|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Radio Compression [message #86190 is a reply to message #86151] |
Wed, 06 June 2007 05:39  |
brandon[2]
 Messages: 380 Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
kspam to fight spam, and =
you?<BR>>=20
<A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C7BE88.2472C700--I' ain't payin' for the repair.........
;o)
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:468c6dc6$1@linux...
>
> Just get your money back now - there are perfectly useable '84's
> out there for sale that you won't have to pay Nuemann their
> ungodly sums to repair after you buy 'em.
>
> My opinion, anyway.
>
> Neil
>
>
>
>
> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>>Hopefully the capsule is good and the mic can be fixed. I have fallen in
>
>>love with KM84's. If the capsule is damaged and would be prohibitively
>>expensive to fix (which is likely if it's damaged), I will definitely want
>
>>my money back..
>>
>>;o)
>>
>>"Neil" <OIOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:468c2449$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Get your money back - you're not being an asshole at all...
>>> the bastard misrepresented the item by feigning ignorance of a
>>> problem.
>>>
>>> Neil
>>>
>>>
>>> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>>>>I especially like the part where he applies phnntom power and calls it
>
>>>>good.
>>>
>>>>This was a sequentially numbered pair out of a lot of 5. I haven't seen
>>>
>>>>feedback from the other buyers yet. I will say that this pair of mics
>>>>reproduces a signal (or at least *reproduced*) a much truer replication
>>> of
>>>>the original signal than any instrument mic I've ever heard, though I
>>>>admittedly haven't heard them all.
>>>>
>>>>;o)
>>>>
>>>>"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:468c03b4@linux...
>>>>> You're not an A hole - more like a G# hole. No, you're in the right.
> The
>>>
>>>>> mic is broken, duh.
>>>>>
>>>>> My advice for next time: if a guy spells that poorly he probably has
> no
>>>
>>>>> idea if a mic is in "very good working condition".
>>>>>
>>>>> DJ wrote:
>>>>>> I purchase a pair of Neumann KM84i's on EBay. Seller uses the
>>>>>> following
>>>
>>>>>> language in his ad........
>>>>>> It is in very good working condition it is missing the purple
>>>>>> neumann
>>>
>>>>>> shield on the microphone it has some minor ware and tare a few light
>>>
>>>>>> scratches on it as well over all i would give it an 8 out of 10
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I plugged it in with Phantom power it works and sounds great
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i will offer a refund only if microphone is damaged during shipping
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shipping insurance is recomended
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this item will be sold as is and will not arrive D.O.A.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seller offers to hship them to me for $10.00. I tell him no, and
>>>>>> provide
>>>
>>>>>> him with my UPS account number and tell him to ship them 2nd day,
>>>>>> insured
>>>
>>>>>> for $3000.00, which he does. For some reason, they arrive late, (the
>>>
>>>>>> evening of June 28th) but the package is completely intact and shows
>>> no
>>>>>> signs of damage or mishandling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I put them up on stands and conncet them to my Great river preamp.
> the
>>>
>>>>>> output of one if them is a bit low initially, but comes back up to
> an
>>>
>>>>>> acceptable level after a minute. I leave them up for about 45 minutes
>>> to
>>>>>> get a burn in and they appear to function normally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The next day I do the same. Output level of same mic is a bit low,
> but
>>>
>>>>>> stabilizes. I use them for a little while, then put them away. I
>>>>>> leave
>>>
>>>>>> the seller positive feedback because I am willing to concede that
> an
>>> old
>>>>>> mic like this may need to get the circuitry warmed up in order to
>>>>>> stabilize.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sund
|
|
|
|