|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: US court ruling good news for spammers [message #73796 is a reply to message #73795] |
Tue, 10 October 2006 11:31   |
animix
Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > David.
> >
> >
> > "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:453d9ba4$1@linux...
> >>
> >>
> >> Chuck,
> >>
> >> There was talk some time ago (oh how the years wander on...) of
somebody
> >> making an EDS chip emulator, which would then allow various
> >> possibilities,
> >> which one would assume would include:
> >>
> >> 1) a "Virtual" EDS card driver which emulates all the functionality of
an
> >> EDS card down to the last bit, and hence plugs right into Paris
allowing
> >> more submixes, natively, but with the same sound characteristics as the
> > EDS
> >> subs, or...
> >> 2) using the same technology, a virtual Paris mix bus, which uses the
> > emaulation
> >> of the EDS alongside the code from the Paris OS to basically allow a
> >> Paris
> >> mix bus, using something like rewire, to plug in to a native app.
> >>
> >> I believe the talk was inspired by Matthew Craig's efforts in creating
> >> the
> >> VST Pa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: US court ruling good news for spammers [message #73816 is a reply to message #73795] |
Tue, 10 October 2006 21:19 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>coupla mic inputs & DI's, as well, BUT... only has 4 balanced
>analog i/o's... so you gotta buy 4 of 'em to do 16 channels
>pure. ALSO... no BNC/word clock... WTF? Trying to get
>prorietary on us with a unit like THIS!!!??? We have to ONLY
>use these together with each other? Can't sync anything-digital-
>else???
>
>Handy, nice for "semiprosumer" applications, but another
>opportunity to really go after the pro market wasted, IMO -
>they have the technology, they have the tinker toy set, they
>just didn't "go pro" with it... Paris didn't either at the
>time, and neither did Emu with their 1812/1212, etc - although
>the onboard DSP & good convertors plus a few other features
>coulda got them there. Is everyone afraid of alsihad? Is that
>it? Is that why all things like this come out as small-time
>entrants targeted at price points in the home recording level
>only?
>
>As the subject line says: Close, but no cigar.
>
>Here's the thing... Yeah there are other options like MADI
>units that can get you 1,569,878,760,000 channels of i/o, but
>who needs that much, and then you also need a half dozen
>lightpipe interfaces, and stringing all that shit toge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: US court ruling good news for spammers [message #73843 is a reply to message #73836] |
Wed, 11 October 2006 09:10 |
animix
Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
replace the HD on my old B&W and after my last move I can't seem
>>>>to find my copy of 9.2.2. Could someone help a brother out?
>>>>
>>>>respect
>>>>Nappy
>>>
>>
>Yep ..That's the company..
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>"LaMont " <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>
>>Good Luck DJ.. The Europeans daw users seem to love the SCOPE platform.
>It's
>>very powerful
>>
>>I think the company Frontier Digital will make the kind(s) of interface
>that
>>Neil is talking about. They are very inovative with a keen eye to what's
>>"missing" is the average project studio.
>
>Are you talking about Frontier Design (the guys that make the
>Dakota, Tango, TranzPort, etc)? Or is this another company
>you're referring to?
>
>NeilAbout six years ago or so, I spoke to Max M. about them building a two or
three space rack with 16 mic pres on combo connecters with 16 inserts, 16
out put and 16 channels of 24 bit Adat light Pipe I/O, and 16 24bit SP/DIF
I/Os. I tried to convince EMU that Paris would be a more complete and professional
system with mic pres with inserts and 24bit Adat light pipe I/O and 16 SP/DIFs.
Later at a NAMM show, I talked Max in to walking with me over to see Malcolm
Toft MTA and Rick Nafi at Presonus, about OEMing their mic pres. Max's though
that Mic pres might be too subjective. He told me for quite some time after
that, that they were considering building it and said several times stated
that it was discussed in their internal meetings. He even called it t
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: US court ruling good news for spammers [message #73856 is a reply to message #73843] |
Wed, 11 October 2006 13:37 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
f "spend more than I
>>muthafuckin' have, spend more than I muthafucking have again
>>two years later"...
>>
>>... so why hasn't somebody done this? THIS is the market we're
>>all in, right? Those features at that price point? Wouldn't we
>>all pay it? Tomorrow, first thing in the morning? Wouldn't
>>about at least a quarter million other people that we don't
>>even know about do the same? And it can be done (obviously,
>>look at the half-assed feature sets at half the price that if
>>combined, could add up to this type of unit at that price
>>point!).
>>
>>So why? WHY hasn't anyone done this?
>>
>><Rant off>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Check out the two Analog Devices videos. The info on the developer kit
will
>get your wheels spinning.
>
>http://aes.harmony-central.com/121AES/
>
>James
Imagine if you could suck out of Paris every thing that makes Paris sound
great and have DSP recreate it in a new system. Instead of recreating an
1176, what if you could recreate a whole Neve series 80 console, Calrec,
Trident, Neotek, or the sound of an Ampex, Studer, or MCI recorder. Isn't
this what SCS did???
Lets get started on the next Paris system.
Ok, who'd like to dedicate their life to this, please raise their hand.
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>About six years ago or so, I spoke to Max M. about them building a two
or
>>three space rack with 16 mic pres on combo connecters with 16 inserts,
16
>>out put and 16 channels of 24 bit Adat light Pipe I/O, and 16 24bit SP/DIF
>>I/Os. I tried to convince EMU that Paris would be a more complete and
professional
>>system with mic pres with inserts and 24bit Adat light pipe I/O and 16
SP/DIFs.
>> Later at a NAMM show, I talked Max in to walking with me over to see Malcolm
>>Toft MTA and Rick Nafi at Presonus, about OEMing their mic pres. Max's
>though
>>that Mic pres might be too subjective. He told me for quite some time
after
>>that, that they were considering building it and said several times stated
>>that it was discussed in their interna
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: US court ruling good news for spammers [message #73888 is a reply to message #73836] |
Wed, 11 October 2006 21:58 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
com" target="_blank">c@c.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >DJ,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Listen I know you love messing with this stuff, but I think we need
> >> >> >to
> >> > focus
> >> >> >on how to get the mixes we want out of an all native system.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >It just doesn't make any sense to me to get onboard with another
> > weird,
> >> >> proprietary
> >> >> >dsp system. Creamware is as weird, oddball nad proprietary as it
> > gets.
> >> >>
> >> >> >Why bother with it? Why bother with UAD or anything else. It just
> >> > doesn't
> >> >> >make sense to me.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >If we can't get decent mixes out of a native daw then something is
> >> >> >wrong.
> >> >> > Let's find the thing that's wrong, and make it right.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Chuck
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00B7_01C6FEAC.099D6DA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I looked at the Steinberg website but didn't see anything yet on this.
They don't list XP Pro 64 as the OS to use so I'm a little nervous about =
it.
I probably should stay away from it huh.
Anyone know?
Tom
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
