| Please help with XP install problems [message #74982] |
Fri, 27 October 2006 17:08  |
MikeP
Messages: 37
Registered: October 2006
|
Member |
|
|
t now. I'm
> just going to let it go for a few hours and see if I can get it to crash.
>
> Deej
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:455fb6b8$1@linux...
> >
> > Aw crikey, another $2k out the window. Why couldn't you say it really
> sucks?
> > You're not even a synth guy and you like it that much.
> >
> > Now we're just down to getting ADAT I/O or Z-link. Not a big deal for
> someone
> > who doesn't record a lot of live instruments, I guess, but I think one
of
|
|
|
|
| Re: Please help with XP install problems [message #74997 is a reply to message #74982] |
Sat, 28 October 2006 02:55  |
damien.gelee
Messages: 36
Registered: July 2006
|
Member |
|
|
g for the 35k Protool/Control 24 rig(HD3
>> Acell) or the Euphonics /Neundo Setup or the Fairlight setup.. But, she
think
>> it's stupid(for me) to keep throwing money on faster PCs and not having
a
>> great control surface to boot..
>>
>> I make no excuse in saying that I need Eye Candy in my studio. I have
found
>> that along with proving a great mix, people pay for Eye Candy..More to
the
>> point, they pay for faders!!! :) Faders and big (19inch and above) video
>> monitors..
>> When you're asking for client to part with cash for their project, you
have
>> to provide someting different than what they already have. Most everyone
>> has some kind of DAW..So, to say I'm using Paris, Pro Tools LE, Cubase
or
>> even Logic and Nuendo, does not easily impress.. BUT, when they see over
>> 32 faders..lights, big monitors and Great sound...Money comes.. :)
>>
>>
>>
>> "Neil" <IOUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> "LaMont" &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Please help with XP install problems [message #75016 is a reply to message #75001] |
Sat, 28 October 2006 09:31 |
Don Nafe
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;>
>>>>>So for me I expect the Pulsar will be mostly a synth card, plus some
>>>
>>>effects,
>>>
>>>
>>>>>and the UAD will continue to be my 'bread and butter' EQ/Comp card.
>
> That
>
>>>>>will leave me with native stuff only for really low CPU things like
>>>
>>>samplers
>>>
>>>
>>>>>and Absynth. Sounds like a good rig to me.
>>>>>
>>>>>TCB
>>>>>
>>>>>Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>DJ, Neil, Thad, and others - I've only skimmed the thread here and
>>>
>>>there
>>>
>>>
>>>>>so
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>pardon if you've answered this, but what makes the Pulsar system more
>>>>>>attractive to you than Soundscape or some other DSP system? Just
>>>
>>>curious.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>Dedric
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On 11/19/06 6:59 PM, in article 4561099d@linux, "DJ"
>>>
>>><nowayjose@dude.net>
>>>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>..but you're still gonna want more cards.....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>;o)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OI.com> wrote in message news:4560f252$1@linux...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Please help with XP install problems [message #75035 is a reply to message #75024] |
Sat, 28 October 2006 12:39 |
Don Nafe
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ent/effect 'racks' which are a bunch
of sounds and/or effects that can be added to a track or a bus all at once.
I'm going to hold off buying any more new hardware/software until I decide
about the Pulsar card (OK, that's a lie, I'm going to buy the UAD Space Echo
but that's it) so I'll pass on the Ableton FM synth for now, but the 6.0
software is worth the upgrade, IMHO.
TCBHey I am the pulsar geek here not DJ :)
Well you don't need neither the adat interface nor the U16 ad/da .
You can buy yourself a pulsar card with classic option that has spdif in
out and analog in out amoung 16 adat in out.
I suppose you have either a mec or a 442 interface.
So you could connect your digital inputs and outputs plus one stereo analog
in out.
So you can have 4 channels at least for starting to send and receive between
paris and pulsar.
Regards,
Dimitrios
"Mike R." <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I've read DJ's posts about the scope cards and I'm giving some thought to
>perhaps getting a the scope "home" card. I only have one EDS card and I'm
>not sure if I've got this right. I'm thinking that I'd like to run the
>scope card on the same system as Paris (AMD Athlon 1.7 -or something like
>that speed, haven't got the box in front of me). I'm guessing that I'd
have
>to get an ADAT card for Paris and route the 8 aux sends to the scope card,
>with the returns coming back through the same ADAT line. Scope is saying
>something like 3ms latency. Have I got this right? Would something like
>this work?
>Thanks!
>MR
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030505050207060806050804
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
If this is the 8" two way box, it is very similar to the MS-802. The
interface series were used a lot as radio station program monitors. I
personally find them quite bass heavy. *IF* it is the one I am
thinking of (8" foam surround woofer as attached), the recone kits for
the woofers are still available from EV...PN 81177XX. The phenolic
tweeter diaphragms are also stil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Please help with XP install problems [message #75068 is a reply to message #75066] |
Sat, 28 October 2006 19:54 |
MikeP
Messages: 37
Registered: October 2006
|
Member |
|
|
AgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
IAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
