Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Convolution reverbs
| Convolution reverbs [message #68827] |
Thu, 01 June 2006 17:02  |
|
|
;>>>>>>>>>I remember Kim having teething problems with this combo.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Did it pan out for you??
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Kim #2.
>> >>>>>>>>>
Gantt Kushner
Gizmo Recording Company
Silver Spring, MD
www.gizmorecording.com
|
|
|
|
| Oh, well... was: Convolution reverbs [message #68856 is a reply to message #68827] |
Fri, 02 June 2006 11:31  |
|
|
sign
>>resources as it seemed fit.
>>It's NEVER been this easy with any other comp. (I've been running
>>Paris pretty much since it was released...
>>starting with a 686 200 cyrix).
>>The IRQ sharing seems to have no negative effects, and both
>>dual-head Nvidia Quadras are happy.
>>To those thinking of upgrading their Paris boxes, grab one of
>>these mobos while/if you can, and XP3500+'s are cheap as chips
>>now.
>>Rave over :-))))
>>Kim W.
>>
>>
>>
>>"Kim" <Gantt Kushner
Gizmo Recording Company
Silver Spring, MD
www.gizmorecording.com
|
|
|
|
| Re: Oh, well... was: Convolution reverbs [message #68862 is a reply to message #68856] |
Fri, 02 June 2006 12:46 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>1: Nvidia Quadro PCI irq 11
>>>>>>>>2: EDS irq 9
>>>>>>>>3: EDS irq 7
>>>>>>>>4: EDS irq 5
>>>>>>>>5: EDS irq 10
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Onboard audio uses irq 12, Firewire controller uses irq 10,
>>>>>>>>ACPI controller uses irq 9.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Is this enough info?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Cheers,
>>>>>>>>Kim.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>BTW why would my brand new 250 gb ata drive only have been formatted
>>>>for
>>>>>>>>130gb during XP install? Only just noticed it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>What slots are each card in. Also, their manual didn't mention
what
>>>>>agp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>uses for irq and whether it shares or not. Can't you tell on boot
>>>up
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>when that black resource screen shows what's on what?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It would be good to know if you have 4 or 5 independent IRQs
>>>>>>>>>2,3,4,1/5,agp
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I run my 2 eds cards on the same IRQ 3 on my box.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>John
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Kim W. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Just returned from "The Dungeon", and am happy to report that
>>>>>>>>>> all appears to be working.
>>>>>>>>>> (4 EDS's, 2 Nvidia Qudras).
>>>>>>>>>> Thus far I have no DX/VST plugins installed.
>>>>>>>>>> (In the past this is where my installs have come unstuck.)
>>>>>>>>>> After initial disappointment with the dreaded Crash-on-
>>>>>>>>>> exit, I remembered about the "minimum install" effects subsystem
>>>fix,
>>>>>>>>with
>>>>>>>>>> wires.
>>>>>>>>>> Applying this seems to have cured the COE.
>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty stoked at the moment, and have ghosted.
>>>>>>>>>> All slots are full, and there appears to be some sharing going
>on,(I
>>>>>>>attached
>>>>>>>>>> a screen grab)
>>>>>>>>>> but time will tell if it causes any problems. I just bunged all
>>>>>>>>>> four EDS's in, and let the system allocate resources as it
>>>>>>>>>> seemed fit.
>>>>>>>>>> I did, however, disable the SATA, and the parallel port in the
>bios.
>>>>>>>>>> Time for bed, as it's been 12 hours since I deemed it "Beer O'clock".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>It doesn't say on mine that the AGP card is sharing with 1/5,
>unless
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>that's
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>just assumed...? I know often 1 shares with AGP.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Kim...........if PCI 1 and 5 "do not" share with the AGP, this
>is
>>>>>>>>>>>potentially a HUGE deal and this would be the most flexible (semi
>>>>current)
>>>>>>>>>>>mobo in existence today for 939 CPU's. I cannot find a
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Oh, well... was: Convolution reverbs [message #68868 is a reply to message #68865] |
Fri, 02 June 2006 13:37 |
Chris Lang
Messages: 91
Registered: March 2007
|
Member |
|
|
two slots have the Nvidia Quadro dual heads.
>(Obviously the first slot being the AGP, and the PCI version is
>next to it.)
>The other four PCI slots (The K8NS ultra 939 has five), have
>my four EDS 1000 cards.
>As mentioned, I disabled SATA, as I don't use it, and also the
>parallel and game ports.
>Firewire is active, so if I need to I can hook up my Maudio
>Firewire Audiophile. (The K8NS has the Texas Instruments 1394
>chipset, which is cool!).
>RAM is generic 768mb DDR in DDR slots 1&3. (Dual channel would be
>better ofcourse, but I used what I had in my old comp.)
>Drives are Western Digital 2500JB (boot) and whatever else I have in my
removeable
>caddies (Mainly WD's), for audio. I use the boot
>drive as backup storage for works in progress.
>Nice and quick, as the two are on seperate IDE channels.
>
>One thing I did initially during windows install, was to use a
>single Nvidia MX400 geforce graphics card. After a flawless setup,
>I then installed both Quadras with drivers, then the EDS's.
>Yes, and I HAVE imaged every step of the way.
>(Haven't had to roll-back yet.)
>
>Now for MY favourite FZ quote:
>
>"If it sounds good, it's BITCHEN', If it don't it's SHITTY!
>
>Kim
>
>
>"John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>
>>How about posting up your final config, what slots things are in, any
>tweaks.
>> Do you have a sound card? Ram, drive types, etc.
>>
>>Glad you're cooking with hot weasel grease ! Image that sucka !
>>John
>>
>>"Kim W." <no@way.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Well, after my first tracking session with the new
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Oh, well... was: Convolution reverbs [message #68906 is a reply to message #68883] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 09:34 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>learning curve less daunting than when I started with it.
>
>If you're interested you can hear mp3 demos of some stuff I mixed with
>Logic (much of which was also tracked in PARIS) on my CD page:
>http://www.JamieKrutz.com/jcds.html - click some of the song names
>listed for "Toward An Attitude." (If you happen to like what you hear
>the CD is available for purchase. :^)
>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie
> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>Dedric Terry wrote:
>> Nuendo and Sequoia here. I switched for features and workflow mainly.
>>
>> Delay compensation, quality midi and VSTi, and better editing and production
>> capabilities in general (post features, etc) have been key for me. Paris'
>> converters were good at the time, but there are a lot of great options
now
>> in a similar price range that supercede them in varying degrees.
>>
>> Imho, sound does come down to technique and approach - the capabilities
are
>> there with most DAWs now - it's just a matter of learning the differences
>> and making them work for you, rather than working against them expecting
>> something else. Feel free to email me offline if you want since this
may
>> not be of as much interest to Paris users here.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dedric
>>
>> On 7/13/06 3:50 PM, in article 44b6c031$1@linux, "macle" <Mates9999@cs.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just curious...
>>>
>>> For people who've switched from Paris, did you switch for features or
sound
>>> or both or what?
>>>
>>> Every so often, I think about switching, and since I'm gearing up
>>> for some new recording, I'm wondering if now's the time
>>> (although, sticking with Paris might be the easiest thing, and my
>>> main goal is to improve my room and tracking and those sorts of
>>> things first).
>>>
>>> But I wonder if I'd be stupid to not get with all the advances.
>>> ADC would be nice, midi would be nice, etc. And maybe low end
>>> converters have come a long way, etc.
>>>
>>> I heard some stuff done on a Digi 002, and I was knocked out. You
>>> can get a complete Digi 002 system with control surface and a
>>> bunch of software for about $2000 which is cheaper than Paris
>>> was (I got Paris mainly because it was a complete system like
>>> Pro Tools, but way cheaper).
>>>
>>> Sorry for the long post. Thanks for any feedback.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Might be a little premature but I'm thinking of unloading Paris and using my
other apps as well as SawStudio and run everything through a Lavry Blue 2
ch AD DA and my Dakota card or something similar
As I am doing 99% mixing only I'm thinking this might be the way to go for
me...still researching and debating.
DOn
"macle" <Mates9999@cs.com> wrote in message news:44b6c031$1@linux...
>
> Just curious...
>
> For people who've switched from Paris, did you switch for features or
> sound
> or both or what?
>
> Every so often, I think about switching, and since I'm gearing up
> for some new recording, I'm wondering if now's the time
> (although, sticking with Paris might be the easiest thing, and my
> main goal is to improve my room and tracking and those sorts of
> things first).
>
> But I wonder if I'd be stupid to no
|
|
|
|
| Re: Oh, well... was: Convolution reverbs [message #68914 is a reply to message #68906] |
Sat, 03 June 2006 12:51 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
till adds that "analog" feeling. YMMV of course.
Tony
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ldnfb2tc6a8u0f88q8a856evjlhobvcshm@4ax.com...
> for the a-holes who only know the words pt or mac. for absolute sound
> i still think paris is the shit. if you listen to drums recorded on
> paris vs...pt...dp...logic...or cubase sx there is just no comparisons
> imho. paris kills them all for phat analogish in your face sound.
>
> On 14 Jul 2006 07:50:41 +1000, "macle" <Mates9999@cs.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Just curious...
>>
>>For people who've switched from Paris, did you switch for features or
>>sound
>>or both or what?
>>
>>Every so often, I think about switching, and since I'm gearing up
>>for some new recording, I'm wondering if now's the time
>>(although, sticking with Paris might be the easiest thing, and my
>>main goal is to improve my room and tracking and those sorts of
>>things first).
>>
>>But I wonder if I'd be stupid to not get with all the advances.
>>ADC would be nice, midi would be nice, etc. And maybe low end
>>converters have come a long way, etc.
>>
>>I heard some stuff done on a Digi 002, and I was knocked out. You
>>can get a complete Digi 002 system with control surface and a
>>bunch of software for about $2000 which is cheaper than Paris
>>was (I got Paris mainly because it was a complete system like
>>Pro Tools, but way cheaper).
>>
>>Sorry for the long post. Thanks for any feedback.
>>
>>
>Well........I have fgound a couple of bugs, but they are easily worked
around and as long as this thing doesn't explode and catch fire, I'm willing
to put up with just about anything to have this kind of control over BFD.
This thing is soooooo much better than a keyboard
;o)
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:krnfb2ls09o0r7m9mshjeetghol79lhink@4ax.com...
> gosh deej that's really swell...no really...it is. crap, no matter
> how i say this it comes out like the sky will eventually fall...or at
> least bend a little...but i'm with ya brotha...
>
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:12:43 -0600, "DJ"
> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>
> >This is it the **** folks!!! Maps perfectly to BFD (and I'm sure DFH
> >........and a number of other stuff too) and it is possible to achieve
> >*very* realistic rolls, fills and flams with the X/Y pad. the driver
loading
> >was a little wierd but Korg support was very responsive and e-mailed a
patch
> >to take care of my *issues*. This thing has a jack for a foot controller
> >too, thich I will definitely be ordering. I've been looking for years for
> >something *simple* and straight forward for controlling BFD and at the
same
> >time allowing for the expression that the BFD multisamples can allow if
> >properly controlled. This thing pretty much does it right outta' the box.
> >Almost too good to be true.
> >
> >DJ
> >
>Aaron, sent you an email!
"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>Still awaiting the post man to deliver mine.... sniff...
>AA
>
>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
>news:44b6745c@linux...
>> Got the CD's today.
>>
>> "macle" <Mates9999@cs.com> wrote in message news:44b180d9$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Alright! Thanks a lot DJ, that would be great! Way above and
>>> beyond.
>>>
>>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>> >;o).......well..... I'm gonna spread this around a little
>>> >bit................
>>> >
>>> >http://www.ksu
|
|
|
|
| Re: Oh, well... was: Convolution reverbs [message #68933 is a reply to message #68906] |
Sun, 04 June 2006 08:43 |
Paul Artola
Messages: 161
Registered: November 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
er seen anybody do anything like that before, it was fantastic. Are
you a doctor?"
"No," the woman replied. "Divorce attorney".it's about time the gods of "bend over" smiled upon you again.
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:59:13 -0600, "DJ"
<animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>Well........I have fgound a couple of bugs, but they are easily worked
>around and as long as this thing doesn't explode and catch fire, I'm willing
>to put up with just about anything to have this kind of control over BFD.
>This thing is soooooo much better than a keyboard
>
>;o)
>
>"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:krnfb2ls09o0r7m9mshjeetghol79lhink@4ax.com...
>> gosh deej that's really swell...no really...it is. crap, no matter
>> how i say this it comes out like the sky will eventually fall...or at
>> least bend a little...but i'm with ya brotha...
>>
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:12:43 -0600, "DJ"
>> <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>
>> >This is it the **** folks!!! Maps perfectly to BFD (and I'm sure DFH
>> >........and a number of other stuff too) and it is possible to achieve
>> >*very* realistic rolls, fills and flams with the X/Y pad. the driver
>loading
>> >was a little wierd but Korg support was very responsive and e-mailed a
>patch
>> >to take care of my *issues*. This thing has a jack for a foot controller
>> >too, thich I will definitely be ordering. I've been looking for years for
>> >something *simple* and straight forward for controlling BFD and at the
>same
>> >time allowing for the expression that the BFD multisamples can allow if
>> >properly controlled. This thing pretty much does it right outta' the box.
>> >Almost too good to be true.
>> >
>> >DJ
>> >
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Jun 01 23:53:19 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.13522 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
