Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Any thoughts on this Paris Mix?
| Any thoughts on this Paris Mix? [message #93421] |
Fri, 07 December 2007 21:49  |
emarenot
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
s review databases,
>>>>>> and goes along these lines: apparently, the Variax 700 has a
>>>>>> significant deficiency in the sustain area (enough to be considered an
>>>>>> unacceptable compromise by several reviewers).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So Jamie (and anyone else who "believes" in the Variax): did you find
>>>>>> such a flaw in the Variax's sustain? How usable is it really?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any thoughts on this Paris Mix? [message #93454 is a reply to message #93447] |
Sun, 09 December 2007 09:02  |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
>>> sing-around-the-campfire acoustic guitar.
>>>
>>> It has multiple guitar models to choose from including several that are
>>> bread and butter, plus a few non-guitar models like banjo, sitar and
>>> mandella.
>>>
>>> It also can do alternate tunings on the fly (via DSP so not quite as
>>> great as tuning them yourself, but for live it's fine and - important
for
>>> shows - instant). It can also imitate a 12 string (again via DSP).
>>>
>>> It looks good, with nice grain on the top. It's has a shallow body. It
>>> plays well. The upper strings have 24 frets, very rare for an acoustic.
>>>
>>> It's more affordable than a high-end acoustic, and therefore less of
a
>>> risk at gigs. It sounds as good or better through a PA than any other
>>> acoustic guitar I've heard.
>>>
>>> The only acoustic guitar thing it doesn't do well is body slaps, which
is
>>> probably why it never feeds back.
>>>
>>> The output is mono. I do use it for recording direct sometimes. It sits
>>> nicely in the track and is good for L/R panned part doubling using
>>> different models.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Jamie
>>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>>
>>>
>>> D.P. wrote:
>>>> I'm usually an electric player, but I need to buy a decent acoustic
>>>> (with electronics). I tried a bunch of brands, and seem to be converging
>>>> towards a Taylor (something along the 714CE or 814CE).
>>>>
>>>> Before I commit to an actual purchase, I wanted to ask around for any
>>>> potential advice. As much as I'd love to buy from a luthier, I don't
>>>> think I'll get much traction with my planned budget (as a reference,
the
>>>> 714CE would cost ar
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any thoughts on this Paris Mix? [message #93455 is a reply to message #93454] |
Sun, 09 December 2007 09:47 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ound $2800). I don't know many luthiers, and the
ones
>>>> I do know have a worldwide reputation (and are therefore not making
>>>> guitars for $2800 - more like $5k and up).
>>>>
>>>> While reading Taylor reviews, I've seen several references to the Martin
>>>> OMC-Aura, so I went to try it out. I found it to be incredibly ugly,
but
>>>> quite playable, although the action is typical Martin (i.e. high action,
>>>> a guitar that you have to dig in hard). Since I play mostly electric,
>>>> the nice low action of Taylors is appealing to me.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone out there able to make some suggestions? General or specific,
>>>> good or bad, I'm quite open to any ideas.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dan
>>
>>
>
>Well put! I happen to catch Clinton Fearon in Boston last week..Smokin band..
The openers were a decent young group called Pressure Cooker..but man when
Clinton's Rhythm section kicked in hells bells..they knocked me out.
What is also amazing is that you can still catch some of the masters in small
clubs for not much dough
Sorry to hijack.
"JJDPRO@gmail.com" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Nice job. I love reggae. Like Country & Jazz (nont smooth) classical music,
>it's our last refuge of real playing organic music.
>
>"John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>
>>i finished the reggae album and uploaded a sample here: http://download.yousendit.com/7B92572579456D73
>>
>>all in cubase 4.1
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C8601D.408CDA70
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
He guys,
It's been a month since my last post. Reason being
I broke my tibia fibula just above my ankle clean through
on 12/30. =20
Got some titanium inserted inside where the marrow was
and screwed in in three places. I spent five days in the hospital
due to a fever I was running. The pain was incredible for
the first three weeks. Now I'm barely taking the pain meds.
They helped alot though. Toes are moving and feeling. They
tell me that's good. Ankle feels swollen and tender and is tough
to move.
Physical therapy is in house which is great although
very difficult. I am giving it all I've got to get back on my=20
feet asap. So far keeping the foot above my heart all
the time is the best way to keep the swelling down along with
ice after exercise.
I want you all to know that I've been looking in here over the
last few weeks and it's great to feel some what normal again.
I can't spend more than 30 minutes at a desk. The studio
has been out of the question although I'm looking for a way to=20
rest my foot on the console without falling out of my chair.
I am gigging once or twice/week which is way
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any thoughts on this Paris Mix? [message #93463 is a reply to message #93455] |
Sun, 09 December 2007 11:29 |
emarenot
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;>>>>>> your own models etc.
>>>>>>>> you can install a GK-2 pickup on any guitar if you don't have or
>>>>>>>> want one with one built in.
>>>>>>>> there is absolutely NO delay as with a midi guitar setup.
>>>>>>>> there is also a midi out if you would like to drive a synth
>>>>>>>> from the VG99.
>>>>>>>> there are allot of models built in and infinite ways to vary
>>>>>>>> those.I'm not crazy about the electric guitar models but the
>>>>>>>> acoustic models kick ass.
>>>>>>>> way too much for me to write about now.
>>>>>>>> and it can be had for around $1000
>>>>>>>> the martin D-28 model is my favorite so far.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "D.P." <ottawarocks@netscape.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:47989b01@linux...
>>>>>>>>> Once again, thanks to all for the contributions...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All this dialog has given me a wicked idea: instead of shelling out
>>>>>>>>> almost $3K on a Taylor, I could get for roughly the same amount
>>>>>>>>> both a decent Breedlove chosen mainly for its acoustic properties,
>>>>>>>>> *and* a Variax 700 for live playing where a "reasonable" substitute
>>>>>>>>> is good enough.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But I read some comments on the Variax that make me nervous - I
>>>>>>>>> cannot find a Variax locally, and may have to (gulp!) mail-order
>>>>>>>>> one. The comment in question comes up frequently in various review
>>>>>>>>> databases, and goes along these lines: apparently, the Variax 700
>>>>>>>>> has a significant deficiency in the sustain area (enough to be
>>>>>>>>> considered an unacceptable compromise by several reviewers).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So Jamie (and anyone else who "believes" in the Variax): did you
>>>>>>>>> find such a flaw in the Variax's sustain? How usable is it really?
>>>>>>>>> And (as an add-on bonus question) how convincing and artifact-free
>>>>>>>>> are the altered tunings? Would you trust it enough to buy one via
>>>>>>>>> mail order?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks to all again,
>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:47963ccf$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>>> For live acoustic guitar gigs I currently use a Line 6 Variax 700
>>>>>>>>>> Acoustic modeling guitar. This is the one that looks like an
>>>>>>>>>> acoustic guitar, not the PRS-ish looking electric 700 version,
>>>>>>>>>> although I have one of those too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The acoustic 700 VAX sounds quite good through the PA. It doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> feed back. Even when using the built-in compressor which is really
>>>>>>>>>> nice to use on fingerpicked songs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Acoustically it's fairly quiet, good for late night practicing
>>>>>>>>>> without waking anyone. But without plugging it in, it's not a
>>>>>>>>>> booming sing-around-the-campfire acoustic guitar.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It has multiple guitar mod
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any thoughts on this Paris Mix? [message #93471 is a reply to message #93463] |
Sun, 09 December 2007 12:51 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t.
>>>>>>> you want a Rick 360 and a danelectro56 through a Marshall stack and
>>>>>>> a Solano SLO100 at the same time? no problem.
>>>>>>> you want altered tuning? the impossible is possible with this thing.
>>>>>>> sticking a pickup at the 12th fret ?what?
>>>>>>> sorry for being unclear about the electric models.
>>>>>>> The VG99 has some serious processing power(double the previous)
>>>>>>> It fills so many needs I think everyone should get one.
>>>>>>> A VG99 through a stereo tube amp like a mesa 20/20 would be very
>>>>>>> convenient for gigs.
>>>>>>> anyway your going to have to get one to dig in on the capability of
>>>>>>> this thing cause a store demo wont give you the picture, unless you
>>>>>>> spend a day with the manual.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:479a14f7@linux...
>>>>>>>> Alex, I'm interested in something you wrote, "I'm not
>>>>>>>> crazy about the electric guitar models..." Really? I would have
>>>>>>>> expected the electric guitars to be best. What's wrong with them?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> alex plasko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> if you get a Roland VG99 you wont have the issues that the variax
>>>>>>>>> has. I use mine with a Brian Moore DC-1/13 and there are no
>>>>>>>>> artifacts ,any tuning imaginablealot more flexibility in designing
>>>>>>>>> your own models etc.
>>>>>>>>> you can install a GK-2 pickup on any guitar if you don't have or
>>>>>>>>> want one with one built in.
>>>>>>>>> there is absolutely NO delay as with a midi guitar setup.
>>>>>>>>> there is also a midi out if you would like to drive a synth
>>>>>>>>> from the VG99.
>>>>>>>>> there are allot of models built in and infinite ways to vary
>>>>>>>>> those.I'm not crazy about the electric guitar models but the
>>>>>>>>> acoustic models kick ass.
>>>>>>>>> way too much for me to write about now.
>>>>>>>>> and it can be had for around $1000
>>>>>>>>> the martin D-28 model is my favorite so far.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "D.P." <ottawarocks@netscape.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:47989b01@linux...
>>>>>>>>>> Once again, thanks to all for the contributions...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All this dialog has given me a wicked idea: instead of shelling
>>>>>>>>>> out almost $3K on a Taylor, I could get for roughly the same
>>>>>>>>>> amount both a decent Breedlove chosen mainly for its acoustic
>>>>>>>>>> properties, *and* a Variax 700 for live playing where a
>>>>>>>>>> "reasonable" substitute is good enough.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But I read some comments on the Variax that make me nervous - I
>>>>>>>>>> cannot find a Variax locally, and may have to (gulp!) mail-order
>>>>>>>>>> one. The comment in question comes up frequently in various
>>>>>>>>>> review databases, and goes along these lines: apparently, the
>>>>>>>>>> Variax 700 has a significant deficiency in the sustain area
>>>>>>>>>> (enough to be considered an unacceptable compromise by several
>>>>>>>>>> reviewers).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So Jamie (and anyone else who "believes" in the Variax): did you
>>>>>>>>>> find such a flaw in the Variax's sustain? How usable is it
>>>>>>>>>> really? And (as an add-on bonus question) how convincing and
>>>>>>>>>> artifact-free are the altered tunings? Would you trust it enough
>>>>>>>>>> to buy one via mail order?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any thoughts on this Paris Mix? [message #93482 is a reply to message #93478] |
Sun, 09 December 2007 19:03 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
the song..And the horns and keys are too out front...
>>Also bring the vix up a CH..
>>
>>Let the song chill a bit.. don't try so hard to make a "mix"
>>
>>Just my thoughts...very close and better sounds than I ever get
>>
>>Remember the lyric is where it is at..Listen to Culture or G Isaacs to
get
>>in vibe.
>>
>>
>>Ya mon!
>>
>>
>>"John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>i finished the reggae album and uploaded a sample here: http://download.yousendit.com/7B92572579456D73
>>>
>>>all in cubase 4.1
>>
>Weird... do you perhaps have some external effect patched into
it or otherwise some routing variation going on that channel on
that particular EDS card?
Neil
"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>
>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>>Channel #1 in Paris doesn't work... The audio file is there,but that channel
>>in the computer seems to not be working and only with this song. If I drag
>>that audio file down to another channel, it will sound. Also if I drag
any
>>audio file into channel #1, it simply will not sound. It's as if it were
>>muted (but it's not). Thoughts anyone?
>Also-it only does it on card #1 (of the three I use)
>>Steve
>http://womb.mixerman.net/showthread.php?p=109943#post109943Have ya been playing around in the patch bay.
"Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote in message news:479b9424$1@linux...
>
> Weird... do you perhaps have some external effect patched into
> it or otherwise some routing variation going on that channel on
> that particular EDS card?
>
> Neil
>
>
> "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>Channel #1 in Paris doesn't work... The audio file is there,but that
>>>channel
>>>in the computer seems to not be working and only with this song. If I
>>>drag
>>>that audio file down to another channel, it will sound. Also if I drag
> any
>>>audio file into channel #1, it simply will not sound. It's as if it were
>>>muted (but it's not). Thoughts anyone?
>>Also-it only does it on card #1 (of the three I use)
>>>Steve
>>
>It gets worse:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12 /28/AR2007122800693.html
It seems the RIAA is not only intentionally biting the hand that feeds it,
it's also trying to rip it off
and pretend it doesn't need it. The RIAA isn't out to protect creative
ownership rights, it's
trying to destroy it with a shortsighted view of profit-grabbing, rather
than seeing a potential for increased
profits in the future for all, albeit not at the exhorbitant rate they are
wanting to grab now.
Imho, musicians, artists and independants should lobby to get the federal
courts to outlaw or restrict the RIAA's
approach or there won't be a profitable music industry left for anyone, much
less record labels. This is
a very dangerous line they are walking, and why they can't see the longterm
disaster awaiting the record
industry being massively hastened such tactics is beyond me. Why in the
heck would I even bother writing music for 0.58% share?
I wouldn't - it would take massive sales just to pay for a demo session.
Why would the buying public buy songs that are going to bring big brother
(RIAA) down on them? They won't. Artists are next - just wait, the
suggested artist royalty will also be below 1%. That should just about tank
the established recording industry completely.
Songwriters already make very little compared to the income generated from a
successful song, and composers make less (the US is the only country that
does not pay royalties to composers for film distribution/performance, and
sync royalties are far below
that of a song for the same broadcast).
"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:479bac00@linux...
> http://womb.mixerman.net/showthread.php?p=109943#post109943
>Can you see the lights on the fader moving when the file is played?
Hmm, could the master EQ knob be all the way down for some reason?
"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>Have ya been playing around in the patch bay.
>
>
>"Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote in message news:479b9424$1@linux...
>>
>> Weird... do you perhaps have some external effect patched into
>> it or otherwise some routing variation going on that channel on
>> that particular EDS card?
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>> "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Channel #1 in Paris doesn't work... The audio file is there,but that
>>>>channel
>>>>in the computer seems to not be working and only with this song. If I
>>>>drag
>>>>that audio file down to another channel, it will sound. Also if I drag
>> any
>>>>audio file into channel #1, it simply will not sound. It's as if it were
>>>>muted (but it's not). Thoughts anyone?
>>>Also-it only does it on card #1 (of the three I use)
>>>>Steve
>>>
>>
>
>"Neil" <OIOI@OI.com> wrote:
>It's that damn, cheap, Chinese lava... no quality control!
>
>lol
Yeah! the guy down the street sells the REAL NOS lava...
ONLY 300.00 per lamp. Ahhh, the price of tone.
DCMost of you have heard
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any thoughts on this Paris Mix? [message #93483 is a reply to message #93455] |
Sun, 09 December 2007 19:22 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
this song in various permutations, but
now, FINALLY, i think i can call it "DONE!"
Ladies & gentlemen, our very own Rod Lincoln on drums...
you REALLY do have to check this out - he threw down
a totally 100% ass-kickin' performance! Especially from the
midpoint solo sections onward.
http://saqqararecords.com/MiscAudio/Istanbul-3rdRough-RLinco lnDrums.mp3Seen this:
http://gizmodo.com/348873/p+per-cellphone-concept-is-too-per fect-to-be-true
DCNo, nothing like that at all.
"Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote:
>
>Weird... do you perhaps have some external effect patched into
>it or otherwise some routing variation going on that channel on
>that particular EDS card?
>
>Neil
>
>
>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>Channel #1 in Paris doesn't work... The audio file is there,but that channel
>>>in the computer seems to not be working and only with this song. If I
drag
>>>that audio file down to another channel, it will sound. Also if I drag
>any
>>>audio file into channel #1, it simply will not sound. It's as if it were
>>>muted (but it's not). Thoughts anyone?
>>Also-it only does it on card #1 (of the three I use)
>>>Steve
>>
>Of course. No external effects, no EDS inserts, no plug-ins.
"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>Have ya been playing around in the patch bay.
>
>
>"Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote in message news:479b9424$1@linux...
>>
>> Weird... do you perhaps have some external effect patched into
>> it or otherwise some routing variation going on that channel on
>> that particular EDS card?
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>> "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Channel #1 in Paris doesn't work... The audio file is there,but that
>>>>channel
>>>>in the computer seems to not be working and only with this song. If I
>>>>drag
>>>>that audio file down to another channel, it will sound. Also if I drag
>> any
>>>>audio file into channel #1, it simply will not sound. It's as if it were
>>>>muted (but it's not). Thoughts anyone?
>>>Also-it only does it on card #1 (of the three I use)
>>>>Steve
>>>
>>
>
>No, the leds in ch-1 do not go up while the song is playing. When I am in
the edit page and doble click on the wav,then I can hear it solo.
I just brought up a new song and imported all the files into it and now I'm
good. Thanks guys!
Steve
"Cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
>Can
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any thoughts on this Paris Mix? [message #93484 is a reply to message #93483] |
Sun, 09 December 2007 19:27 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
you see the lights on the fader moving when the file is played?
>Hmm, could the master EQ knob be all the way down for some reason?
>
>
>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>>Have ya been playing around in the patch bay.
>>
>>
>>"Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote in message news:479b9424$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Weird... do you perhaps have some external effect patched into
>>> it or otherwise some routing variation going on that channel on
>>> that particular EDS card?
>>>
>>> Neil
>>>
>>>
>>> "Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Channel #1 in Paris doesn't work... The audio file is there,but that
>
>>>>>channel
>>>>>in the computer seems to not be working and only with this song. If
I
>
>>>>>drag
>>>>>that audio file down to another channel, it will sound. Also if I drag
>>> any
>>>>>audio file into channel #1, it simply will not sound. It's as if it
were
>>>>>muted (but it's not). Thoughts anyone?
>>>>Also-it only does it on card #1 (of the three I use)
>>>>>Steve
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>Basic question, but...
Are you looking at the Mixer window, or the Editor window, to be sure the
track
isn't muted? Often in the Editor, when I move a window round, the mute
(and solo) button will cease to display the "engaged" state (pressed down
& hilighted). I haven't seen this in the Mixer window, just the Editor.
Just a thought
Ted
"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>
> No, nothing like that at all.
>
>"Neil" <IOUOI@OI.com> wrote:
>>
>>Weird... do you perhaps have some external effect patched into
>>it or otherwise some routing variation going on that channel on
>>that particular EDS card?
>>
>>Neil
>>
>>
>>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>"Steve Cox" <stevec1@charter.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Channel #1 in Paris doesn't work... The audio file is there,but that
channel
>>>>in the computer seems to not be working and only with this song. If I
>drag
>>>>that audio file down to another channel, it will sound. Also if I drag
>>any
>>>>audio file into channel #1, it simply will not sound. It's as if it were
>>>>muted (but it's not). Thoughts anyone?
>>>Also-it only does it on card #1 (of the three I use)
>>>>Steve
>>>
>>
>On 27 Jan 2008 04:53:00 +1000, "Neil" <OIOU@OI.com> wrote:
>
>Paul Braun <cygnus_nospam@ctgonline.org> wrote:
>
>>What would it be?
>
>
>It would be: "Would you like to sing the lead vocals on all the
>songs on my current CD project?"
>
>lol
I can try.....
;-P
pabso you were the guy in the cape and spandex tights on the news...whoda
thunk. get better and remember the safety ropes next time. :o)
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:13:33 -0500, "Tom Bruhl" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any thoughts on this Paris Mix? [message #93507 is a reply to message #93485] |
Tue, 11 December 2007 00:35 |
Sarah
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
http://www.unsignedbandweb.com/music/play.php?mode=song_hifi &band_id=1424&song_id=3218
>
>Here's links to other tunes me and bunch of amateur friends recorded in
my
>living room, side bedroom, and a small bathroom (for isolation :-) )
>http://www.unsignedbandweb.com/music/bands/1424/
>http://www.unsignedbandweb.com/music/bands/5533/
>
>Again, thanks to all the folks here who convinced me to go with Paris way
>back when and helped me understand some of the techniques of recording,
>
>ShaneOn 28 Jan 2008 03:17:23 +1000, "Neil" <OIUOI@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>Paul Braun <cygnus_nospam@ctgonline.org> wrote:
>>On 27 Jan 2008 04:53:00 +1000, "Neil" <OIOU@OI.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Paul Braun <cygnus_nospam@ctgonline.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>What would it be?
>>>
>>>
>>>It would be: "Would you like to sing the lead vocals on all the
>>>songs on my current CD project?"
>>>
>>>lol
>>
>>I can try.....
>>
>>;-P
>
>
>You asked what ***I** would ask him - not what i thought YOU
>should ask him lol
So, I asked him.
He said he was a little busy right now, but thanks....
;-P
He was actually a very good interview. Well-spoken, cordial.
It didn't hurt to have Pamela in the studio with us to chat about
stuff. She and Tate had quite a bit to talk about.
By the way, they will be starting recording on a new Queensryche album
in March, probably to be released Jan of 09. According to Geoff,
it'll be another Mindcrime-style concept album, but with a completely
different theme.
Cool.
pabOn 28 Jan 2008 08:03:28 +1000, "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
> http://www.break.com/index/amazing-young-organ-player-rocks- out.html
Whoa!!!! That was freakin' amazing! I'm impressed that not only did
she do an awesome job with the vocal lines, but she also had to keep
switching voices and play different parts. I'm assuming the drums
were sequenced, but I wonder how much of the rest was sequenced and
how much was hers.
pabThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 20 10:39:28 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04159 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
