| OT: Little Feat fans rejoice!! [message #70057] |
Sat, 08 July 2006 03:00  |
Kim W
Messages: 165 Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ame enough of
> a
>>>>> threat
>>>>>>> to the Romans and the Jewish heirarchy that they decided to kill
> him?
>>>>>>> You speak a lot about assumptions. OK, here's one you seem to share
>>> with
>>>>>>> other believers that drives me nuts: without God there is no right
> or
>>>>>>> wrong. This is such nonsense. One does not need to believe in God,
>>>>> Heaven,
>>>>>>> or Hell to know the difference between right and wrong and to behave
>>>>>>> accordingly. "A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually
>>> on
>>>>>>> sympathy, education,
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Little Feat fans rejoice!! [message #70104 is a reply to message #70057] |
Sat, 08 July 2006 14:05   |
Sarah
 Messages: 608 Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;"DC" <dc@tunersinhell.com> wrote:
>I'd like to see if stretch tuning on kb's corresponds at all to the
>Feiten system or the Petersen sweetened guitar tuning.
It doesn't.. it doesn't correspond at ALL, and that's the whole
point of it, in fact... stretch tuning PURPOSELY throws stuff
out of perfect intonation. There's something about it that
sounds more pleasing to our ears, and in that regard one could
probably liken it to the whole tube/x-former/analog tape
thing... certain types of distortion, while "imperfect", sound
more pleasing to our ears.
You know what stretch tuning is right? I mean, you know what
I'm referring to when I say that, yes? If you're not sure,
google it or let me know & I'll elaborate - it's the polar
opposite of what Buzzy & fan-fretting are trying to accomplish,
yet it's been the standard for skilled piano tuners forever.
Neil"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>You know what stretch tuning is right? I mean, you know what
>I'm referring to when I say that, yes? If you're not sure,
>google it or let me know & I'll elaborate - it's the polar
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Little Feat fans rejoice!! [message #70131 is a reply to message #70104] |
Sat, 08 July 2006 23:37  |
Kim W
Messages: 165 Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ded up having to add a sub to the system due to kick and sub-bass
problems.
AA
"Mike Audet" <mike@mikeF-SPAMaudet.com> wrote in message
news:44e763e3$1@linux...
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I just thought I'd post because I just got a set of the orginal NS10M
> speakers,
> and they are awesome! I've never had a mix translate so well in all my
> life.
> I can hear the reverbs better. I can fix probelms in the mids that I
> couldn't
> hear before. The detail in incredible.
>
> These little babies are in every studio because they are fantastic. Don't
> believe the hype that they suck. I don't know what's wrong with people
> who
> bash these things.
>
> If you don't own a set of these, go buy one before you die! I would
> honestly
> take a bullet before giving these things up.
>
> MikeYeah, and on top of that, a lot of good ears begin to fatigue after 3 hours
use on them. There goes all that wonderful referencing.
W.
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
news:44e7b5d1$1@linux...
> Mike, while I do think that the mids are very clear (proper placement
> given, they have a great image) and translate well - be real careful of
> anything under about 100Hz... seriously man. I used a set of those for
> years, and ended up having to add a sub
|
|
|
|