Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: Internet and Transferring large files from L.A...
| OT: Internet and Transferring large files from L.A... [message #87902] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 18:30  |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
im some of the
>> songs
>> he has here in PARIS. So I'm thinking I somehow need to get them to Mp3.
>> Will this work? Bounce to disk as a wav file, use what to convert to Mp3.
>> Thanks Jim
>
> Yes.that will work.
>
> ;o)
>
>That's great to know. I'm gonna have to try that out after I track down Neil's
sonic nirvana. Thanks
Johnhey Neil, how about emailing me your phone number please. I'd like to chat
with you about your mixes.
j o h n AT k f o c u s DOT c o mOh, I thought Paris was releasing a new version. hehe soon
JohnHi Ed I need to be able to email him the file. Will this still work? Jim
"Ed" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Internet and Transferring large files from L.A... [message #87921 is a reply to message #87902] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 22:39  |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
lace for audio apps. Logic was the
first to support OSX.
Other audio products from other companies help support Apple's interest
in selling more Macs. Which is why Apple encourages other developers.
> Developers adopted AU and Core Audio because they had to in order to survive
> - most of them already had Mac products they would simply lose if they
> didn't. Notice that some developers that didn't have Mac support, never
> moved to AU (Voxengo for one; Algorithmix, etc). It was a forced decision
> since VST, ASIO, etc had been dropped, just as Logic 5/PC was - if it
> doesn't make money for Apple, it is unceremoniously canned. With Vista,
> VST, ASIO, WDM all still work, so developers aren't buying Microsoft's pitch
> to move to their own internal driver/protocol. I believe at least one of
> the developers in that article expressed reservations over trusting their
> product to a protocol (WaveRT) that was held by an OS developer that had no
> direct interest in professional audio (sound familiar now? They've learned
> from the Apple experience, and past Microsoft experience - DirectX for one).
I would say they've learned from their VST experience as Apple did.
Apple moved a way from a Steinberg controlled standard to their own
integrated standard. Review the history there, more than a few
developers were a bit impatient with Steinberg.
> I think the moral of the story is that pro audio is best handled by
> developers in that market, not companies more interested in selling
> operating systems, home computers, and/or iToys.
The opposite moral is also possible to glean from all of this. Let the
OS handle it.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
> Regards,
> Dedric
>
> On 9/7/07 9:16 AM, in article 46e16b5e$1@linux, "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Okay fam, I just read a very interesting article in July's 07 SOS (Sound On
>> Sound -What The Devlopers Think) about the state of MS Vista AND
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Internet and Transferring large files from L.A... [message #87927 is a reply to message #87921] |
Tue, 10 July 2007 23:23 |
JeffH
Messages: 307
Registered: October 2007
Location: Wamic, OR
|
Senior Member |
|
|
own internal driver/protocol. I believe at least one
> of
>>>> the developers in that article expressed reservations over trusting their
>>>> product to a protocol (WaveRT) that was held by an OS developer that
> had
>>> no
>>>> direct interest in professional audio (sound familiar now? They've learned
>>>> from the Apple experience, and past Microsoft experience - DirectX for
> one).
>>>> I think the moral of the story is that pro audio is best handled by
>>>> developers in that market, not companies more interested in selling
>>>> operating systems, home computers, and/or iToys.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dedric
>>> Sometimes You guys kill me with your anti Mac/Apple opinions. When MS
> goes
>>> proprietary you guys call it a standard, and you accept it. If Apple
> does
>>> it, it's a problem. AU is a ground up rewrite of their audio software
> system.
>>> They did it to improve audio on Mac OS. I don't like that they dropped
>>> VST support in some of their software, but you still have other choices
> on
>>> a Mac to use VSTs, including your favorites from Steinberg. Many new
> plugin
>>> development companies showed up because the new AU format created new
>>> opportunities
>>> for start ups. It's all good.
>>>
>>> By the way, read this: http://www.voxengo.com/press/114/
>>>
>>>> On 9/7/07 9:16 AM, in article 46e16b5e$1@linux, "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Okay fam, I just read a very interesting article in July's 07 SOS (Sound
>>> On
>>>>> Sound -What The Devlopers Think) about the state of MS Vista AND is
> it
>>> time
>>>>> for (Them DAW manufactuers) to go 64 bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, the article featured most of the heavey hitters in the industry
>>> (RME,
>>>>> M-Audio, Native Instruments, Steingberg, Cakewalk, Lynx .
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as 64 bit in the DAW most , except Cakewalk, feels that it's
> not
>>>>> needed.
>>>>> But, you get the feeling that they say this because of the work involved.
>>>>> Secondly, They're not impreesed(except Cakewalk) with Microsoft's new
>>> built-in
>>>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Internet and Transferring large files from L.A... [message #87945 is a reply to message #87902] |
Wed, 11 July 2007 11:24 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
stop now. But, we need to let the manufacturers know (what they already
>> know) and that is the Windows train is moving and even if Vista is not
the
>> OS, the Next version will be the right one and it will be 64 bit.. Companies
>> like RME & Steinbergs will get left behind if they don't start moving
in
>> that 64 bit direction).
>>
>> To may of us have Pre-Invested in 64 bit CPUs with the promise of 64 bit
>> processing. Apple will be there soon with OS-x 64 with a newly re-wriiten
>> version of Logic (64 bit). Digi and Motu will be on the 64 bit train as
>> well..Chooo
>> chooooc choo...
>>
>>
>However, what kinda price do you put on "piece of mind". Work arounds, Total
mix?? Yikes!!
How much does, "it just works" cost?? :)
Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>Lamont - you might want to add up the equivalent plugin counts on a HD accel
>card and compare it to, for example, a UAD-1. The cost is more than double
>per plugin compared to a UAD-1, with PCs and all hardware factored
>in/balanced off. So, who's hoodwinking who? ;-)
>
>Digi has no interest in prevent
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT: Internet and Transferring large files from L.A... [message #87967 is a reply to message #87963] |
Wed, 11 July 2007 19:19 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t it may be more up to th motherboard. Sometimes the chip set
makers will do stupid stuff.
Bigger drive=more data to lose...
:)
Chris
DJ wrote:
> I need a new audio drive and was thingking about this:
>
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148 134
>
> Can Win XP handle 750GB?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Deej
>
>
>
--
Chris Ludwig
ADK
chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
(859) 635-5762Interesting that you wrote that Deej,
>>>>(Steinberg doesn't really have their apps optimized for 64 bit or dual
>>>>socket
quad core CPU's on windows or OSX, right?)<<<<
I've been running a Q6600 (Core 2 Quad with 4 Gb Ram), for a month or so
with Nuendo and PT M-Powered.
Initially, I had problems with PT, (graphic redraw etc), and Nuendo seemed
fine, or so I thought,
I managed to solve the PT problems with great thanks to Chris Ludwick and
his advise and now PT flies with very little latency.
On the other hand, as soon as I try to get any latency approaching PT on
Nuendo, I get many (random) clicks.
It really shot me in the foot last week during a V/O session with a high
profile voice / actor.
When I reduced the latency to 20 ms all was OK, but I'm sure when I was
running it on my core 2 Duo (E6600), I could get a smaller size than that.
What's with that?
BTW, Nuendo works really well with Vista, at least on my home comp, (the old
studio E6600 dual c
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Jul 01 19:33:42 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.24059 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
