|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Windows XP sp-2? [message #97716 is a reply to message #97686] |
Tue, 01 April 2008 15:54   |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
e 6th string with my thumb, index on
the 2nd, and then 3 or 4 on the 4th string. I don't have that thumb rule,
and I like the sound of the chord with the A string open, especially if
it's capo'd up a few frets.
My favorite version is to do it with a dropped D tuning, capo'd up to the
2nd fret or higher. Then it looks like this:
1||---|---|---|---|---|--
2||-1-|---|---|---|---|--
3||---|---|---|---|---|--
4||---|---|-4-|---|---|--
5||---|---|---|---|---|--
6||---|---|-3-|---|---|--
It's easy to mute that 5th string, if you must, with a tilt of the 3rd
finger.
S
"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:487b580a$1@linux...
> I'm pretty sure the chord you want is F Maj 9 (no 3rd), but I'm unfamiliar
> with the numbering system of the strings. Isn't the low E the 1st string?
>
> Anywho I think you only have one good option. Use the side of the 1st
> finger to mute the A string.
>
> > 1||---|---|---|---|---|--
> > 2||-2-|---|---|---|---|--
> > 3||---|---|---|---|---|--
> > 4||---|---|-4-|---|---|--
> > 5|X---|---|---|---|---|--
> > 6||-1-|---|---|---|---|--
>
> D.P. wrote:
>> I'm trying to learn finger-picking, and am working on a song where one of
>> the chords gives me some trouble:
>>
>> 0 1 0 3 X 1
>>
>> ... or...
>> 1||---|---|---|---|---|--
>> 2||-O-|---|---|---|---|--
>> 3||---|---|---|---|---|--
>> 4||---|---|-O-|---|---|--
>> 5|X---|---|---|---|---|--
>> 6||-O-|---|---|---|---|--
>>
>> I'm really not sure how to finger this. On my electric, I'd probably bend
>> one of my usual rules, and use my thumb for the 6th string 1st fret...
>> but the nut width and neck size of my acoustic guitar makes that very
>> difficult for me.
>>
>> I tried a number of other ways, and can get three different fingerings
>> that can be made to work, but need a lot of setup time (or I get buzzing
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Windows XP sp-2? [message #97720 is a reply to message #97713] |
Wed, 02 April 2008 06:44 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
Voxengo or Faderworks or other latency plugin and slowly move the knob to
like over 10 samples and so.
Around 20-30 samples I am sure you will find the "almost" cancellation occuring
(don't forget to flip phase on one track !).
You will need to change volume on one track also to match for volume recording
differences.
Then you keep data like this.
If you have Behringer ADA8000 then by using adat card there is a 24 sample
latency already measured for you !
Now when you record a multiple mic setup you can compensate by using faderworks
for this latencies to have a time alligned recording !!
Believe me the recording which is time alligned will sound exceptional when
done so.
ALSO important when using faderworks make a preset with your cards ( I have
a 5 card preset ) where you put the eds cards time differences already alligned
in beetween the cards just by using faderworks and have the latency on on
all paris audio tracks.
So first submix needs no faderworks latency input.
Second submix tracks need a 14 samples being put.
Third 16 samples, fourth 18, fifyh 20 etc...
You can check that by using same methoid as above only easier.
Just put the same recorded audio tracks on separate submixes, flip the phsae
of one and put a latency plugin to check on FIRST submix (this comes earlier
than all other submixes ) 14 samples or maybe 15 or 16 , depends on your
system !
Then every after submix it will be two samples added.
My system has 0,16,18,20,22 (cards 1-5).
You need to allign all your submixes because all other DAWS have this by
default ! and because this way you can insure that you can record to multiple
eds cards and spread across time snsitive tracks.
Even when mixing and you wanna use more eds resources especially with Mike's
great
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
