| Rendering Cubase SX files for PARIS import [message #61932] |
Tue, 27 December 2005 21:36  |
Craig Mitchell
Messages: 20
Registered: July 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
>
> >I was alternately called a M$oft zealout and a free software
zealot--clearly
> >far too biased to take all THAT seriously. A brainwashed zombie =
peddling
> >urban myths of the platform irrational.
> >
> >Flash forward a bit, and now it's not nut job Thad and his =
brainwashed
urban
> >M$oft/linux pablum talking about performance, it's Steve Jobs! And =
we're
> >hearing that Intel chips will be "2X-5X" faster than the G5s! So, =
let's
see,
> >a 2 Ghz Cele outperforming a dual quad 2 Ghz PPC seems, well, right =
in
line
> >with El Presidente for Life Estebahn Jobs is saying on stage at Mac
World.
> >
> >
> >So then, did the PPC chips suck? If they do someone sold Sony the
railroad
> >right of way under Lake Superior since they're using a massivly =
parallel
> >version of it in the most important product they've launched in a =
decade,
> >the PS. Oh, and they're all over the place in cars, network =
switches, and
> >so on. I guessed kernel changes on OS X, though others (perhaps
unintentionally)
> >raised hideously bad compilers as another pony in the race.
> >
> >So everyone takes back that brainwashed, urban myth stuff now that =
Steve
> >agrees with me, right?
>
------=_NextPart_000_028D_01C61788.593A4560
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" nam
|
|
|
|
| Re: Rendering Cubase SX files for PARIS import [message #61937 is a reply to message #61932] |
Wed, 28 December 2005 03:05  |
Martin Harrington
Messages: 560
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
audio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
>>>>>(859) 635-5762
>>>
>>>--
>>>Chris Ludwig
>>>ADK
>>>chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
>>>www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
>>>(859) 635-5762
>>
>Thanks John! Now everyone in my office has officially seen me cry. From
laughing mind you, but still . . .
;>)
Tony
"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote in message
news:43c6b940$1@linux...
>
> http://www.chucknorrisfacts.com/
>
> :)Nice to hear. I came REAL close to getting this one but instead bought the
FW1884 which I love. I was worried about the USB latency. I'm assuming you
really haven't experienced any?
I think you have the same faders that I have on my FW1884 and they rock!
Like you said they make some solid gear. I do wish it had the scribble strip
all though the on screen scribble strip has really worked fine for me.
"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote in message news:43c680b5$1@linux...
>
> My US2400 arrived two days ago and yesterday I got Cubase SL3 installed.
> Here is what I think about the unit, and how it works with Cubase:
>
> For my needs, this thing kicks major ass. The build quality is solid,
> with
> all the buttons, faders, and knobs feeling like pro level stuff.
> Construction
> is at least as good as the Mackie, if not better. The lack of a weighted
> flywheel for jog/shuttle isn't a problem. While not as nice as the
> Mackie,
> the wheel has a decent feel and is still usable. I'll talk about the most
> obvious difference between this unit and a Mackie first, the missing LED
> scribble strips. This is probably what will be a deal breaker for some.
> For me, it's OK since I am usually under 24 channels anyway, often with
> tracks consolidated into groups. For folks who often run more than 24
> channels,
> you might want to bite the bullet and go for the Mackie with extender(s).
> There are two reasons that I wouldn't want to use this unit for large
> channel
> count projects. The first is that the virtual scribble strips are
> worthless.
> The strip is sized to fit on a single monitor, and the resulting font
> required
> to fit all 24 channels is super small. I'm only 36 years old, but my
> young
> eyes can't read it at an arms length. It also has no grid structure or
> numbers.
> This is basically what you see on screen:
>
> kick snare OH L OH R bass DI bass mic gtr disto gtr crunch keys 1 alt
> keys lead vox bak vox vox comp harmony solo... etc.
>
> OK, can anyone tell me what's on channel 12, in less than 5 seconds? The
> second issue is the way the bank button works in Cubase SL/SX3. If you
> have
> say 28 channel strips, banking up doesn't change the physical faders to
|
|
|
|
| Re: Rendering Cubase SX files for PARIS import [message #62204 is a reply to message #61932] |
Mon, 02 January 2006 02:41 |
dbrady
Messages: 2
Registered: January 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
one am tired of chasing the speed
demon.Enough
> >>> already..I
> >>>>>>> say this and I work as a IT Network Consultant.. Okay :) i digress
> >>>>>>> again..:)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I guess this post grew out of neverending post over on
www.gearslutz.com
> >>>>>>> about Ribbon mics, Summing buss's, 5k mics, 4k pre-amps, 4k
converters..
> >>>>>>> I'm thinking, why do I want to keep sinking good money into
"dressing
> >>>>>
> >>>>> up
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> a naitive DAW to try to sound as good as Paris does for (2,700.00
> Orginal
> >>>>>>> list)??? Those guys, bless their hearts are into dreaming that if
> they
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sink
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> another 5-10k in analoge summing gear, tey will have that magic
ssound..
> >>>>>>> So, I'm thinkink, 'Why have we gone backwards in this dAW game??
> Is
> >> it
> >>>>>
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Digi has such a strangle hold on the industry,that they can
dictate
> >> jsut
> >>>>>>> how much cool stuff reaches the lowered of the spectrum. What I
mean
> >>> is
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> PT LE is just enough to get frustrated to only dream and save up
> for
> >>> HD..
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Now, we have this Apple fiasco..New machines, with new CPUS,
little
> >> software
> >>>>>>> support. do they really think that thisi was good move now?? I'm
> not
> >>> even
> >>>>>>> a current Mac owner and I agonise for MAc lovers and users. If I
> were
> >>>>>
> >>>>> them,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> I would not upgrade for at leat 3-4 years. I digress again ..:)
Sorry.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Again, calling on all new and current manufactures..You a vast
market
> >>>>>
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Pro users and studios that needs more juice and pro features than
> your
> >>>>>
> >>>>> current
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> offereing, but we don;t want to spend 20k for it.. Soemthing along
> say
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 3-15k
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> would do it..
> >>>>>>> Okay end of rant..LaMont
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>Thanks guys. This is on my office machine. I'm running Win ME on this unit.
I'll hide the outbox from OE by stashing it in a folder and renaming it and
maybe it will have mercy on me and just give me new one.
;o)
"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:43cbec2e$
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
