|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What hits? [message #74915 is a reply to message #74880] |
Thu, 26 October 2006 16:52   |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
They RAISED me to be
evil!"
:D
"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>for those are were interested in Soundscape DSP products, below is the response
>I got back from them concerning, Interface appearance, DSP track count.
mixer,
>summing..
>
>Hello,
>
>
>Thanks for contacting us.
>
>1. You are right, we have not paid as much attention to the looks of
our
>Editor & Mixer as other companies. We have always given priority to feature
>set, performance and reliability over the looks. Having been taken over
by
>SSL, we have been told that we will need to address the grahical appearance
>issue; and of course we will. We have however a number of development plans
>at the same time, and have to put priorities all the time. The skinability
>is on our list, but we cannot yet commit to a fixed date yet. Today there
>is no possibility to "skin" the system. We plan to add that possibility
later
>in 2007.
>
>2. A single SS32 with Mixpander is capable of playing/mixing 32 DSP-based
>tracks plus 32 PC-based tracks, in other words, it is a 64 track system.
>It is possible to stack multiple SS32, adding each time another 64 tracks
>to the system. Indeed we're not talking about virtual tracks here, these
>are all real smultaneously playing tracks. The DSP-based tracks do not rely
>on PC-power, while the PC-based tracks do. Over and above the SS-based tracks,
>the mixer can also mix a number of streams that belong to any PC-based audio
>application. In other words, you could play some Nuendo tracks, some GigaSapmler
>tracks, some Sonar tracks over and above the Soundscape tracks and mix all
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What hits? [message #74971 is a reply to message #74957] |
Fri, 27 October 2006 15:18 |
j-cron
Messages: 23
Registered: October 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
digipatch
> >digital patchbay. It's got me bamboozled right now but other than that,
> I
> >think I'm going to hold off on the Fairlight for a while. this thing
sounds
> >great and so far is extremely stable.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Deej
> >
> >"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote in message news:455dd1e3$1@linux...
> >>
> >> Well, I've been on my search for another DSP professional solution. My
> >search
> >> for the ultimate Paris replacement has sent looking at :
> >>
> >> 1) Soundscape system
> >> 2) Pro Tools HD-3 With Dcommand Controller
> >> 3) Nuendo3-With Euphonix MC5
> >> 4) Fairlight Crysltal Core Setup/ Constellation XT
> >> 5) Scope II Platform..
> >>
> >> Well, it's looking like the Fairlight solution is winnning and is the
> >future
> >> of DSP DAW.
> >>
> >> Take a look at the videos and let me know what you guys think..
> >>
> >> http://img3.harmony-central.com/Video/aes121/Fairlight_CC-1. mp4
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>OK................that's it. My Tijuana bordello story doesn't even compare
to this level of sickness. .
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:60ltl25ovkv6n7un1jdjujd36j5te2h24b@4ax.com...
> and don't forget "you're so vein"
>
>
>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:26:19 -0600, Paul Braun
> <cygnus_nospam@ctgonline.org> wrote:
>
> >On 18 Nov 2006 00:39:04 +1000, "Neil" <IOUOI@OIU.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>glad to here he's okay...if not a song they already have a >drink named
> >>after theis...the bloody brain.
> >>
> >>Well, you could come up with a song pretty easily:
> >>
> >>Sung to the tune of "Casey Jones" by the Grateful Dead:
> >>
> >>Blood on my brain, feeling some pain,
> >>Ambulance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What hits? [message #75147 is a reply to message #75119] |
Mon, 30 October 2006 09:23 |
John Macy
Messages: 242
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
the
> >> >>latency plug concept Chuck was talking about sounds good. Sync via
> ADAT
> >> >>on the multiface (plus 8 channels), pass the the other channels via
> >> >>ethernet, create a template to compensate for latency and... nah...
> not
> >> >>DJ-esk enough!!!
> >> >>
> >> >>:-)
> >> >>
> >> >>JH
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>DJ wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>Glad you're liking the DAC-1. That was recommended to me by Mike
> >> >
> >> > Claytor. He
> >> >
> >> >>>brought one up to Durango and we hooked it up and I immediately
started
> >> >>>hearing stuff that I had never heard and selling stuff that could
live
> >> >>>without to buy one. I haven't regretted it for one minute. It's a
great
> >> >>>piece of kit.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Keep in mind that the dual box thing can get pretty expensive.
There's
> >a
> >> >
> >> > lot
> >> >
> >> >>>of I/O to buy on both platforms and you will likely end up running
> >Paris
> >> >
> >> > on
> >> >
> >> >>>Win ME. It's not as expensive as a Pro Tools/Fairlight or Soundscape
> >> >
> >> > system
> >> >
> >> >>>by a long shot and you've probably got quite a bit of the
> >infrastructure
> >> >>>already, but the Pulsar cards are not cheap. Sounds like Morgan is
> >gonna
> >> >
> >> > try
> >> >
> >> >>>to help ease the pain.I sure hope the Pulsar cards are as stable for
> >> >>>everyone else as they are for me.
> >> >>>;o).
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>"Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
> >> >
> >> > news:45612d30@linux...
> >> >
> >> >>>>I am ready to go to the dual box thing...just a matter of time to
> set
> >it
> >> >>>>up. By the way, thanks for the recommendation on the DAC1 last
> >> >>>>spring...it's has really healped me hear things.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>JH
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>DJ wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>I agree that it's hard to be produdctive when you're chasing
> >something
> >> >>>
> >> >>>as
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>elusive as stability or a certain functionality. It's a major
> >> >>>
> >> >>>distraction to
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>the creative process. I bought the Paris system in 97 because I
liked
> >> >>>
> >> >>>the
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>sound of it. It just blew me away. I have continued to stick with
> it
> >> >
> >> > for
> >> >
> >> >>>the
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>same reason. I haven't found anything yet that I like as much. I
> just
> >> >>>
> >> >>>can't
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>live without the Cubase editor and delay compensation these days
> >> >
> >> > though.
> >> >
> >> >>>>>;o)
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>"Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
> >> >>>
> >> >>>news:456125ec@linux...
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>Bought mine the first of '99. Still trying to catch up with you
> >> >
> >> > ....and
> >> >
> >> >>>>>>oh yeah, not just be a gear slut, but actually produce something.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>JH
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>DJ wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>I bought my Paris system on November 27 1997. In a few days,
that
> >> >
> >> > will
> >> >
> >> >>>>>be 9
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>years.so after 9 years I'm stiing here with the workaround that
> >> >
> >> > finally
> >> >
> >> >>>>>does
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>everything I want. It's not nearly as elegant as a Fairlight,
but
> >it
> >> >>>>>>>probably can do more since it can use a Native front end and VST
> >> >>>
> >> >>>plugins
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>like the UAD-1.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>This thing has been running all day and hasn't crashed once. I
> feel
> >> >>>
> >> >>>like
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>the
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>dust is starting to settle and the realization is setting in
that
> I
> >> >>>
> >> >>>just
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>won
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>a 9 year long battle to achieve what I want in a DAW..but it's
> kind
> >> >
> >> > of
> >> >
> >> >>>a
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>bittersweet feeling considering I'm having to use two
> >DAWs.......but
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>I've
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>had the scenario working more or less since last Christmas. All
> I
> >was
> >> >>>>>>>lacking was stability.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>Now if this 9 year old Paris system will just hold
> >together.......;o)
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
> >> >>>>>>>news:C1866D55.5905%dterry@keyofd.net...
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>Thanks Thad and DJ - that's what I've considered it for over
the
> >> >>>
> >> >>>years -
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>a
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>synth card mainly. Good to hear that kind of recommendation.
> >While
> >> >
> >> > I
> >> >
> >> >>>>>>>would
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>love to fill the room with some hardware synths, this sounds
more
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>practical
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>to augment the softsynth library at some point, as long as
> >Creamware
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>lasts
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>a
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>bit longer than Paris or Lexicon's Studio 12T, etc.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>Regards,
> >> >>>>>>>>Dedric
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>On 11/19/06 8:26 PM, in article 4561126a$1@linux, "TCB"
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>><nobody@ishere.com>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>Different things for different people. Deej is getting ungodly
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>stability
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>with
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>it mostly as a mixer/ADAT interface in his whacked PARIS/SX
rig.
> >> >
> >> > For
> >> >
> >> >>>>>me,
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>I reviewed a Pulsar computer card way back when and also the
> Noah
> >> >>>
> >> >>>synth
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>just
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>as Home Recording was gasping its last and I had to go get a
> real
> >> >
> >> > job
> >> >
> >> >>>>>>>again.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>Creamware writes some *superb* sounding synthesizers, though
> I
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>understand
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>some of that development team has moved on. It's also a
semi-open
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>platform
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>so third parties have gotten involved as well. As a synth guy,
> >John
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>Bowen
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>was one of the main people behind the Sequential Circuits
synths
> >> >
> >> > back
> >> >
> >> >>>>>in
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>the day, including the ProphetVS and then after SC was
swallowed
> >up
> >> >>>
> >> >>>by
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>Korg
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>the Wavestation series, among others. Now he develops for
Scope
> >and
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>sells
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>his stuff at http://www.zargmusic.com/. For me, anyone putting
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Waldorf
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>Wave
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>oscillators into a slightly hot-rodded Prophet 5 emulation is
> >> >
> >> > pretty
> >> >
> >> >>>>>>>cool,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>when it's John Bowen that's something like if Bob Moog had
> >decided
|
|
|
|
| Re: What hits? [message #75148 is a reply to message #75119] |
Mon, 30 October 2006 09:25 |
John Macy
Messages: 242
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> >> >
> >> > to
> >> >
> >> >>>>>>>learn
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>to program SHARCs and started another company. Oh, and there's
> a
> >> >>>
> >> >>>_sick_
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>modular
> >> >>>>>>>>>synth that comes with it and a third party package of modules
> >that
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>sounds
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>dreamy as well.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>So for me I expect the Pulsar will be mostly a synth card,
plus
> >> >
> >> > some
> >> >
> >> >>>>>>>effects,
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>and the UAD will continue to be my 'bread and butter' EQ/Comp
> >card.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>That
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>will leave me with native stuff only for really low CPU things
> >like
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>samplers
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>and Absynth. Sounds like a good rig to me.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>TCB
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>DJ, Neil, Thad, and others - I've only skimmed the thread
here
> >and
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>there
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>so
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>pardon if you've answered this, but what makes the Pulsar
system
> >> >>>
> >> >>>more
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>attractive to you than Soundscape or some other DSP system?
> >Just
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>curious.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>Regards,
> >> >>>>>>>>>>Dedric
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>On 11/19/06 6:59 PM, in article 4561099d@linux, "DJ"
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>><nowayjose@dude.net>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>..but you're still gonna want more cards.....
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>;o)
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>"Neil" <OIUOIU@OI.com> wrote in message
> >news:4560f252$1@linux...
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Don't worry.you're gonna want more cards.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>One card had better do the trick... I can't afford more
cards!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>My gearsluttishness has reached new precedents already...
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>I may have to sell some of my less-utilized stuff to cover
> >what
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>I've already bought!
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>Neil
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>Remember, all MIDI controllers are 128 step creatures. No matter what. Some
software gets around that by doing some fancy math with how fast/long the
MIDI changes go, but the devices can only transmit 0-127.
Glad to hear the f/x are that good. I think it's a pretty much done deal
for me.
Morgan, any pricing yet?
TCB
"DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
>They are top shelf La Mont. Every bit as good as the UAD plugins, IMO. I
>haven't tried them all, but I've got some demos here and I'm liking them.
>I'm thinking that at some point, I could live with the Pulsar DSP as an
>integrated system and not even need UAD-1 or other VST plugins.I'm going
to
>take this slowly and explore this system over time. I'm so damned tickled
>with my cubase>Pulsar>Paris mix scenario that I'll have to admit that my
>desire to go out and puch the envelope with this new system has been
>tempered a bit. I've got a lot of stuff to catch up on before I start
>getting into another learning curve. One thing that would be nice to have
is
>a control surface that is mapped to the Pulsar mixer. I'm sure it could
be
>done in a number of ways, but it's midi functionality is limited to 127
>steps and I'm not at all sure that this resolution will be enough to keep
>from zippering. It would be very cool to get one of those Tascam 24 fader
>controllers happening with the Pulsar mixer.
>
>
>Deej
>
>
>"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:45623bbb$1@linux...
>>
>> DJ,
>> How are the Creamware FX plugins (EQ's, Comps,verbs, etc
>>
>> "DJ" <nowayjose@dude.net> wrote:
>> >It's basically pretty simple. Once I'm for sure about it I'll post it
up.
>> It
>> >similar to the one I was using with the RME cards, but simpler.
>> >
>> >If Chuck's ASIO goodie happens, I'll likely drop all of my UAD-1 cards
in
>> >the Paris rig, Interface my digital gear with the Paris s/pdif and the
>RME
>> >ADI4 DD I've got here and just mix on the Paris rig. with the Pulsar
>cards
>> >DSP FX inserted via ADAT since they are real time but I don't know what
>> >Chuck has up his sleeve. It might be possible to run Cubase on the same
>> >machine as a Paris plugin for all I know right now.
>> >
>> >;o)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >"Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
>news:45613cf5@linux...
>> >> Do you have a routing map yet? Love to see it.
>> >>
>> >> JH
>> >>
>> >> DJ wrote:
>> >> > I'm hoping that Chuck develops the ASIO interface for Paris too.
I
>will
>> >buy
>> >> > it in a heartbeat. I just couldn't afford to wait for an undisclosed,
>> >> > indefinite period of time. I'm always willing to find a simpler way
>> to
>> >> > interface gear with Paris and losing the need for ADAT I/O would
be
>> >nice.
>> >> > These Pulsar cards can be used in so many ways that even if I decide
>> to
>> >drop
>> >> > all my UAD-1 cards into my Paris box with Chucks ASIO goodie, I'll
>> >still
>> >> > hold on to them. they are great stuff for a Native rig.
>> >> > Deej
>> >> >
>> >> > "Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
>> >news:45613985@linux...
>> >> >
>> >> >>Thought about that. Already have one multiface for passing via Adat,
>> >> >>really need to be able to pass about 20-24 tracks max. That's why
>the
>> >> >>latency plug concept Chuck was talking about sounds good. Sync via
>> ADAT
>> >> >>on the multiface (plus 8 channels), pass the the other channels via
>> >> >>ethernet, create a template to compensate for latency and... nah...
>> not
>> >> >>DJ-esk enough!!!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>:-)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>JH
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>DJ wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>Glad you're liking the DAC-1. That was recommended to me by Mike
>> >> >
>> >> > Claytor. He
>> >> >
>> >> >>>brought one up to Durango and we hooked it up and I immediately
>started
>> >> >>>hearing stuff that I had never heard and selling stuff that could
>live
>> >> >>>without to buy one. I haven't regretted it for one minute. It's
a
>great
>> >> >>>piece of kit.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Keep in mind that the dual box thing can get pretty expensive.
>There's
>> >a
>> >> >
>> >> > lot
>> >> >
>> >> >>>of I/O to buy on both platforms and you will likely end up running
>> >Paris
>> >> >
>> >> > on
>> >> >
>> >> >>>Win ME. It's not as expensive as a Pro Tools/Fairlight or Soundscape
>> >> >
>> >> > system
>> >> >
>> >> >>>by a long shot and you've probably got quite a bit of the
>> >infrastructure
>> >> >>>already, but the Pulsar cards are not cheap. Sounds like Morgan
is
>> >gonna
>> >> >
>> >> > try
>> >> >
>> >> >>>to help ease the pain.I sure hope the Pulsar cards are as stable
for
>> >> >>>everyone else as they are for me.
>> >> >>>;o).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>"Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
>> >> >
>> >> > news:45612d30@linux...
>> >> >
>> >> >>>>I am ready to go to the dual box thing...just a matter of time
to
>> set
>> >it
>> >> >>>>up. By the way, thanks for the recommendation on the DAC1 last
>> >> >>>>spring...it's has really healped me hear things.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>JH
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>DJ wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>>I agree that it's hard to be produdctive when you're chasing
>> >something
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>as
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>elusive as stability or a certain functionality. It's a major
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>distraction to
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>the creative process. I bought the Paris system in 97 because
I
>liked
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>the
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>sound of it. It just blew me away. I have continued to stick with
>> it
>> >> >
>> >> > for
>> >> >
>> >> >>>the
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>same reason. I haven't found anything yet that I like as much.
I
>> just
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>can't
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>>live without the Cubase editor and delay compensation these days
>> >> >
>> >> > though.
>> >> >
>> >> >>>>>;o)
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>"Jeff hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>news:Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
