Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Mac to PC files batch file
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mac to PC files batch file [message #93704 is a reply to message #93691] |
Sun, 16 December 2007 18:46   |
Wayne Carson
 Messages: 86 Registered: June 2007
|
Member |
|
|
>chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
>www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
>(859) 635-5762Hi Chris,
I've heard speculation from video producers that Avid is putting more into
their road show than trade shows, but there is also the minor issue of
decreased earnings and bringing on a new CAO to forge a new direction for
the company. I think they see the writing on the wall - they may be
established, but they aren't gaining new ground - just maintaining, barely.
Yes, you are right, FCP is kicking their butts royally. Avid rooms are
being bypassed for FCP on bigger and bigger projects here in the corporate
and advertising markets.
Regards,
Dedric
On 2/7/08 9:57 PM, in article 47abe3f7$1@linux, "Chris Ludwig"
<chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
> Hi Dedric,
> Yes probably the case with Apple. I think Apple in general just don't
> need ot every do trade shows.
> They already have MacWorld and with Apple stores and resellers you can
> pretty much find out or see anything you want so not much point.
>
>
> For Avid it was probably the utter lack of a something worth while to show.
> Both Premiere, Final Cut and even Vegas are kicking their ass.
> They have upgrade and support policies t
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mac to PC files batch file [message #93707 is a reply to message #93704] |
Sun, 16 December 2007 21:20   |
Chris Ludwig
 Messages: 868 Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
although the action is typical Martin (i.e. high action,
> a
>> guitar that you have to dig in hard). Since I play mostly electric, the
> nice
>> low action of Taylors is appealing to me.
>>
>> Anyone out there able to make some suggestions? General or specific, good
> or
>> bad, I'm quite open to any ideas.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>>
>>
>Chuck-
Using the transpose button reminds me somewhat of using a capo.
Sure, you can learn your licks and just slide them up and down the neck (or
transpose your keyboard to do the same.) It will sound good to the audience.
But you won't be progressing.
I remember seeing someone play who impressed me mightily. Found out he played
everything in G and transposed the keyboard.
Personally, I think it's just so much more fun to actually learn the licks
in the different keys. Each key is different (obviously) but in ways you
wouldn't anticipate. Playing the same tune in different keys is a challenge,
and adventure, and hard work followed by a sense of joy and accomplishment
that you just don't get by pushing the transpose button.
The first time someone asked me to accompany them on some standard, I forget
what it was, Misty or Someone to Watch Over Me, or something, and they asked
for it in F#, and I pulled it off, I felt like I was finally beginning to
get a grip on this keyboard thing.
-steve
"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>
>Hi Paul,
>
>That's what I was doing to practice, but my buddies have this nice old steiny
>at the house, and when I get there - well there is no substitute :-)
>
>Chuck
>Paul Artola <artola@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Chuck -
>>
>>If you are playing on a digital keyboard, you could transpose the root
>>note so you are in your comfort zone.
>>
>>- Paul
>>
>>On 8 Feb 2008 08:26:59 +1000, "chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>steve i truly think we have a psychic connection :-). First I love monk.
>Second,
>>>for the first time in
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mac to PC files batch file [message #93720 is a reply to message #93707] |
Mon, 17 December 2007 09:47   |
Wayne Carson
 Messages: 86 Registered: June 2007
|
Member |
|
|
to improve playing
>stamina, but things like scales and arpeggios only take about 15 seconds
>to do. You can do quite a few of them in just a couple of minutes. Plus,
>if you do, say, two five minute sessions in the morning, and then another
>four or so five minute sessions through the day or at night, the brain actually
>prioritizes it better because it gets the idea that "Gee, I seem to be doing
>this all the time!". You brain gets the idea that it needs to have those
>skills ready because they are constantly needed.
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I know that there are some keyboard players in here. Does anyone have any
>>recommendations for some books/materials with a good practive regimen. I
>>do all the standard stuff, scales arpeggios, etc. I don't have a huge amount
>>of time to practice, and I'm looking for the most effective exercises to
>>increase speed, agility and accuracy.
>>
>>Thanks
>>ChuckIf it's a paris mix, just do it the Brian T way, bounce it directly to 16
bit.
Bjorn R
"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote in message news:47ac6093$1@linux...
>
>
>
> How are you guys getting your 24 bits to 16 for evaluating mixes?
>
> I've been using CEP for a long time. And I wonder if the dithering is
messing
> with the sound too much, clouding the stereo image a tad and just adding
> a haze that is really not there.Glad to hear this.
DC
"Deej" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>He hasn't had a siezure in a week now so things are looking good.
>
>;o)
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:47ab6c2c$1@linux...
>>
>> Nope, the Matrox, and Deej is going to put a pair of them in a Magma
>> chassis,
>> so he'll have an octo-dane rig.
>>
>> Glad the pup is doing better Deej,
>>
>> TCB
>>
>> Paul Braun <cygnus_nospam@ctgonline.org> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:32:30 -0700, "Deej" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'll post
>>>>some quad dane pandemonium pics when ava
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Mac to PC files batch file [message #93798 is a reply to message #93791] |
Fri, 21 December 2007 08:39  |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
nd
> >
> >>convert them back to .pafs and then begin mixing? Wouldn't this be
> >>cumbersome?
> >>
> >>Also, you mention that you avoiding using boost or cut on the bass
because
> >
> >>of artifacts. Did you mean on the EQ trim or anywhere in the graphic
EQ?
> >
> >>Since many of us are XP users it can make a difference knowing what you
> >
> >>meant since the bass is a tough instrument to EQ in the first place and
> >we
> >>may be complicating or making it worse with EQ. I went with BT's
> >>recommendation to crank the trim on bass . . . but he was on Win98, if
> I
> >
> >>recall correctly. But, Brian also stated on the DVD, that Paris was a
> bit
> >
> >>mushy in the low to low/mid area so maybe it's been there all along.
> >>
> >>Concerning DC offset, Mike Audet said he encountered it with a narrow
band
> >
> >>EQ at a low frequency. Sounds like there might be some correlation
between
> >
> >>the two.
> >>
> >>Anyhow, I'm jus
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri May 08 21:52:26 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.12321 seconds
|