Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Any of you guys see this?
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any of you guys see this? [message #93323 is a reply to message #93319] |
Wed, 05 December 2007 02:17   |
Sarah
 Messages: 608 Registered: February 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ged him for his
>>>>>>> hyperbole.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Imho, that chique is hurting consumers as it keeps Apple's
>>>>>>>> product prices higher, with less range of price point
>>>>>>>> competition, but for Apple customers, price doesn't seem to be a
>>>>>>>> concern.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe for some, but not overall. Apple is competing on features
>>>>>>> and implementation. And even, lately, on price.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Basically Apple has its' customers right where it wants them.
>>>>>>>> Imho, it should be the other way around, and then we would truly
>>>>>>>> have more choices.
>>>>>>>
>&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any of you guys see this? [message #93336 is a reply to message #93334] |
Wed, 05 December 2007 09:03   |
DJ
 Messages: 1124 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
dkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
>> (859) 635-5762
>>
>
>
--
Chris Ludwig
ADK
chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
(859) 635-5762They really need Don Felder, He rocked the band up now they are wimps
hank
>
>So, the recurring theme is "gay"? lol
>
>Neil
>
>
>"John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>
>>I agree with Waiting in the Weeds, really a nice song but the middle
section
>>is a bit weird where Don Henley sings:
>>
>>And now the Ferris Wheel has stopped,
>>You're swinging on the top, suspended there with him,
>>And he's the darling of the chic, playboy of the week,
>>The flavor of the week is melting down your pretty summer dress, baby what
>>a mess you're making.
>>
>>
>>Now on to the rest of the drivel:
>>
>>No More Walks In The Wood
>>Not even a song, just some acapella stuff.
>>
>>How Long
>>Sounds like an uninspired Eagles country song.
>>
>>Busy Being Fabulous
>>Wish I cold delete it off the album and never hear it again. It's so gay.
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any of you guys see this? [message #93342 is a reply to message #93323] |
Wed, 05 December 2007 12:48   |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>>Seriously though, the only songs worth a crap from best on down are:
>>
>>Last Good Time in Town
>>Waiting in the weeds
>>Frail Grasp On The Big Picture
>>Long road out of eden
>>
>>So, you got 4 whole songs worth playing ! Schweet !!!!! Double album,
>
>>2 songs per. nice !!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>so how near death are you?
:o)
On 21 Jan 2008 12:37:03 +1000, "Deej" <nowat@jose.net> wrote:
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQbnPqimRiQI can send you the Plextor PDF manual if you wish. If so, I need your
e-mail adress. There stands nearly "everything" about these things.
Erling
On 21 Jan 2008 01:33:32 +1000, "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>i'm using a variety of burners and nero cd / dvd speed to test withAnybody with a G4 have any luck with an expansion chassis? I am running 3
EDS's and would like to be running at least 5.
Also I do have the AGP slot and was wondering if anybody has a better vidio
card in their G4 than the ATI "Rage 128 Pro"? Thoughts?
SteveSweeeeeeeeeeet! Surprisingly good price points. Looks like it would for me!
As a side note, though, it is funny how we can get the mind set that our
lowly keyboard and mouse are such crap controllers. The truth is you can
do a hell of a lot with them, and pretty easily, too, especially if you
take the time to set up macros. When I was doing a lot of dialog editing
I had an extensive set of macros written for Paris and I could work very
fast with my right hand on the jog wheel and my left on the keyboard.
Deej wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQbnPqimRiQI agree. i just finished mixing and entire album using the mouse / keyboard
and while it can be done I would prefer a controller. I had great fine control
in cubase using Shift/drag fader but I end up holding down the mouse clicker
for long times to write automation. Maybe there's an easier setting I'll
have to look up. I would like maybe 4 to 8 motorized faders though and I
think that would be grand.
JohnYup, the LS9 is pretty cool! Huge bang for the buck factor and sounds
great! Actually, the A/D board is the *same* for all the live consoles
from the LS9 to the PM5D-RH. For post, the O2R96 still beats it because
of the monitoring section.
David.
PS, I am also on the "will never buy another Mackie product" list.
Aaron Allen wrote:
> I'm on that list. I'm about to take over a position whereas I'll be
> responsible for the in the field mixers.. basically put, 4 to 12 ish
> channels each. Mackie is straight up crossed off on my list. If I want QC
> issues and chinese build, I may as well get a Behringer, yano?
> Now, the master control mixer... that's another line completely. I think I'm
> going to consider my first Yamaha mixer, ever... they've come a long long
> way
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any of you guys see this? [message #93367 is a reply to message #93343] |
Thu, 06 December 2007 11:48   |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t of folks.
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>> Hay Aaron.
>>>>>> That's my daily gig...using those mixers, mainly the 4 channel ENG /
>>
>> EFP
>>
>>>>>> (SD
>>>>>> 442 type) kind, the kind you find on small film / commercial and reality
>>>>>> shoots.
>>>>>> Quite different set of skills than in a studio...just wait till you
>>
>> get to
>>
>>>>>> play with radio mics and frequencies and stuff.
>>>>>> Have fun.
>>>>>> Martin H
>>
>>
The only way to fight this, and I think it's already underway, is to inform
the pollies that without radio mics, and applicable frequencies, there will
be NO MORE DOORSTOPS, no more PRESSS CONFERENCES, and no more fast ways for
them to get their propaganda out to the masses, not to mention all the
Broadway, and equivalent shows out there around the world.
It's not only happening in the States, but here in Australia, and th
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any of you guys see this? [message #93372 is a reply to message #93365] |
Thu, 06 December 2007 14:08   |
dc[3]
Messages: 895 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
slaps, which is
> probably why it never feeds back.
>
> The output is mono. I do use it for recording direct sometimes. It sits
> nicely in the track and is good for L/R panned part doubling using
> different models.
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
> D.P. wrote:
>> I'm usually an electric player, but I need to buy a decent acoustic (with
>> electronics). I tried a bunch of brands, and seem to be converging
>> towards a Taylor (something along the 714CE or 814CE).
>>
>> Before I commit to an actual purchase, I wanted to ask around for any
>> potential advice. As much as I'd love to buy from a luthier, I don't
>> think I'll get much traction with my planned budget (as a reference, the
>> 714CE would cost around $2800). I don't know many luthiers, and the ones
>> I do know have a worldwide reputation (and are therefore not making
>> guitars for $2800 - more like $5k and up).
>>
>> While reading Taylor reviews, I've seen several references to the Martin
>> OMC-Aura, so I went to try it out. I found it to be incredibly ugly, but
>> quite playable, although the action is typical Martin (i.e. high action,
>> a guitar that you have to dig in hard). Since I play mostly electric, the
>> nice low action of Taylors is appealing to me.
>>
>> Anyone out there able to make some suggestions? General or specific, good
>> or bad, I'm quite open to any ideas.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> DanI'm hearing that it is about as good as the full pro version.
199.00
Opinions?
TIA
DCApple charges 500.00 extra to get an 8-core MP over the 4.
Any real-world advantage for audio use?
TIA
DCI dunno about Variaxen as a belief system, they're merely clever
guitars. :^
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any of you guys see this? [message #93374 is a reply to message #93372] |
Thu, 06 December 2007 13:46   |
Jamie K
 Messages: 1115 Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
y so it's easy to set up a patch with a couple of bass
strings and the rest as normal guitar tuning.
It would sound a little weird if you used the DSP to tune it up an
octave and play only the detuned sounds alone.
Bottom line, it's good enough for a lot of stuff, and it's instant. None
of the other guitars you mentioned offer it, so it's just icing on the
cake. I regularly do live multitracking with a normal guitar tuning, a
DADGAD tuning, a drop D tuning, a bass tuning and then throw a sitar
part on top, all without stopping to physically tune or switch instruments.
3) Mail order: If I had the option to send it back in case it had neck
problems or something, I'd consider buying mail order. But I prefer to
buy guitars from a store where I can play them (having said that, I've
purchased four guitars mail order/ebay and it's worked out OK except for
the Variax _Electric 700_, which has a loose whammy bar).
If you're really picky about neck radius and such, you'd want to play
_any_ guitar before you buy it. BTW, the Variax plays better than my
Ovation.
I played several _Acoustic 700_ guitars before buying mine, both played
well, sounded the same. However the one I took home developed a problem
on one string. The store (GC) exchanged it without question. The second
one has worked fine for several years. Except last week it cut out in
rehearsal. But unplugging the cable (which also carries power) and
plugging it back in fixed it.
The only chronic problem I've heard of on the _Acoustic 700_ is that
some were finished before the bridge was glued, causing the bridge to
rise up over time. I believe Line 6 fixes that for free if you get one
of those (or any luthier could probably reglue it). But that was several
years ago, probably not even a problem any more.
Finally, just to muddy the waters, Line 6 makes two other acoustic
models that are less expensive but lack some of the features of the
_Acoustic 700_ (no alternate tunings, I think). One is nylon strung, the
other steel. I have not played them. If you prefer the sound of nylon
strings, check that one out.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
D.P. wrote:
> Once again, thanks to all for the contributions...
>
> All this dialog has given me a wicked idea: instead of shelling out almost
> $3K on a Taylor, I could get for roughly the same amount both a decent
> Breedlove chosen mainly for its acoustic properties, *and* a Variax 700 for
> live playing where a "reasonable" substitute is good enough.
>
> But I read some comments on the Variax that make me nervous - I cannot find
> a Variax locally, and may have to (gulp!) mail-order one. The comment in
> question comes up frequently in various review databases, and goes along
> these lines: apparently, the Variax 700 has a significant deficiency in the
> sustain area (enough to be considered
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any of you guys see this? [message #93376 is a reply to message #93374] |
Thu, 06 December 2007 15:46   |
DJ
 Messages: 1124 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
to:Meta@Dimensional.com" target="_blank">Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:47963ccf$1@linux...
>> For live acoustic guitar gigs I currently use a Line 6 Variax 700 Acoustic
>> modeling guitar. This is the one that looks like an acoustic guitar, not
>> the PRS-ish looking electric 700 version, although I have one of those
>> too.
>>
>> The acoustic 700 VAX sounds quite good through the PA. It doesn't feed
>> back. Even when using the built-in compressor which is really nice to use
>> on fingerpicked songs.
>>
>> Acoustically it's fairly quiet, good for late night practicing without
>> waking anyone. But without plugging it in, it's not a booming
>> sing-around-the-campfire acoustic guitar.
>>
>> It has multiple guitar models to choose from including several that are
>> bread and butter, plus a few non-guitar models like banjo, sitar and
>> mandella.
>>
>> It also can do alternate tunings on the fly (via DSP so not quite as great
>> as tuning them yourself, but for live it's fine and - important for
>> shows - instant). It can also imitate a 12 string (again via DSP).
>>
>> It looks good, with nice grain on the top. It's has a shallow body. It
>> plays well. The upper strings have 24 frets, very rare for an acoustic.
>>
>> It's more affordable than a high-end acoustic, and therefore less of a
>> risk at gigs. It sounds as good or better through a PA than any other
>> acoustic guitar I've heard.
>>
>> The only acoustic guitar thing it doesn't do well is body slaps, which is
>> probably why it never feeds back.
>>
>> The output is mono. I do use it for recording direct sometimes. It sits
>> nicely in the track and is good for L/R panned part doubling using
>> different models.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>> D.P. wrote:
>>> I'm usually an electric player, but I need to buy a decent acoustic (with
>>> electronics). I tried a bunch of brands, and seem to be converging
>>> towards a Taylor (something along the 714CE or 814CE).
>>>
>>> Before I commit to an actual purchase, I wanted to ask around for any
>>> potential advice. As much as I'd love to buy from a luthier, I don't
>>> think I'll get much traction with my planned budget (as a reference, the
>>> 714CE would cost around $2800). I don't know many luthiers, and the ones
>>> I do know have a worldwide reputation (and are therefore not making
>>> guitars for $2800 - more like $5k and up).
>>>
>>> While reading Taylor reviews, I've seen several references to the Martin
>>> OMC-Aura, so I went to try it out. I found it to be incredibly ugly, but
>>> quite playable, although the action is typical Martin (i.e. high action,
>>> a guitar that you have to dig in hard). Since I play mostly electric, the
>>> nice low action of Taylors is appealing to me.
>>>
>>> Anyone out there able to make some suggestions? General or specific, good
>>> or bad, I'm quite open to any ideas.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dan
>
>Wow, thanks. That is all I wanted to hear (and then some).
Thanks again,
Dan
"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any of you guys see this? [message #93379 is a reply to message #93377] |
Thu, 06 December 2007 16:32   |
DJ
 Messages: 1124 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
guitar tuning, a
> DADGAD tuning, a drop D tuning, a bass tuning and then throw a sitar part
> on top, all without stopping to physically tune or switch instruments.
>
>
> 3) Mail order: If I had the option to send it back in case it had neck
> problems or something, I'd consider buying mail order. But I prefer to buy
> guitars from a store where I can play them (having said that, I've
> purchased four guitars mail order/ebay and it's worked out OK except for
> the Variax _Electric 700_, which has a loose whammy bar).
>
> If you're really picky about neck radius and such, you'd want to play
> _any_ guitar before you buy it. BTW, the Variax plays better than my
> Ovation.
>
> I played several _Acoustic 700_ guitars before buying mine, both played
> well, sounded the same. However the one I took home developed a problem on
> one string. The store (GC) exchanged it without question. The second one
> has worked fine for several years. Except last week it cut out in
> rehearsal. But unplugging the cable (which also carries power) and
> plugging it back in fixed it.
>
>
> The only chronic problem I've heard of on the _Acoustic 700_ is that some
> were finished before the bridge was glued, causing the bridge to rise up
> over time. I believe Line 6 fixes that for free if you get one of those
> (or any luthier could probably reglue it). But that was several years ago,
> probably not even a problem any more.
>
>
> Finally, just to muddy the waters, Line 6 makes two other acoustic models
> that are less expensive but lack some of the features of the _Acoustic
> 700_ (no alternate tunings, I think). One is nylon strung, the other
> steel. I have not played them. If you prefer the sound of nylon strings,
> check that one out.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
> D.P. wrote:
>> Once again, thanks to all for the contributions...
>>
>> All this dialog has given me a wicked idea: instead of shelling out
>> almost $3K on a Taylor, I could get for roughly the same amount both a
>> decent Breedlove chosen mainly for its acoustic properties, *and* a
>> Variax 700 for live playing where a "reasonable" substitute is good
>> enough.
>>
>> But I read some comments on the Variax that make me nervous - I cannot
>> find a Variax locally, and may have to (gu
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any of you guys see this? [message #93381 is a reply to message #93376] |
Thu, 06 December 2007 16:58   |
Jamie K
 Messages: 1115 Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t;Currently Digital Performer is the only app that I know that properly takes
>advantage of the 8 processors. Logic, Pro Tools and Nuendo all run better
>on a 4-core. This will change soon, but an 8-core requires more RAM before
>you see the benefits. Cockos Reaper runs very fast using all 8 processors
>under boot camp.
>
>Despite the fact that DP uses all 8 processors correctly, Logic is more
efficient
>on a 4-core than DP is on an 8-core. Apple should have an update for Logic
>soon that properly shows off the power of an 8-core. Digi seems to be in
>no hurry to show off the potential of all native power!
>
>I’m still running out of power, even with 8 :-( One reason...I have completely
>fallen in love with Flux plugs, but they use up a computer in a hurry.
>
>
>Gene
>
>"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>Apple charges 500.00 extra to get an 8-core MP over the 4.
>>
>>Any real-world advantage for audio use?
>>
>>TIA
>>
>>DC
>>
>Sure, you can mix a five minute song in only two-and-a-half minutes.
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4798d188$1@linux...
>
> Apple charges 500.00 extra to get an 8-core MP over the 4.
>
> Any real-world advantage for audio use?
>
> TIA
>
> DC
>
>Stay tuned, ok.
Rich
"erlilo" <erling.lovik@lyse.net> wrote in message
news:5ghgp3tgcdbub9mmib529qul4p4vbl2ouq@4ax.com...
> It's coming, soon;-) Look at their new/old homesite.
> http://www.intelligentdevices.com/
>
> Erling
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:50:19 -0600, "Carl Amburn"
> <carlamburn@hotNOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Time for native Paris !! What the heck has ID been doing??? Anything???
> >
> >-Carl
> >
> >"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
> >news:4797f102@linux...
> >> Apparantly The Soniq has dropped the year warranty down to 90 days. Bad
> >> news.
> >>
> >> AA
> >>
> >"New P:roducts Coming Soon" ????
http://www.intelligentdevices.com/pro_audio.shtml
"erlilo" <erling.lovik@lyse.net> wrote in message
news:5ghgp3tgcdbub9mmib529qul4p4vbl2ouq@4ax.com...
> It's coming, soon;-) Look at their new/old homesite.
> http://www.intelligentdevices.com/
>
> Erling
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:50:19 -0600, "Carl Amburn"
> <carlamburn@hotNOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Time for native Paris !! What the heck has ID been doing??? Anything???
>>
>>-Carl
>>
>>"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
>>news:4797f102@linux...
>>> Apparantly The Soniq has dropped the year warranty down to 90 days. Bad
>>> news.
>>>
>>> AA
>>>
>>if you get a Roland VG99 you wont have the issues that the variax has. I use
mine with a Brian Moore DC-1/13 and there are no artifacts ,any tuning
imaginablealot more flexibility in designing your own models etc.
you ca
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 09 09:55:38 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05386 seconds
|