|
|
|
|
| Re: UAD-1 Neve 1081 [message #76214 is a reply to message #76211] |
Mon, 20 November 2006 10:40   |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
> if I insert that at 88.2k, all DSP resources become maxed-out.
> Now I can also kinda see why Deej opted for a couple of
> the "Home" (3-DSP) cards & one of the Project (6-DSP) cards,
> because there's also an i/o & routing issue, and so Deej ended
> up with a dozen total DSP chips across the three cards he's
> got, plus a bit better i/o flexibility as compared to if he'd
> gotten just one of the Pro (14-DSP) Cards. Now also, keep in
> mind I'm running at 88.2k, so that indeed is going to take more
> DSP horsepower to process in three different Pulsar stages
> (Mixer channels/any plugins/and Mixer bus) than those of you
> running at 44.1 or 48, but if I can only insert TWO big plugins
> or five normal less-DSP-intensive ones on this card, how many
> instances could you get at 44.1k? Far from what we're used to
> in Paris or Native, methinks.
>
> So if you're looking to get into
|
|
|
|
| Re: UAD-1 Neve 1081 [message #76228 is a reply to message #76214] |
Mon, 20 November 2006 16:05 |
|
|
have a straight
G-series and an "Enhanced" E-series... maybe that means a
cleaner Black EQ? I dunno. The E-series weren't noisy, but the
G's were cleaner still.
Dynamics-wise, I find the SSL comps pretty useful, but
certanily not for everything - I never liked 'em for kick or
bass, but they work great on lots of guitar tones & backup
vox... things like that - IMO, they tend to thin things out a
little bit, so I wouldn't use it on lead vox, either...
sometimes a little thinning isn't bad thing, though, esp if you
have a metric shitload of tracks running! Oh, snare... the SSL
comps are total ass-kickers on snare! (almost forgot!).
Finally the busscomp - if the Duende is $1,500, and you only
like this one thing, then it's worth it, because how much do
the hardware ones go for? Or an Alan Smart clone (about $2,500,
right?)?
NeilBill, yep, Cubase on both of 'em, same mix, just summed
differently.
....and probably rigged, if you ask Lamont.
:D
Neil
"Bill Lorentzen" <bill@lorentzen.ws> wrote:
>I listened to your samples and yes there is a big diff. Is that Cubase
>you're using?
>
>
>"Neil" <IUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:459076c2$1@linux...
>>
>> "Bill Lorentzen" <bill@lorentzen.ws> wrote:
>>>Hey Neil,
>>>
>>>I missed the origination of this thread. What is
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
