The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Has anybody tried Crossover for Mac? Audio Apps.?
Has anybody tried Crossover for Mac? Audio Apps.? [message #94442] Mon, 07 January 2008 09:52 Go to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
; DM1000/2000??........wait......sorry.......this isn't about me. I'm just
>>> a
>>>> consumer.
>>>>
>>>> Color me disappointed (but not surprised) that they are moving toward
> the
>>>
>>>> Digidesign model......unless, of course, they are still moving forward
> with
Re: Has anybody tried Crossover for Mac? Audio Apps.? [message #94452 is a reply to message #94442] Mon, 07 January 2008 13:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TCB is currently offline  TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
Senior Member
That engineer would not be me.
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. Will future rewrites scuttle the functionality of my Houston controller
>>>>
>>>>> (which does a lot of what their controller does already)?
>>>>>
>>>>> 5. Why do they assume I'm going to want to pay for 8 x Yamaha preamps
>> per
>>>>
>>>>> interface? This is one reason I don't already own an 02R 96 or
>>>>> DM1000/2000??........wait......sorry.......this isn't about me. I'm
just
>>>> a
>>>>> consumer.
>>>&
Re: Has anybody tried Crossover for Mac? Audio Apps.? [message #94455 is a reply to message #94442] Mon, 07 January 2008 15:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mark McDermott is currently offline  Mark McDermott   
Messages: 204
Registered: February 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Senior Member
ess of "zero" or "near
zero" latency claims, they are all lower than most people care about since
it's hardware based routing, rather than latent software routing (which
actually could be nearly as fast if the OS were optimized for it - i.e.
systems like Radar, etc).

Marketing.... it's all marketing.... in reality, every single DAW on the
planet adheres to the same physical limitations - they just use different
packaging and emphasis of hardware vs. software. Good try Steiny/Yamaha.

Dedric

On 3/16/08 1:49 AM, in article 47dcc2fd$1@linux, "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Dedric, they are stating 'No' Latency as in Nada..zilch..Nothing.. hey
> mentioned
> this at least 5 times. They even critisize other companies claim of "near
> zero " latency.
>
> Look at the video again.
>
>
> Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>> On 3/15/08 10:50 PM, in article 47dcaa29@linux, "Aaron Allen"
>>
Re: Has anybody tried Crossover for Mac? Audio Apps.? [message #94457 is a reply to message #94442] Mon, 07 January 2008 15:19 Go to previous message
LaMontt  is currently offline  LaMontt   
Messages: 424
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member

to the code will require sending
> "something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
> up for this. I can be a bit naive.
>
> All the best,
>
> Mike
>
>Check out these sounds, and let me know what you think.

http://www.stevenslatedrums.com/

Love the old Zep
http://www.stevenslatedrums.com/demo2/OLDZEP7.mp3

"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net
Re: Has anybody tried Crossover for Mac? Audio Apps.? [message #94461 is a reply to message #94442] Mon, 07 January 2008 14:35 Go to previous message
Martin Harrington is currently offline  Martin Harrington   AUSTRALIA
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
Dedric
>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
news:C40220B7.131DC%dterry@keyofd.net...
>I only watched part due to time constraints so I didn't catch that (i.e. I
> could tell early on there was nothing new here).
>
> Yes of course latency is *effectively* "zero" for the builtin dsp (in and
> out of the onboard mixer), but not in and out of the native system.
> Nothing
> different from what Totalmix, Cuemix, Soundscape and TDM do, and while it
> may be a few nanoseconds faster than others, it's still not *
Previous Topic: UAD1 4.9 upgrade.
Next Topic: When is winter NAMM?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon May 11 09:57:54 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06112 seconds