| Computer noise coming from Cubase to Paris [message #92601] |
Fri, 09 November 2007 23:25  |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ign (by Axel Hartmann, a true
genius of audio gear design) with some QC issues at first but wound up being
a pretty nice product.
I guess I'm Joe Capitalist this week, but with all of those companies getting
their noses bloodied in that segment of the market, and a complete unwillingness
of new players to step in, I have to wonder if the 'C24 crowd' just isn't
big enough to make it a financially viable target. Not that I have any insight
into this being true, but it seems like that's what the market thinks.
TCB
"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>It does look clean line..I think it does have wide appeal. I just think
that
>there is the C24(ish) crowd like myself..
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>I dunno, LaMont, that's some pretty sweet looking design with the Eupohinx
>>stuff. I think a lot of clients would be pretty impressed even if it doesn't
>>look as much like a big analog console. Not that I'm likely ever to find
>>out, of course.
>>
>>TCB
>>
>>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I guess like some others, we are looking for a C24 like product. We've
>asking
>>>for this for now going on 7 years and all they keep bringing out (Save
>for
>>>Digidesign) is these 8 fader units.
>>>
>>>I've never been a mackie controller fan. This is not hard to do. 24 32
>faders
>>>to support Cubase,Logic,DP,Sonar ..Again look at the C24 http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?navid=219&langid=100 &itemid=5342
>>>
>>>Dropthat baby into a argosy http://www.argosyconsole.com/c24.htm and you
>>>really have something that clients, yourself can be proud of...
>>>
>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>Sweetwater says PC support is in the works, but we'll have to see what
>>
>>>>really transpires (I've emailed Euphonix about it).
>>>>The sales rep says they saw it in their product preview and it's a very
>>>nice
>>>>unit - way better than the Mackie. He says
>>>>Euphonix thought of everything, except PC support of course.
>>>>
>>>>Post market only? Imo, that depends on what you need for a music only
>>
>>>>studio - if a Mackie control
>>>>does the job for a music studio, the MC Mix/Control would likely do it
>>
>>>>better - more control and functionality
>>>>and control of their monitor software as well (Mac of course). I hear
>>>the
>>>>end caps come off
>>>>so you can attach multiple units and have a larger controller. Also
the
>>>MC
>>>>Mix can function alone,
>>>>or in addition to the MC Control. It does use Eucon, but no mention
of
>>>
>>>>there being an extra cost for it,
>>>>so it sounds like it's included (e.g. no limitations with HUI or Mackie
>>>
>>>>control protocol support).
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Dedric
>>>>
>>>>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:477bd84f@linux...
>>>>&
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
