Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » How to render inividual tracks in cubase?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: How to render inividual tracks in cubase? [message #76238 is a reply to message #76224] |
Mon, 20 November 2006 19:45   |
JeffH
Messages: 307
Registered: October 2007
Location: Wamic, OR
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>> LOL!
>>
>> So WHICH card did you get? Did you pick up an older one (I
>> noticed your other post... less DSP's and an older software
>> pack?)?
>>
>> Neil
>
>Coward
"Bill O'lielly" <B@fauxnews.com> wrote:
>
>yeah...OK Rush
>it's getting old..what a douchebag you are ...keep on topic.
>DC" <dc@saddaminhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>The New York Times goes into mourning....
>Oh jeez, that's funny...
whooo, hah hah thanks man. I love fantasy especially when it's so damn
funny.
DC
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>"DC" <dc@saddaminhell.com> wrote:
>>
>>The New York Times goes into mourning....
>
>Don, the NYT was one of the largest outlets for pre-war, pro-war propaganda
>in the US media. Judith Miller pretty much staffed the print media desk
for
>the Office of Special Plans and the Cheney Brigade, while the editorial
staff
>beat the war drums like Philly Joe Jones--fast and loud. Like so many Monday
>morning geopolitical quarterbacks who played a game or two of Risk back
in
>the day, they have supported every militarily aggressive move by the US
or
>Israel that I can recall. When it became obvious that Miller had been supremely
>duped and the war wasn't going well, they VERY VERY slowly came around to
>the moderately critical stance they have now. Even today, with the exception
>of the honest Paul Krugman, the editorial page is relentlessly pro-war in
>that neo-dem, we have to look 'tough on security' kind of way.
>
>As for Saddam, few alive were more deserving of the walk down that plank
>and the snap of the neck. But anyone who aided, abetted, and bankrolled
his
>crimes against humanity (that would include anyone who paid US income taxes
>in the 1980's, among many others) should pause to think a bit as well.
>
>TCBDo you read the NYT editori
|
|
|
|
| Re: How to render inividual tracks in cubase? [message #76267 is a reply to message #76238] |
Tue, 21 November 2006 15:09 |
TCB
Messages: 1261
Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ia desk
>>>for
>>>>the Office of Special Plans and the Cheney Brigade, while the editorial
>>>staff
>>>>beat the war drums like Philly Joe Jones--fast and loud. Like so many
>Monday
>>>>morning geopolitical quarterbacks who played a game or two of Risk back
>>>in
>>>>the day, they have supported every militarily aggressive move by the
US
>>>or
>>>>Israel that I can recall. When it became obvious that Miller had been
>supremely
>>>>duped and the war wasn't going well, they VERY VERY slowly came around
>>to
>>>>the moderately critical stance they have now. Even today, with the exception
>>>>of the honest Paul Krugman, the editorial page is relentlessly pro-war
>>in
>>>>that neo-dem, we have to look 'tough on security' kind of way.
>>>>
>>>>As for Saddam, few alive were more deserving of the walk down that plank
>>>>and the snap of the neck. But anyone who aided, abetted, and bankrolled
>>>his
>>>>crimes against humanity (that would include anyone who paid US income
>taxes
>>>>in the 1980's, among many others) should pause to think a bit as well.
>>
>>>>
>>>>TCB
>>>
>>
>OK, well... cool - and thanks. Just trying to be helpful.
Heck, I figure if I was confused, and my IQ is AT LEAST 75 or
80, then probably some other people were, too. lol
Neil
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>I gotta go with Chuck on this one too Neil, great post for the same reasons
>he mentions.
>AA
>
>"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote in message news:45966d22$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> Take a step back and read your post as if you were someone interested
in
>> purchasing a pulsar system.
>>
>> There is a ton of useful information in your post, and the style is pretty
>> damn funny in my opinion.
>>
>> It reminds me of the good old days :-)
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Neil;" <IOOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Well thanks, Chuckster; but I must ask why is it one of your
>>>favorites?
>>>I mean, it's just a summary of some stuff that was (I thought)
>>>confusing, and that I was trying to make clearer for the peeps,
>>>since
|
|
|
|
| Re: How to render inividual tracks in cubase? [message #76272 is a reply to message #76267] |
Tue, 21 November 2006 15:44 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;>maybe that's if you add on an extender card, but from what I
>>>>>can tell it's just a stereo analog i/o & a stereo digital i/o &
>>>>>a MIDI i/o on that card.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you get either the {Project, or the Pro card, THEN you have
>>>>>to choose between the following i/o options
>>>>>
>>>>> a.) "Classic i/o"
>>>>> b.) "Plus i/o"
>>>>> c.) "Z-link i/o"
>>>>>
>>>>>Here's a link that gives you details on the differences between
>>>>>them (scroll down to the bottom half of that page):
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.infinitevortex.com/creamware/scope-cards/project/
>>>>>
>>>>>The i/o options are the same for the Project & Pro cards
>>>>>
>>>>>NOW... BE WARNED: the "Classic" & "Plus" i/o's can be used with
>>>>>hardware you (most likely) already have - it's straight-ahead
>>>>>analog & digiblah inzies & outsies, but the "Z-Link" has to
>>>>>have another piece of their hardware in order to make full use
>>>>>of the 28 total i/o's... the "Z-Link" i/o set is designed to
>>>>>work with one of THESE:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.infinitevortex.com/creamware/io/a16-ultra/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>They have more hardware like sync plates to clock externally
>>>>>through, and DSP booster cards with no i/o's, but those are the
>>>>>basic/foundation platforms & options I've listed above.
>>>>>
>>>>>To sum it all up:
>>>>>If you're going with just one card, my advice would be don't
>>>>>even fucking bother with the "Home" card - if you want to throw
>>>>>away 450 bucks, just send it to me and at least I'll send you a
>>>>>birthday & christmas card in return. In my experience with the
>>>>>6-DSP Project card, the 3-DSP Home card won't do much at all
>>>>>for you - even at the lower sample rates... you MIGHT be able
>>>>>to sum a few channels & insert a couple of plugins, but that
>>>>>would be about the limit - ALSO, again if you're going with
>>>>>just one card (at least to start) the Plugins that come with
>>>>>the Home card are fairly scant... IOW, if you wanted the Mix &
>>>>>Master or Synths & Samplers pack & bought them separately along
>>>>>with a Home card, you'd be almost up the price of the 6-DSP
>>>>>Project card, which comes with your choice of either of those
>>>>>to begin with, plus has 3 more chips... see what I mean?
>>>>>
>>>>>Just make your first choice an educated one because like I've
>>>>>said, these people don't know their own product as well as they
>>>>>should, and also don't really stand behind it, either.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Neil
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: How to render inividual tracks in cubase? [message #76287 is a reply to message #76267] |
Tue, 21 November 2006 21:37 |
JeffH
Messages: 307
Registered: October 2007
Location: Wamic, OR
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>
>>>
>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>> Do you read the NYT editorial page? I ask because I do, almost every day,
>>>> because it's delivered to my office.
>>>>
>>>> "DC" <dc@spammersinthenewsroom.org> wrote:
>>>>> Oh jeez, that's funny...
>>>>>
>>>>> whooo, hah hah thanks man. I love fantasy especially when it's so
>> damn
>>>>> funny.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> DC
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "DC" <dc@saddaminhell.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> The New York Times goes into mourning....
>>>>>> Don, the NYT was one of the largest outlets for pre-war, pro-war propaganda
>>>>>> in the US media. Judith Miller pretty much staffed the print media desk
>>>>> for
>>>>>> the Office of Special Plans and the Cheney Brigade, while the editorial
>>>>> staff
>>>>>> beat the war drums like Philly Joe Jones--fast and loud. Like so many
>>> Monday
>>>>>> morning geopolitical quarterbacks who played a game or two of Risk back
>>>>> in
>>>>>> the day, they have supported every militarily aggressive move by the
>> US
>>>>> or
>>>>>> Israel that I can recall. When it became obvious that Miller had been
>>> supremely
>>>>>> duped and the war wasn't going well, they VERY VERY slowly came around
>>>> to
>>>>>> the moderately critical stance they have now. Even today, with the exception
>>>>>> of the honest Paul Krugman, the editorial page is relentlessly pro-war
>>>> in
>>>>>> that neo-dem, we have to look 'tough on security' kind of way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As for Saddam, few alive were more deserving of the walk down that plank
>>>>>> and the snap of the neck. But anyone who aided, abetted, and bankrolled
>>>>> his
>>>>>> crimes against humanity (that would include anyone who paid US income
>>> taxes
>>>>>> in the 1980's, among many others) should pause to think a bit as well.
>>>>>> TCB
>There is nothing so laughably ironic as an accusation of "fantasy" in the
mouth of a partisan of the Right.
The only fantasy exposed here is this shopworn 'Liberal Media Ripped my Flesh'
riff. No doubt, this noise will grow increasingly strident in the months
ahead, as it becomes clear to all but the most deluded that, as American
Clusterfucks go, this invasion ranks near the very top.
But hey, you know what? "The media done it." Just like in the last clusterfuck.
The media. The liberal bleeding hearts. The pussies. It's their fault. If
only Real Men had been allowed to run with the ball. A couple of Christian
divisions armed with tactical nukes and by now there would be nothing left
to do except hand out the chocolate bars.
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 30 22:38:48 PDT 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.12885 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
