The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Gonna be a daddy
Gonna be a daddy [message #55037] Wed, 29 June 2005 04:41 Go to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
ng in our best interest. I know people are ultimately concerned with

>their own security and survival.
>
>The politicalcompass thing was helpful to show that political beliefs are

>really a complex combination of iss

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gonna be a daddy [message #55041 is a reply to message #55037] Wed, 29 June 2005 04:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
sraeli thing is VERY different than the situation we
>> face with radical Islam... they do NOT want peace more than
>> war, they only want to kill all the "infidels" and sing praise
>> & glory to their blood-soaked god Allah, while trying to knock
>> the rest of the world back into the 12th century, economically,
>> societally, and politically. So, knowing this, and seeing what
>> they've done beginning on 9/11 and continuing to this day, I
>> think a slightly "different" approach is what's called for.
>>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gonna be a daddy [message #55043 is a reply to message #55041] Wed, 29 June 2005 05:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
OIIU is currently offline  OIIU
Messages: 4
Registered: April 2007
Junior Member
mas.

Without a moral compass, a people's political or cultural compass is no more
than a Cracker Jack toy.

On 7/14/05 4:43 PM, in article 42d6eab0@linux, "justcron"
<justcron

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gonna be a daddy [message #55056 is a reply to message #55037] Wed, 29 June 2005 09:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [3] is currently offline  Deej [3]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 181
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
; that you made up for
yourself to argue against.



> do not expect us to listen since you care more for your
>ideology than you apparently care for our lives.


i do care only about the lives. at several points i
pointed out how i believe we all want the same (among
other things i mentioned this as reason why i dont belong
to the george-bush-is-evil-group). i do find the
ideal way to this common goal open for debate.
you obviously disagree on this one. its a little weird
why you would enter a debate about it anyway then. is it
just to spank my ideologic european ass?


>"

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gonna be a daddy [message #55068 is a reply to message #55037] Wed, 29 June 2005 11:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
ssion about the possible different paths to a solution,

Have I not been civilized to you? Certainly, I strongly disagree
sometimes, but I think I have been civil. I would have said the
same things to your face.

>if there is one at all. i can ackownledge and talk about
>both approaches, you seem to struggle with that part
>and fall back into europe-is-so-whatever rants, which,
>btw, are no bet

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gonna be a daddy [message #55148 is a reply to message #55068] Fri, 01 July 2005 17:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
nt on changing somebody else's politics in the course of a few news
>>>group
>>>posts. That isn't ever going to happen. It takes years for each of us to
>>>develop our various points of view. The best we can do is try to
>>>understand
>>>each other and live with the fact that everyone doesn't share the same
>>>view.
>>>I'm confident that if we all were to meet somewhere, with no discussion of
>>>our personal politics, we would get along famously. Don't get me wrong,
>>>this
&

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gonna be a daddy [message #55190 is a reply to message #55148] Sat, 02 July 2005 15:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
as paris in alaska???
>
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 08:02:30 -0600, "Miguel Vigil" <nospam@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I have it on unimpeachable authority that the eight card limit is a
software
> >switch.
> >
> >Ten cards have been successfully tested by a gnome.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >El Miguel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42d

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gonna be a daddy [message #55209 is a reply to message #55190] Sun, 03 July 2005 02:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
DArial size=3D2>Best</FONT></DIV>
<DIV align=3Dcenter><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV align=3Dcenter><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>erlilo</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML >

------=_NextPart_001_00A2_01C58A11.B8BE8D20--

------=_NextPart_000_00A1_01C58A11.B8BE8D20
Content-Type: image/jpeg;
name="PICT0001+.jpg"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: <009c01c58a44$03515c00$0500a8c0@domain.actdsltmp>

/9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAgEASABIAAD/4RX1RXhpZgAATU0AKgAAAAgADAEOAAIA AAAeAAAAngEPAAIA
AAAQAAAAvAEQAAIAAAAKAAAAzAESAAMAAAABAAEAAAEaAAUAAAABAAAA1gEb AAUAAAABAAAA3gEo
AAMAAAABAAIAAAExAAIAAAAlAAAA5gEyAAIAAAAUAAABCwITAAMAAAABAAEA AMSlAAcAAAB2AAAB
H4dpAAQAAAABAAABmAAAA/RLT05JQ0EgTUlOT0xUQSBESUdJVEFMIENBTUVS QQBLT05JQ0EgTUlO
T0xUQSAARGlNQUdFIFo1AAAAAEgAAAABAAAASAAAAAFBZG9iZSBQaG90b3No b

Report message to a moderator

Re: Gonna be a daddy [message #55217 is a reply to message #55209] Sun, 03 July 2005 04:42 Go to previous message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
Rvc2hvcD0naHR0cDovL25z LmFkb2JlLmNvbS9w
aG90b3Nob3AvMS4wLyc+CiAgPHBob3Rvc2hvcDpIaXN0b3J5PjwvcGhvdG9z aG9wOkhpc3Rvcnk+
CiA8L3JkZjpEZXNjcmlwdGlvbj4KCiA8cmRmOkRlc2NyaXB0aW9uIHJkZjph Ym91dD0ndXVpZDpl
ZGQ5YjEwMC1mNjMxLTExZDktYTk4MC1hYTc0YWVhY2IzMmUnCiAgeG1sbnM6 dGlmZj0naHR0cDov
L25zLmFkb2JlLmNvbS90aWZmLzEuMC8nPgogIDx0aWZmOk1ha2U+S09OSUNB IE1JTk9MVEEgPC90
aWZmOk1ha2U+CiAgPHRpZmY6TW9kZWw+RGlNQUdFIFo1PC90aWZmOk1vZGVs PgogIDx0aWZmOk9y
aWVudGF0aW9uPjE8L3RpZmY6T3JpZW50YXRpb24+CiAgPHRpZmY6WFJlc29s dXRpb24+NzIvMTwv
dGlmZjpYUmVzb2x1dGlvbj4KICA8dGlmZjpZUmVzb2x1dGlvbj43Mi8xPC90 aWZmOllSZXNvbHV0
aW9uPgogIDx0aWZmOlJlc29sdXRpb25Vbml0PjI8L3RpZmY6UmVzb2x1dGlv blVuaXQ+CiAgPHRp
ZmY6WUNiQ3JQb3NpdGlvbmluZz4xPC90aWZmOllDYkNyUG9zaXRpb25pbmc+ CiA8L3JkZjpEZXNj
cmlwdGlvbj4KCiA8cmRmOkRlc2NyaXB0aW9uIHJkZjphYm91dD0ndXVpZDpl ZGQ5YjEwMC1mNjMx
LTExZDktYTk4MC1hYTc0YWVhY2IzMmUnCiAgeG1sbnM6eGFwPSdodHRwOi8v bnMuYWRvYmUuY29t
L3hhcC8xLjAvJz4KICA8eGFwOkNyZWF0ZURhdGU+MjAwNS0wNy0xNlQyMTo0 NzoyOSswMTowMDwv
eGFwOkNyZWF0ZURhdGU+CiAgPHhhcDpNb2RpZnlEYXRlPjIwMDUtMDctMTZU MjE6NDc6MjkrMDE6
MDA8L3hhcDpNb2RpZnlEYXRlPgogIDx4YXA6TWV0YWRhdGFEYXRlPjIwMDUt MDctMTZUMjE6NDc6
MjkrMDE6MDA8L3hhcDpNZXRhZGF0YURhdGU+CiAgPHhhcDpDcmVhdG9yVG9v bD5BZG9iZSBQaG90
b3Nob3AgRWxlbWVudHMgMy4wIFdpbmRvd3M8L3hhcDpDcmVhdG9yVG9vbD4K IDwvcmRmOkRlc2Ny

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Compaq Presario for softsynth box. Good or bad?
Next Topic: Was PCI 2.3 a step backwards or am I missing something?
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Mon Aug 17 08:29:21 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.30174 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.2.0.
Copyright ©2001-2023 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software