Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OK-here's what I was beta testing
| OK-here's what I was beta testing [message #79284] |
Tue, 30 January 2007 18:10  |
Deej [4]
 Messages: 1292 Registered: January 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> And the O'Hare person. I never heard of her before you mentioned her
>>>> name
>>>> and for some reason because she was an awful person you think that
>>>> anyone
>>>> who has any of the same beliefs must also be awful and bitter and likely
>>>> to be murdered. That makes no sense.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Thad.......I met her on a few occasions back in the 70's when I was a
>>>student at University of Texas and afterward. I don't know if she was
>>>awful
>>
>>>because she was an atheist, or because she was an antheist who felt like
>> she
>>>was being oppressed by the religious right (and there isn't much of that
>> in
>>>Austin..it's always been a liberal minded place for the most
>>>part).........or because she was just mean......but she was one of the
>>>most
>>
>>>singularly unpleasant people I've ever had the misfortune to meet, more
>>
>>>then once.........so from my perspective, this extreme unpleasantness
>>>seems
>>
>>>to have been consistent thing. I never said anything to provoke this
>>>person.
>>
>>>As for her being murdered, if one subscribes to the theory that people
>>>attract to themselves those who are of of like mind, then she certainly
>>
>>>could have found herself up to her neck in a swirling brew of negative
>>>personalities.
>>>
>>>Glad you're having good experiences in Thailand. It's springtime here,
>>
>>>skunk season has arrived, the hounds are estatic and I am a bit fatigued
>> due
>>>to having to do the "skunkcheck" for these guys prior to letting them
>>>outside at night when they alert that the property perimeters have been
>>
>>>violated by some creature that has come out of hibernation and is foraging
>>
>>>for food. Unsupervised boundary patrols by the dogs can be disastrous
at
>>
>>>this time of year.
>>>
>>>Now back to the seach for giant, combative cephalopods......
>>>
>>>;o)
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>the one that works for 98 won't work in xp ?
Dunno - haven't tried loading either on the XP box yet.
>Fire 'em up, can't hurt anything.
True. Unless it causes a rip in the space-time continuum,
or something.
Neilboth stereo.
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:17:47 -0600, Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net>
wrote:
>Was the channel mono? I don't remember how N2 handled it but SX2 may not be
>sending stereo to Amplitube when inserted on a channel.
>
>I've never heard a plugin sound any different on a channel vs. the main bus
>in N3/C4 - stereo works fine there as long as the source is stereo.
>
>If you mono audio on a stereo track, you can get a mono input to some
>plugins, which is solved by sending to a stereo effect instead.
>
>There are some amp sim comps that simply pass the right channel and only
>process the left, making it only possible to use a mono track. Don't know
>about Amplitube.
>
>On 3/16/07 12:35 PM, in article kgolv2d4vie8930helbnjmg6f1eib5s4ju@4ax.com,
>"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> i use SX2 mainly as a vsti/vst vehicles. when using amplitube2 on the
>> mains insert i have found that the sound is much bigger, fatter and
>> generally better than when using it on a individual channel insert.
>> have any of you? i was showing this to one of the interns here
>> yesterday and he too was amazed at the difference.
>>
>> rickjust have amy hit you somewhere...anywhere...i don't care where in the
back of the head. not once, but several times until the symptoms
disappear and you can think clearly again.
;o)
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:27:32 -0600, "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com>
wrote:
>I think this is the fastest available 939 CPU, unless I wanted to OC a lower
>cycle AMD 64 or Opteron which doesn't have a fixed multiplier....which I
>don't.........but if I did, I think the multiplier on this CPU is fixed so I
>can't, because it won't, but since I don't, then I won't, therefore
>...well.....anyway........we'll see how it goes.
>
>;o)
>"I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must
be silent."
How's about THAT for some liberation!
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>I don't pick fights with Don anymore, but I will respond when I am haughtily
>>treated and mocked. I don't expect to change his mind, but it does chafe
>>my ass to be told that depression is a 'choice' by someone who cl
|
|
|
|
 |
|
OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Deej [4] on Tue, 30 January 2007 18:10
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Jamie K on Tue, 30 January 2007 19:08
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Deej [4] on Tue, 30 January 2007 20:14
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Jamie K on Wed, 31 January 2007 09:02
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: LaMont on Tue, 30 January 2007 22:46
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Deej [4] on Tue, 30 January 2007 22:10
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: LaMont on Wed, 31 January 2007 09:58
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Nil on Wed, 31 January 2007 08:52
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Deej [4] on Wed, 31 January 2007 08:08
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: LaMont on Wed, 31 January 2007 10:50
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Deej [4] on Wed, 31 January 2007 09:52
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: LaMont on Wed, 31 January 2007 09:55
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: TCB on Wed, 31 January 2007 13:05
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Neil on Wed, 31 January 2007 20:14
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: neil[1] on Wed, 31 January 2007 18:05
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: LaMont on Thu, 01 February 2007 09:27
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Deej [4] on Thu, 01 February 2007 08:35
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: LaMont on Thu, 01 February 2007 11:08
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: LaMont on Thu, 01 February 2007 11:12
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: excelav on Thu, 01 February 2007 14:42
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: LaMont on Thu, 01 February 2007 18:00
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Jamie K on Wed, 31 January 2007 09:01
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: LaMont on Wed, 31 January 2007 10:29
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: LaMontt on Wed, 31 January 2007 13:28
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Neil on Wed, 31 January 2007 13:32
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Jamie K on Wed, 31 January 2007 13:01
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Nil on Wed, 31 January 2007 17:28
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Jamie K on Wed, 31 January 2007 17:04
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Neil on Wed, 31 January 2007 17:45
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: Don Nafe on Wed, 31 January 2007 16:58
|
 |
|
Re: OK-here's what I was beta testing
By: neil[1] on Wed, 31 January 2007 23:11
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Jul 10 14:35:11 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01091 seconds
|