| Okay, what about G3's and Paris? [message #87863] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 09:04  |
![Michael[1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Michael[1] is currently offline")
Michael[1]
Messages: 6
Registered: May 2008
|
Junior Member |
|
|
nxp =
plug'n'play thing?=20
Latency?=20
Would it have a submix mode to address, well.. submixes?=20
Foot control inputs for punch in/out?
AA
"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote in message =
news:46c66516@linux...
> I'm very interested in t
|
|
|
|
| Re: Okay, what about G3's and Paris? [message #87868 is a reply to message #87863] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 10:02  |
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
> http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/ART-Tube-MP-Studio-Mi c-Preamp?sku=180581&src=3NL7H2Great story, now not to be a bummer but what about all that copyrighted music
in the video? Surely that isn't legal.Where do you guys like to go for CD duplication of small runs like 100 to
500 ?
Thanks,
JohnDoes the music fall under fair use?
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rap/copyright
Q. What is fair use?
A. Another noteworthy exception to the exclusive rights previously described
is referred to as the fair use doctrine. Fair use provides an absolute exception
to the exclusive rights of the copyright owner when another uses the owner’s
work in specific ways. In cases where the fair use exception applies, permission
from the copyright owner to use the work is unnecessary.
Generally, use of a copyrighted work for criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research
qualifies as fair use. While no bright line rules exist for determining whether
a particular use is fair, courts rely on a four factor test. The factors
are 1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is
commercial or for non-profit educational purposes; 2) the nature of the copyrighted
work itself, in which courts typically evaluate whether the work is factual,
scientific, or ar
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Okay, what about G3's and Paris? [message #87872 is a reply to message #87863] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 10:47 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
; examples here, in fact, as I'm sure
>>>>>you recall) to where I'm convinced that a.) you can indeed hear
>>>>>a difference, b.) the difference is not super-significant, and,
>>>>>c.) There are tradeoffs.
>>>>>
>>>>>Neil
>>
>>
>>No, I haven't taken it - and I really don't need to, because:
a.) It's not a dead-on a/b test because in one example you have
to go out into the analog domain (to mix in the console) and in
the ITB example, you don't.
b.) I have no doubt that someone can build a set of plugins
that model the SSL's sonic characteristics.
c.) I already believe that you can get equally good results ITB
vs a large-format console.
Therefore, that particular test wouldn't prove or disprove
anything to me.
Nei
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
