| Obama! [message #94339] |
Thu, 03 January 2008 22:59  |
![dc[3] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "dc[3] is currently offline")
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
qoBUbuQM/nWlF++YV1aBz97GBMzDOG5zVXODwa0ZkMisC
DlRWaemcV11IdTgi76EqvjaQeVOatx3APXOaz+TTwSAKySsUa8N88bYzxVsr
b3P3lAc9wcVhB+PpVuzn3cP26V0U2pe6zKcexPPYSQx7wuUJwDVQjsa2I7k4
MZJK9QKW4s4rsBwArn04FKph+xiY20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Obama! [message #94412 is a reply to message #94410] |
Sun, 06 January 2008 15:07  |
Deej
Messages: 130
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
fL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---=_linux47dbcb9e--I sincerely hope Spitzer is run through the ringer.
Also, I don't have a problem with anyone doing anything they please with
another consenting adult. I DO have a problem with sanctimonious 'family
values' types (which family? mine is kinda weird, can we use our values?)
lording their morality over me and then not even following it themselves.
I like to drink, gamble, and chase women, but I don't expect anyone else
to do the same unless they want to. If I were caught in church on a Friday
night praying for my eternal soul I'd wouldn't begrudge anyone a little ball
breaking session.
TCB
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>
>
>It will be interesting to see if the governor of New York gets equal =
>time. Here are the late night barbs that were thrown at the Republican =
>who got busted doing the same thing- note the charming political spins:=20
>
>"Louisiana Senator David Vitter held a press conference this week, where
=
>he admitted yes, he was a client of the DC madam, but he said those =
>stories of hookers dressing him in diapers were not true. Boy, what do =
>you do there? Are you supposed to take the word of a politician over a =
>hooker? It's a tough decision for people." --Jay Leno
>
>"Vitter's wife was by his side when he made the announcement. She called
=
>the senator her 'best friend.' Unfortunately, his best friend is someone
=
>named Thumper." --Jay Leno=20
>
>"At his press conference yesterday, where he admitted being involved =
>with prostitutes, Louisiana Senator David Vitter apologized to his =
>longtime supporters -- the working men and the working girls of =
>Louisiana." --Jay Leno
>
>"Last night, down in Washington, DC, they had the all-night Senate =
>session. The senators were there all night. It was the DC madam's =
>slowest night ever." --David Letterman
>
>"The darling of the religious right, conservative Senator David Vitter =
>of Louisiana, not only admitted to having sex with prostitutes, he would
=
>pay them $300 to make him wear diapers. And today that crazy astronaut =
>called him 'my dream guy, he's got my vote!" --Jay Leno
>
>"Vitter put out a statement saying he only started cheating on his wife
=
>after he started hanging out with the wrong crowd, you know, Giuliani, =
>Newt Gingrich, the mayor of LA." --Jay Leno
>
>"David Vitter has admitted he dates hookers in Washington, D.C., and =
>also in Louisiana. He said in his defense he always selected the girl =
>who made the lowest bid, so he's fiscally prudent." --David Letterman
>
>"There's another one of those prostitution scandals down there in =
>Washington, DC. Louisiana Senator David Vitter admitted that he's been =
>visiting Washington area prostitutes. And I thought about this, 'Whoa, =
>wait a minute, a politician, paying for a hooker? I didn't see that =
>comin.'" --David Letterman=20
>
>"But good for Vitter, he said that it did not cost the taxpayers a cent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Obama! [message #94422 is a reply to message #94412] |
Sun, 06 January 2008 18:45 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ough CPU horsepower
>is available .......which sorta' begs the following questions:
>
>1. Does this mean that Steinberg has decided to back burner the software
>rewrite that they say is happening for Cubase that will allow it to more
>efficiently use multiple cores in order to move users toward buying their
>hardware?
>
>2. Will this work with Nuendo, or will Steinberg just integrate the code
>rewrite in Nuendo, thus selectively crippling Cubase and requiring Cubase
>users to crossgrade to Nuendo, plus their ripoff Cubase addon which gives
it
>the same functionality as Cubase at a considerable expense, in order to
take
>advantage of 3rd party controllers and multiple core CPU's?
>
>3. Where do they come up with the convenient fantasy that mix engineers
only
>use a single fader at a time? That engineer would not be me.
>
>4. Will future rewrites scuttle the functionality of my Houston controller
>(which does a lot of what their controller does already)?
>
>5. Why do they assume I'm going to want to pay for 8 x Yamaha preamps per
>interface? This is one reason I don't already own an 02R 96 or
>DM1000/2000??........wait......sorry.......this isn't about me. I'm just
a
>consumer.
>
>Color me disappointed (but not surprised) that they are moving toward the
>Digidesign model......unless, of course, they are still moving forward with
>the software rewrites that will allow native CPU's and 3rd party
>hardware/drivers to eclipse the performance of their own hardware that they
>have just announced.
>
>The reason I haven't built a system with 8 cores is because it would be
>relatively worthless with Steiny software which is what I have chosen to
>use. Cubase can barely utilize a single socket system with 4 x cores or
a
>dual socket system with 2 x dual cores. Steinberg has been saying that they
>are working to correct this. I'm just wondering if the new hardware will
>provide them a convenient excuse to market hardware rather than correct
>their antiquated software.
>
>Maybe I'm paranoid. We've seen DAW manufacturers do an about face and
>blatantly lie to their user base.......the EMU acquisition of Ensoniq and
>the subsequent killing off of the stepchild Paris system, even as they
>rebranded the proprietary hardware and sold it to us at a premium while
>assuring this heavily invested user base that they were moving forward with
>development and upgrades is a classic example.
>
>;o)
>
>Hi All,
I want to thank everyone who has supported my efforts with the PARIS plugins.
20 People have donated over 10 plugins. My plan is to do at least 3 more
before turning my attention to the driver.
I also hope top start releasing Mac plugins as soon as possible. With any
luck, that will be within a month.
I really hope these have meant something to people. I've had a great time
working on them, and they really are a dream come true for me - both having
them and making them.
The Amp was the hardest one yet. took probably around 75 hours to finish,
and it built on countless hours learning about the plugins before. It's
still got me wondering why a MOV command from main memory into a register
done by the logic unit is 4 times as loud (2 bits offset) as compared to
the same MOV command by the Math unit. That lead to a mean bug that took
forever to track down.
Anyway, it just doesn't feel right spending that kind of time and watching
dozens and dozens of copies get downloaded when only 6 people cared enough
to pay anything for it. And of those 6, one person doesn't own PARIS anymore,
and another is waiting for a Mac version. So, of all the people who downloaded
and hopefully used the code, only 4 people gave anything for it.
Anyway, the download links are gone. You can still pay anything you want
- there are no set prices. But, access to the code will require sending
"something." If this upsets anyone, I apologize. I probably set myself
up for this. I can be a bit naive.
All the best,
MikeHey DJ, although some what pricey, this new SSL Controller does handle HArdware
integration really nice..Take a look.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nki8IVUSFPY
"Mr. Simplicity" <noway@jose.net> wrote:
>pretty cool.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDZbfGOdufo&feature=relat ed
>
>Hi, Mike
Strangely enough, i can't now f
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
