> >>so you have to buy a whole new computer to upgrade.
>> >>
>> >>This machine will be a whole new beast, I for one , will not be the
> first
>> >>to dive in! It will be interesting to see how these systems perform
>> >>and
>> >>what problems they will have with them. People are already talking
> about
>> >>hacking them to run dual boot, with XP and Mac OS. Dual boot would be
>> >
>> > cool.
>> >
>> >>I'm thinking, that even though Apple will be using Intel hardware
> software
>> >>locking technology, some body will hack the new Mac OS and run it on a
>> >
>> > standard
>> >
>> >>PC with the new chip set. So it might be cheaper to wait.
>> >>
>> >>I guess will know more Jan. 9th. A $299 Mac mini with a built in TV
> tuner
>> >>would be vary cool. A dual boot, multi processor tower with standard
> PCI
>> >>slots that could run Paris XP and Mac OSX would be even cooler!
>> >>
>> >>Anybody have any thoughts?
>> >>
>> >>James
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>Was 7 of 9 PARIS compatible?
Deej, knowing you, your right eye will be replaced with a socket linking
to five outboard fans, fourteen heat sinks, twenty eight i/o modules and
a small generator on a cart. And somehow you'll make it all look stylish
and hip!
Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com
Aaron Allen wrote:
> No doubt the 7 of 9 model you were looking at.
> AA
>
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
> news:43a460b9@linux...
>
>>I will admit that the Mac is a much prettier Borg......perhaps a Borgette?
>>I'm sure gonna wake up one day and notice a heatsink with a spinning fan
>>where my right eye used to be
>>
>>;o)
>>
>>"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:43a45cf8@linux...
>>
>>>You are already one with the Borg, Deej. Choose your Borg. On Slashdot
>>>the Borg icon is reserved for Microsoft, and for good reason.
>>>
>>>Not that you shouldn't feel free to use whatever system you feel does
>>>the job for you. Enjoy what you dig. And dig deep. ;^)
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>> -Jamie
>>> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>
>>>
>>>DJ wrote:
>>>
>>>>I was down an the local Mac store here yesterday. I played around with
>>>>a
>>
>>new
>>
>>>>monster G5. I must say that *elegant in every way* was my
>>>>impression..........but that's my impression of Pro Tool HD system
>>>>too.
>>>>IMO, with both of them, the purchaser becomes the *screwee* whenever
>>>>the
>>>>moneymonkey needs a new injection of cash. Thing is, with a little
>>
>>tweaking,
>>
>>>>I can achieve at least an equal, if not better result with alternative
>>>>platforms and not become one with the Borg.
>>>>
>>>>;o)
>>>>
>>>>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:43a43ddf$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Sorry about mucking up Deej's thread. I wasn't looking to start the
>>
>>whole
>>
>>>>>Mac vs. PC debate. I was just thinking out loud. I go through this
>>
>>same
>>
>>>>>kind of thing every time I build a new PC or upgrade, it's kind of a
>>
>>PITA.
>>
>>>>>I was just wondering if upgrading an Apple Intel mac will have the
>>>>>same
>>>>>kind of issues? I hope they get it right. I wonder if Apple will have
>>>>
>>>>affordable
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>upgrade paths? Knowing Apple, they will probably solder in the
>>
>>processors
>>
>>>>>so you have to buy a whole new computer to upgrade.
>>>>>
>>>>>This machine will be a whole new beast, I for one , will not be the
>>
>>first
>>
>>>>>to dive in! It will be interesting to see how these systems perform
>>>>>and
>>>>>what problems they will have with them. People are already talking
>>
>>about
>>
>>>>>hacking them to run dual boot, with XP and Mac OS. Dual boot would be
>>>>
>>>>cool.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I'm thinking, that even though Apple will be using Intel hardware
>>
>>software
>>
>>>>>locking technology, some body will hack the new Mac OS and run it on a
>>>>
>>>>standard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>PC with the new chip set. So it might be cheaper to wait.
>>>>>
>>>>>I guess will know more Jan. 9th. A $299 Mac mini with a built in TV
>>
>>tuner
>>
>>>>>would be vary cool. A dual boot, multi processor tower with standard
>>
>>PCI
>>
>>>>>slots that could run Paris XP and Mac OSX would be even cooler!
>>>>>
>>>>>Anybody have any thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>>James
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>I've got a friend here who is seriously into metalworking. He is also into
studio engineering in a big way and he helps me out on larger sessions. He
wants to build me a custom computer case that will house 3 x mobos and all
the components for three DAWs in one big rolling case with all of the ports,
power access and PCI access sticking out the front. I'm envisioning
something bigger..........like the big mechanical spider in Wild Wild West.
;o)
"Jamie K" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue May 05 23:29:24 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06234 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
